Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
02-20-2014, 09:41 AM,
#1
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Just found this while searching stuff on Canada's common law "rights". Since it doesn't appear to head any thread, I thought I'd post it here in case it's of interest.

Quote:The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.


Article 1.

- All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

- Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

- Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

- No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

- No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

- Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

- All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

- Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

- Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

- (1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
- (2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

- No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

- (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
- (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

- (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
- (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

- (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
- (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

- (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
- (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
- (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

- (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
- (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

- Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

- Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

- (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
- (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

- (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
- (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
- (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

- Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

- (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
- (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
- (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
- (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

- Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

- (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
- (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

- (1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
- (2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
- (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

- (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
- (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

- Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

- (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
- (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
- (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

- Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

From: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-20-2014, 11:47 AM,
#2
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
A quite brilliant new article from Mary Croft on the topic:

Let’s NOT “give peace a chance”
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=425

Excerpt:
Quote:As we now see that there is only statute (codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, bylaws, acts, bills, legislations, constitutions, policies, charters, and treaties) which serves only to restrict our Natural, God-given Birth-Rights, then Statute must apply to something other than man. Statutes apply only to NAMES.



Over the years, we have all vacillated on “who owns the name?”. It’s been the prime question: how did thugs come to believe they have authority over us? Answer: someone, whom they believe has authority over them, told them, and they foolishly believed it.



We know it is via the NAME. They create debt in OUR Name, and are holding us as surety, but the eternal question is, how did they manage to get what they believe to be the right to do this? We all know about the birth certificate is backed by a bond and that the NAME on the BC is what is charged, for the benefit of the public, not us, and then we are made liable for a debt we did not create. Not only that but also no debt could possibly exist, if all debts and charges were handled properly, i.e.: via offset and discharge, respectively.



The NAME was made into a legal fiction, called a “person”, to which all statute applies. NOT ONE Statute applies to “man”. In only a few acts/codes, is there any definition for person, and NONE for man or woman. In the BC Motor Vehicle Act the word person is mentioned over 1200 times; in Alberta’s Traffic Safety Act, the word person is mentioned 938 times, however, in the list of 49 definitions, “person” is not defined. Since “person” is to whom the entire Act applies, logic dictates that the word would be defined, if obfuscation were not the motive for the deliberate omission.



If any man or woman (“man”) chooses to identify himself with a NAME which is, again, somehow, under the control of the province/state, whether upon demand or under threat, intimidation, coercion, or even voluntarily, then all 100 million statutes apply to him, yet, if he is smart enough not to identify with a legal fiction/person/NAME on the BC, then, only Natural Law applies to him.



Our holding the BC proves that only we have a right to use the name. No one can use our (or our parents’) intellectual property without our consent and, since the public has, indeed, used it for their unjust enrichment, it was fraud because their access to the name came only from having deceived and coerced our parents into signing over the name, and intimidating us into obtaining and paying for unnecessary documents. This is extortion, all in order to defraud us of our labour. The main issue is that there was no full disclosure. If only the agent, at the hospital had said, “We’re going to set up a trust, in your child’s name, making him the beneficiary, so that any debt he incurs, will be offset as soon as he signs, because he is entitled to his share of Canada’s value (GNP). But, any sane parent, used to the old way –prior to the bankruptcy of 1933-34– of having to pay debts with cash, would ask, “What’s the catch?” Due to the fraud, undertaken when parents are not in a state of mind to handle this type of situation, our use of the NAME causes them to think we are the trustees and liable for the accounting, and they made sure that we cannot access the credit of the trust, in order to do so. So, we had better be very careful not to identify with the name/trusteeship, until we gain control.



From Salhany’s Police Manual: “Refusal of Citizen to Identify Self: The common law does not require a citizen to identify himself or carry identification of any sort. Therefore, while it may be the mark of a good citizen to identify himself when asked to do so, a police officer must not use force to compel someone to identify himself when he refuses; otherwise, he will be guilty of criminal assault and be liable to vicil damages.”



