Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
the nexus of narcotics and banking (and, of course, intelligence agencies.)
06-01-2012, 09:03 PM, (This post was last modified: 08-21-2012, 01:07 AM by h3rm35.)
the nexus of narcotics and banking (and, of course, intelligence agencies.)
a recap, for those that have no idea who Allen Stanford is:

Stanford faces decades in jail for stealing $7bn

By Kara Scannell in New York
Indicted financier R. Allen Stanford©Bloomberg

Allen Stanford, the billionaire Texas banker who was once knighted by the government of Antigua, was convicted of stealing $7bn in customer money to fund a high end lifestyle that involved sponsorship of an international cricket tournament, yachts, and island properties.

After a six week trial in Houston and on the fifth day of deliberations, the jury of eight men and four women voted to convict Mr Stanford on 13 of 14 counts including fraud, conspiracy and obstructing a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation. He was found not guilty on one count of wire fraud. Mr Stanford, who has been held in custody since his June 2009 arrest, could face decades in prison when he is sentenced later this year.

The verdict came one day after the jury told the judge they were deadlocked on some counts.

The conviction is a partial resolution to the Stanford affair, which attracted international headlines and embarrassed the Securities and Exchange Commission which was criticised for concluding as far back as 1997 that Stanford’s Antiguan bank was engaging in a fraud but took more than a decade before it launched an aggressive investigation.

For thousands of Stanford bank customers who bought certificates of deposit the verdict may be a hollow victory. None of the 20,000 customers has received money from the court-appointed receiver, who has sued former Stanford brokers, the Libyan government, and the national fundraising arms of the Democrat and Republican parties for more than $600m.

Angela Shaw, founder of the Stanford Victims Coalition, said, “It’s bittersweet. I’m happy to see that at least 13 of 14 counts, but investors are still fighting for any recovery for three years later and that’s our justice.”

For Mr Stanford it marks a dramatic fall. In 2006 he was knighted and two years later made Forbes magazine’s list of richest Americans with an estimated net worth of $2.2bn. The knighthood has since been stripped and Mr Stanford’s remaining assets frozen or sold.

Prosecutors accused Mr Stanford of misleading investors in marketing brochures by promising that their money would be invested in easy to trade assets, such as stocks and bonds, when instead he used it to buy two Caribbean newspapers, islands, and aeroplanes. He also paid bribes routed through Swiss bank accounts to an Antiguan regulator to interfere with a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation and a local accountant to sign off on the bank’s books.
A decade of Ponzi sentences $ term
Bernard Madoff (2010) $65bn 150yrs
Thomas J. Petters (2009) $3.7bn 50yrs
Scott W. Rothstein (2009) $1.2bn 50yrs
Peter Lombardi (2003) $1bn 20yrs
Reed E. Slatkin (2001) $593m 14yrs

The prosecution’s key witness was James Davis, the former chief financial officer of the bank and Mr Stanford’s college roommate. Mr Davis pleaded guilty and is co-operating.

Mr Stanford, who wore suits but no necktie during the trial, did not testify contrary to a promise his lawyer made in his opening statement when he told the jury Mr Stanford would describe his dreams for the bank and goals for building businesses in Antigua.

Instead his lawyers called former bank employees who testified that Mr Stanford was the visionary, but it was Mr Davis who ran the bank day to day. His lawyers maintained that no investor lost money until the SEC filed its lawsuit in February 2009 and a court froze the bank’s assets.


Allen Stanford, American Drug Lord
Posted on March 21, 2012 by Daniel Hopsicker

Missing from coverage of the conviction two weeks ago of Texas "financier" Allen Stanford for running a $7 billion Ponzi scheme was any mention of Stanford’s long-time role as an authentic—if no longer certified—American Drug Lord.

"Sir" Allen (the title was bought) is an excellent example of a curiously under-publicized species: the American Drug Lord. (The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration claims the species doesn’t even exist; it may be they have their own reasons.)

To most observers in the Caribbean, however, Stanford’s narco-bank was as visible a manifestation of the global drug trade as a homemade semi-submersible submarine, or a convoy of SUV’s snaking through Sinaloa’s Sierra Madre Mountains.

Banks like his immodestly-named Stanford International Bank on the island of Antigua, where financial regulators are apparently even more easily-corrupted than their counterparts in the U.S., are as essential to global drug trafficking as fleets of late-model, preferably American-registered luxury jets.

“Every island has one,” one veteran Caribbean observer told us from Kingston Jamaica, referring to Stanford’s bank. “The days are mostly gone when you could walk in and lay out three suitcases of cash and get a penthouse condo on Miami Beach.”

“You can’t spend money you haven’t first deposited in a bank these days.”
It’s the little things

Conspicuously missing at Stanford’s trial were answers to questions widely being asked, especially in the Caribbean, where many lost their life savings, about Stanford’s relationship with the CIA.

Was Stanford’s bank in Antigua just the latest in a long line of money-laundering banks—like Castle Bank, Nugan Hand, and Wachovia—used to move money around by the CIA and organized crime?

One telling detail: when Stanford’s fellow Ponzi All-Star Art Nadel (of Huffman Aviation in Venice Florida fame) went on the lam, he lit out for Slidell, Louisiana, the legendary site of Carlos Marcello’s hunting lodge just outside New Orleans.

