Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
05-19-2008, 06:37 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-19-2008, 09:29 PM by swansong.)
#1
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
Weekend Edition
May 3 / 4, 2008
Study: Smoking Pot Doesn't Cause Cancer--It May Prevent It!
The Greatest Story Never Told
By FRED GARDNER

Smoking Cannabis Does Not Cause Cancer
Of Lung or Upper Airways, Tashkin Finds;
Data Suggest Possible Protective Effect

The story summarized by that headline ran in O'Shaughnessy's (Autumn 2005), CounterPunch, and the Anderson Valley Advertiser. Did we win Pulitzers, dude? No, the story was ignored or buried by the corporate media. It didn't even make the "Project Censored" list of under-reported stories for 2005. "We were even censored by Project Censored," said Tod Mikuriya, who liked his shot of wry.

It's not that the subject is trivial. One in three Americans will be afflicted with cancer, we are told by the government (as if it's our immutable fate and somehow acceptable). Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S. and lung cancer the leading killer among cancers. You'd think it would have been very big news when UCLA medical school professor Donald Tashkin revealed that components of marijuana smoke -although they damage cells in respiratory tissue- somehow prevent them from becoming malignant. In other words, something in marijuana exerts an anti-cancer effect.

Tashkin has special credibility. He was the lead investigator on studies dating back to the 1970s that identified the components in marijuana smoke that are toxic. It was Tashkin et al who published photomicrographs showing that marijuana smoke damages cells lining the upper airways. It was the Tashkin lab reporting that benzpyrene -a component of tobacco smoke that plays a role in most lung cancers- is especially prevalent in marijuana smoke. It was Tashkin's data documenting that marijuana smokers are more likely than non-smokers to cough, wheeze, and produce sputum.

Tashkin reviewed his findings April 4 at a conference organized by "Patients Out of Time," a reform group devoted to educating doctors and the public (as opposed to lobbying politicians). Some 30 MDs and nurses got continuing medical education credits for attending.

The National Institute on Drug Abuse supported Tashkin's marijuana-related research over the decades and readily gave him a grant to conduct a large, population-based, case-controlled study that would prove definitively that heavy, long-term marijuana use increases the risk of lung and upper-airways cancers. What Tashkin and his colleagues found, however, disproved their hypothesis. (Tashkin is to marijuana as a cause of lung cancer what Hans Blick is to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction -an honest investigator who set out to find something, concluded that it wasn't there, and reported his results.)

Tashkin's team interviewed 1,212 cancer patients from the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance program, matched for age, gender, and neighborhood with 1,040 cancer-free controls. Marijuana use was measured in "joint years" (number of years smoked times number of joints per day). It turned out that increased marijuana use did not result in higher rates of lung and pharyngeal cancer (whereas tobacco smokers were at greater risk the more they smoked). Tobacco smokers who also smoked marijuana were at slightly lower risk of getting lung cancer than tobacco-only smokers.

These findings were not deemed worthy of publication in "NIDA Notes." Tashkin reported them at the 2005 meeting of the International Cannabinoid Research Society and they were published in the October 2006 issue of Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. Without a press release from NIDA calling attention to its significance, the assignment editors of America had no idea that "Marijuana Use and the Risk of Lung and Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancers: Results of a Population-Based Case-Control Study" by Mia Hashibe1, Hal Morgenstern, Yan Cui, Donald P. Tashkin, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Wendy Cozen, Thomas M. Mack and Sander Greenland was a blockbuster story.

I suggested to Eric Bailey of the L.A. Times that he write up Tashkin's findings -UCLA provided the local angle if the anti-cancer effect wasn't enough. Bailey said his editors wouldn't be interested for some time because he had just filed a marijuana-related piece (about the special rapport Steph Sherer of Americans for Safe Access enjoyed with some old corporado back in Washington, D.C.) The Tashkin scoop is still there for the taking!