No officer has the right to demand identification from any man, unless said officer is witness to a breach of common law. This does not mean statute; it means: if there is an injury to a man or damage to his property. Otherwise, officers have the right to request identification, but not demand it. An officer can charge only a NAME so, without that information, a man is not subject to charges under statute. Since everything, including theft, assault, and murder are under statute, you can see that no man is subject to charges of statute. Your question ought to be: so, how can a victim of such crimes obtain justice?



As all alleged provincial/state courts operate under statute, and no man can be charged under statute, unless he actively consents or reluctantly acquiesces or tacitly agrees, then, the only way to seek justice is to take the offender into civil court under common law jurisdiction. No man is permitted in any other court and no court has jurisdiction over man.
Reply
02-20-2014, 02:19 PM,
#3
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Positive rights. The UN actually based their Charter on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

(09-20-2010, 02:21 PM)FastTadpole Wrote: In a culture of limited thought policy can be formed with little resistance to it. How about a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the American CONstitution or the Civil Rights Bill saying we are only free to do this rather than we have unlimited freedoms to do what we want except for infringing on another person's liberties and then defining what encompasses that. How did we agree to something like that that defines what we can do on a single page or document? How are we even ruled by a document? Law is a beast that keeps getting bigger too but that is another story altogether. Positive rights are a clever, subversive way to limit what we are allowed to do. Not only by way of laying down barriers to thought but in deterring action as well via enforcement.
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
02-21-2014, 06:46 AM,
#4
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The trick is to NOT give up one's natural identity to anyone whatsoever. This is part and parcel of not submitting to the will of others, most of whom seem to not give two shits about anyone but themselves anyway. These "rights" systems are best used to educate people on common law rights rather than submission to "allowances" by alleged authorities. The next step is to understand the nature, and subsequently the spirit, behind common law, because it rules over all else.

I haven't seen any proof that a "birth certificate" gives one a "right" to use a name. It's not even legal identification. All it is is proof that the name, birth, and other vital statistics were registered with a government entity. Names are nothing but identifiers. I answer to a handful of names under various circumstances, and there is nothing stating I cannot do as such. They are just identifiers. They hold no power in and of themselves.

It seems Mary's mixing up fact and fiction. The last couple of paragraphs detailing officer rights in common law appear accurate.
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-21-2014, 02:16 PM,
#5
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
well, in Germany we actually have a law (or should I say statute?) claiming that the state holds the (legal) title on the NAME. This leaves us only with the right of use. And the process of registering the birth seems the logical act, which establishes this transaction. But since the name becomes a financial instrument, a legal fiction, by this process, it leaves us with two entities of the same name. The flesh and blood man with pre-constitutional rights and the legal fiction strictly under rules and regulations. The first entity HAS a person, the second IS a person... the question is which person/title do we use along the way.
But you're right, thokling, there has been no disclosure that registering a birth establishes a new legal entity or that it is an exchange of titles. To me this process is "de facto" but not "de jure", or simply put: fraud!
Reply
02-21-2014, 04:41 PM,
#6
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(02-21-2014, 02:16 PM)Krise Wrote: well, in Germany we actually have a law (or should I say statute?) claiming that the state holds the (legal) title on the NAME. This leaves us only with the right of use. And the process of registering the birth seems the logical act, which establishes this transaction. But since the name becomes a financial instrument, a legal fiction, by this process, it leaves us with two entities of the same name. The flesh and blood man with pre-constitutional rights and the legal fiction strictly under rules and regulations. The first entity HAS a person, the second IS a person... the question is which person/title do we use along the way.
But you're right, thokling, there has been no disclosure that registering a birth establishes a new legal entity or that it is an exchange of titles. To me this process is "de facto" but not "de jure", or simply put: fraud!

That's the way it seems to work here in Canada. Two entities, the "natural person" (flesh and blood) and the "artificial person" (legal fictional entity), operate separately. One can choose whether to act as the legal person (carrying the title with less liability) or the common law person (no title but more freedom and likewise more responsibility).

