Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
09-29-2009, 03:38 PM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
AWESOME!

been wondering...

how many flat batteries can you fully charge with one positively charged 12v battery?

how many flat batteries can you fully charge with one negatively charged 12v battery?

.... does that make sense?

Reply
09-29-2009, 10:50 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-29-2009, 10:51 PM by Easy Skanking.)
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
This is good. You guys have some good questions and it looks like you are catching on.:D

Quote:- If you hook this wheel/system up to a (or several) battery bank(s), what kind of device would this system [Bedini wheel+ battery banks ] be able to continiously power? (if any)

With multiple (2+) banks and a nice switching circuit, what can you run with batteries? Pretty much anything that is DC powered. Get large enough batteries and an inverter and you can run AC devices from it. I'm sure there must be a limit, but from all of our experiments, online experiments and Bedini's experiments, I haven't seen the limit yet. Bedini has a large 10 coil motor with 2 large banks of batteries and he can run his lab from those. It's enough to power a house.

As another option, run capacitor banks instead of batteries. That leaves you with rapid charge and rapid discharge capabilities.

The primary supply battery drains very slowly but it will eventually run down. You can use 2 primaries and a switching circuit to keep a fully charged source voltage going. If the primary is uninterrupted and you constantly have a load on the system, it will run until some component or wheel bearings fail. Bedini has had the same window motor ( a different design but same principles) that has been running for 15 years constant.

Quote:You could hook it up recharge car batteries, and then use a convertor to convert the 12 volt direct current to AC. However, I think it will only last a certain time before the battery will require more time to recharge when it is drained. Am I right about this?

When charging batteries conventionally, they gradually degrade in storage capacity and decreased discharge time. This is sulfation. When charging batteries with negative energy, they INCREASE in their storage capacity and discharge time (C20) and DECREASE the charging time with every charge/discharge cycle. This shows that this kind of charging desulfates the batteries. When dealing with 12VDC lead acid car batteries, I would suppose the charge limit would be around 14-15VDC but I haven't reached that point yet.

Do not mix conventional and negative energy in a circuit.

You will also notice that batteries that were charged with negative energy will take a VERY long time to charge if they are put back on a conventional charger. All of the "holes' need to be filled with electrons before the battery will be charged with a conventional charger. It will work, but it takes a long time. When the reverse is tried, the battery will rise to a particular voltage and then drop very low, to 0 in some cases, and then rise back up to a negative charged voltage.

Quote:AWESOME!

been wondering...

how many flat batteries can you fully charge with one positively charged 12v battery?

A lot. I've charged 3 car batteries from one car battery and the drain was less than charging one from one. I've also run 2 systems from one battery and charged 5 batteries like that. Once again, the drain was less than just running one system with one charging battery.

Quote:how many flat batteries can you fully charge with one negatively charged 12v battery?

.... does that make sense?

None.
The system will not run from a negatively charged battery. The way this is designed, it requires a conventional current to set up the the proper EM resonance in the coil so that the Bloch Wall (gate) is opened enough so that "holes" may flow in from the Dirac Sea. There would have to be some caps or the like, to convert it to conventional current to run the system.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
09-29-2009, 11:32 PM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
thanks!:)

the negatively charged battery releases pulsed dc implosions?



Reply
09-29-2009, 11:51 PM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
Quote:thanks!:)

the negatively charged battery releases pulsed dc implosions?

No. It discharges "holes" instead of electrons. The voltage (difference in electrical potential) is still relatively the same but there is no collective mass of electrons pushing current down the line. The "holes" are what is being moved down the line. This lack of mass may be in part responsible for the anti-gravitic effects in high voltage usages.

The pulses come from the transistor rapidly cutting itself off once conventional current starts flowing in the circuit.

If you really want to get down to the nitty gritty, you could look at it this way. If conventional current is divergent in nature, given the quantum theories about subatomic particle make-up and the theories and formula of Konstantin Meyl on vortices, you could conclude that an electron is an electromagnetic vortex with spin governed by quantum theory but still outward expanding overall.

With regard to negative energy, it would be the same except that the vortex would be overall inward or convergent. So instead of implosions, each hole is made up of an inward spiraling "hole" in space-time that carries approximately the same source charge as an electron but in opposite polarity. What gets awkward is that the source charge of an electron is negative but it is positive energy because it possesses mass. The negative energy would have a positive charge but is considered negative energy because of the lack of mass.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
09-30-2009, 10:37 AM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
So this setup will power a whole house?
Wow, amazing!

