Covid PCR Test Debunked!

I knew this from the get-go in January, reading Crowe's incredibly detailed critique.
see:
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/index2.php
Critique of Covid 'science' (definition, existence, testing, transmission): http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
Comparison of 33 FDA-approved RT-PCR COVID-19 tests: https://lockdownsceptics.org/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-...

I remember quoting him and Rappoport on ConCen.
However, at the very same time, an admin by the name of 'pax' responded to my comments in a very insulting, and very vulgar manner. But truth flows like a river... Now Crowe's last podcasts have been listened to by thousands.

It's just that unlike 99% of the population, and probably 90% of conspiracy researchers, I already knew what the PCR method was and how it was not a test, per its own inventor. Which means I could have averted, or at least limited, the ongoing disaster.
I wasn't right, I was too lazy to build good-looking blogs and graphics and lists of links for the 'meme war' which I knew was about to come one day -- and came too soon.

I had already wondered, a few years back, what was behind these supposedly terrible viral epidemics like Ebola and Zika, that were obviously very political. And on AIDS, there's a ton of conspiracies, but which one is correct? Most don't even make sense.
Then I came across the HIV/AIDS "denialists" made up of at least 3 Nobel Prizes, a thousand scientists and many honest people using sound logic who had this simple argument: this 'viral disease' can be explained otherwise, because it's a sort of name game whereby diseases already known like TB or pneumonia, are included. That argument alone suffices to destroy the house of cards (see the 2008 documentary 'House of Numbers'). Later the AIDS definition was completely changed (it's now a measure of T4 cells which do correlate with health -- but overall health, not STD-related). It turns out the pictures of 'the HIV' are not showing a purified virus, but barely anyone bothers to ask for one, so they do it. It also turns out that the tests are completely bunk, which confirms the other point. To top it all, the drug given as remedy, AZT, is in fact deadly!

You talk about falsification. I fully agree with you.
Now what if I tell you that in 2000, there was an AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa, in which President Zuma invited the unwanted scientists, who asked to debate these issues with the mainstream. The response (or lack thereof) from the other side (besides defamation and accusations of murder) showed that it was the mainstream scientists who relied on an unfalsifiable premise: "HIV→AIDS".
Just like today for Covid: whatever the research, no team of scientists can conclude a paper by saying that Covid isn't something to be afraid of because it's in most cases a flu with another name. They may, at best, question one thing, two if they're courageous, but not the whole story, the tale that an invisible thing called 'Sars-CoV-2' replicates and circulates amongst humans and causes their death. That's the dogma, on which skyscrapers of assumptions are built.
Likewise, PCR inventor Kary Mullis noted in 1996 that there were over 100,000 papers on HIV, but not one that demonstrated that it was the cause of AIDS.
That's how you come to understand that 'Science' today does not follow its own guidelines. Only the letter, but not the spirit. It works through corrupt paradigms of thinking that are imposed to students, journals and professionals. Money and state power come into play.

The use of epidemics as a political pretext can be traced back to Antiquity and the Middle Ages. It has been studied by Michel Foucault and others, who called it "biopolitics". This is a fascinating reading.
Now it seems the whole intent of the dominant paradigm in epidemiology is to make us believe in contagion in the same way people in the Middle Ages did. And it works perfectly!