Size | Seeds | Peers | Completed |
---|---|---|---|
2.27 GiB | 0 | 0 | 728 |
Vaccine Salesprofessor Hannah Fry meets seven unvaccinated people to investigate why around four million adults remain unvaccinated against Covid-19, and to find out if any of them will change their mind.
A nice attempt at a hit-piece that shows how vaccine zealots don't really listen to people's concerns, patronise them (with Jelly beans), and expect others to change their opinions when they have no intention of doing so themselves.
There are a litany of half-truths and outright lies in this, just at first glance, that will surely be covered well elsewhere. Watch out for the participants appearing on GB News to talk about the bias in the production. Sadly, it's clearly aimed at the vaccinated and deliberately designed to foster their hatred and division of people who made what was obviously the right choice if you look at statistics instead of headlines.
Watch on iPlayer here for licence-payers in the UK:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0019g27
This is the obnoxiously-large 50fps edition from iPlayer, if anyone feels like converting this to x265 make sure you drop the frame rate. I'll probably do this tomorrow.
Comments
The GB News piece:
The GB News piece:
https://youtu.be/F-QbvAfrXKQ?t=3000
Extremely bias.
Extremely bias.
yakir wrote:
I haven't watched this, but I would add to your comment that *everything* is biassed. It has always been this ways, but these days, amidst the strange web of algorithmic codes we find ourselves enmeshed, this biassing effect is amplified extremely to the point where it is almost visible. Got an opinion? Time to do a double-take on that circus mirror!
euxalot wrote:
I should add that this website is biassed in favor of Tucker Carlson!
Hey, Tucker: tell me what to believe!
euxalot wrote:
This web site is a collection of torrents uploaded by its members. What you're really saying is that I have a pro Carlson bias. That is not true. I will not apologize to you for uploading his show. Nobody is forcing you to watch him.
Do you really think the people that watch him are that gullible? What do you think of ConCen's members? Are they gullible?
Would you like me to stop uploading Carlson? If so, why?
Big Pharma
Any journalist or news anchor that is challenging Big Pharma and showcasing the dangerous side effects of medications and vaccines, not only has huge balls for taking that risk, but ultimately gets my respect for challenging conventional medicine and science. I see ConCen as representative of alternatives of all sorts: alternative religion/spirituality, alternative health/medicine and Tucker Carlson now represents alternative news, kind of like Alex Jones, but maybe less controversial!
forcing a medical experiment is a crime.
The whole allopathic medical mafia should be dismantled.
any profession that gets paid whether they "fix" the problem or not should be shut down.
you don't pay a mechanic for NOT fixing your car do you when offered an "experimental" fix.
No, you sue the bejesus out of him, run him out of town tar and feathered.