You are here

DMCA Notice of Copyright Infringement - Braving the Wilderness

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
nibs
DMCA Notice of Copyright Infringement - Braving the Wilderness

*** Sent via Email - DMCA Notice of Copyright Infringement ***

Dear Sir/Madam,

I certify under penalty of perjury, that I am an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the intellectual property rights and that the information contained in this notice is accurate.

I have a good faith belief that the page or material listed below is not authorized by law for use by the individual(s) associated with the identified page listed below or their agents and therefore infringes the copyright owner's rights.

I HEREBY DEMAND THAT YOU ACT EXPEDITIOUSLY TO REMOVE OR DISABLE ACCESS TO THE PAGE OR MATERIAL CLAIMED TO BE INFRINGING.

This notice is sent pursuant to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the European Union's Directive on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society (2001/29/EC), and/or other laws and regulations relevant in European Union member states or other jurisdictions.

My contact information is as follows:

Organization name: Attributor Corporation as agent for the rights holders listed below
Email: counter-notice@attributor.com
Phone: 650-340-9601
Mailing address:
1825 S. Grant Street
Suite 600
San Mateo, CA 94402

My electronic signature follows:
Sincerely,
/Devon E. E. Weston/
Devon E. E. Weston
Attributor, Inc.

*** INFRINGING PAGE OR MATERIAL ***
Infringing page/material that I demand be disabled or removed in consideration of the above:

Rights Holder: Random House Group UK
Original Work: Braving the Wilderness
Infringing URL: https://concen.org/content/braving-wilderness-quest-true-belonging-and-c...
Rights Holder: Random House, Inc.
Original Work: Braving the Wilderness
Infringing URL: https://concen.org/content/braving-wilderness-quest-true-belonging-and-c...

nibs
Another example of a frivolous claim

This is the 2nd notice regarding this material. Upon receiving the 1st notice I immediately unpublished the torrent (in DrupalSpeak: the node). I wrote the Drupal Torrent module code so that torrent nodes which are unpublished cannot be uploaded again. This is extra protection for the copyright holder, so they want me to unpublish instead of delete a torrent node.

The problem with the last few technically illiterate and/or incompetent people is that the links they were pointing to were still visible even though the node was unpublished. This means that there was no access to the torrent file, and also that the tracker refuses to track that torrent. Yet because they saw an info or content page, they mistakenly assumed it was possible to download the torrent file itself. Not true. Pure laziness or I-Don't-Give-A-Fuckness on their part.

Rather than waste time trying to point out to these obviously incompetent people that ConCen is no longer hosting a torrent of their work, I wrote more code that blocks access to any of the content, info, or tracker tabs of an unpublished torrent node. Best of both worlds, because now I don't have to delete a node to get them off my back.

Does any of this make sense? Do you even give a shit? Probably not. Just remember you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone...

Log in to post comments