Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
09-21-2013, 04:05 PM,
#1
Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
WorldNetDaily Exclusive

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions
Published: 01/14/2010 at 12:30 AM

Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.

In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama’s regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban “conspiracy theorizing.”

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate “extremists who supply conspiracy theories” to disrupt the efforts of the “extremists” to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, “What can government do about conspiracy theories?”

“We can readily imagine a series of possible responses. (1) Government might ban conspiracy theorizing. (2) Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories.”

In the 30-page paper – obtained and reviewed by WND – Sunstein argues the best government response to “conspiracy theories” is “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups.”

Continued Sunstein: “We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”

Read more about Cass Sunstein’s agenda in “Shut Up, America!: The End of Free Speech”

Sunstein said government agents “might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”

Sunstein defined a conspiracy theory as “an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”

Some “conspiracy theories” recommended for ban by Sunstein include:

“The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.”

“The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
“The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile.”
“The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy.”
“That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents.”
“The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred.”

Sunstein allowed that “some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true.”

He continued: “The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s,
the CIA did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of ‘mind control.’”

Sunstein’s paper advocating against the belief that global warming is a deliberate fraud was written before November’s climate scandal in which e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University in the U.K. indicate top climate researchers conspired to rig data and keep researchers with dissenting views from publishing in leading scientific journals.

Sunstein: Ban ‘right wing’ rumors

Sunstein’s paper is not the first time he has advocated banning the free flow of information.

WND reported that in a recently released book, “On Rumors,” Sunstein argued websites should be obliged to remove “false rumors” while libel laws should be altered to make it easier to sue for spreading such “rumors.”

In the 2009 book, Sunstein cited as a primary example of “absurd” and “hateful” remarks, reports by “right-wing websites” alleging an association between President Obama and Weatherman terrorist William Ayers.

He also singled out radio talker Sean Hannity for “attacking” Obama regarding the president’s “alleged associations.”

Ayers became a name in the 2008 presidential campaign when it was disclosed he worked closely with Obama for years. Obama also was said to have launched his political career at a 1995 fundraiser in Ayers’ apartment.

‘New Deal Fairness Doctrine’

WND also previously reported Sunstein drew up a “First Amendment New Deal” – a new “Fairness Doctrine” that would include the establishment of a panel of “nonpartisan experts” to ensure “diversity of view” on the airwaves.

Sunstein compared the need for the government to regulate broadcasting to the moral obligation the U.S. had to impose new rules that outlawed segregation.

Sunstein’s radical proposal, set forth in his 1993 book “The Partial Constitution,” received no news media attention and scant scrutiny until the WND report.

In the book, Sunstein outwardly favors and promotes the “Fairness Doctrine,” the abolished FCC policy that required holders of broadcast licenses to present controversial issues of public importance in a manner the government deemed “equitable and balanced.”

Sunstein introduces what he terms his “First Amendment New Deal” to regulate broadcasting in the U.S.

His proposal, which focuses largely on television, includes a government requirement that “purely commercial stations provide financial subsidies to public television or to commercial stations that agree to provide less profitable but high-quality programming.”

Sunstein wrote it is “worthwhile to consider more dramatic approaches as well.”

He proposes “compulsory public-affairs programming, right of reply, content review by nonpartisan experts or guidelines to encourage attention to public issues and diversity of view.”

The Obama czar argues his regulation proposals for broadcasting are actually presented within the spirit of the Constitution.

“It seems quite possible that a law that contained regulatory remedies would promote rather than undermine the ‘freedom of speech,’” he writes.

Writes Sunstein: “The idea that government should be neutral among all forms of speech seems right in the abstract, but as frequently applied it is no more plausible than the idea that it should be neutral between the associational interests of blacks and those of whites under conditions of segregation.”

Sunstein contends the landmark case that brought about the Fairness Doctrine, Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, “stresses not the autonomy of broadcasters (made possible only by current ownership rights), but instead the need to promote democratic self-government by ensuring that people are presented with a broad range of views about public issues.”

He continues: “In a market system, this goal may be compromised. It is hardly clear that ‘the freedom of speech’ is promoted by a regime in which people are permitted to speak only if other people are willing to pay enough to allow them to be heard.”

