Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Law enforcement chiefs strongly back new 'web snooping' powers
07-13-2012, 10:21 AM,
Law enforcement chiefs strongly back new 'web snooping' powers
Quote:New powers to gather online communications data will make it easier to convict murderers and paedophiles, law enforcement chiefs have said.

The head of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection agency also told Parliament that chances to help children at risk of suicide were missed nearly every day without the powers.

Ministers argue reforms are needed to catch criminals using new technology.

But some civil liberties groups say the plans are a "snooper's charter".

The heads of a string of law enforcement agencies and associations strongly supported the government's position as they testified to a committee of MPs and peers charged with scrutinising the legislation containing the new powers.

The Joint Committee on the Draft Communications Data Bill heard details of one case where existing powers to gather data on mobile phone communications had made it possible to find and convict the perpetrators of a double murder.


But Peter Davies, the chief executive of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection (Ceop) agency, told them, "bluntly, there were other people involved in the conspiracy, who it might have been possible to prosecute and convict, but it was not possible" under the current regime on gathering communications data.

In a separate case involving the production and distribution of child pornography, Mr Davies said, "132 children in the UK were safeguarded and protected, nearly 200 suspects were arrested... and the four people at the heart of this operation, which was run for profit and, regrettably, for enthusiasm, were convicted.

"Without access to communications data, those outcomes would not have been possible."

But, he added, had law enforcement agencies been given access to other types of communications data, as now proposed by the government, "more people might have been brought to justice; more children might have been safeguarded".

The law enforcement chiefs were reluctant to divulge precise information about the data to which they sought access, for fear of exposing their vulnerabilities to criminals. They offered to brief the committee on such details in private.
'Ethically complex'

But Mr Davies gave one very specific example of the difference that the legislation could make.

Children seeking help from ChildLine - a charity offering free counselling services - via the internet cannot be traced as easily as those using telephones.

"It is inconceivable to imagine a society where law enforcement, or people like ChildLine, are denied the opportunity to identify children at risk of suicide [who are seeking help online], locate them, and then get the right thing done about them," Mr Davies told the committee.

This situation was arising "more or less daily", he added.

Gary Beautridge, of the Association of Chief Police Officers, told the committee about a recent investigation he had overseen into the rape of two children.

"Because of the method of communication that was used, which was web-based communications," he said, "we had to employ other techniques, which were ethically and technically extremely complex, very expensive, and very lengthy, to bring this offender to justice."
'Surveillance on the entire nation'

Mr Beautridge was asked whether he believed the legislation would help to ameliorate this situation. "Absolutely, I do," he affirmed.

Metropolitan Police Service assistant commissioner Cressida Dick remarked: "When I sit down with my senior investigating officers, both in counter-terrorism and in serious crime, they all say that they have experience of not being able to get the data that they would like, and that they are feeling that increasingly."

The committee also gathered evidence from Trevor Pearce, the director-general of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, and Donald Toon, the director of criminal investigation at HMRC.

In a Commons debate in May, former shadow home secretary David Davis was scathing about the proposals.

They would be costly to implement and "pretty straightforward" for organised criminals to circumvent, he said.

"We will create something which will not be effective against terrorism but which will be a general purpose surveillance on the entire nation," Mr Davis warned.

Campaign group Liberty has also argued that the proposals threatened individual privacy and suggested the coalition had gone back on a pledge on coming to office to end the storage of web and e-mail records "without good reason".
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Code of Silence: Law Enforcement Can’t Talk About This Tool They Use Every Day mexika 0 243 05-13-2014, 12:56 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Civilian officials 'given further crime powers' TriWooOx 0 393 07-09-2012, 01:33 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Pot Vs. Kettle: ¨Back Da Fuck Up Nigga! Dis My ´Hood!¨ h3rm35 3 892 06-23-2012, 01:36 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  This snooping bill is worthy of a surveillance state TriWooOx 0 404 06-17-2012, 10:05 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Target on your cyber back: DHS has a list of words deemed ‘suspicious’ h3rm35 0 348 05-26-2012, 11:35 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Tim Berners-Lee urges government to stop the snooping bill TriWooOx 0 349 04-18-2012, 08:10 AM
Last Post: TriWooOx
Exclamation ACTA sucks ass, but now there´s HR 1981, a broad new Internet snooping bill. h3rm35 2 675 02-04-2012, 11:21 PM
Last Post: Sovereignman
  Hundreds more civilians get powers to fine people and demand personal details TriWooOx 1 574 09-27-2011, 01:51 PM
Last Post: Dunamis
  House panel approves broadened ISP snooping bill drummer 1 694 08-02-2011, 06:43 PM
Last Post: rsol
  U.S. Government Builds First Law Enforcement Base in Puebla, Mexico mexika 0 437 07-14-2011, 08:18 AM
Last Post: mexika

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)