After Stanford went on the lam he was found in Fredericksburg, Virginia, just over the hill from “The Farm,” the training facility of one of the U.S. Government’s most famous three-letter agencies at the Marine Corps Base in Quantico.
White kid gloves only, please

The kid-glove treatment accorded two of Stanford’s accomplices is another clue to Stanford’s provenance. Without their help, say observers, Stanford’s operation would have been shut down as much as a decade earlier.

Both were high-level U.S. Federal Agency employees, one in the DEA, the other in the SEC, America’s Securities Exchange Commission, charged with preventing financial fraud.

Neither Agency has exactly covered itself in glory in living memory.

In the $3 trillion financial heist in 2008, the SEC, unfortunately, got there a little late…

And in the now 40-year old War on Drugs, the DEA cannot be said to be “shock and awe-ing” the global drug trade into anything like submission.

In the aftermath of Stanford’s arrest, the two former high-level Federal employees fared pretty well. One, deeply and criminally implicated by numerous sources, paid just a $50,000 fine, and never even faced criminal charges.

And when the second one did face criminal charges, a miracle occurred.
The 'Immaculate Acquittal'

It’s morning in Miami. Tuesday the 10th of February, 2010. Inside the Federal Courthouse downtown something extremely rare is about to take place: a miracle, at least the closest thing to a miracle veteran court-watchers have seen in a long time.

It comes at the end of the trial of Thomas Raffanello, Allen Stanford’s Chief of Security, and the long-time chief of the Drug Enforcement Administration's Miami office. Before joining Stanford, Raffanello led investigations against Manuel Noriega and the Medellin Cartel.

There has long been speculation about Stanford’s connections with the world of “los narcos.” But Raffanello is the one verifiable link between Allen Stanford and the global drug trade.

Raffanello, accused of illegally shredding documents at Stanford Financial Group after Stanford’s arrest, was taken to a Fort Lauderdale federal courtroom in shackles, facing charges of conspiracy, obstruction of justice and destroying records.

But he had committed no crime, his lawyers said in a court filing. He was simply ‘taking out the garbage.’

On the morning of February 10, 2010, Raffanello sat in court awaiting the jury’s verdict as the jury asked for clarification on one of the charges. Then, after they retired to continue their deliberations, Judge Richard Goldberg ordered the charges dismissed.

Lawyers called the ruling extremely rare, almost unprecedented. "Something smells here,” said one courtroom observer afterwards.

It was the Immaculate Acquittal.

“Judges always wait for the jury to finish deliberations. If the jury finds the defendant not guilty, case closed. If they find him guilty, the judge has the power to over turn the conviction. But in that case the judge proclaims, ‘Judgment notwithstanding the verdict.’"

"We witnessed a miracle," said one of Raffanello's defense attorneys, Janice Burton Sharpstein.
It's a small world, after all

Sharpstein is married to Richard Sharpstein, a Miami attorney who represented one of the trigger men in the assassination of Barry Seal in Baton Rouge Louisiana in 1986.

We interviewed him while researching “Barry & the Boys.” But the story he told us speaks volumes about the world of Allen Stanford.

“Why was Barry Seal murdered?” we asked.

“Seal had been irate when the IRS seized all his property,” Sharstein related. “The IRS man said to Seal, ‘You owe us $30 million for the money you made drug smuggling.”

“Hey, I work for you,” was Seal’s reply. “We both work for the same people.”

“You don’t work for us,” the IRS agent replied. “We’re the IRS.”

“Then Unglesby (Seal’s attorney) watched as Seal place a call to (then-Vice President) George Bush,” Sharpstein stated.

“He heard Barry say, ‘If you don’t get these assholes off my back I’m going to blow the whistle on the Contra scheme.”
“What Unglesby says is, 'That’s why he’s dead.’

Allen Stanford isn't dead. But he pissed somebody off bad enough to make him wish he were.

Allen Stanford & ‘The Caribbean Two-Step’
Posted on March 23, 2012 by Daniel Hopsicker

Call it the “Caribbean two-step.”

The dance the U.S. Government has just pirouetted through with convicted mega-swindler Allen Stanford, repeats a familiar pattern its been using for at least 30 years. But rarely has it looked more like a lumberjack in The Nutcracker.

According to final reports of investigations by the two hand-wringing U.S. Agencies most involved—the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”)—cowboy bandit Stanford was known to have been running a Ponzi scheme as early as 1997.

Those were simpler times. Back then, scientists were still trying to clone dolly the sheep. And Allen Stanford had “only” stolen a billion dollars. By the time he was busted the figure had gone up to $7 billion.

So, who was out the big bucks? Mostly investors from Latin America: Colombia, Mexico, and Venezuela, most of whom are currently either suing the SEC, or thinking about it.

However jilted investors could probably make an equally good case against the DEA, because at the same time he had a Fly-Through Window open at his narco-bank laundering drug money, according to the BBC, Allen Stanford was a DEA informant.

No word yet on whether the DEA felt this might present a concern.

None of this is exactly cricket

It was February 9 2009. After unsuccessfully trying to flee the country (his credit card was refused at a Houston charter jet service), Allen Stanford was picked up by the FBI in Virginia, sitting in his girlfriend's car.