Have you tried testing your setup in another location? Like many, many miles away from where you are running it now?

The reason I ask is that I'm thinking whatever energy is 'bleeding' through might be coming from the same source as where what is sometimes known as ley lines flow/run; especially where they cross.
In places like Glastonbury, England, your system might be running just fine, where as if you would test it in an energetically 'dead' area, you might see little or no yield.

Just a thought.
Reply
10-01-2009, 01:21 AM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
Quote:So this setup will power a whole house?

Not as small as I have. This is the setup that Bedini uses that is large enough to run a house.

[Image: bigguy1.jpg] [Image: Batteries111.jpg]

[Image: Load%20bank22.jpg]

Quote:Have you tried testing your setup in another location? Like many, many miles away from where you are running it now?

Yes. It's been run in the original location, where it is now (10 miles away) and a third that was 40 miles away. Location made no difference in speed or charging rate. THe only thing that has made a difference is whether it's day or night. The wheels spin faster and charge better at night.

Quote:The reason I ask is that I'm thinking whatever energy is 'bleeding' through might be coming from the same source as where what is sometimes known as ley lines flow/run; especially where they cross.
In places like Glastonbury, England, your system might be running just fine, where as if you would test it in an energetically 'dead' area, you might see little or no yield.

Just a thought.

That has been a popular attempted rebuttal as well as "stealing electricity" from nearby power lines. As I have said, location seems to make no difference in how they perform. Proximity to power lines also seems to have no bearing as all three locations have been at different distances from power lines.

One thing that bothers me about the "bleeding through" theory, is that power and electricity just doesn't bleed through the air. The resistance of air = p*L/A where "L" is the length, "A" is the area, "p" is the resistivity of air (between 2 and 4 *10^13 ohms). That requires a VERY high voltage to make that distance of a jump and is visible in both conventional and radiant energy. All of those lightning bolts that you see around Tesla's experiments were not lighting shooting OUT of the equipment but were radiant electricity CONVERGING into the devices. So, for those reasons, that kind of explanation holds no water for me.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
10-01-2009, 06:13 AM,
Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
Man, your lectures would slap JR in the face:D
I kind of get it now, it isn't electrons that are being produced in the process to charge the batteries, but "negative energy". Weird concept since all we learn about is atoms and such.
[Image: Palestinian_Dawn_by_Palestinian_Pride.jpg]
Reply
07-11-2010, 11:36 PM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
(10-01-2009, 06:13 AM)mastermg Wrote: Man, your lectures would slap JR in the faceBig Grin
I kind of get it now, it isn't electrons that are being produced in the process to charge the batteries, but "negative energy". Weird concept since all we learn about is atoms and such.
By JR I hope you don't mean ME. I'm quite easy with this. I'm just not easy with "something for nothing", because the Universe isn't, either.
Reply
02-09-2011, 07:24 PM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
apart from the big bang?
Reply
08-09-2011, 03:18 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-09-2011, 04:13 PM by JazzRoc.)
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
(02-09-2011, 07:24 PM)rsol Wrote: apart from the big bang?
The sum total of energy in any universe is ZERO. Go, look it up.

Universes appear to begin with a "WORD". (SHOCK!!!, HORROR!!!) Or, in other words, they are TRIGGERED. An analogy is the formation of a bubble of steam in boiling water. There is a change of PHASE. This is so intense that NO matter may be used to "steal" bits of the initial string. Fission and fusion are relatively small energies compared.

The closest we have got to "free" energy is the work of Podkletnov and Znidarsic (Good stuff!). If we found it, it would KILL us.

So let's embrace renewable energies.
Reply
08-11-2011, 11:46 AM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
I recall watching one or two YT videos where a fellow had used magnets arranged in such a way as to cause a wheel to spin without electrical input, and then the energy in the rotation could be used to power a device or charge a battery. However, all of that energy came from the magnets, which had to be reenergised every few years or so. One could charge them through non-renewable resources or renewable resources as required (the former would be much faster).

Now I stumble upon this magical device, and I'm thinking to myself this sounds a lot like that fellow in Eastern Canada who had reportedly been visited by extraterrestrials (possibly pan-dimensional) who taught him how to construct the device out of natural materials. Allegedly, he forgot to put a clutch on the device, and it ended up escaping. However, I was left with the impression that this energy was coming from some as-yet undiscovered source, as in vacuum or "zero-point".

