Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Email Inbox Not Private, Says South Carolina Court
10-16-2012, 05:13 PM,
#1
Email Inbox Not Private, Says South Carolina Court
Quote:The South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled a man’s privacy was not violated when his wife’s daughter-in-law managed to get into his email and find out the name of his lover because the messages remained in his inbox.

In their unanimous ruling, the justices decided the woman did not violate a 1986 federal law about email storage and ruled a lawsuit from the husband could not go forward.

But the justices also pointed out that just because they ruled the woman didn’t violate the husband’s privacy, it didn’t mean they liked what she did.

“This should in no way be read as condoning her behavior,” Associate Justice Kaye Hearn wrote in her opinion.

The case started when M. Lee Jennings’ wife found a card for flowers for another woman in his car. He admitted he was in love with the other woman, but would not give her name.

Jennings’ wife turned to Holly Broome, who was married to her son from a previous marriage. Broome once worked for Jennings and was able to guess the answer to his security question and access his email. She printed out the emails between Jennings and the other woman, giving copies to his wife’s divorce attorney and a private investigator.

Broome’s lawyer said it wasn’t a good idea to go snooping in the email, but he is glad the Supreme Court interpreted the law the way it was written.

“All she was trying to do was help her mother-in-law and it blew up in her face,” attorney Gary Popwell Jr. said. “She’s now had to spend all this time worrying.”

Jennings’ lawyer did not return a message seeking comment.

The justices wrote three separate opinions, but all pointed out how a 26-year-old law written when email was in its infancy is a hard guide to use for today.

The Stored Communication Act makes a hazy distinction between obtaining emails that have not been read or messages that have been read and stored elsewhere versus emails that have been read and remain in an inbox.

Nearly all 14 pages of the Supreme Court’s ruling deals with trying to sort out those distinctions with a law that reads in part: “Electronic mail is a form of communication by which private correspondence is transmitted over public and private telephone lines … if the addressee is not a subscriber to the service, the electronic mail company can put the message onto paper and then deposit it in the normal postal system.”

The act “is ill-fitted to address many modern day issues, but it is this Court’s duty to interpret, not to legislate,” Chief Justice Jean Toal wrote in her own opinion.

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/southeast/2012/10/15/266433.htm
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast
Reply
10-16-2012, 06:00 PM,
#2
RE: Email Inbox Not Private, Says South Carolina Court
This ruling wouldn't last 10 seconds in Canada.
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Microsoft charges the FBI $50 for a copy of your private data, claim 'Redmond hackers 4cc 4 680 03-24-2014, 01:51 AM
Last Post: 4cc
  If You Used This Secure Webmail Site, the FBI Has Your Inbox temp9 2 348 01-30-2014, 06:23 PM
Last Post: oteca676
  CIA-Funded Software Company Manages Private Data For Healthcare.gov mexika 0 348 10-25-2013, 09:53 PM
Last Post: mexika
  Lawsuits & Court Rulings Spark Racial Profiling Reform mexika 0 260 10-11-2013, 08:13 PM
Last Post: mexika
  iPhone Tracks Users' Movements, Email, Photos, GPS Coordinates TriWooOx 11 5,377 04-23-2013, 05:37 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Border Agency could have access to email, internet and text data under new law TriWooOx 0 477 11-01-2012, 03:40 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Phone and email records to be stored in new spy plan TriWooOx 3 700 03-22-2012, 08:29 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Right to private life 'at risk’ in plan to store DNA of innocent people TriWooOx 3 969 10-07-2011, 05:06 PM
Last Post: Armilus
  India urged to implement court ban of anti-Maoist militias R.R 0 423 07-07-2011, 05:18 PM
Last Post: R.R
  People get power to take CCTV abusers to court TriWooOx 3 850 02-12-2011, 03:22 AM
Last Post: Dunamis

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)