Just three days earlier (Feb. 6 2009), a second American-sponsored drug figure in the Caribbean had been arrested. When 35-year old drug pilot Michael Francis Brassington was taken down in Miami by the FBI, it marked the end of a very long run.

The tall rangy Texan and the short pudgy Guyanese pilot looked nothing alike. Yet they shared some remarkable characteristics.

Michael Brassington was a drug pilot from Guyana. Yet oddly enough he was politically very well-connected in Washington, D.C. His father had for many years been a top figure at Barclay's Bank in the Caribbean.

While Allen Stanford could do pretty much anything he wanted with his bank, financially, Michael Brassington's charter jets flew with little regard to impediments like borders. His charter jet company in Fort Lauderdale had what envious aviation observers in Florida thought was diplomatic impunity, or at least a laminated non-revocable "get out of jail free" card.

Almost daily, Brassington flew into and out of the U.S. At Fort Lauderdale Executive Airport, where he often landed, U.S. Customs Agents sometimes didn’t even bother to check his plane.

Allen Stanford's "luck" with financial regulators is clearly visible in the record. So is Brassington’s. In July of 2000, he was caught co-piloting a Learjet in Orlando carrying 43 lbs of heroin; yet he suffered no ill effects.

He wasn't arrested. His name wasn't even in the papers, which is really impressive, because 43 lbs of heroin is known in the drug trade as "heavy weight."

It is a lot of heroin.
Turning a blind eye

They say timing is everything.

30 years ago officials in Washington were turning what is euphemistically called a “blind eye” to the cocaine and weapons trafficking operation run by Marine Colonel Oliver North, flown on hastily-decommissioned U.S. military cargo planes by a motley crew put together by ex-CIA pilot Barry Seal. The cocaine his planes were hauling belonged to the Medellin Cartel, which fell from favor and was then brought down in 1989.

The Cali Cartel then picked up the slack, until it too was brought down a half-dozen years later. Strangely, however, these two massive “victories” in the “War on Drugs” affected neither the price hor the availability of cocaine in America, which is re-stocked onto the nation’s illicit drug shelf with Procter & Gamble-like efficiency.

“Drug trafficking is a movable feat,” stated a drug pilot who regularly flew cocaine into Mena Arkansas during the infamous contra-cocaine debacle. “There’s plenty of other places to go to avoid the glare of the spotlight when things get hot somewhere. Moving is easy.”
It's all done with smoke and mirrors.

For more than 30 years the drug trade has remained a remarkably stable industry. The effect of constant movement is achieved by constantly moving things around, to give an illusion of progress in the never-ending War on Drugs.

Time marches on, and the “Oliver Norths” become the “Allen Stanfords.”

Back when Oliver North was an active American Drug Lord, the movie of the moment was Basic Instinct and starred Sharon Stone crossing and recrossing her legs.

Today Sharon Stone is on the cover of AARP, the glossy magazine of the American Association for Retired People. (No word on whether Stone does anything scandalous or naughty in her interview with the retired people.)

But not much else has changed.

When Stanford was arrested, the first thing he did was retain Oliver North’s lawyer.

Seen in this light, when DEA Chief Administator Michele Leonhart showed up in Afghanistan last year on the arm of former American Drug Lord Oliver North, it was business as usual.

Learning to spell "philanthropist"

Sir Allen Stanford was America's 205th richest man. Somebody was getting him some good PR. One widely circulated story was that when a Catholic priest stricken with the stigmata (wounds resembling those Jesus suffered in his crucifixion) needed medical treatment in the United States, Stanford flew him on his private plane.

“His strong bond with the islands,” one paper reported, “was strengthened by an encounter with Father Gerard Critch, a local priest afflicted by stigmata, which Sir Allen believed to be the wounds of Jesus. He carries a vial of congealed fluids from the clergyman's foot.”

Stanford said he remembered touching his head to the priest’s and experiencing a “life-changing” surge that strengthened his faith in God. "That was a major personal event in my life," Stanford said. "It was truly an out-of-this-world experience, a supernatural experience."

The priest survived. Stanford lost touch with him.

Narco-Banker: The Allen Stanford Story
Posted on April 13, 2012 by Daniel Hopsicker

With his recent conviction on 13 counts of money laundering—ensuring that a man who once lived in a $57 million mansion with a moat will be doing his entertaining behind bars for a very long time—the Allen Stanford scandal would seem to be all but over.

But Allen Stanford’s Ponzi scandal is ending before the most important question about the scandal has even been asked…

How did a gym owner filing bankruptcy in Texas happen to wake up a year later owning an offshore bank?

In 1982, Allen Stanford was the bankrupt owner of a bankrupt chain of athletic clubs in Waco Texas. In his personal bankruptcy filing he listed $13.6 million in debt against less than $200,000 in assets.

Paul Holt, a businessman in Waco Texas, watched as Stanford’s sketchy business career was getting underway. “I knew about Stanford’s failed health club in Waco, Texas, because that’s where I live, and I was there when it happened,” Holt told Vanity Fair in 2010.

“Then one day I go online and out of the corner of my eye I see this headline: ‘Allen Stanford, Caribbean Banking King, in $8 billion Scandal.’”

“And I’m going, whoa! How does somebody go from bankrupting a Total Fitness Center to becoming a knight in the Caribbean?”

