Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
10-17-2012, 01:33 PM,
#16
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-17-2012, 04:40 AM)Negentropic Wrote: What's wrong with 'prejudice' when it's justified by facts and general statistics ? At that point 'prejudice' becomes rational 'self defense,' does it not ?
Do you know what the word prejudice means?

It seems not.
Reply
10-17-2012, 04:04 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-18-2012, 08:35 PM by CharliePrime.)
#17
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
************* EDITED ************

Quote of Negra's single post containing 33 hyperlinks, 19 text quotes, 5 YouTube videos, and 4 image files edited per mod command.

*********************************
Reply
10-17-2012, 04:08 PM,
#18
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-17-2012, 04:04 PM)CharliePrime Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:40 AM)Negentropic Wrote: [hundreds of lines deleted]
No.

You quoted all that crap just to say no? Do you have that little respect for the other members of ConCen?
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply
10-17-2012, 04:41 PM,
#19
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-17-2012, 04:08 PM)yeti Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:04 PM)CharliePrime Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:40 AM)Negentropic Wrote: [hundreds of lines deleted]
No.

You quoted all that crap just to say no? Do you have that little respect for the other members of ConCen?

Is there something wrong with posting hundreds and hundreds of lines?
Reply
10-17-2012, 05:42 PM,
#20
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-17-2012, 04:41 PM)CharliePrime Wrote: Is there something wrong with posting hundreds and hundreds of lines?

Why are you asking me such a stupid question? I'm referring to you quoting hundreds of lines merely to answer with the word "no". Nice try though...

You should edit your post so that:
  1. We don't have to scroll through what we've already seen
  2. We can better understand what you're specifically saying no to
You'll feel better later.
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply
10-17-2012, 06:58 PM,
#21
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
Quote:Is there something wrong with posting hundreds and hundreds of lines?
Yes - because its extremely tedious.
Quotes are only needed to remind the reader of the particular section, point or comment you are replying to, it is safe to assume that the reader does not need you to post everything again as, surprise surprise, ....they have already read it! Duh!
Remember you are unique
...just like everyone else.
Reply
10-18-2012, 01:03 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-01-2012, 06:52 AM by Negentropic.)
#22
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
Quote: flamesong wrote:

Do you know what the word prejudice means?

It seems not.

Like I wrote in the other thread you posted on. The dictionary definition of a word is often a way to pervert and police your thinking. They try to keep people from their natural right to rational generalizations by using this term pre-judice.

You can use the term POST-judice for what I'm describing if you don't want to use 'rational pre-judice'

Now you would think that post-judice should be a word you can use to describe a 'rational generalization' if you can't say prejudice, right ?

Wrong. Not if you go to Wikipedia's Tel Aviv located servers for your info

They have already made sure of that by defining Post-Judice as yet another type of evil 'prejudice' as well and therefore it's a big No-No for decent human beings to use this term to get back their mental freedom.

postjudice (plural postjudices)
1.A prejudice or bias acquired after the fact, or after a given event.

So according to these assholes at wikipedia there CANNOT be such a thing as a rational generalization. It's always a 'prejudice or bias.' Screw them and the horse they rode in on.


The more accurate de-fini-tion can be found at Urban dictionary:

postjudice = Not liking a person or group with a good reason. A rational generalization.

Example: After spending a year working with mechanics, i became postjudiced against them, and did not trust mechanics
Reply
10-18-2012, 01:58 AM, (This post was last modified: 10-23-2012, 12:35 AM by Negentropic.)
#23
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-17-2012, 04:41 PM)CharliePrime Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:08 PM)yeti Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:04 PM)CharliePrime Wrote:
(10-17-2012, 04:40 AM)Negentropic Wrote: [hundreds of lines deleted]
No.

You quoted all that crap just to say no? Do you have that little respect for the other members of ConCen?

Is there something wrong with posting hundreds and hundreds of lines?

That wouldn't have worked for your little joke there would it ?

You had to repost that very long post so that you could ridicule it with that one word 'no' response.

Being cute is not always economical. That's why Charlie Prime should endeavor to be both 'cute' and economical next time.

Hey Yeti, please disregard my other post. I thought you were telling me to keep it down to a few lines. Read your response wrong. Temporary retard relapse.LOL



[Image: 599451_380485835350274_1239018663_n.jpg]
Reply
10-18-2012, 04:08 PM,
#24
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-18-2012, 01:58 AM)Negentropic Wrote: Being cute is not always economical.

Economical ?!?! ...from the guy who makes a single post containing 33 hyperlinks, 19 text quotes, 5 YouTube videos, and , 4 image files (I counted them) about Jewish Supremacism in a thread regarding a celebrity pedo!

