Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
09-26-2009, 11:39 AM,
#1
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
Footage of a UFO seen in the same frame as the air strike on the South Tower, is said to be a Tomahawk Class cruise missile with multiple thermonuclear warheads, which impacted the WTC complex moments later,

[Image: japanesegifobject.gif]

The damage to WTC’s 4, 5 and 6 visible on high resolution photographs reveal multiple cratering, one concrete panel inside the devastated WTC 6 appears to be partially vaporized, a shallow concave surface defining the event horizon of the thermonuclear fireball.

[Image: image301o.jpg]

As the second jet rammed its target, “that was an explosion,” says Stephen McArdle a tax consultant from inside the Marriot Hotel, he was taping as part of an FBI sting operation, then comes a longer and much louder explosion, the second explosion was thought to be the detonation of the missile’s warhead. Greg Smith 2002.

Do not adjust your sets... this side view is aligned with the video shots!

[Image: 4-1_wtc-091701534.jpg]

Quote:The above side on view says the alleged missile is on the wrong trajectory, were it going to impact at the foot of the towers, it would need to be on an entirely different flight path!

A massive explosion devastated World Trade Center 6 the eight-story U.S. Customs building, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower at about 9:03 am, photo caption: The flame in the photos of the mysterious burning object passing through the South Tower is almost pure white, and leaves a dark trail, is this the burning remnant of a DU penetrator. Christopher Bollyn @ American Free Press.

[Image: objectsflyingoutofsouth.jpg]

Quote:The flaming wreckage Bollyn says might be a DU penetrator, is thought to be an engine and a brightly burning magnesium wheel rim, part of the landing gear of the plane that struck the South tower, which had a different trajectory than the alleged missile.

Photo: A pyroclastic cloud in an inner city environment, caption: While onlookers were distracted by the events at skyscraper level, moments after the second plane hit the South Tower, WTC 6 was torn apart by a massive explosion. The crater in the building was eight stories deep, an immense hole blasted into the sub basements, all eight stories missing, no wreckage, blown away, vaporized by the thermonuclear warhead on the missile.

TIMING CONFIRMED: American Free Press contacted CNN to determine exactly when the footage was filmed… CNN’s Public Affairs Department, confirmed that the explosion shown in the footage, occurred immediately after the second plane had crashed into the South Tower.

[Image: 08building6342.jpg]
Jack White’s 911 Studies.

Quite clearly the above images were taken at the start of the collapse of the South Tower at 10:00 am, not at 9:04 as stated... the demolition wave is clearly visible in profile in the frames at left, while the pyroclastic cloud rising from street level between Bldg 7 and the North Tower, must be coming from WTC 6.

The smaller component visible at the left of Bldg 7, could be the plume rising from the destruction of WTC 4 & 5, both are of the same shape and texture, which is distinctly different than the collapse material.

AFP: When asked if the footage was taken at 9:04 am the CNN archivist said, "that’s correc," when asked if CNN could offer any explanation about what might have caused the blast that soared higher than the 47-story WTC 7 in the foreground, the archivist said, “we can’t figure it out.”

Quote:Some 800 workers from WTC 6, were safely evacuated within 12 minutes of the first plane hitting the North Tower at about 8:46 am, according to a Sept. 18 Washington Post article by Stephen Barr.

The Barr piece is the only known article published about WTC 6, he never mentioned an explosion that allegedly devastated the building, just minutes after the workers had escaped with their lives.

Avoiding the Subject: A spokesman for FEMA told AFP that because the building was considered to be very dangerous, there was no data collection from WTC 6.

[Image: kkkiu.jpg]

There never was any visual trace on the NY skyline until the collapse, the tremendous damage to WTC’s 5 & 6 does appear consistent with a missile strike...

[Image: gz_aerial_wtc6140.jpg][Image: gz_aerial_wtc5660.jpg]

A multiple warhead Tomahawk cruiser would do it easy, though as we have ascertained, the pyroclastic event did not occur till the start of the collapse of the South Tower.

