DRB 7 The Real Science Behind Mercury In Vaccines & Amalgam Fillings - Prof Boyd Haley

Brilliant presentations regarding mercury in fillings and exactly how it affects us. includes at the end the clip of mercury killing a neuron (which was put up here on concen a few years ago).

i agree with Dr. Boyd Haley, dentists have major mental problems.

***************
Published on Sep 11, 2013

Dr. Boyd Haley. Doctors for Disaster Preparedness 2003.

There are literally hundreds of studies proving the toxicity of thimerosal (ethylmercury) in vaccines. It has been well documented that ethylmercury is not only just as toxic as methylmercury (found in fish) but it is actually more toxic. This is because a larger percentage (34%) of ethylmercury will convert in the brain into ionic mercury as opposed to 7% with methylmercury. Ionic mercury is the most toxic form of mercury and is almost impossible to remove from the brain.

Pregnant women are often told not to eat certain types of fish while pregnant because of the danger that the methylmercury can have on the developing fetus. But now these idiots are still encouraging infants, the elderly and pregnant women to take the flu vaccine which contains a full dose of thimerosal (ethylmercury), proven to be more toxic than methylmercury. On top of that injecting mercury is far more hazardous than ingesting it orally because injecting it bypasses all the body's natural defenses of getting rid of it.

They were forced to take out the mercury from the childhood vaccines because the damage to children was becoming obvious. As we saw in the Simpsonwood documents released under the freedom of information act, it was obvious in those transcripts that they themselves found the results to be disturbing. Yet the big pharma sponsored media then had the audacity to tell the public that the mercury was taken out of the vaccines only on quote "public speculation".

So how are they getting away with it?

Step one: Allow big pharma to do your government agencies favors such as fund research and sponsor grants.

Step two: Lobby politicians so that they will sign laws in so that it makes it almost impossible to be held accountable or sued if found to be negligent, so you can get away with anything without being liable. (e.g.Two of George Bushes major sponsors for his campaign was pharmaceutical industries).

Step 3: Advertise in the major medical journals and TV networks to the point where they are dependent on the millions of dollars you are giving them. They will now do anything to protect you, their media networks will back you up at any cost, because if the public finds out that the studies are rigged, these outlets will lose millions in funding.

Step 4: Fund all the major studies, leave things out or don't mention certain things so that you get desired results (you can even show that mercury is good for you!), anything that can potentially threaten revenue on your products don't mention in your study.

Step 5: Publish your study in the medical journal that you have made dependent on your sponsorship money.

Step 6: Disregard the hundreds of studies showing the opposite to what your study is saying. Get the media not to mention these studies or if they are mentioned deem them as not "credible". Only the studies published in the pharmaceutical sponsored medical journals can be deemed "credible".

Step 7: Get so called respected authority figures (doctors/scientists on the big pharma payroll) to go around lecturing the public on pharmaceutical funded studies. The big pharma sponsored media will give them all the attention they need. Repeat! Repeat! Repeat!

Step 8: Fund websites and use the media to call any other researches, doctors and scientist exposing the scam or showing science that proves opposite as "quacks". Now many brainwashed believers of the pharmaceutical funded rhetoric will also peddle the same agenda for you.

Step 9: Crush dissent. Anyone who is damaged by your products, get the media to ignore them, give them no chance to tell their story on your networks, if they are allowed air time make sure it's minimal and you get someone on to "debunk" it afterwards, make sure you always have the last word.

Step 10: Quickly fabricate more studies proving that your products don't cause damage to anyone, repeat strategy of discrediting studies that show otherwise, and deem any independent studies as not "creditable". Repeat steps 1-9.

1) Drasch G, Schupp I, Hofl H, Reinke R & Roider G. Mercury burden of human fetal and infant tissues. Eur J Pediatr 153:607-610 (1994).

2) Szucs A, Angiello C, Salanki J, Carpenter DO Effects of inorganic mercury and methylmercury on the ionic currents of cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Cell Mol Neurobiol 1997 Jun;17(3):273-88.

3) Koos et al., Mercury toxicity in pregnant women, fetus and newborn infant. Am J Obstet And Gynecol., 1976:126;390-409.

4) Geier DA, Geier MR. An assessment of the impact of thimerosal on childhood neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatric Rehabil 6: 97-102, 2003.

5) Ueha-Ishibaschi T, et al. Effect of thimerosal, a preservative in vaccines, on intracellular Ca+2 concentration of ra cerebellar neurons. Toxicology 195: 77-84, 2004.

6) Havarinasab S, Lambertsson L, et al. Dose-response study of thimerosal-induced murine systemic autoimmunity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 194: 169-179, 2004.