OMG. You just made my morning.

Dude. This forum is not Reddit. People here have seen all these expositions of Jewish evil thousands of times. I was corresponding with Matt Hale while you were still in grade school.

It's GD rude and silly for you to keep wadding up threads with off-topic posts 18 screens long (and I run at screen resolution 1680x1050 !).

Please, show more respect for readers.
Reply
10-18-2012, 05:58 PM,
#25
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-18-2012, 04:08 PM)CharliePrime Wrote: It's GD rude and silly for you to keep wadding up threads with off-topic posts 18 screens long (and I run at screen resolution 1680x1050 !).

OK, so why did you quote his entire post for a 1 word reply, FFS?? I asked you to edit your post and you ignored me. Therefore you of all people have no right to criticize Negentropic's posts.

(10-18-2012, 04:08 PM)CharliePrime Wrote: Please, show more respect for readers.

Please take your own advice lest you look like a total hypocrite. Edit your post please. This is the 2nd and last time I'm asking you.
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply
10-18-2012, 09:21 PM,
#26
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
As I seem to be entangled in this slightly, I feel I should say something.

I still don't understand the meaning of CharliePrime's one word answer, 'no' (I don't know which question he was answering) but I think I understand the purpose of quoting the supertanker answer from Negentropic, it was, if I am not mistaken, making an ironic jab at the ridiculous length of the post - if not its irrelevance - and much as I think I disagree with CharliePrime on the substance of some of his posts on this topic, I don't think that he should be sanctioned for this; it constitutes a sense of humour failure. Sadly, I think that your last post, yeti, accusing CharliePrime of hypocrisy makes this quite apparent.

To me, the intention of the post seems glaringly obvious and I am only sorry that it needed to be pointed out.
Reply
10-18-2012, 09:50 PM,
#27
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
(10-18-2012, 09:21 PM)flamesong Wrote: I don't think that he should be sanctioned for this; it constitutes a sense of humour failure.

Indeed, it was a failure, but sanctions will not occur. If he won't edit his joke I'll just edit his post and put him on my shit list for the rest of his miserable life. LOL
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply
10-19-2012, 02:57 AM,
#28
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
Perversion Files: Decades of Scout Abuse Revealed
1:24am UK, Friday 19 October 2012
Decades worth of "perversion files" are published, showing how scoutmasters and authorities let sex abuse predators go free.

[Image: 116003702-1-522x293.jpg]
The alleged abuse took place during camping trips

Confidential papers showing US scout leaders covered up generations of alleged sexual abuse inflicted on their young members have been published.

The Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has released decades worth of so-called "perversion files", showing how a range of authorities - from police to church pastors - quietly allowed scoutmasters and others accused of molesting children to go free.

In many instances - more than a third, according to the Scouts' own count - police were not told about the reports of abuse. And even when they were, sometimes local law enforcement did nothing, seeking to protect the reputation of Scouting.

The Oregon Supreme Court ordered the papers, dating from 1959 to 1985 – and a handful from later years -to be released, despite objections played out in a lengthy legal battle from the Boy Scouts.

[Image: evs-xtaccess-2012-10-19-cam-a-23h56m07s07-1-522x293.jpg]
The boxes of newly released files containing allegations of sexual abuse

The 14,500 pages of confidential files, including handwritten notes, reveal details of alleged abuses by more than 1,200 scout leaders and other adults.

Officially called the Boy Scouts Ineligible Volunteer Files, some of the papers had been released previously, but others were made public for the first time.

In one case from the files, a distraught mother walked into a Louisiana sheriff's office in 1965 and said a 31-year-old scoutmaster had raped one of her sons and molested two others.

Six days later, the scoutmaster sat down in front of a microphone in the same station and confessed. He admitted to raping a 17-year-old boy on a camping trip and sexually molesting two other boys. The victims corroborated his confession.

"They just occurred," the scoutmaster said.

[Image: evs-xtaccess-2012-10-19-cam-b-22h11m26s22-1-522x293.jpg]
A boy scout statue outside the organisation's American HQ

Seven days later, the decision was made not to pursue charges against him.

The man "was asked to leave the parish, and if he was caught around or near any boy or youth organisation, he would be sent to state prison immediately", a Scouting executive wrote to national headquarters. "We are indeed sorry that Scouting was involved."

The files also show Scouting volunteers serving in the military overseas molesting American children living abroad and sometimes continuing to molest after returning to the States.

The lawyers who unveiled the files said BSA had not done enough to root out paedophiles using the youth movement to prey on minors.

