Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
05-11-2009, 01:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-11-2009, 01:49 PM by JazzRoc.)
#76
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:we are not getting straight answers / we do not have a true concrete answer / we can't get a simple answer / WTF is going on / if we did we would have it plain by now / we would know
Google Search Results for "paper" "aviation" "saturated" "atmosphere" "contrails" "-chemtrails" "-aerosols" (Search undertaken Dec 19th 2008.) NOW YOU KNOW. HERE IS YOUR ANSWER SIX HUNDRED AND FORTY FIVE TIMES. (Also found on the "Penrod" page of "Jazzroc vs. Chemtrails" in my signature.)

Quote:We speculate / we go around guessing of this and that / We can say that what is happening
That is a waste of time. Why do you think people go to COLLEGE to study atmospheric physics? Why don't they just LOOK UP? Isn't it because you cannot find the answers to non-intuitive phenomena using your intuition?

Quote:Basically, someone is laughing at us / couldn't care less about any visible spray patterns in the sky / someone simply does not consider anyone worthy for getting concrete answers / to them, we are simply rodents with no power to contest or get answers... / they simply do not care if we see those white trails in the sky, they do not care, and they couldn't care less of what you think / they do not see the human race as important enough to disclose the true nature of what we see
They laugh at you because you speculate and guess instead of studying.

Quote:unless you are acting and asking hard core questions
Here's a hard-core question. Why speculate when you can study and understand?

Quote:We simply do not matter / we do not matter
YOU do not matter.
Reply
05-18-2009, 01:47 AM,
#77
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:what ever it is that they are having to spray in the skies, we are not getting straight answers from the number one source "Government!" We go around guessing of this and that, but what is the government and media not telling us. We live in America or the planet where this thing is happening, yet, we do not have a true concrete answer of why we are getting sprayed. Seems to me that as we see all the spraying going around all over the globe and people see it, we can't get a simple answer from government or the media, radio, or anyone. We speculate, yet we as people of the planet do not know and people are not rising to questions in the millions from 7.8 billion people on earth? WTF is going on, we simply do not matter to government because if we did we would have it plain by now and we would know. We can say that what is happening is Plain and Blind and as cattle they do not see the human race as important enough to disclose the true nature of what we see in the skies everyday. We do not matter to the secret OPS. And they simply do not care if we see those white trails in the sky, they do not care, and they could are less of what you think, unless you are acting and asking hard core questions to those who see the planet populace not worthy of any answers. Basically, someone is laughing at us, the whole human race on the planet. Someone simply could care less about any visible spray patterns in the sky and any people below watching those white patterns all over the sky. Someone simply does not consider anyone worthy for getting concrete answers. To them, we are simply rodents with no power to contest or get answers...

We do matter Mexika, that is why they sicced jr on us so that it could dissemble, obfuscate and distract us from our attempts to document and verify what they are doing to us. Don't lose heart and keep on keeping on.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
05-19-2009, 10:49 AM,
#78
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
cointelpro generally dont debate on the actual issues themselves. They tend to try and propagate distrust within a movement. JR isnt cointelpro. Hes just not good at relaying information AND refraining from insult. Its maybe a multitasking issue i dont know.

I have to be on the side on the the contrail people here. Apart from the science, there are the human issues to contend with and one of my specialties, logistics!!! The whole process you talk of is that of an entity trying to poison the entire population through "spraying" chemicals into the air. Lets break this down.

1. dispersion
First of all, why use air? for many years, farmers have sprayed their crops with pesticide and even feeder in order to improve their yield. This is done at a very low level and many people die each year because this is a very dangerous exercise. The low level is needed in order for this to be effective. As air is constantly moving, the dispersion would make the whole process pointless if you don't get the craft low enough to your crops. Dispersion would be the first thing i would consider as a nono for this. why not use cars?

2. we all live here
we have one planet. If you are going to kill people through poisoning the air, dont YOU have to breath it too? Also some flights from say London to new york spend about 90% over the Atlantic. No humans to poison....

3.
Engines. they cant do much else but move planes.
The turbojet engine is a wonder of modern engineering. The design of these things is one of precision. Every element is accounted for. in order for the engine to work at all it has to be fed correct fuels. Even small deviations can cause engine failure of catastrophic degrees. Foreign elements are not wise in one of these things.