Whoa, indeed.

State-Sponsored Crime: Effective, Simple, Safe

Allen Stanford’s startling transition from bankrupt Texas grifter to star money launderer is a vivid snapshot which authorities don’t want anyone examining too closely… a Polaroid capturing the collapse of the rule of law in the United States of America during the Iran Contra-inspired cocaine epidemic of the 1980’s.

According to news accounts, the government’s tepid response to Allen Stanford’s continuing criminal enterprise began in the late 1990’s.

Not so. Stanford was fingered as a criminal as far back as 1989, when George Bush the Elder was in the White House, "Back to the Future II" was in theaters, and tanks were rolling through Tienanmen Square.

So the real villains in the scandal of Allen Stanford and his $8 billion Ponzi scheme are the people who prevented his prosecution for two full decades. And many of them have yet to be publicly named, let alone punished.

The Stanford scandal produced the usual tepid admissions of wrongdoing by government Agencies charged with guarding America from crooks and grifters. Many saw criminal negligence in the government’s inaction.

The SEC knew all about Stanford’s criminal fraud back in 1996, for example, a full decade before taking even baby steps to end it.

This disclosure prompted some public handwringing, but not much else. And the results of the official investigations into Stanford’s big score were less than inconclusive…

In a civil proceeding, one former SEC administrator paid a $50,000 fine for crimes that would send an ordinary citizen to jail for a decade.

And the longtime head of the DEA in Miami—a Stanford “security” officials caught red-handed after Stanford’s indictment in an orgy of file-shredding that would have done Oliver North and Fawn Hall proud—was acquitted in an extraordinary extrajudicial move by a Federal judge who snatched the case from the hands of a jury deliberating a verdict.

In such cases, one wonders: why bother with the expense of a trial? Tea Party advocates should have been outraged. But perhaps they were all on vacation.
Get out of jail passes all around!

A little history lesson offers some big clues.

The Caribbean island of Montserrat was ‘discovered’ by Christopher Columbus in 1493. A volcanic eruption in 2003 rendered the island all but uninhabitable.

Somewhere in between those two dates came Allen Stanford, who opened a bank on the island in 1985. It was his first.

Stanford’s bank was chartered by a fraudster from Beverly Hills named Jerome Schneider, author of an early entry in the booming field of helping the parasitic rich avoid paying taxes. It was called “Hiding Your Money."

Schneider also hosted "offshore wealth summits" in places like Cancun, attended by congressmen and other public figures, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Schneider set up about 800 offshore banks in 15 years, and was a “thorn in the side of federal banking authorities and the Internal Revenue Service for years,” according to the LA Times.

But if he was a thorn in their side, you couldn't tell. They never did anything about him. Nothing.

To anyone who has felt the full force of the government come down over unpaid parking tickets or a minor moving violation, this must seem strange.

What such people need to understand is that selective prosecution is not the exception in the U.S. It’s the rule.
Chase, Morgan, Stanford, DuPont

Frequently, the names of Schneider-chartered banks were similar to those of well-known domestic banks, with words like "Chase" or "Morgan" in their titles.

Schneider must have seen Stanford, already an inveterate liar, as manna from the gods. Soon he was boasting of his family ties with the founder of Stanford University in Palo Alto, Leland Stanford, a tie the University has taken pains to refute.

Schneider’s most famous client before Stanford was a fraudster from La Jolla, a city which, given its small size turns out fraudsters with astonishing regularity, was a man named J David Dominelli.

Dominelli’s claim to fame, oddly enough, is that before Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff and Art Nadel came along, he was America’s biggest Ponzi All-Star. When he went down, so did a number of Republican politicians in San Diego like Roger Hedgecock, the city’s long-time mayor.

When the scandal grew too big to ignore, the island of Montserrat shut down most of the phony banks. One oft-cited closure featured the prestigious-sounding Zurich Overseas Bank, which operated out of a tavern in the island’s capital, Plymouth.

“Almost every bank in Montserrat was operated illegally,” says David Marchant, editor of OffshoreAlert, a newsletter covering offshore banking.

“The fact that Stanford had a banking license in Montserrat is all you needed to know about his credibility. It wasn’t like most of the banks were good and you had a few bad eggs. The only reason you opened a bank in Montserrat was to commit fraud.”

Allen Stanford, lucky fellow, emerged unscathed, if not unnoticed. He moved his bank to Antigua, then a British Crown Colony.
They didn't call them the go-go 80's for nothing

So, just what was going on in 1985 that made starting an American-owned no-questions-asked bank in the Caribbean such a sure thing?

The answer is obvious to everyone… except American authorities, who never asked the question… save for a few brave souls, quickly hounded out of the government or moved to jobs watering plants in the office.

But someone from Scotland Yard was apparently paying attention, detective Paul Marston, who in 1989 targeted Stanford’s bank, which had already grown into one of the Caribbean’s largest.

Where were all Stanford’s deposits coming from? Marston didn’t have to wonder long to find the answer. Colombian drug money was flooding into banks across the region, and there were persistent rumors that this was the source of Stanford’s growth.

Marston called in an expert from the U.S. Government’s Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. “The O.C.C. guy went down there, stood across from the Stanford office for maybe several hours, came back and said, ‘Yep, that’s a money-laundering operation,’” recalled an agent involved in the operation.