"What these files represent is ... the pain and the anguish of thousands of scouts," said lawyer Paul Mones, while presenting details of the files at a press conference in the northwestern US city of Portland.

[Image: rtr39ava-1-522x293.jpg]
A Boy Scouts of America handbook

Mr Mones said the files "demonstrate the depth and breadth of the BSA's vast knowledge about the threats to scouts by scoutmasters and adult leaders who used their authority ... to sexually molest generations of boys".

The lawyers highlighted a 2010 court case, in which an assistant scoutmaster in a Mormon Church-sponsored troop sexually molested a boy in the 1980s.

The abuser involved had previously confessed to molesting 17 other boys in the troop, but was allowed to return to scouting within a few months and then found a new victim.

Responding to the release, BSA national leader Wayne Perry reiterated an apology to the victims.

He said: "There have been instances where people misused their positions ... to abuse children, and in certain cases, our response to these incidents and our efforts to protect youth were plainly insufficient, inappropriate or wrong.

[Image: rtr39av2-1-522x293.jpg]
The uniform worn by Boy Scouts of America

"Where those involved in Scouting failed to protect, or worse, inflicted harm on children, we extend our deepest and sincere apologies to victims and their families."

In a statement on its website, BSA also said it has improved its procedures to ensure safety, including now requiring background checks and formal training of its leaders.

But Mr Mones said the organisation, founded as part of the international Scouting Movement in 1910, has not done enough.

The BSA have "made some improvements, but we think there's more still to be done," said the lawyer, noting that on average each abuser typically molested between five and 25 scouts.

http://news.sky.com/story/999680/perversion-files-decades-of-scout-abuse-revealed
“Everything Popular Is Wrong” - Oscar Wilde
Reply
10-24-2012, 04:40 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-24-2012, 04:43 PM by drummer.)
#29
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
Was there a paedophile ring in No 10? MP Tom Watson demands probe.
WEDNESDAY 24 OCTOBER 2012

A powerful paedophile network may have operated in the UK with links to Parliament and Downing Street, a Labour MP said today.

Speaking at Prime Minister’s Questions, Tom Watson urged David Cameron to ensure that the allegation was properly investigated.

Mr Watson, who campaigned on the phone hacking scandal long before a new police inquiry was opened, said: “The evidence file used to convict paedophile Peter Righton, if it still exists, contains clear intelligence of a widespread paedophile ring.

“One of its members boasts of a link to a senior aide of a former prime minister, who says he could smuggle indecent images of children from abroad.”

He went on: “The leads were not followed up, but if the files still exist, I want to ensure that the Metropolitan Police secure the evidence, re-examine it, and investigate clear intelligence suggesting a powerful paedophile network linked to Parliament and Number 10.”

Mr Cameron, who had earlier spoken of Jimmy Savile’s “appalling” case, agreed to look into the claims.

He told the Labour MP: “You raise a very difficult and complex case and I’m not sure which former prime minister he is referring to. But what I would like to is to look very carefully in Hansard to the allegations you have made, the case that you have raised ... and to see what the Government can do to give you the assurances you seek.”

Earlier, Mr Cameron had said the police inquiry into Savile must find out how he had been allowed to abuse children for so long.

Criticising the BBC’s record on the TV presenter, the Prime Minister told the Commons: "These allegations do leave many institutions - perhaps particularly the BBC - with serious questions to answer - I think above all the question, 'How did he get away with this for so long?'.”

He added: "The most important thing is that the police investigation is properly resourced and is allowed to continue. I don't rule out further steps but we do now have independent investigations by the BBC, independent investigations into the NHS."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/was-there-a-paedophile-ring-in-no-10-mp-tom-watson-demands-probe-8224702.html

“Everything Popular Is Wrong” - Oscar Wilde
Reply
11-01-2012, 12:52 AM,
#30
RE: Jimmy Savile BBC Paedophile Sex Ring
I have re-uploaded this video to YouTube so that it can be embedded here; I hope nobody from YSTV will mind. I am extremely interested to know on what basis the allegations of paedophilia were made by the students involved in 1992 and I wonder if any of them, given what they were apparently studying, are now working in the media twenty years later.

Jim'll Sodomise You - YSTV 1992





From: http://ystv.co.uk/watch/1225

By the way, the description on the original page says, 'The idea being that Jim in this case would not fix it, and would thereby sodomise your ambitions (rather than literally sodomise you)'. This may have been the opinion of the person who posted the video in February 2011 but watching it, there are clear, unambiguous sexual references including, as mentioned, the allegation of paedophilia - at 2.50: 'They don't call me paedophile Savile here for nothing'.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)