4. why bother?
Population control perhaps? so......medication, preservatives, poisonous sweeteners, pollution and all the others not good enough? The amount of things that are there to kill us are abundant and in your face. planes allready pump out loads of horrible shit as it is. Its called pollution.

5. maybe you are being played
If i were a resident living near heathrow, I wouldn't like to associate myself with chem trailers as this would not help my credibility when campaigning against this airport. Living next to one of these things is hell. They account for the great many health problems. The area 51 people were happy to have people speculate about their planes as "UFOs" as it simply discredited anyone investigating. Its the same thing with 911 truth movement. The "no planers" are the ones getting the limelight while those advocating controlled demolition through evidence are sidelined.
Reply
05-19-2009, 01:26 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-19-2009, 11:08 PM by ---.)
#79
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:cointelpro generally dont debate on the actual issues themselves. They tend to try and propagate distrust within a movement. JR isnt cointelpro. Hes just not good at relaying information AND refraining from insult. Its maybe a multitasking issue i dont know.

I have to be on the side on the the contrail people here. Apart from the science, there are the human issues to contend with and one of my specialties, logistics!!! The whole process you talk of is that of an entity trying to poison the entire population through "spraying" chemicals into the air. Lets break this down.

1. dispersion
First of all, why use air? for many years, farmers have sprayed their crops with pesticide and even feeder in order to improve their yield. This is done at a very low level and many people die each year because this is a very dangerous exercise. The low level is needed in order for this to be effective. As air is constantly moving, the dispersion would make the whole process pointless if you don't get the craft low enough to your crops. Dispersion would be the first thing i would consider as a nono for this. why not use cars?

2. we all live here
we have one planet. If you are going to kill people through poisoning the air, dont YOU have to breath it too? Also some flights from say London to new york spend about 90% over the Atlantic. No humans to poison....

3.
Engines. they cant do much else but move planes.
The turbojet engine is a wonder of modern engineering. The design of these things is one of precision. Every element is accounted for. in order for the engine to work at all it has to be fed correct fuels. Even small deviations can cause engine failure of catastrophic degrees. Foreign elements are not wise in one of these things.

4. why bother?
Population control perhaps? so......medication, preservatives, poisonous sweeteners, pollution and all the others not good enough? The amount of things that are there to kill us are abundant and in your face. planes allready pump out loads of horrible shit as it is. Its called pollution.

5. maybe you are being played
If i were a resident living near heathrow, I wouldn't like to associate myself with chem trailers as this would not help my credibility when campaigning against this airport. Living next to one of these things is hell. They account for the great many health problems. The area 51 people were happy to have people speculate about their planes as "UFOs" as it simply discredited anyone investigating. Its the same thing with 911 truth movement. The "no planers" are the ones getting the limelight while those advocating controlled demolition through evidence are sidelined.

I've remained quiet on this issue for a while and I'll tell you why.. I have been observing, as far as possible, the commonly used air traffic routes; their direction and their regularity over the last almost 3 months now, those that are visible from around my flat as a focal orientation point.

I think I have a pretty good handle on where to expect to see planes moving in the sky at the moment and in which direction. I have the visible flight paths more or less mapped imsho..there's not a seriously heavy amount of air traffic around here and I know in which direction the nearest airport lies, so it was a tenable task to undertake and I felt I needed to as the issue has been vexing me for a while now.

Having said that, in the last two weeks on two separate occasions - I have noticed the classically related phenomena occur - in that, on both occasions, over a period of only a few hours there was a DISTINCT increase of traffic in the sky from multiple directions which, according to my observations, are not commonly traversed, long heavy trails which crossed each other - and DIFFERING from the usual traffic, I have been observing, in that, these trails DID indeed hang there and spread out over hours turning an otherwise blue sky into a milky mush...the trails I have been watching for, as said, almost three months now - have NEVER done this. I live right on the edge of town and have the bonus of relatively panoramic views.

I think JR needs to re-evaluate. I have read his blog and listened with respect and good courtesy, learning much about the science along the way; for which I am grateful. In fact, the very reason I invited JR to register here was indeed because I was unsure about the whole theory and wished to embolden the debate by bringing someone to the table educated in the field. The reason also as to why I have gone to these painstaking efforts of observation and note taking.