“So Marston goes, ‘How can you tell from just standing across the street?’ And the guy goes, ‘I’m telling you, it is.’

“Then, a little later, we got fairly detailed intelligence that they were indeed laundering for major Colombian drug traffickers.”
"We own it. You can always count on Florida"

Montserrat authorities finally revoked Stanford’s license, in May 1991.

This cut no ice with banking officials in Florida, however. Despite objections from the state's chief banking counsel, Florida regulators allowed Stanford to open a Miami office and transfer significant amounts of money outside the US… with no government oversight.

This is one of countless pieces of damning evidence, clues, absolute indications, sure signs, telltale tip-offs, unmistakable signs, and, yes, smoking guns illustrating Allen Stanford’s favored position as an officially-sanctioned drug money launderer.

As, in other words, an American Drug Lord.

Anyone wanting to know why the US Government is roundly despised in so many places around the world need look no further:

Christopher Sandrolini, chargé d'affaires at the US Embassy in Barbados, recently lectured a meeting of Caribbean heads of state in Barbados on how they could become crime-busters—just like us!— if only they tried hard enough.

“The Stanford case should serve as a warning to small societies in the Caribbean,” he said. “Given the region’s vulnerability to crrminals, Caribbean nation’s cannot afford to relax their vigilance and laws.”

Hear hear.
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
06-07-2012, 07:19 PM,
RE: Allen Stanford, American Drug Lord
A Full-Service Bank: R. Allen Stanford and the CIA
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
06-15-2012, 09:24 PM,
RE: Allen Stanford, American Drug Lord
American Narcos: The Real 'Masters of Paradise'

As the body count climbs across Mexico, the drugs continue flowing across the border by the ton.

Despite the evident disconnect--a "war" on drugs that increases the supply while lowering the price, in the best tradition of our reigning "free market" ideology--the American media regales the public with fairy tales of heroic "warriors" doing battle with murderous gangsters named "Joaquín," "Jorge" and "Amado."

The fact is, more likely than not, the real narcos taking the biggest cut from deep inside the reeking abattoir of the grisly trade have far less prosaic names like "Brett," "Ethan" or "Jason."

'The Only Liquid Investment Capital'

Earlier this month, The Observer reported that "The vast profits made from drug production and trafficking are overwhelmingly reaped in rich 'consuming' countries--principally across Europe and in the US--rather than war-torn 'producing' nations such as Colombia and Mexico, new research has revealed."

Journalist Ed Vulliamy informed us that the authors of that report provide compelling evidence that "financial regulators in the west are reluctant to go after western banks in pursuit of the massive amount of drug money being laundered through their systems."

Indeed, at the height of the global financial crisis Antonio Maria Costa, then the head of the UN Office on Drugs and Crime told The Observer "he has seen evidence that the proceeds of organised crime were 'the only liquid investment capital' available to some banks on the brink of collapse last year. He said that a majority of the $352bn (£216bn) of drugs profits was absorbed into the economic system as a result."

"In many instances," Costa said, "the money from drugs was the only liquid investment capital. In the second half of 2008, liquidity was the banking system's main problem and hence liquid capital became an important factor."

"Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drugs trade and other illegal activities... There were signs that some banks were rescued that way." While Costa "declined to identify countries or banks that may have received any drugs money, he said the money is now a part of the official system and had been effectively laundered."

In other words, for dodgy bankers it was "accounts balanced" and an excuse to buy a new Armani suit or two, a case of 20-year-old single malt or that vacation home for the trophy wife, no questions asked.

Selective Prosecutions

In stark contrast to the impunity enjoyed by our capitalist overlords, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Treasury Department "slapped sanctions on two key operatives of the Sinaloa drug cartel" last Thursday.

The Journal informed us that "Kingpin Act sanctions were placed on Maria Alajandrina Salazar Hernandez and Jesus Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, the wife and son of Joaquín "Chapo" Guzmán, the fugitive drug lord who heads the Sinaloa Cartel."

Also last week, the Associated Press reported that Sandra Ávila Beltrán, whom the media dubbed "La Reina del Pacífico" (The Queen of the Pacific), can be extradited to the United States "where she faces cocaine-related charges." Ávila was arrested in Mexico City in 2007 and awaits prosecution on money laundering charges.

A third-generation drug trafficker, Ávila is the niece of of Miguel Ángel Félix Gallardo, onetime godfather of the Guadalajara Cartel now serving a 40-year prison term for the 1984 murder of DEA agent Enrique Camarena. Camarena was kidnapped and tortured to death after he uncovered evidence linking the CIA and Oliver North's sordid "Enterprise" to drug trafficking Nicaraguan Contras during the Reagan administration.

And just this week, The Guardian reported that two relatives of former Colombian President Álvaro Uribe, "are awaiting extradition to the US over claims they had ties to the world's most wanted drug lord."

"Ana Maria Uribe Cifuentes and her mother, Dolly Cifuentes Villa, were arrested last year after a request from a US federal court for alleged ties to the head of Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel, Joaquín 'El Chapo' Guzmán."

According to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), "both women are alleged to belong to the Cifuentes Villa clan," which DEA claims "trafficked at least 30 tonnes of cocaine to the US between 2009 and 2011, and laundered the proceeds in several Latin American countries including Colombia."