Now, I'm not certain that there hasn't been any disclosure, at least over here, because it's all published and open for review by anyone regardless of their citizenship. The problem is the masses have got it into their heads, due to the posturing of politicos and corporates, that the aforenoted entities are masters of our dominion. But governments are supposed to place high value on the wellbeing of people. And, in this sense, fraud has definitely been committed by not being more open to people.

All in the name of people with titles gaining some extra thick wallets.
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-26-2014, 01:34 PM,
#7
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Dean Clifford: Birth Certificate is a class of person



Published on Feb 22, 2014
The certificate of birth is a class of person, entirely statutory in nature, it is a rank.
Governed entirely by the jurisdiction of its creation, being statues.
You now have the ability to join the great game and all the fun associated with it, "society".
The legal person, persona, or legal identity which you have the right or the option of you being recognised under when playing their game of commerce. But it is not the only game in town but it is a game they created and seems to be the dominate one at the moment.
It is no different as a certificate in a particular trade in which you are deemed competent in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cD9WKfggF6s
Reply
02-27-2014, 03:25 AM,
#8
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Thanks a lot for that post, Krise. It brings more of the perspective I'm seeking into view now. Not much more, since I still find my head aching after deciphering some of the information, but the idea of "jurisdiction" still seems to apply which suggests it's the cornerstone of how all of this works.

I finished watching Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 1 FULL - 2011 and I'm going to be downloading more videos to upload them. They're chock full of data, including the notion that most of this falls under Trust Law. Courts apparently operate within the trustee/beneficiary/executor model, and our power within court is to replace the paradigm court operators attempt to establish with the one we're willing to work from. This apparently takes away their power entirely by simply changing the jurisdiction.

I've had to make quite a few assumptions so far about this because I still find myself unable to grasp a basic premise of all of this beyond considering it under Trust Law. So the more data, the better.

In short, Dean Clifford brings a "fresh" face to all of this.

I'm currently downloading the remainder of his "Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them" full series videos and I'll be uploading them to ConCen shortly. Those who are impatient can view them at YouTube as follows:

Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 1 FULL - 2011
Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 2 FULL - 2011
Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 3 FULL - 2011
Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 4 FULL - 2011
Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 5 FULL - 2011
Dean Clifford - Your Rights, Trusts, and how to enforce them. Series 6 FULL - 2011
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-27-2014, 02:00 PM,
#9
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
yes, thokling, "Your Rights, Trusts, and how to..." gives a lot of insight in how they play the game... It has been a little revelation to me, too. But the story is incomplete (and therefore dangerous) without the knowledge presented in his "Both Sides Of The Story" lecture (posted in the "Sovereign Citizens"-thread). I guess you already watched it!?! Combined it gives a pretty good overview of the matrix and how to position yourself in it (or rather: outside of it).
Additionally you might wanna check out his interviews on "My private Audio" -> http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Dean-Clifford.html (usually you can skip the first 10 minutes or so, -most of the times they suffer from technical glitches, connection problems and t'ing :-)). Here it gets more practical, due to incoming calls from people with concrete problems... keep in mind that Dean also learned more over the last years, so the later the interviews, the more reliable.
Reply
02-27-2014, 05:39 PM,
#10
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Much obliged. And, yes, he's been involved in this long enough that he's had the opportunity to test his theories and get results. So his later works are definitely more reliable.

Edit: I've been perusing https://worldfreemansociety.org/ a bit. I've decided to create a Speed Dial page for common law and the freeman movement.

Edit edit: This looks to help explain the idea of a "birth certificate", which has been covered by other sources (Dean Clifford included if I'm not mistaken):

From https://worldfreemansociety.org/do-you-consent/ :

Quote:Since the “New Deal” Social Security Act (1933), and the Securities and Exchange Act (1934), systems of Social Security, Social Welfare, Birth Certificate registration, and central bank monitors, have been introduced throughout all Chapter 11 bankrupt nations.

