Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What happened to global warming?
10-13-2009, 01:48 AM,
#1
What happened to global warming?
Anthropogenic Global Warming on the Rocks. Shaken and stirred?
Reply
10-14-2009, 08:57 AM,
#2
What happened to global warming?
It's getting colder, that's why the world savers changed their rhetoric to "climate change". That term is more neutral :rolleyes:
Reply
10-14-2009, 10:03 AM,
#3
What happened to global warming?
Digg Discussion:
http://digg.com/environment/Shock_BBC_Global_Warming_Honesty

I've noticed the trend of a lot of people are coming around to wake up to the farce that global warming is lately. It's getting harder for the IPCC to defend and constantly adjust their findings, data and computer models no matter how much money is thrown at it.

Hopefully the greenies will wake up and direct their efforts to toxic pollution, factory farming, genetically engineered foods, life patents, water privatization and the real causes of environmental destruction for human sustainability out there. Maybe they'll even dig a little deeper realize the systems, ideologies governments and corporations (all one in the same) are behind it and meet us on the other side before they get vaccinated, chipped and sterilized.
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
10-14-2009, 01:41 PM,
#4
What happened to global warming?
FastTadpole said
Quote:Digg Discussion:
http://digg.com/environment/Shock_BBC_Global_Warming_Honesty

I've noticed the trend of a lot of people are coming around to wake up to the farce that global warming is lately. It's getting harder for the IPCC to defend and constantly adjust their findings, data and computer models no matter how much money is thrown at it.

Hopefully the greenies will wake up and direct their efforts to toxic pollution, factory farming, genetically engineered foods, life patents, water privatization and the real causes of environmental destruction for human sustainability out there. Maybe they'll even dig a little deeper realize the systems, ideologies governments and corporations (all one in the same) are behind it and meet us on the other side before they get vaccinated, chipped and sterilized.

Yes!
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
10-14-2009, 04:31 PM,
#5
What happened to global warming?
Quote:It's getting colder, that's why the world savers changed their rhetoric to "climate change". That term is more neutral :rolleyes:
some scientist even say that the cooling is a result of global warming. No joke, they really mean it. Well, at least they pretend to do so. Common sense hasn't died yet, so there will probably only be a small number who believe that nonsense.
I am my savior
Reply
10-16-2009, 11:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-16-2009, 11:05 PM by drew hempel.)
#6
What happened to global warming?
http://www.goodplanet.org/en/ Watch HOME and then talk about global warming -- it was made as a response to Al Gore (whom I personally confronted about the oil ecological crisis back in 2000, before he got on the bandwagon) -- that this 1 hr 1/2 "HOME" film - very beautiful French director with Arabic-flavored music -- goes through history of life on Earth, traveling all across the planet relying on overhead air shots....

Then focuses on human history since agriculture and then the switch to oil and the last 50s sky-rocketing ecological destruction....
Reply
10-17-2009, 10:46 AM,
#7
What happened to global warming?
Quote:Some scientist even say that the cooling is a result of global warming. No joke, they really mean it.

Yeah, they also say that:D
Reply
10-19-2009, 06:53 AM,
#8
What happened to global warming?
Quote:
Quote:Some scientist even say that the cooling is a result of global warming. No joke, they really mean it.

Yeah, they also say that:D

lol, So goes the double speak. According to them, War is Peace.:D
"Listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research"
~William Cooper

DTTNWO!
Reply
10-23-2009, 07:40 PM,
#9
What happened to global warming?
Thousands protest global warming.
[Image: 3256633723_3561778b4d.jpg]
http://digg.com/environment/Thousands_Prot...bal_Warming_PIC
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sully_aka__wstera2/3256633723/
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
10-23-2009, 09:19 PM,
#10
What happened to global warming?
Now that is funny.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
10-23-2009, 09:57 PM,
#11
What happened to global warming?
Al Gore Sued by 30,000+ Scientists for Global Warming Fraud
Group of PHDs led by Weather Channel founder John Coleman wants its day in court



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6l1Cp3MYCQ
http://digg.com/world_news/Al_Gore_Sued_by...l_Warming_Fraud
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
02-12-2013, 06:48 AM,
#12
RE: What happened to global warming?
Quote:Latest Empirical Evidence: The Abysmal Prediction Failure Of Taxpayer Funded CO2-Based Climate Models
January 24, 2013

Taxpayers have spent billions on CO2-driven climate model "science," which the empirical evidence now suggests was like pouring money down a rat-hole....the abysmal prediction failure of CO2-centric models is simply fact - are there actual scientific models that can replace this current wasteland of biased AGW climate research?

   

   

   

   

As major mainstream news outlets are starting to report, global warming has essentially disappeared, replaced with a slight cooling trend in recent years. Taxpayer-funded climate scientists are finally being forced to go on record stating the obvious - their global warming predictions were incorrect.