There is something going on, that cannot reasonably be delineated by the science of contrails imsho..and that sucks, as it was a great feeling to think that the whole thing thing was hysteria and there was nothing malign happening.
Reply
05-19-2009, 10:25 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-19-2009, 10:27 PM by icosaface.)
#80
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Good for you nik. I recently talked with an Inuit person who until 3 years ago lived in NE Labrador. He told me that while hunting geese with a buddy, sitting in a blind, they noticed a plane coming from a direction that planes had never been observed to come from in the past. This plane gave off a "pollution trail"(his words") that spread and spread for the couple of hours that they observed it. He recalled that they had discussed why this pollution trail should be so different from the others they had observed, having no other info to go on they concluded that it might be burning a different type of fuel. He was very interested to hear about chemtrails and aghast, as we all are, at the implications.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
05-20-2009, 01:44 PM,
#81
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
The type of plane he was referring to was a commercial airliner, one that flies at 30,000 ft or thereabouts. The only planes he had seen come from that direction were small ones, pontoon types, and they fly at relatively low altitudes.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
05-26-2009, 02:27 PM,
#82
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
can anyone please have a go at my bullet points? They are not scientifically based. They are merely intuitive questions related to con/chem trails. Im simply asking why. You say there is evidence, circumstantial at best in my eyes. Id just like to look at the motives. Who has what to gain?
Reply
06-18-2009, 09:29 PM,
#83
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
[Image: 170609top2.jpg]
Rutgers Professor Warns Geoengineering Could “Create Disasters,” Global Famine
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Debate surrounding the possibility of geoengineering the earth’s climate by lining the atmosphere with aerosol particles has moved from idle speculation to serious consideration, and was a core topic of discussion at a recent National Academy of Sciences workshop.

However, a top Rutgers University professor warned at the meeting that tampering with the planet’s delicate ecosystem could create famines and droughts, threatening the lives of no less than a third of the world’s population.

The plan to shoot aerosols - dust particles - into the earth’s upper stratosphere in an attempt to cool the planet and offset the purported effects of global warming, should be considered as an “emergency response” to a climate crisis, according to Harvard University’s Dan Schrag, who told the workshop that such a crisis was already underway.

“I think we should consider climate engineering only as an emergency response to a climate crisis, but I question whether we’re already experiencing a climate crisis — whether we’ve already crossed that threshold,” Schrag said.

According to an NPR report on the meeting, University of Calgary’s David Keith urged the introduction of geoengineering experiments on a global scale and that they should be conducted “sooner rather than later”.

But Rutgers University professor Alan Robock warned that such experiments “could create disasters,” damaging the ozone layer and potentially altering the stratosphere by eliminating weather patterns such as the annual Asian monsoon rain season, which 2 billion people rely upon to water their crops and feed the population.

“Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the planet,” Robock said.

As we have previously highlighted, discussions regarding the possibility of “geo-engineering” the earth’s climate to counter global warming by “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays” has stoked fresh concerns that similar programs are already underway, and that chemtrails are directly connected to such experimentation.

Chemtrails differ from ordinary contrails in that they hang in the sky for hours and are often observed to be emitted from planes that fly criss-cross routes, leading to the formation of ‘X’ and grid-like patterns in the sky. Chemtrails also directly effect localized weather by turning a clear blue sky into a hazy overcast.

Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature. The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.”

KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center further reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.

As we covered in a previous in-depth report, numerous universities and government agencies have been conducting studies in the field of geoengineering for years.

In addition, the Obama administration’s interest in exploring “geo-engineering” mirrors recent publications penned by the elite Council On Foreign Relations.

In a document entitled Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the CFR proposes different methods of “reflecting sunlight back into space,” which include adding “small reflecting particles in the upper part of the atmosphere,” adding “more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere,” and placing “various kinds of reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and the sun.”