Known as the “New Deal” in the United States, and Social Welfare in Commonwealth nations, the “deal” gave public “benefits”, “privileges”, and “debt”, to the people, in exchange for their private “rights”, “freedoms”, and their lifelong “credit” (labour and property).

When a baby is born, the hospital sends the original of the “record of live birth” (not a copy) to the government, which creates a Birth Certificate Bond by claiming the legal title of the baby’s Estate, later appearing as a legal fiction name, i.e. JOHN DOE. This bond is registered as a Security, which the Treasury uses as Surety for new Treasury securities such as Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills.

As was planned, men and women provide their “commercial value” to the financial masters of the state via the artificial “legal person”created on the Birth Certificate.

The public “registration” of the Given name with the family name creates an artificial “legal personality” administered by the State, so anyone who is unaware of this mirroring device will unwittingly “act” as a “legal person” transferring their “commercial value” to the State. This “transmitting utility” is called a “straw man.”

The article is rather lengthy, and I recommend users spend some time studying it for the sole purpose of information gathering. By no means should we rely on a single source of data, but rather aggregate data from sources to figure out, for and by each of us individually, how things work.

It looks like everything, including common law, is based on trust law, so I'll be focusing some of my attention on that just to get another perspective.

Edit: Uploading the aforenoted series now. It's available at: http://concen.org/tracker/torrents-details.php?id=35351
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-28-2014, 11:45 AM,
#11
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(02-27-2014, 05:39 PM)thokling Wrote: Edit edit: This looks to help explain the idea of a "birth certificate", which has been covered by other sources (Dean Clifford included if I'm not mistaken):

From https://worldfreemansociety.org/do-you-consent/ :

yep, a good summery! Good to give away to friends and family!

upps, the link has crashed:
Quote:Table './freeman_jpf8/jpf8_session' is marked as crashed and should be repaired SQL=INSERT INTO `jpf8_session` (`session_id`, `client_id`, `time`) VALUES ('0510b4d934c8a74be043282f3dccfa0e', 0, '1393583757')

Here's another:
http://freedomriver.wordpress.com/do-you-consent/
As PDF:
http://freedomriver.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/do-you-consent3.pdf
Reply
02-28-2014, 02:16 PM,
#12
RE: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
For various reasons (usually system was improperly shut down), MySQL tables can crash and require repairing. I've had this happen only once on a system (the host's fault) and it was fairly easy to repair. Journalling filesystems help keep it from happening, but it's still not impossible.

Now it's throwing up a "Database connection error (2): Could not connect to MySQL." message. This isn't difficult: just stop the daemon, repair the table, and start the daemon. But that's what they pay techs to do.

Nice catches on the copies, Krise. Much obliged for those.
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Natural Rights? macfadden 9 1,662 01-19-2013, 12:18 AM
Last Post: macfadden
  Will US Patent Office end gene patent enslavement of the human race? h3rm35 1 866 11-02-2010, 11:04 AM
Last Post: Mami
  Obama reports Arizona to the UN as a human rights violator plasticfan 0 695 08-31-2010, 08:53 PM
Last Post: plasticfan
  Iconoclast Radio Interviews - James: Your Rights In Court SolidSWARM 0 635 04-23-2010, 01:10 AM
Last Post: SolidSWARM
  Canadian Hate speech law unconstitutional: rights tribunal yeti 5 1,602 09-12-2009, 11:59 AM
Last Post: Hans Olo
  Girl's forced blood transfusion didn't violate rights: top court plasticfan 0 740 08-28-2009, 08:11 PM
Last Post: plasticfan
  Individual Rights Versus Collectivist Rights Skinski7 6 1,497 04-09-2007, 06:18 AM
Last Post: harmonius
  Senator Introduces Bill To Criminalize Human Microchipping pizzaman777 4 1,174 02-17-2007, 01:34 PM
Last Post: whitesand
  Water Rights In Usa Skinski7 2 1,204 10-13-2006, 04:36 AM
Last Post: tsoldrin
  Water Rights In Australia, My Commentary Skinski7 0 718 10-12-2006, 09:15 PM
Last Post: Skinski7

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)