You are here

Jon Rappoport - The Creation of a False Epidemic

Primary tabs

SizeSeedsPeersCompleted
114.81 MiB10356
This torrent has no flags.


This is awesome, totally explains what's going on in a very concise and clear manner, and I hope won't be offensive to those who are really losing people. I'm not but people close to me are.

I downloaded the highest quality audio from YouTube, each video was a single slide anyway.

---

From Solari Report on YouTube:

Exposing the scam, I’ve just completed three audio presentations about COVID-19.

With the cooperation of Solari.com and Catherine Austin Fitts, we’re making these presentations available to you, and to people around the world.

The series is titled: THE CREATION OF A FALSE EPIDEMIC

Episode 1: HOW IT STARTED
Episode 2: THE MEDICAL CIA, COVERT OPS
Episode 3: THE TRUE GOAL OF THE FALSE PANDEMIC

Readers have been asking how they can help. Listen to the presentation, send out the link to others.

Exposing the COVID-19 covert operation is more important every passing day.

As always, thank you for your support!

Comments

Part one starts with the premise that the Wuhan cases are pneumonia caused by extreme air pollution. This a key component in his theory. There are two fundamental flaws in this premise:

  1. He omits the fact that the initial cases had high fever and/or head/body aches. Chronic air pollution does not cause fevers or body aches, nor does it create sudden spikes in case counts.
  2. Pneumonia, by definition, is caused by a virus, bacteria, or fungus. Therefore air pollution cannot be the cause of pneumonia.

I don't think he discounts that particular factor. Pollution over time can diminish immunity.

See the description of lung problems
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200407/doctors-puzzle-over-covid19-lun...

The 5G claim is that it messes with oxygen getting into the blood.
Could also be pollution, some new pollutant maybe.

Either way, it doesn't add up, and it would be a completely new thing for a virus to do. Maybe that's it, it's an extraordinary claim though - it would be new.

zoopenhoff wrote:

I don't think he discounts that particular factor.

Which factor?

Your objection assumes that modern medicine isn't a monument of bureaucratic stupidity.

In January 2020, the WHO published a definition of a "novel coronavirus syndrome", which included "fever" as a criterion, "with or without recorded temperature". There is not even an objective definition of fever, and here they don't even ask for an actual recording. It can be mild. There is a large element of subjectivity - and thus bias from nurses and doctors.

Now ask yourself: who decided that this had to be a new syndrome? and not just regular symptoms?
In a city of 11 million inhabitants like Wuhan, in cold wintertime, you can bet that you're going to see plenty of cases of fever.

Also, your point (2.) assumes that textbook definitions can replace real understanding of the processes at play.
Official science says pneumonia is caused by an infection. But why do you think fungi appears in nature? Most of them appear on dead tissue.
So ask yourself: why is there dead tissue in the first place? Likewise for bacteria. They come in countless types, with whom we live in symbiosis, when we're healthy.
Rappoport is an expert in denouncing viral scaremongering for over 35 years, since AIDS, Inc.. He collects evidence of corruption and the countless contradictions in the narrative.
In each case (Ebola, Zika, Swine flu, and of course AIDS and Corona), the diseases can be explained through other factors, without the need for an infectious telltale.

Of course that wipes out the theory that these viruses could be a REAL "sci-fi" lab creation (from the CIA, the CCP or anyone else).
A bioweapon doesn't have to exist for real. To do harm, all it needs is to be believed to be real. Start with CDC/WHO statements.

Regards

there are no experts except YOU!
or a guy like Rapaport who actually has no medical expertise what-so-ever.. but he's an expert.
you do know they have isolated and can test specifically for Sars-Cov-2?