Drug trafficking allegations have long swirled around the Uribe family. A 1991 Defense Intelligence Agency report published by The National Security Archive pointedly stated that during his tenure in the Colombian Senate, Uribe was a "close personal friend of Pablo Escobar" and was "dedicated to collaboration with the Medellín [drug] cartel at high government levels."

The document went on to assert that before becoming a key U.S. "partner in the drug war," and rewarded with some $3 billion under Plan Colombia to "fight drugs," Uribe "was linked to a business involved in narcotics activities in the United States" and "has worked for the Medellín cartel."

Although the U.S. government disavowed that report, for purely political reasons I might add, several members of Uribe's family, including the president's cousin, Mario Uribe Escobar, the former President of the Colombian Congress, was convicted and removed from office over his close ties to the far-right, drug trafficking paramilitary death squad, the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia, or AUC.

In announcing sanctions against the Guzmán clan, Adam Szubin, the director of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, said in a statement: "This action builds on Treasury's aggressive efforts, alongside its law enforcement partners, to target individuals who facilitate Chapo Guzmán's drug trafficking operations and to pursue the eventual dismantlement of his organization, which is culpable in untold violence."

While Chapo, Inc. earned honorable mention at No. 1153 on Forbes "World's Billionaires List," and may very well be responsible for the estimated 25% of illegal drugs trafficked into the United States as the DEA alleges, his place at No. 55 on Forbes list of "The World's Most Powerful People," sandwiched between PIMCO founder and "Bond King" Bill Gross and Ahmed Shuja Pasha, Director-General of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency, speak volumes about the rather interesting juxtapositions (parapolitically speaking, that is!) between the worlds of finance, crime and covert operations.

Citing findings by two Colombian academics, Alejandro Gaviria and Daniel Mejía in their study, Anti-Drugs Policies In Colombia: Successes, Failures And Wrong Turns, Ed Vulliamy disclosed "that 2.6% of the total street value of cocaine produced remains within the country, while a staggering 97.4% of profits are reaped by criminal syndicates, and laundered by banks, in first-world consuming countries."

Gaviria told The Observer, "Colombian society has suffered to almost no economic advantage from the drugs trade, while huge profits are made by criminal distribution networks in consuming countries, and recycled by banks which operate with nothing like the restrictions that Colombia's own banking system is subject to."

Co-author Daniel Mejía added: "The whole system operated by authorities in the consuming nations is based around going after the small guy, the weakest link in the chain, and never the big business or financial systems where the big money is."

Where, inquiring minds can't help but wonder, are Treasury's "aggressive efforts" when it comes to those simple, yet readily demonstrable facts?

But like drug cartels, banks and the "old boy" networks who run them have names. I'll give you a hint: they're not self-styled "Lords of the Heavens," though they just might think of themselves as proverbial "Masters of the Universe."

A case in point. Back in 2000 when Narco News publisher Al Giordano and Mario Menéndez, a reporter for the Mexican newspaper Por Esto! were sued in a New York court for libel by Banamex-Citigroup, Giordano wrote that "The true bosses of the illegal drug trade do not appear on the FBI 'Most Wanted' list."

No, Giordano averred, "The Chief Operating Officers of drug trafficking are not Mexicans, nor Colombians: they are US and European bankers, those who launder the illicit proceeds of drug trafficking. Institutions like Citibank of New York--as this report documents--are the true beneficiaries of the prohibition on drugs and its illegal profits."

While Chapo Guzmán's family are now targets of Treasury Department sanctions, what can we learn from recent reporting on Justice Department inaction when it came to prosecuting officers of America's fourth largest bank, Wachovia, bought by Wells Fargo & Co. in 2008 at the height of the capitalist financial meltdown?

Charlotte: The World's Narco Capital?

In landmark exposés of corporate greed, criminality and corruption, Bloomberg Markets Magazine and The Observer revealed in 2010 and 2011 respectively, that Wachovia was up to its eyeballs in laundering hot money for Colombian and Mexican drug cartels.

As I reported in 2010 on Wachovia's foray into money-laundering for Chapo Guzmán's Sinaloa Cartel (see: "All in the 'Family.' Global Drug Trade Fueled by Capitalist Elites," Antifascist Calling, July 20, 2010) then-CEO, G. Kennedy "Ken" Thompson, a former president of the Federal Reserve Board's Advisory Committee and Bush Ranger who raised some $200,000 for W's 2004 presidential campaign, was buying up competing banks faster than you can say "credit default swaps."

By the time Wells Fargo bought Wachovia at the fire-sale price of $12.8 billion, the bank and Thompson, who had "retired at the request of the board," were in deep trouble.

Prior to the takeover, Wachovia had embarked on a veritable shopping spree. After the firm's 2001 merger with First Union Bank, Wachovia merged with the Prudential Securities division of Prudential Financial, Inc., with Wachovia controlling the lion's share of that firm's $532.1 billion in assets. Following this coup, the bank then bought-out Metropolitan West Securities, adding a $50 billion portfolio of securities and loans to their Lending division. In 2004, Wachovia followed-up with the $14.3 billion acquisition of SouthTrust Corporation.

