Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Instagram seeks right to sell access to photos to advertisers
12-18-2012, 11:16 PM,
#1
Instagram seeks right to sell access to photos to advertisers
Quote:Facebook's photo-sharing site Instagram has updated its privacy policy giving it the right to sell users' photos to advertisers without notification.

Unless users delete their Instagram accounts by a deadline of 16 January, they cannot opt out.

The changes also mean Instagram can share information about its users with Facebook, its parent company, as well as other affiliates and advertisers.

The move riled social media users, with one likening it to a "suicide note".

The new policies follow Facebook's record $1bn (£616m; 758 euro) acquisition of Instagram in April.

Facebook's vice-president of global marketing solutions Carolyn Everson earlier this month had said: "Eventually we'll figure out a way to monetise Instagram."

A notice updating the privacy policy on the Instagram site said: "We may share your information as well as information from tools like cookies, log files, and device identifiers and location data with organisations that help us provide the service to you... (and) third-party advertising partners."

"To help us deliver interesting paid or sponsored content or promotions, you agree that a business may pay us to display your username, likeness, photos, in connection with paid or sponsored content or promotions, without any compensation to you," it said in its terms of use.

But Instagram said that its aim was to make it easier to work with Facebook.

"This means we can do things like fight spam more effectively, detect system and reliability problems more quickly, and build better features for everyone by understanding how Instagram is used," it said in a statement.
'Suicide note'

However, the updated policy will not change how it handles photo ownership or who is able to see a user's pictures, it added.

But the new policy has triggered a backlash among social media users, with some threatening to quit.

One user tweeted: "Good bye #instagram. Your new terms of service are totally stupid and nonsense. Good luck playing with the big boys."

New York-based photographer Clayton Cubbit wrote on his account that the new policy was "Instagram's suicide note".

Analysts said that the new policies could deal a blow to Facebook's reputation and alienate some users.

Richard Holway, chairman of TechMarketView, said: "Every time Facebook has altered their privacy policy it has led to a backlash and they've been forced to retreat. They tamper with people's privacy at a cost. People are very upset."

Alan Pelz-Sharpe, research director at 451 Research, added: "It's a barefaced tactic that Facebook and Instagram have taken, and one that will likely meet with many challenges, legally and ethically.

"The fact is that Facebook has critical mass, and is quite confident that such moves may cause uproar, but not a flight of business.

"Larger firms like Facebook are essentially trailblazing before specific regulations can catch up with them, and as we have seen with Google in the past, regulations and laws have limited real impact on their business operations - so they tend to move forward regardless of opposition."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20767537
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast
Reply
12-19-2012, 01:00 AM,
#2
RE: Instagram seeks right to sell access to photos to advertisers
however....................
Slashdot Wrote:we discussed news that Instagram introduced a new version of their Privacy Policy and Terms of Service that will take effect in thirty days. The changes seemed to allow Instagram to sell users' photos, and many users were upset. Instagram now says 'it is not our intention to sell your photos' and that 'users own their content and Instagram does not claim any ownership rights over your photos.' This is good news for Instagram users." And so closes another chapter of "We Let Lawyers Write a Legal Document and The Internet Freaked Out."
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/12/18/2247241/instagram-we-wont-sell-your-photos?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
[Image: siolflag.gif]
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  iPhone Tracks Users' Movements, Email, Photos, GPS Coordinates TriWooOx 11 5,367 04-23-2013, 05:37 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Border Agency could have access to email, internet and text data under new law TriWooOx 0 476 11-01-2012, 03:40 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Taking photos of clouds earns Texas man a visit from the FBI h3rm35 0 308 10-09-2012, 10:36 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Home Office seeks £12.8m facial recognition system TriWooOx 0 348 06-18-2012, 10:35 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Concen blocking proxy access to forum peragrate 4 734 03-21-2012, 10:46 AM
Last Post: peragrate
  ACLU Seeks Details on US Government Mobile Phone Tracking R.R 0 474 08-07-2011, 06:31 PM
Last Post: R.R
  Google to build profiles of Gmail users for advertisers R.R 0 419 04-01-2011, 06:30 AM
Last Post: R.R
  F.B.I. Seeks Wider Wiretap Law for Web TriWooOx 0 469 11-17-2010, 09:06 AM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Lawful access legislation would reshape Canada’s Internet h3rm35 0 438 11-16-2010, 03:16 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Obama Demands Access to Internet Records, in Secret, and Without Court Review h3rm35 0 528 08-16-2010, 06:33 PM
Last Post: h3rm35

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)