Their favorite euphemism to describe what is happening is that global warming is at a "standstill." Even the most infamous climate reality denier has started using that terminology to describe a decade of non-existent warming - he can't quite yet bring himself to say global cooling.

Three of the above charts (top-left, top-right and bottom-left) represent the state-of-the-art models used by the "consensus" climate experts. As seen, all three have been spectacularly wrong through the end of 2012.

These three models (World Climate Research Programme, NASA-GISS and the IPCC) are CO2-centric climate models - global warming and climate change are primarily driven by levels of atmospheric CO2. As a result, they have long predicted dangerous and accelerating global warming for Earth's atmosphere, oceans and land surfaces - and it bears repeating, they have been spectacularly wrong.

The majority of scientists now agree that these "consensus" science models are flawed (at least 97% of scientists would agree ;-) and are incapable of accurately predicting global temperatures. Thus, newer models based on non-CO2 drivers of climate are starting to see the light of day, so-to-speak.

One such newer model is represented by the bottom-right chart above. This model appears to have better global temperature prediction capabilities, which also happens to verify that CO2 is not the principal climate driver, as scientists on the taxpayer dole claim (and misrepresent).
http://www.c3headlines.com/2013/01/empirical-evidence-abysmal-prediction-failure-taxpayer-funded-co2-based-climate-models.html
Data Sources: http://www.c3headlines.com/chartsimages.html
Supplemental: Testing an astronomically based decadal-scale empirical harmonic climate model versus the IPCC (2007) general circulation climate models
http://people.duke.edu/~ns2002/pdf/ATP3533.pdf (56 Pages)
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
02-12-2013, 04:19 PM,
#13
RE: What happened to global warming?
The IPCC always has been, and likely will always be, a cash vacuum for those who value wealth over fact.

Haven't trusted any info from the IPCC ever since researchers aligned with the group started referring to one another's reports. Fortunately, aside from some enthusiastic lying, and absorbing money from important stuff like the world economic response, no damage appears to have been done.

Thanks for the post, FT.
Truth appears in many forms. Find those that resonate with you.

- "If we do not believe in freedom of speech for those we despise, we do not believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky
- "Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one." - Leon Festinger

http://avaaz.org - The World In Action
Reply
02-12-2013, 04:24 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-12-2013, 04:26 PM by Watchdog.)
#14
RE: What happened to global warming?
An analogy.

Here in Montreal Quebec we have an NHL hockey team called the Canadiens. The goalie is called Carey Price. In the media there is a "concensus" within all the sports journalists that Price is one of the best goalies in the league, despite the fact that the team finished dead last in the league last year, has never gone past the first round of series except one year when the second goalie (Halak) was in goal, and the fact that statistics show that Price is not better than the average goalie (rates between 15-20th in the league). He finished 22nd last year!

No matter how he plays the "consensus" is that he is a superstar, hero, and perhaps the best they ever saw. When the team wins it's because of Carey, when the team loses it's because of everyone but Carey...

But, most hockey fans know that he's not that great, except those that have been brainwashed by the media. But still, why would the media pimp this putz? Well, follow the money trail. RDS the local sports channel is owned by Bell media, who owns the hockey arena and the television rights to broadcast the game. Also, because the owners of the Canadiens hockey team gave Price a 35 million $ contract stating that "he was the best player on the team, a superstar".

The analogy?

When so many people get their feet wet they cannot admit that it's raining outside. When people are given lots of money to defend a position they lose their ability to question the premise. So many people will look like fools when the cat comes out of the bag. They will have to "blame" external conditions to save face.

The day will come when some scientists and politiciens will say that "we have been successful in mitigating climate warming, and the cooling of the climate is the proof that science and policy have evolved into a life saving tools for humanity".

Once more, the layers of mental programs via brainwashing that have been given to us are so deep that digging for "reality" has become a challange, almost impossible, if not a lifetime endeavor.

The strange things is that when a layer is shed, "reality" can be frightening. It's mind blowing to realise that things are the inverse of what we beLIEved all our lives. Could someone die of fright if all layers were shed together in an instant? Perhaps not die, but certainly go insane. That's a possibility.

One layer at a time and steady as she goes. Finally, if those surrounding us don't participate in this endeavor, or don't proceed at the same pace, we should be prepared to feel great inner solitude and awkwardness.

Like Tarzan who was taken away from the jungle and dropped downtown in the traffic of a big city, sort to speak.
Paix, Amour et Lumiere
Reply
02-26-2013, 02:03 AM,
#15
RE: What happened to global warming?
Here's a quantitative analysis that shows a massive fail in carbon accounting. Wind and Biofuel actually produce more Greenhouse Gas than Coal, Oil and Natural Gas.. tell this one to the windbags pushing for a global carbon currency system.

Quote:Renewable energy's big secret
by Steve Goreham on February 24, 2013

Climate change has again moved to center stage. In his State of the Union address, President Obama stated, “But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change.” Two days later, Senators Sanders and Boxer introduced a legislative package calling for a carbon tax on coal mines, refineries, and natural gas facilities.