In his book, Sunstein slams the U.S. courts’ unwillingness to “require something like a Fairness Doctrine” to be a result of “the judiciary’s lack of democratic pedigree, lack of fact-finding powers and limited remedial authority.”

He clarifies he is not arguing the government should be free to regulate broadcasting however it chooses.

“Regulation designed to eliminate a particular viewpoint would of course be out of bounds. All viewpoint discrimination would be banned,” Sunstein writes.

But, he says, “at the very least, regulative ‘fairness doctrines’ would raise no real doubts” constitutionally.

http://www.wnd.com/2010/01/121884/
One of the first duties of the physician is to educate the masses not to take medicine...
William Osler
Reply
09-21-2013, 04:23 PM,
#2
RE: Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
Interesting paper. Thanks man!

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1084585
Reply
09-21-2013, 04:32 PM,
#3
RE: Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
This 2010 paper is now being put into practice, somewhat..

Quote:“9/11 Conspiracy Theorists” Categorized as Terrorists: F.B.I. Calls Half of US Population with “9/11 Doubts” Potential Terrorists
By Ralph Lopez
Global Research, September 20, 2013

The FBI is instructing local police departments and “communities against terrorism” to consider anyone who harbors “conspiracy theories” about 9/11 to be a potential terrorist, in a circular released to local police departments.

The memo thus adds 9/11-official-story skeptics to a growing list of targets described by federal law enforcement to be security threats, such as those who express “libertarian philosophies,” “Second Amendment-oriented views,” interest in “self-sufficiency,” “fears of Big Brother or big government,” and “Declarations of Constitutional rights and civil liberties.”

A newly released national poll shows that 48 percent of Americans either have some doubts about the official account of 9/11, or do not believe it at all. The FBI circular entitled “Potential Indicators of Terrorist Activities Related to Sleepers” says that people who should be ‘considered suspicious’ of possible involvement in “terrorist activity” include those who hold the “attitude” described as ” Conspiracy theories about Westerners.” The circular continues: “e.g. (sic) the CIA arranged for 9/11 to legitimize the invasion of foreign lands.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-conspiracy-theorists-categorized-as-terrorists-f-b-i-calls-half-of-us-population-with-911-doubts-potential-terrorists/5350657
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/358624#ixzz2fRd8oH1b

Related:

Ridiculous DHS list: You might be a domestic terrorist if...
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/ridiculous-dhs-list-you-might-be-domestic-ter

Obama Staffer Calls for “Cognitive Infiltration” of ” 9/11 Conspiracy Groups”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-staffer-calls-for-cognitive-infiltration-of-9-11-conspiracy-groups/17302
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
09-23-2013, 01:28 AM,
#4
RE: Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'
watch out... Zionists do not play nice...
Unite The Many, defeat the few.

Revolution is for the love of your people, culture, knowledge, wisdom, spirit, and peace. Not Greed!
Soul Rebel Native Son


http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=277...enous&hl=en
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Another so called "Conspiracy Theory" JFK 3 542 07-01-2014, 03:21 AM
Last Post: JFK
  Black Panthers Condemn Obama mexika 3 603 04-24-2014, 03:03 AM
Last Post: Watchdog
  Obama’s DHS Activating National License Plate Tracking Database mexika 0 311 02-15-2014, 01:25 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Congress: Obama Must Answer for NSA Abuses mexika 0 384 08-27-2013, 08:48 PM
Last Post: mexika
  Former U.S. Prosecutor Sues Obama and NSA over PRISM Scandal thokling 7 1,054 06-12-2013, 09:58 PM
Last Post: SiLVa
  Time Warner Deletes Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura Facebook Page Gzenum 2 610 02-01-2013, 04:18 PM
Last Post: Watchdog
  Obama gives himself control of all communication systems in America TriWooOx 1 547 07-10-2012, 04:08 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
Exclamation Obama to hand Commerce Dept. authority over cybersecurity ID Dunamis 0 488 01-30-2011, 03:23 AM
Last Post: Dunamis
  Obama proposal--Internet ID to be assigned to all Americans? solar 1 677 01-09-2011, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Umbrellaman
  Obama Demands Access to Internet Records, in Secret, and Without Court Review h3rm35 0 546 08-16-2010, 06:33 PM
Last Post: h3rm35

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)