Investigators from New Zealand recently got widespread media attention for a study contradicting Tashkin's results. "Heavy cannabis users may be at greater risk of chronic lung disease -including cancer- compared to tobacco smokers," is how BBC News summed up the New Zealanders' findings. The very small size of the study -79 smokers took part, 21 of whom smoked cannabis only- was not held against the authors. As conveyed in the corporate media, the New Zealand study represented the latest word on this important subject (as if science were some kind of tennis match and the truth just gets truthier with every volley).

Tashkin criticized the New Zealanders' methodology in his talk at Asilomar: "There's some cognitive dissonance associated with the interpretation of their findings. I think this has to do with the belief model among the investigators and -I wish they were here to defend themselves- the integrity of the investigators... They actually published another paper in which they mimicked the design that we used for looking at lung function."

Tashkin spoke from the stage of an airy redwood chapel designed by Julia Morgan. He is pink-cheeked, 70ish, wears wire-rimmed spectacles. "For tobacco they found what you'd expect: a higher risk for lung cancer and a clear dose-response relationship. A 24-fold increase in the people who smoked the most... What about marijuana? If they smoked a small or moderate amount there was no increased risk, in fact slightly less than one. But if they were in the upper third of the group, then their risk was six-fold... A rather surprising finding, and one has to be cautious about interpreting the results because of the very small number of cases (14) and controls (4)."

Tashkin said the New Zealanders employed "statistical sleight of hand." He deemed it "completely implausible that smokers of only 365 joints of marijuana have a risk for developing lung cancer similar to that of smokers of 7,000 tobacco cigarettes... Their small sample size led to vastly inflated estimates... They had said 'it's ideal to do the study in New Zealand because we have a much higher prevalence of marijuana smoking.' But 88 percent of their controls had never smoked marijuana, whereas 36% of our controls (in Los Angeles) had never smoked marijuana. Why did so few of the controls smoke marijuana? Something fishy about that!"

Strong words for a UCLA School of Medicine professor!

As to the highly promising implication of his own study -that something in marijuana stops damaged cells from becoming malignant- Tashkin noted that an anti-proliferative effect of THC has been observed in cell-culture systems and animal models of brain, breast, prostate, and lung cancer. THC has been shown to promote known apoptosis (damaged cells die instead of reproducing) and to counter angiogenesis (the process by which blood vessels are formed -a requirement of tumor growth). Other antioxidants in cannabis may also be involved in countering malignancy, said Tashkin.

Much of Tashkin's talk was devoted to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, another condition prevalent among tobacco smokers. Chronic bronchitis and emphysema are two forms of COPD, which is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. Air pollution and tobacco smoke are known culprits. Inhaled pathogens cause an inflammatory response, resulting in diminished lung function. COPD patients have increasing difficulty clearing the airways as they get older.

Tashkin and colleagues at UCLA conducted a major study in which they measured lung function of various cohorts over eight years and found that tobacco-only smokers had an accelerated rate of decline, but marijuana smokers -even if they smoked tobacco as well- experienced the same rate of decline as non-smokers. "The more tobacco smoked, the greater the rate of decline," said Tashkin. "In contrast, no matter how much marijuana was smoked, the rate of decline was similar to normal." Tashkin concluded that his and other studies "do not support the concept that regular smoking of marijuana leads to COPD."

Hope that makes you breathe easier.



http://www.counterpunch.org/gardner05032008.html
None Are More Hopelessly Enslaved
Than Those That Falsely Believe They Are Free
- Goethe
Reply
05-19-2008, 11:33 PM,
#2
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
shit I'm invincible.
Reply
05-21-2008, 12:38 AM,
#3
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
you know what it also does?