The proposals in the CFR document match exactly the atmospheric effects observed in the aftermath of chemtrail spraying.


http://www.prisonplanet.com/rutgers-profes...bal-famine.html
Reply
06-26-2009, 12:03 PM,
#84
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
NIK: "Having said that, in the last two weeks on two separate occasions - I have noticed the classically related phenomena occur - in that, on both occasions, over a period of only a few hours there was a DISTINCT increase of traffic in the sky from multiple directions which, according to my observations, are not commonly traversed, long heavy trails which crossed each other - and DIFFERING from the usual traffic, I have been observing, in that, these trails DID indeed hang there and spread out over hours turning an otherwise blue sky into a milky mush...the trails I have been watching for, as said, almost three months now - have NEVER done this. I live right on the edge of town and have the bonus of relatively panoramic views.
I think JR needs to re-evaluate. I have read his blog and listened with respect and good courtesy, learning much about the science along the way; for which I am grateful. In fact, the very reason I invited JR to register here was indeed because I was unsure about the whole theory and wished to embolden the debate by bringing someone to the table educated in the field. The reason also as to why I have gone to these painstaking efforts of observation and note taking.
There is something going on, that cannot reasonably be delineated by the science of contrails imsho..and that sucks, as it was a great feeling to think that the whole thing thing was hysteria and there was nothing malign happening
."

It is a hard thing to comprehend, Nik, I know. There are two main factors here, one of which is hard to appreciate, and the other one even harder still.

The first is that you HAVE to educate yourself in SCIENCE. Passing through schooling with minimum scientific involvement is easy to do. I was "good" at it, quite often "top" at it, in the "A" stream of a grammar school. yet I look back on my performance with shame and embarrassment when I compare what I understood then with my present understanding. We live so firmly committed to a technological world that to lose complete touch with it may be both irrecoverable and FATAL.
It seems to me that we are close to this position. You only have to read my "Penrod" page to discover that this character has the presumption to argue SCIENCE with the Niels Bohr Institute, and describe Thomas Schlatter, Chief Scientist, Forecast Systems Laboratory, NOAA Research, as "Thomas Schlatter, who passes himself off as a 'NOAA meteorologist'", or Dr. Patrick Minnis, without mentioning that he heads the NOAA satellite team which spends its time analyzing Earth's atmosphere, and has written 153 papers on atmospheric science. Or you could read my "Sleeps" page, and consider Socrates of "All aircraft are not involved", who comes up with "Epoxynous/Contrail Science is a Patrick Minnis mouthpiece. They are admitting that we are seeing what Minnis refers to as contrail outbreaks. These guys are going way out of their way to try to make chemtrails look kooky. But there has been a push to cover up the Dr. Evil part of it, from Paul Crutzen to guys like Wigley and Benford."
Professor Paul Crutzen is an Emeritus Professor at Utrecht University Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences who in 1995 won a Nobel Prize for his work in Atmospheric Chemistry, particularly concerning the formation and decomposition of ozone.
These people are foremost in the world in the scientific understanding of the Earth's atmosphere. They are both intelligent and hard-working - all of them. It seems totally incredible to me that they be subjected to abuse and disbelief brought about by such ignorance. PROPAGATING such material worldwide inflates this misdemeanour to criminal proportions. Such an ignorant anti-science stance can bring our society down. It CAN achieve a 98% population REDUCTION. It is quite possibly the most dangerous thing on the planet.

The second item pertains to your perception.
You may quite easily find figures for passenger aviation. These will show that, apart from a brief period after 9-11, there has been an unbroken rise in flights, which have been remarkably consistent. They are as regular as clockwork.
The weather is a different thing. Planes cruising in the stratosphere are always in very cold air, but its humidity CAN vary. When it does, you get persistent trails above a certain humidity level. There is 1993 research paper which puts this at 17% of the time. It may have increased since then, as increased traffic has put more moisture up there.
So, when you look up, what catches your attention? The TRAIL does. In fact, you don't notice trail-less aircraft at all in a blue sky unless you see a Sun reflection off it. It's the way the brain works: it discards visual information as rapidly as possible, especially when it isn't profound.
You also don't notice traffic on overcast days - but IT IS STILL THERE.
So re-read what you have written. The traffic is always the same. There are countless sources that will confirm this.
It is just your misperception. After all, the Sun goes round the Earth, doesn't it?
Reply
06-26-2009, 12:25 PM,
#85
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
I take on board what you're saying.. I actually have started to try looking into deeper and get official information about flight paths and traffic...well, I started too but I haven't really followed it up yet..but as said the two times I referenced were anomalous - not simply due to me observing what ordinarily my brain would filter out.. I mean a highly significant increase in traffic over a period of only a few hours(certainly enough to register as 'anomalous' to someone who had been consciously observing the skies to an almost obsessive point for somemonths).