Take a look at this detail from the side on shot, ask yourself if the pattern of dark shapes at ground level to the right of the Millennium Hotel, downrange from Bldg 5, is where an overshoot component of the guided missile struck!

[Image: ovrshtwtcmsle572.jpg]
Update: Google Earth exposes the dark shapes as trees.

McArdle’s FBI Sting tape, that recorded the explosion just after the impact on the South Tower, must have been recording one of the explosions in the underground levels Willie talks about.

Quote:So who is going' around making false videos, and going to the trouble of putting websites together like Bollyn and Jack White have done, that are total fabrication!!

NY1 an internet news service from NY had excellent long shots of the entire drama, when the South Tower began to disintegrate at 10:00 am, the station was showing close up chromatically aberrated images, and it was not till the collapse was well under way were the long shots put back onto the screen.

So investigators are unable to see whether a missile could be seen at 10 am, and are unable to exactly time the emergence of the explosive cloud, emanating from the vicinity of WTC’s 4, 5 & 6.

A female ambulance officer who was a first responder, said in an interview on 1 October 2001, that cars were blowing up in the street, and that she looked up and saw an airplane explode in mid air, after seeking shelter in Building 6, to be turned away by officers in "Smoky Bear" hats.

Quote:Patricia Ondrovic says: As I was running, parked cars were blowing up and some were on fire, running up Vesey, the first car blew up on me on the corner of Vesey and the West Side Highway.

I saw two other planes, one came in one way, and the other came in the other way, there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance, the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball, it looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it," Killtown.com.

Her story resurfaced in April ’07 on Rense.com, only to be buried under truck loads of spam.

[Image: image8g.jpg]

This is a shot of the car park, adjacent to where she witnessed the cars exploding at the corner of West and Vesey, diagonally opposite WTC 6 visible in the above side on shot, the missile appears to have come in on that vector, and surely from head on could easily resemble a golf ball shaped object, when the containment housing was blasted away by the separation charge!

The independent components could have then been steered "smart bomb" fashion, into their targets.

Quote:The the Readers Digest ran a story in about September 1970, which said explosives were to be built into the major buildings at the WTC complex to facilitate their eventual controlled demolition.

[Image: laffoley.jpg]

Paul Laffoley a new York artist who was once one of Andy Warhol's proteges, worked for Emory Roth an architectural firm on the WTC project during construction, he has since gone public that there was indeed discussion of doing just that, building demolition charges into the towers!

The latest WTC update

[Image: topics911attacks.jpg]

The missile like object at right in the pic above, appears to endorse the claim that there was a missile impact almost simultaneous with the strike on the South Tower.

However that scenario seemed impossible, since the damage which appeared to have been caused by a multiple warhead cruise missile, was to Bldg's 4, 5 & 6, the supposed missile in the flash vid and in the update pic, is on the wrong trajectory to impact at the foot of the towers.

Quote:Friends there is a mystery... the streaking object in the gif animation, and the object at right in the update pic appear to be one and the same, and both resemble a cruise missile.

However what sort of missile can impact in the middle of New York City without leaving a trace...

[Image: 23overheadlowres.jpg]

Quote:We had concluded that a missile hit Bldg's 4, 5 & 6 at 10:00 am, simultaneous with the collapse of the South Tower, using the Jack White montage above as a reference point.

Check this latest pic...

[Image: 18wtc1heli.jpg]

The South Tower is gone and Bldgs 5 & 6 remain intact, which means that the missile if there was one, neither impacted at the same time as the South Tower was hit by the plane, nor when it collapsed!

So now we have to formulate a hypothesis that fits all the facts.


[Image: jackwhite.jpg]

Jack White is a falsifier we know that because he declared his montage was filmed at 9:04 am, however the demolition wave seen in profile as the South Tower disintegrated means that it was 10:00 am.