Apparently flush with cash and new market clout, Wachovia set it sights on acquiring California-based Golden West Financial. Golden West operated branches under the name World Savings Bank and was the nation's second largest savings and loan. At the time of the buy-out, Golden West had over $125 billion in assets. For Wachovia and Thompson, it was a deal too far.

A cash-crunch soon followed. Now exposed to risky loans, including toxic adjustable rate mortgages acquired as a result of the Golden West deal, which Thompson had described as Wachovia's "crown jewel," the firm's loan portfolios were hammered by heavy losses during the subprime mortgage meltdown.

While the bank had reported some $2.3 billion in earnings during the first quarter of 2007, by 2008 they were reporting heavy losses that topped $8.9 billion by the fourth quarter. It was panic time in Charlotte.

And where did some of that "liquid capital" come from which enabled Wachovia's reckless expansion?

"One customer that Wachovia took on in 2004 was Casa de Cambio Puebla SA," Bloomberg Markets reported. The Puebla, Mexico currency exchange was the brainchild of Pedro Alatorre Damy, a "businessman" who "had created front companies for cartels."

Alatorre, and 70 others connected to his network were arrested in 2007 by Mexican law enforcement officials. Authorities discovered that the accused money launderer and airline broker for the Sinaloa Cartel controlled 23 accounts at the Wachovia Bank branch in Miami and that it held some $11 million, subsequently frozen by U.S. regulators.

In 2008, a Miami federal grand jury indicted Alatorre, now awaiting trial in Mexico along with three other executives, charging them with drug trafficking and money laundering, accusing the company of using "shell firms to launder $720 million through U.S. banks." The Justice Department is currently seeking Alatorre's extradition from Mexico.

Despite the fact that Wachovia's Miami office had been designated by federal investigators a "high-intensity money laundering and related financial crime area," in a "high-intensity drug trafficking area," The Observer reported that even in the face of internal warnings from their own anti-money laundering investigators, Wachovia did nothing to stop the illicit flow of hot funds.

With America's housing bubble now fully-inflated, and warning signs that the speculative boom would soon go bust, one can only surmise that the need for liquidity at any price, had driven Wachovia to play dumb where shady, yet highly-profitable "arrangements" with Casa de Cambio Puebla SA were concerned.

Bleeding cash faster than you can say "mortgage backed securities," Wachovia was on the hook for their 2006 $26 billion buy-out of Golden West Financial at the peak of the bubble, a move that Bloomberg Businessweek reported generated "resistance from his own management team" but ignored by Thompson.

Why? "Because no one outside of Thompson and Golden West CEO Herb Sandler seemed to like the deal from the moment it was announced," a company insider told Businessweek.

(An alert reader pointed out when my piece appeared in 2010, that Herb Sandler, who sold Golden West at the top of the market saying he wanted to devote himself to "philanthropy," "now owns ProPublica, a Left gatekeeper that goes after easy targets like racist cops ... but which will not examine Sandler's wing of the power elite. Michael Barker wrote a great series on this outfit and its Establishment handlers called "Investigating the Investigators--A Critical Look at ProPublica.")

While the buy-out may have given Thompson "the beachhead in California he had long desired ... the ink was barely dry on the Golden West deal in late 2006 when the housing bubble in markets including California and Florida began to deflate."

Hammered by the housing bust, Wachovia's share price, which had risen to $70.51 per share when the Golden West deal was announced had slid to $5.71 per share by October 2008. In other words Wachovia, along with the rest of the world's economy was circling the proverbial drain.

In their Deferred Prosecution Agreement with the Justice Department, Wells Fargo agreed not to contest charges brought against Wachovia in the federal indictment.

Banking giant Wells was forced to admit: "On numerous occasions, monies were deposited into a CDC [Casa de Cambio] by a drug trafficking organization. Using false identities, the CDC then wired that money through its Wachovia correspondent bank accounts for the purchase of airplanes for drug trafficking organizations. On various dates between 2004 and 2007, at least four of those airplanes were seized by foreign law enforcement agencies cooperating with the United States and were found to contain large quantities of cocaine."

As Ed Vulliamy reported in The Observer, although investigators from DEA and the IRS uncovered evidence that Wachovia had laundered as much as $378.4 billion, "a sum equivalent to one-third of Mexico's gross national product--into dollar accounts from so-called casas de cambio (CDCs) in Mexico," and later paid federal authorities $110 million in forfeiture, including a $50 million fine "for failing to monitor cash used to ship 22 tons of cocaine," no criminal proceedings were ever brought against bank officers.

"The conclusion to the case," Vulliamy wrote, "was only the tip of an iceberg, demonstrating the role of the 'legal' banking sector in swilling hundreds of billions of dollars--the blood money from the murderous drug trade in Mexico and other places in the world--around their global operations, now bailed out by the taxpayer."

While Chapo Guzmán and other leaders of Mexican drug trafficking organizations face federal charges that could land them in prison for the rest of their lives, contrast the kid gloves approach taken by the government when it comes to American narcos.

Despite serious federal money-laundering charges against Wachovia, "smartest guy in the room" Thompson was paid $15.6 million in total compensation by the board in 2007, fully a year after that fatal Golden West deal went south. Nor did subsequent losses, and an impending criminal indictment (against the bank, not its officers), stop Wachovia from showering Thompson with a severance package worth nearly $8 million.