However, that last story is considered by this author as fantasy at this point. It's likely the Bedini motor is operating on principles that can only rely upon manufactured products. If it were possible to build such a device out of natural materials, and such technologies were available to the public to build with no engineering degrees, society would be permanently altered.

If I had the engineering and fiscal means, I would be exploring this technology most enthusiastically.
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
11-11-2011, 12:47 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-11-2011, 12:55 AM by Easy Skanking.)
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
The Bedini wheel does not operate from magnetic power. The magnets are only used to spin the wheel and re-gauge the electromagnet created in the coils.
There is another patent that is based on the same SSG design but without the wheel, magnets or coils. The same basic circuit is used with the additional circuitry being power and speed control for a Pulse Width Modulator (PWM) chip. The influx of energy for both circuits is derived from the sharp transient of stopping the supplied DC voltage (before the conventional current has time to rise). The sharp conventional EM pulse pushes against the curvature of space-time and space-time pushes back. Since the trigger signal is removed at the time of the reaction, the reactive energy is allowed to enter the circuitry. The circuit is designed to dump that energy into the charging battery.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
12-08-2012, 11:04 PM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
Hi Easy Skanking,

I am new here and have noticed this thread has not been updated for a year now (this is not complain of course) and would like to ask whether you have seen a new e-book just issued on the Bedini SG setup?
Nevertheless, here is link to the ad (I have no affiliation whatsoever with them): http://bedinisg.com/ and the reason I mention all this is that a few days ago they wrote this info in another newsletter:

... "the winding direction of the coil for the Bedini SSG in the book is in the opposite direction compared to the normal Bedini SSG method that has always been used. You can do the normal direction of course to have the standard Bedini SG.
However, what we are giving you is absolutely priceless and you have never seen this method before, nor has it ever been explained.
Yes, this is a "BEGINNER's" handbook - however, it is just as simple for a beginner to do this one single MODIFICATION as it is for an advanced builder so we decided to give it to you. We're going to explain what is actually going on with the recommended modified method that is above and beyond what anyone has ever seen with a Bedini SG! ... Stay tuned, because we'll upload the new version to the same download page by the end of the week and it will have the upgraded explanation. ... For anyone that didn't realize that we really did show them something that they have never seen before, they're going to be in for a real surprise - a very significant one! It is in the original release of the book, but without this distinction, it is easy to miss because it was off the radar. Anyone could have built it if they go by the directions and got the results that are way more than the normal SG but would not have known why."

I wonder what trick is involved... any idea?

regards
Gyula
Reply
12-09-2012, 07:05 AM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
I had seen the book ads but haven't gotten to check it out yet.

The design I used was to wind the coils clockwise when looking at the top of the coil. Obviously the new way would be counter-clockwise when looking at the top of the coil. My guess would be probably polarity of the radiant reaction. Since energy tends to travel in a vortex, changing the winding direction might align more of the wire the same direction as the radiant pulse has, thus presenting an easier path for the influx. However, that is only an educated guess. I need to read the updates.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
12-09-2012, 01:06 PM,
RE: Bedini Monopole Energizer SSG
(12-09-2012, 07:05 AM)Easy Skanking Wrote: I had seen the book ads but haven't gotten to check it out yet.

The design I used was to wind the coils clockwise when looking at the top of the coil. Obviously the new way would be counter-clockwise when looking at the top of the coil. My guess would be probably polarity of the radiant reaction. Since energy tends to travel in a vortex, changing the winding direction might align more of the wire the same direction as the radiant pulse has, thus presenting an easier path for the influx. However, that is only an educated guess. I need to read the updates.

Thanks for that. I did not read the book either.
First I thought that they meant to wind only the main coil in the opposite direction (and not together with the trigger coil) but this would mean to get an oscillator (like a blocking type) but then I thought the two wires are wound together so changing the direction for both does not modify the circuit into an oscillator. So what remains as a result is the flip of the magnetic poles due to a change in the winding direction.
I hope the benefit of this has already turned out by now?

Thanks, Gyula
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  OFFICIAL BEDINI SG MACHINE TRAILER - Energy from the Vacuum - DVD Part 33 investolator 7 2,316 01-28-2014, 09:02 AM
Last Post: investolator

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)