You are here

Indira Singh - 2005.10.28 - 9/11 Whistleblower Testimony

Primary tabs

SizeSeedsPeersCompleted
74.75 MiB000
This torrent has no flags.


[swf]http://www.youtube.com/p/ABE6E63A429654CF?hl=en_US.swf[/swf]

http://web.archive.org/web/20060103122116/www.4acloserlook.com/october20...

October 28, 2005

Hour 1::
Indira Singh
Hour 2::
Indira Singh
Hour 3::
Open Lines

1st and 2nd Hour::
Michael interviews Indira Singh, a whistleblower on 9/11. Indira links some very important facts in her investigation that leads to disturbing conclusions about who was behind 9/11 and why.

3rd Hour::
Michael hosts Open Lines.

---

Introduction to the show - Michael Corbin:

"We're going to have a really, really powerful program. The watchword today is political corruption... that's kind of like the watchword everyday! But political corruption is what we're going to be looking at today and we're going to look at some significant corruption. And what we're going to be doing is we're going to be talking to with a person here [Indira Singh] - you're familiar with her. But this material you're going to hear today has never ever been published or broadcast. And it is the culmination of several years of intense research."

---

http://4acloserlook.wordpress.com/
- by Indira Singh

Michael Corbin [1955-2008] [ http://rememberingmichael.wordpress.com/ ] was a Denver Radio Talk Show Host who ran a show called 4ACLOSER LOOK.

Mike and I were in the middle of a number of projects – covering current stories linked to my own ongoing 9/11 investigations – when he passed away, suddenly, on March 16, 2008.

This site will present some key aspects of those updates planned for 2008. The post on the Home Page pretty much covers all the angles of those updates.

Mike involved me when he smelled a connection to 9/11 and he was never wrong. Mostly however, I passed along my findings to him.

Around Thanksgiving 2007, Mike began confiding some troubling items of a personal nature to me. I tend to consider this “blowing off steam” and didn’t pay attention. Perhaps I should have.
Circumstances of his death

One of his guests had remarked that when new material had been discovered and Mike did a show on the new material, that was always a time Mike faced new security challenges.

I was not that particular guest, but whenever I got on air, I would be subject to the same, and so would Mike.

Needless to say, before we got on air, we did a “security check” to ensure we felt “covered”. In January 2008, Mike was not covered, and he knew it and told me about it, and felt he was under attack. Less than 8 weeks later he was dead.

None of us who really knew what he was working on, are yet convinced all questions have been answered concerning his demise. The controversy is covered at rememberingmichael.blogspot.com.

On March 17, 2008, I had few choices regarding memorial website arrangements at the time – the days immediately following his death were more importantly spent on chasing down the facts surrounding his sudden and strange demise before any cover stories, if applicable, could gel.
My work with Mike at 4ACLOSERLOOK

Mike and I had worked in three ways:

1. investigative journalism
2. the larger (global) political and economic contexts, drawing irrefutable links to the scientific elite and their methods of social engineering used by the corporate, military, medical, intelligence and entertainment establishments
3. local activism, exposing and challenging the aspects of this rearing its head in Colorado.

The bulk of my investigative work with him never made it on air, on purpose, reserved as it is for 9/11 litigation.

Some of the last cases we worked on will be referred to here, so that his supporters and listeners may have some idea of what actually went on behind the scenes regarding the content of Mike’s life’s work, especially the material he was working on with his guests, when he suddenly died.

The post on the HOME PAGE touches on many of the angles. Mike knew, as almost few others do, how to tread the fine line between putting a story out, and holding back litigation quality evidence to preserve it for a courtroom.