It wasn't simply that the trails persisted it was the they engulfed the very sky above me. It would be foolish of me to discount the possibility that active trials no longer occur from the military..moreover the most eminent atmospheric scientists on the planet may well not be privy to such instances. The people you mention who engage in character attacks and obfuscations could quite as easily be stooges as cranks..
Reply
06-28-2009, 09:18 AM,
#86
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:It wasn't simply that the trails persisted it was the they engulfed the very sky above me.
If a 747 can deposit 250 TONS of ice crystals per mile it is QUITE LIKELY to "engulf the sky" on its own. A single trail CAN do so on occasion. It depends on how quickly the other layers can take up those crystals back into solution as water vapor again.

Quote:It would be foolish of me to discount the possibility that active trials no longer occur from the military...
But you would also have to consider for what purpose. The last intentional trials I can recall were for causing the Ho Chi Minh trail to become waterlogged. I can't see any sensible reason to conduct trials over YOUR head - can you?

Quote:moreover the most eminent atmospheric scientists on the planet may well not be privy to such instances.
When they are controlling NOAA and similar satellites from space, capable of inspecting and analyzing ANY part of the atmosphere ANYWHERE, I don't believe this could possibly be true.

Quote:The people you mention who engage in character attacks and obfuscations could quite as easily be stooges as cranks..
Yes.

This is the popular sport of Socrates of "All Aircraft are Not Involved", who, lacking any science, but a naturally devious thinker, thinks that Nobel prizewinners in the field are no different from himself.

http://jazzroc.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/30-sleeps/ - "Socratic Interlude".
Reply
08-30-2009, 07:38 AM,
#87
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
[Image: 180809chemtrails.jpg]
TIME Article Pushes Geo-engineering Agenda
<sup>Acclimatizing the public to the idea of sulfur particle spraying while it is already in progress</sup>

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Tuesday, August 18, 2009

A new article in TIME magazine suggests that geo-engineering the planet may be the only way forward to prevent the climate “collapsing”.

Bryan Walsh’s article, entitled Can Geoengineering Help Slow Global Warming? suggests that through the use of fossil fuels we are “already geoengineers” and that “we might as well get good at it.”

“If we geoengineered the earth into a mess with our uncontrolled appetite for fossil fuels, maybe we have to geoengineer our way out of it” Walsh writes, citing a new paper by the think tank Copenhagen Consensus on Climate.

In the paper, co-author Lee Lane cites all the usual suggestions of how the planet could be cooled including space mirrors, seawater-mist and man-made volcanoes.

The most prominent form of geoengineering suggested in the paper, however, comes in the form of spraying sulfur into the air.

“One way to turn down the thermostat would be to spread sulfur particles into the atmosphere, either through artillery or with airplanes, thickening the air enough so that it would bounce some sunlight back …it would need to be done continuously, to keep up with the intensifying greenhouse effect.” the article explains.

As we previously highlighted when this issue last hit the headlines, the process described here is already being conducted by government-affiliated universities, government agencies, and on a mass scale through chemtrail spraying.

The study of past and ongoing upper atmosphere aerosol programs confirms that the government has been active in this field for years.

The topic of geoengineering came to the fore back in April when Obama’s science czar John Holdren commented in an AP interview that he was pushing for radical terra forming programs to be explored.

Holdren’s suggestions for planetary geoengineering exactly mirrored those in publications penned by the elite internationalist group The Council On Foreign Relations, who also called for the implementation of a global Carbon Tax in 1999.

The Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy then back pedaled 360 degrees on his own comments when the wider media picked up on them and turned them into major headlines.

Holdren’s interest in radical geoengineering programs should be of great concern to the American people and the rest of the world given that he has also advocated extreme population control techniques including forced abortions and mass sterilization all under the oversight of a “Planetary Regime”.

Impossible, you say? That must be an exaggeration or a hoax. If you don’t believe it you can read it for yourself in Holdren’s own book Ecoscience, co-authored in 1977. Excerpts of the book can also be found in another of our previous articles on Holdren here.