IT MAKES ME HIGH!!!
Reply
05-21-2008, 12:39 AM,
#4
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
Quote:shit I'm invincible.
Dont jynx yourself :biggrin:
[Image: Palestinian_Dawn_by_Palestinian_Pride.jpg]
Reply
05-21-2008, 05:46 AM,
#5
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/ video
Reply
05-22-2008, 12:14 AM,
#6
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
Yes, it may well prevent or cure cancer, as Dr Robert Melamede has researched...


Dr. Cannabis

Whether the issues are legal or logistical, medical marijuana advocates say the system isn't achieving its potential.

"Patients need high-quality stuff, and [many of them] can't grow it themselves. Then, we don't have enough dispensaries," says Dr. Robert Melamede, a University of Colorado at Colorado Springs professor who calls himself a "nationally known pro-cannabis scientist."

Melamede, a biology professor and former head of the UCCS biology department, teaches various classes at the school including Biology 408, "Endocannabinoids and Medical Marijuana."

"What endocannabinoids" — that is, cannabis chemicals produced by our bodies — "do is help protect us from free-radical damage, which, in general, is responsible for aging. They literally regulate everything in our bodies," says Melamede. "There are huge medicinal benefits to cannabinoids, both endo- and exo-."

Melamede has written peer-reviewed scientific research that shows pot doesn't just quell nausea and muscle pain, but actually can remedy biochemical imbalances. It can effectively treat high blood pressure and depression. Melamede argues it can even kill cancer cells.

http://www.hempevolution.org/media/colorad...t/csi070208.htm

Gotta loce dat herb lol
Patrick
Reply
05-27-2008, 10:36 PM,
#7
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
just smoke it
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3qnOCC1M4fI
--------------------
IXOYE
Reply
06-03-2008, 10:24 PM,
#8
Cannabis May Prevent Cancer!
i have a joint from time to time and loosely follow the medical argument as i find it intriguing and personally do believe that it has significant medical benefits and as such should be used medically, especially in the case of cancer patients and sufferers of multiple sclerosis as it has been proven time and time again to be the best pain reliever in relative terms (ie morphine would be more effective but the side effects would be more detrimental to the health of the patient then the positive pain reliving effects).

as far recreational use goes i think it should be used as all drugs should be, in extreme moderation but of course that is simply not how the world or indeed people work and as such i think that while having research from an incredibly reliable source will certainly help the case for marijuana use medically (say for high risk cancer demographics).

i do hope that it is not legalized to the level of alcohol as the same nationwide epidemic of substance abuse would occur as has been going on with alcohol for many hundreds of years.

of course this is all just speculation anyway as i cant see UK politicians suddenly U-turning on their approach to drugs policy.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Science of Cannabis (New Documentary) vagabonder 0 249 03-21-2014, 08:57 AM
Last Post: vagabonder
  RUN 2 THE CURE - The Cure for Cancer vagabonder 0 301 02-24-2014, 01:54 PM
Last Post: vagabonder
  Study: Cannabis Use Unlikely To Cause Schizophrenia Easy Skanking 5 681 12-22-2013, 03:57 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  It's Official: Cannabis Possession And Cultivation Now Legal In Colorado Easy Skanking 3 594 12-12-2012, 12:18 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  Cannabis usage Easy Skanking 39 6,956 01-12-2012, 06:04 AM
Last Post: Sovereignman
  Dutch government to ban tourists from cannabis shops Mike_Smith 2 837 05-30-2011, 02:31 PM
Last Post: pax681
  Up in smoke: 'Cannabis gave me my life back' drummer 13 3,045 05-08-2011, 04:53 AM
Last Post: zapoper
  Cannabis fed to ducks by French farmer for 'deworming' mothandrust 1 703 11-25-2010, 01:10 AM
Last Post: persecuted in alberni
  George Soros gives $1m to California's pro-cannabis campaign mothandrust 4 1,477 10-28-2010, 05:14 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  New Report: U.S. Government Data Demonstrates Failure of Cannabis Prohibition kevlar 2 979 10-08-2010, 02:53 PM
Last Post: persecuted in alberni

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)