Size | Seeds | Peers | Completed |
---|---|---|---|
52.6 KiB | 0 | 0 | 0 |
UC (Berkley) professor and decorated royal academy member PETER DUESBERG demonstrates that:
1. HIV does not and absolutely cannot cause AIDS.
2. The vast majority of patients with 100% aids-like symptoms do not even have the HIV antibody.
3. It takes 1000 unprotected sex events, on average, to transmit the aids virus (hetero) sexually to one other person.
4. HIV is at least 200 years old, possibly ancient
5. The real cause of AIDS is [EDIT: I won't spoil the ending]
This research-summary lecture transcript is from here: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/pdlecture.htm (use this rather than the unformatted text file in the torrent...which I have provided only so there is a permanent snapshot)
I guarantee that this document will blow you away, and if you are a medical scientist it should fill you with shame. It is also highly entertaining reading with lots of great mirth and sarcastic humour (my kind of guy).
This lecture synopsizes his 7-peer reviewed, ground-breaking paper (which the media has chosen to ignore) that, more or less, proves that HIV cannot possibly be related to AIDS whatsoever. Not only does it debunk the causality chain, but it debunks that HIV is even present in most patients with symptoms indistinguishable from AIDS. It implies that the US government has staged the entire problem to prevent the public from becoming aware of what is ACTUALLY giving them AIDS (hint: it's largely government-run).
If you have contracted HIV or even HPV then this is the most important document you will ever read. Many of the theories that I used to ridicule as a young physics student, I am now forced to accept as probably true (at minimum). I no longer regard Relativity as complete, I dispute the big bang theory entirely, and on and on and on. But I then ask myself "how deep does this rabbit hole go?". Maybe there really pink elephants circling around the dark side of the moon? Maybe we are we run by aliens in UFOs? Maybe the Earth is not actually round after all? I hope none of those things are true...as yet I see no compelling evidence for them...but never has it been more important for scientists to begin to regard themselves less as truth priests and more as potentially mercenary corporate & career seeking deceivers and spinners, even without realizing it often. As a scientist, I do not trust scientific concensus anymore. Modern science is in abject disgrace. I only trust the scientific method, and that's no longer considered mandatory...in fact, it's a career killer much of the time.
THIS INFORMATION BLOWS AWAY ANY SCIENTIFIC FRAUD THAT I'VE ENCOUNTERED IN PHYSICS, FOR IT'S SHEER FIENDISH, MURDEROUS AUDACITY ALONE.
Obiously, I had to research the claims in this paper before uploading this. Several hundred PhD's and MD's have now attached their names to a petition advocating that this paper become the foundation of a new research thrust, and questioning the doctrine of HIV=AIDS. It probably won't be funded because it will only cost pennies to conduct...billions would be lost following a blind alley that should be good for decades worth of fruitless research. Nobody in power wants a cheap solution, it seems. Meaning it seems they would like us to die, whenever and wherever possible, so long as we endure financially ruinous, protracted, hideous deaths.
The science definitely checks out. He reference over 150 papers in his own (peer reviewed). Bottom line: HIV is 100% benign, as far as the data can discern, and since the discovery of HIV the lifespan of hemopheliacs (75% HIV infection rate) has actually doubled. Unbelievable.