Size | Seeds | Peers | Completed |
---|---|---|---|
1013.08 MiB | 0 | 0 | 88 |
Silent Conquest traces the beginning of the end of freedom of speech in the post-modern West from the 1979 edict of the Iranian Ayatollah upon Salman Rushdie on publication of his book The Satanic Verses to the present time where death threats and criminal prosecutions against writers, journalists, artists and ordinary citizens are now commonplace for the "crime" of insulting Islam.
Comments
what about
just putting a thought out there.. what about the nutbar christians who are so pro life they go and kills people who work in family planning clinics?
All for the crime of a woman exercising the right to do what the fuck she wants with her own body?
just a single wee example
On a lighter note I remember I was in Germany in the Army when that fart wrangling spangle cunt the ayatolla died.
We were already rather tipsy at this point when we heard.
And broke out in a chorus of "The ayatollah's in a box ...in a box ... in a box.. repeat..."
Then my fellow corporal stood still.. had a think and started singing it in German "Die Ayatolla sind in einer Kiste, in einer Kiste, in einer Kiste" x 3 then EE AYE EE AYE OH.
fucking hilarious at the time and still warms me cockles now..lol
Pretty sure that happened
Pretty sure that happened only a few times and the main difference is that its not supported by the ideology. It also didnt change legislation and set a really bad example that was not condoned by the vast majority of the religion's adherents.
550c wrote:
ah but that "majority" of adherents to that ideology is a MINORITY of even just the white people alone who are maybe culturally christian but give zeros shits about religion in reality or who do belief in choice and do not agree with that ideology.
if you are inferring that the whole of america is practising fundamental Christian then what you are inferring is very wrong.
Because that's the only way that statement would make sense bud.
Basically they are breaking the law by conspiring to commit murder, committing murder because someone is exercising their legal rights WITHIN THE LAW, a law supported by the MAJORITY of the population who are not of this ideology what-so-ever.
Murder is the opposite of PRO LIFE. just a simple point or two
I don't know what you are
I don't know what you are talking about. I'm saying that murder of abortion clinic workers is not supported by the ideology of Christianity. I'm saying that killing abortion workers is not condoned by the bible. The bible would probably condone the state killing them though via trial and capital punishment but it would not support someone storming the building and shooting the place up. Not sure where you got the idea that I am calling all of America Christian or any of that stuff.
550c wrote:
apologies.. I misinterpreted you!
hate speech laws
The endless implementation and tightening of hate speech laws is what is destroying free speech. If you Google the history of hate speech laws, they were proposed by the USSR as soon as possible after WWII...via the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It was non-binding resolution at the time but that's usually how most UN resolutions start. It was also pure Marxist Bolshevism and still is now. The silencing of the opposition may have been initiated by the USSR but it was financed out of Wall St and the City of London. The same group would have a hand in anti-Islamophobia laws. Anything to divide us
Agreed
Yup, I got another torrent for hate speech laws coming. Ive got a back log of uploads to do but im on DSL so it takes a while lol. I've got hundreds of torrents to share.