Interestingly, Lee Lane, the author of the new geoengineering paper, is also a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a common hangout for neoconservatives such as John Bolton, David Frum, Irving Kristol, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and John Yoo.

The AEI is renowned for casting doubt on the theory of human caused global warming, and is heavily funded by energy companies, but it is also best known as a forum to engender business opportunities.

These tentative announcements and recycling of ideas to terra form the planet constitute a first step toward introducing the idea to the wider public.

One of the accepted truisms of scientific study is the fact that if scientists are proposing an idea, then those scientists with access to the bottomless pit of black-budget secret government funding are already doing it.

It is highly likely that sulfur spraying and chemtrails are merely one manifestation of “geo-engineering” that is taking place without proper debate, notification or any form of legality, and with a callous disregard for the potential dangers to both our health and our environment.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/time-article-p...ing-agenda.html
Reply
09-26-2009, 04:10 PM,
#88
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
You'll notice the "maybe".

That means (as I INSIST) it hasn't happened. (Except the once) (By EVERYONE)
Reply
09-26-2009, 04:32 PM,
#89
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:You'll notice the "maybe".

That means (as I INSIST) it hasn't happened. (Except the once) (By EVERYONE)

Or that could mean the courtship has begun. To say it will is an admission of guilt and a quick play. The use of the word maybe however could be foreplay. Get enough articles like that and people will be seduced in to accepting that they are a good thing.
Reply
09-26-2009, 08:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-26-2009, 08:53 PM by JazzRoc.)
#90
Sprayed Aerosols Could Ease Climate Woes
Quote:
Quote:You'll notice the "maybe".
That means (as I INSIST) it hasn't happened. (Except the once) (By EVERYONE)
Or that could mean the courtship has begun. To say it will is an admission of guilt and a quick play. The use of the word maybe however could be foreplay. Get enough articles like that and people will be seduced in to accepting that they are a good thing.
Hilly, you know that journalists as a whole are NOT part of any conspiracy.

As for the rest, you could try using a calculator and doing some sums. I have, and worked out that the continual "spraying" of a monomolecular coating of Welsbach materials over the Earth (for instance - a la Edward Teller) is beyond anyone's means (as well as poisonous).

Salter's trimarans and ocean seeding will both work. The second conscripts life processes, and you will remember that it was those processes that formed our atmosphere in the first place.

So geo-engineering is not necessarily a bad idea, and yes, it is quite likely we WILL HAVE TO DO A BIT OF IT. There is such a delay in global warming processes that it is unclear whether we have ALREADY passed a tipping point.

Ocean seeding is exactly analogous to land farming. At present, fish stocks are 20% of what they were a hundred years ago. Such "geoengineering" is a path to their recovery.

It is about time Man gardened the whole Earth.

It IS Eden.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn explains the whole Global Warming aka Climate Change scam icosaface 3 2,062 05-11-2012, 02:17 PM
Last Post: CharliePrime
  Warmlist - A Complete List of Things Caused By Global Warming / Climate Change SerialExpLain 32 6,909 11-16-2011, 06:13 AM
Last Post: icosaface
  HAARP-The Military Pandora's Box-Electromagnetic Manipulation of the Earth's Climate h3rm35 0 2,071 03-03-2010, 10:34 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Top climate change adviser calls for honesty from scientists in global warming debate TriWooOx 0 658 01-27-2010, 08:24 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  UN climate panel incorrectly linked global warming to rise in natural disasters TriWooOx 0 675 01-24-2010, 03:44 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  UN climate body admits 'mistake' on Himalayan glaciers TriWooOx 1 1,047 01-21-2010, 09:30 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Copenhagen climate conference: Nick Griffin calls world leaders mass murderers TriWooOx 3 1,100 12-16-2009, 09:25 AM
Last Post: humbug
Rainbow Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and Climate Change plasticfan 0 1,438 12-08-2009, 05:47 PM
Last Post: plasticfan
  Does having children contribute to climate change? drummer 1 764 11-19-2009, 05:48 AM
Last Post: hilly7
  Wealthy countries sabotaging climate talks, China says --- 0 573 10-11-2009, 12:44 AM
Last Post: ---

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)