Chossudovsky - WWIII Launching a Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran

Chossudovsky - WWIII Launching a Preemptive Nuclear War Against Iran

By Michel Chossudovsky

The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran has been on the active drawing board of the Pentagon since 2005. If such a war were to be launched, the entire Middle East Central Asia region would flare up. Humanity would be precipitated into a World War III Scenario. World War III is not front-page news. The mainstream media has excluded in-depth analysis and debate on the implications of these war plans.

The onslaught of World War III, were it to be carried out, would be casually described as a "no-fly zone", an operation under NATO's "Responsibility to Protect" (R2P) with minimal "collateral damage" or a "limited" punitive bombing against specific military targets, all of which purport to support "Global Security" as well as "democracy" and human rights in the targeted country. Public opinion is largely unaware of the grave implications of these war plans, which contemplate the use of nuclear weapons, ironically in retaliation to Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program. Moreover, 21st Century military technology is at an advanced stage of development combining an array of sophisticated weapons systems.

We are at the crossroads of the most serious crisis in World history. The future of humanity is at stake. The present situation is one of advanced war planning by a formidable military force using nuclear warheads. The Pentagon’s global military design is one of world conquest. The military deployment of US-NATO forces is occurring in several regions of the World simultaneously. Militarization at the global level is instrumented through the US military's Unified Command structure: the entire planet is divided up into geographic Combatant Commands under the control of the Pentagon. According to (former) NATO Commander General Wesley Clark, the Pentagon’s military road-map consists of a sequence of war theaters: “[The] five-year campaign plan [includes]... a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.”

Military action is waged in the name of the "Global War on Terrorism" and Global Security. It has a stated "humanitarian" "pro-democracy" mandate. It is predicated on the notion that the West's arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons are (in contrast to those [nonexistent] of the Islamic Republic), according to expert scientific opinion on contract to the Pentagon, "harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground."Irresponsible politicians are unaware of the implications of their actions. They believe their own war propaganda: nuclear weapons are heralded as an instrument of peace and democracy. War is heralded as a peace-keeping making operation carried out with the support of the "international community". The victims of war are described as the perpetrators. Iran and Syria constitute a threat to Global Security thereby justifying pre-emptive military action.

source: http://globalresearch.ca/

comment:

If the American people don't finally rise up against the anti-Constitutional terrorist Congress of the US, then WWIII seems to be rather likely now. The US and not other countries will trigger WWIII if it shall ever happen. The American people only are capable of dethroning the gangsters in the US-government. Therefore the American people are entirely responsible for the consequences of their non-action - to themselves and to the entire world.

The peoples of the rest of the world can't do much about the removal of these state-terrorists from power. These gangsters will use massive force against the American people to stay in power and therefore getting rid of the US-tyranny is not without risk. On the other hand, if these criminals should stay in power, then WWIII is almost certain - and such a scenario would be way more dangerous to the security of the American people than any revolution could ever be. Regime change in the US and UK is imperative now.

The activation of FEMA concentration-camps in the US is tightly coupled to the planned war against Iran and the expected resistance against it by the American people if nuclear weapons should ever be used. The impending collapse of the US financial system and as a consequence the collapse of the US economy may be another reason for these anti-Constitutional measures.

The whole world including the homeland has been defined by the elites as a battlefield now, and this means that the American people are considered to be an occupied people and America is considered to be an occupied territory - just like the territory of the peoples of Iraq or soon Iran. In other words: US congress, the corrupt puppet of the elite, has declared war to both the American people and the American nation. If they lived today, what would the Founding Fathers do?