A week ago, an estimated 35,000 climate crusaders joined a rally on the national mall in Washington, urging President Obama to block the Keystone XL pipeline project.

These efforts advocate reducing the use of hydrocarbon energy from oil, coal, and natural gas while increasing incentives for wind, solar, biofuel, and other renewable energy sources. Proponents say that use of renewables will reduce carbon dioxide emissions that are claimed to be causing dangerous global warming. But they don’t tell you about renewable energy’s big secret.

Renewable energy remains a tiny part of our energy picture. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, by the end of 2011, 39,000 wind turbine towers were operating in the United States, but provided only 2.9% of our electricity, compared to 42% from coal, 25% from natural gas, 20% from nuclear, and 6% from hydroelectric sources. After twenty years of subsidies and mandates, solar energy remained absolutely trivial, contributing a miniscule 0.04% of our electricity. Ethanol and biodiesel provided about 11% of U.S. vehicle fuel at the heavy cost of using 40% of the corn crop.

Renewable energy’s big secret is that the two biggest renewable sources, wind and biofuels, don’t reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Wind energy is highly variable. Wind output can ramp from negligible output to 100% of rated output to zero again over just a few hours. On average, wind systems provide rated output only about 30% of the time, so they can’t replace hydrocarbon or nuclear electricity sources. Coal or natural gas plants must be used as backup to the wind system, ramping up and down inefficiently to mirror changes in wind velocity.

Your car has two mileage ratings, one for city driving and one for highway driving. A typical car may get 23 miles per gallon (mpg) in the city and 33 mpg when driving on the highway. Stop-and-go driving uses more fuel and produces more emissions than highway driving at continuous speed.

Wind farms change our electrical networks into stop-and-go electrical systems. Analysis of utilities in Netherlands and Colorado show that combined wind-hydrocarbon systems use more fuel, produce more nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide pollutants, and emit more carbon dioxide than coal or natural gas systems alone. Despite claims to the contrary, addition of wind farms to our electrical grid does not reduce emissions.

Neither does the use of biofuels reduce carbon dioxide emissions. For years, advocates for the fight against climate change assumed the burning of biofuels to be “carbon neutral.” Even though the burning of wood or plant material releases CO2 to the atmosphere like any other combustion, the “carbon neutral” concept assumed that as biofuel plants grow they absorb CO2 equal to the amount released when burned.

But a 2011 opinion by the European Environment Agency pointed to a “serious error” in greenhouse gas accounting. The carbon neutral concept does not take into account the CO2 that would be absorbed by the natural vegetation that grows on land not used for biofuel production. A 2011 study by the National Academy of Sciences found that, after considering land use effects, production of ethanol as replacement fuel for gasoline was likely to “increase such air pollutants as particulate matter, ozone, and sulfur oxides.” The study also found that greenhouse gas emissions from ethanol fuel were likely to be higher than gasoline.

So, even if you ascribe to the theory of man-made climate change, it’s unlikely that deployment of renewable energy will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Steve Goreham is Executive Director of the Climate Science Coalition of America and author of the new book The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism: Mankind and Climate Change Mania.
http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/climatism-watching-climate-science/2013/feb/20/renewable-energys-big-secret/
http://blog.heartland.org/2013/02/renewable-energys-big-secret/

Now how to change public perception? .. and if we actually do will it amount to the men with the guns changing up their plan for global domination. Maybe it's time for us to live in our own communities and cut the co-dependant umbilical chord.
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Wink Snow Proves Global Warming ( O RLY!? ) rsol 2 833 10-25-2012, 05:35 PM
Last Post: fireballs
  Astrophysicist Piers Corbyn explains the whole Global Warming aka Climate Change scam icosaface 3 1,969 05-11-2012, 02:17 PM
Last Post: CharliePrime
  Warmlist - A Complete List of Things Caused By Global Warming / Climate Change SerialExpLain 32 6,569 11-16-2011, 06:13 AM
Last Post: icosaface
  Anthropogenic Global Warming - sublimetruth.com - Darius Alexander Darius 38 10,579 11-14-2011, 08:44 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Global Cooling and the NWO - Global Cooling on the Agenda of the Bilderbergs h3rm35 2 1,245 10-16-2010, 01:00 AM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Scientists call for a global nuclear renaissance in new study nik 1 1,169 08-24-2010, 12:45 AM
Last Post: JazzRoc
Exclamation Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global war joeblow 6 2,350 05-10-2010, 01:44 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
Thumbs Up 75 Reasons to be Skeptical of "Global Warming" h3rm35 1 1,088 02-24-2010, 08:06 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  'Bin Laden' blames US for global warming TriWooOx 2 956 02-03-2010, 03:40 AM
Last Post: Genteel
  Top climate change adviser calls for honesty from scientists in global warming debate TriWooOx 0 623 01-27-2010, 08:24 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)