That means the animated gif file at top in the Missile Story, and the update pic above, that has a missile like object in the right place at the right time, remain the only evidence there was a missile at all, sure there are dirty great holes in WTC's 5 & 6... but that does not mean a missile.

Quote:The only available time frame for there to be a missile strike at all, is when the North Tower went down!

The other option is that there was no missile at all, both the gif animation and the update pic are false, these false images and Jack Whites bogus captioning on the ST collapse montage, were combined to create a false missile story, designed to divert attention from what was perhaps the "Beam Weapon," postulated by Dr Judy Wood!
Reply
10-10-2009, 11:22 PM,
#2
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
"The other option is that there was no missile at all, both the gif animation and the update pic are false, these false images and Jack Whites bogus captioning on the ST collapse montage, were combined to create a false missile story, designed to divert attention from what was perhaps the "Beam Weapon," postulated by Dr Judy Wood!"

What a load of old tripe.

I like the (unmentioned) other option.

It's the engineers' sensible version.

The one where the planes struck the towers and the jet engine shafts went right through.

The towers fell because their steel softened at a temperature just about the melting point of aluminum, and the slumping and untying floors allowed the supporting exterior skin of each tower to buckle.

The other buildings were damaged/destroyed because the towers fell on them.













Reply
10-10-2009, 11:41 PM,
#3
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
Quote:"The other option is that there was no missile at all, both the gif animation and the update pic are false, these false images and Jack Whites bogus captioning on the ST collapse montage, were combined to create a false missile story, designed to divert attention from what was perhaps the "Beam Weapon," postulated by Dr Judy Wood!"

What a load of old tripe.

I like the (unmentioned) other option.

It's the engineers' sensible version.

The one where the planes struck the towers and the jet engine shafts went right through.

The towers fell because their steel softened at a temperature just about the melting point of aluminum, and the slumping and untying floors allowed the supporting exterior skin of each tower to buckle.

The other buildings were damaged/destroyed because the towers fell on them.

No Jazz, that's what may have happened if the temperatures were high enough..what did happen was they were denoted and you wrote of expert testimony on evidence of squibs and such like as irrelevant as you familiarised yourself with what they were. This was indeed magic jet fuel both these planes were containing

the magic jet fuel scenario. Mr. scratch's info about benzene and the actual cancer rates of unfortunate exposed to the dust that day? Is that also 'bunk'?

were damaged/destroyed [b]because

of planes with magic jet fuel flying into them and detonations.

were damaged/destroyed because

it was necessary for greater aims than just fundamentalist islamic terrorism.

two significantly large planes at the Pentagon excluding airforce one.
Reply
10-14-2009, 04:06 PM,
#4
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
http://concen.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=30694&hl=
Reply
10-18-2009, 10:01 PM,
#5
WTC's 4, 5 & 6 appear to have been impacted by a guided missile
hi scratch i have to agree with Jazz on this. allthough I wont be throwing the "tripe" word at ya. the explosives used in a missile for example dont have a lot of jet fuel in them. that large yellow ball of flame is NOT indicative of a missile. they generally tend to just blow stuff not burn them. Maybe if someone had put a planes worth of fuel in rather large containers next to the windows its gonna be a bit difficult to synthesize. I think someone would of seen that.

After many years of study on this topic i can wholeheartedly say that planes DID enter those buildings. That "UFO" is a bird or insect disturbed by a rather large noise generated by a rather large plane hitting a really Large building. And before you ask yes i have looked into this. no sale.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Pentagon on 911.. a cruise missile struck the building! MrScratch 198 42,643 11-08-2009, 08:43 PM
Last Post: icosaface
  Suspected US missile strikes in Pakistan kill 8 mastermg 0 401 06-18-2009, 10:54 PM
Last Post: mastermg
  Cruise missile in drag........ Coffinman 28 4,345 02-24-2009, 07:41 AM
Last Post: psilocybin
  Israel behind missile fire from Lebanon TriWooOx 0 437 01-09-2009, 10:34 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)