Now that's juice!

'Air Cocaine'

Following extensive, years' long reporting in the trenches by MadCow Morning News investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker and Narco News' Bill Conroy into the origins of two aircraft seized in Mexico with some ten tons of cocaine on board, we learned that as many as 100 planes had been purchased with hot money laundered through Wachovia Bank.

And when "mainstream" journalists Michael Smith and Ed Vulliamy picked up the trail of breadcrumbs assiduously laid out by Hopsicker and Conroy (always without attribution, mind you), they did however, advance some previously unknown facts surrounding this sordid case.

"Just before sunset on April 10, 2006," Bloomberg's Michael Smith reported, "a DC-9 jet landed at the international airport in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City."

When Army troops grew suspicious after the crew tried to "shoo them away, saying there was a dangerous oil leak," they did what good law enforcement officials should do: they searched the plane.

On board, they found 128 identical black suitcases "packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found. Law enforcement officials also discovered something else."

"The smugglers," Smith wrote, "had bought the DC-9 with laundered funds they transferred through two of the biggest banks in the U.S.: Wachovia Corp. and Bank of America Corp."

But in breaking that story six years ago, (long before Bloomberg and The Observer joined the hunt), Hopsicker revealed that "One of the two owners of the DC-9 (tail number N900SA) busted at an airport in Ciudad del Carmen in the state of Campeche, Mexico last week freighted 5.5 tons of cocaine had been appointed in 2003 to the Business Advisory Council of the National Republican Congressional Committee by then-Congressional Majority Leader Tom Delay, The MadCow Morning News can exclusively report."

That plane, Hopsicker disclosed, was tricked-out by owner Brent Kovar to impersonate a jet flown by the U.S. Transportation Security Administration. An official-looking seal read "Sky Way Aircraft, Protection of America's Skies," complete with the "image of a federal eagle clutching the familiar olive branch in its talons."

And when he searched FAA and corporate records, Hopsicker learned that "A close look at [shell company] Royal Sons reveals evidence indicating that the firm is part of a cluster of related air charter firms being used as dummy front companies to provide 'cover' for CIA flights."

"The companies involved," Hopsicker averred, "include Royal Sons, Express One International, Genesis Aviation and United Flite Inc."

"All four companies appear to be engaged in an interlocking and time-honored Agency scheme going back 50 years: using frequent cosmetic transfers of aircraft title to make positively identifying the ownership of any one plane at any given time as difficult as finding the pea under the shell in a game of three-card Monte."

Subsequent reporting by Hopsicker revealed that the second plane, a Gulfstream II business jet (N987SA) which crash landed on the Yucatán peninsula in 2007 with four tons of coke on board, was registered to a "Donna Blue Aircraft, Inc." (DBA, or "doing business as") and was previously employed as a "private charter" that did "terrorist" rendition flights for, who else, the CIA!

As Narco News journalist Bill Conroy revealed in 2008, "At the center of that controversy are allegations that the downed cocaine jet was part of a CIA-backed narco-trafficking operation."

According to Conroy, the "key to the ill-fated Gulfstream II cocaine shipment is a prolific Colombian narco-trafficker and U.S. government informant named Jose Nelson Urrego Cardenas--who was recently arrested by police in Panama. Urrego allegedly played a major role in organizing the cocaine shipment as part of [Immigration and Customs Enforcement's] Mayan Express operation."

"For those who might wonder why ICE would pursue an operation like the Mayan Express," Conroy wrote, "it pays to keep in mind that Charles E. Allen, under-secretary for the Office of Intelligence and Analysis at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), also happens to be a veteran of the CIA and was a major player in the Iran/Contra scandal that played out during the Reagan administration."

"One facet of Iran/Contra, as you might recall, allegedly involved the use of CIA resources to run drugs in order to raise money to fund the purchase of arms for the Contra rebels who were seeking to overthrow the Sandinista government in Nicaragua."

"For ICE to be cleared to operate a high-profile overseas mission like the Mayan Express, which allegedly involved coordination with the CIA, it is very likely that Allen, DHS' chief intelligence guru, had to be clued into the operation--since ICE is part of DHS."

More recently, in keeping with the dirty history of the CIA's role in managing, not eliminating, the global drug trade, Narco News disclosed that the Agency had a "quid-pro-quo" arrangement with Chapo Guzmán's Sinaloa Corporation's "leadership and US government agencies seeking to obtain information on rival narco-trafficking organizations."

In fact, as Narco News revealed last April, the federal indictment against Jesus Vicente Zambada Niebla claims "he served as the 'logistical coordinator' for the 'cartel,' helping to oversee an operation that imported into the U.S. 'multi-ton quantities of cocaine ... using various means, including but not limited to, Boeing 747 cargo aircraft, private aircraft ... buses, rail cars, tractor trailers, and automobiles'."

Indeed, one of the "private aircraft" used in Chapo Guzmán's drug importation schemes was none other than that ill-fated Gulfstream II (N987SA) which crash-landed in the Yucatán in 2007. Purchased with funds laundered through Wachovia Bank, the business jet was subsequently linked by Council of Europe investigators to CIA ghost flights.

Despite facts laid out in Zambada's federal indictment "the alleged deal," Conroy wrote, "assured protection for the Sinaloa Cartel's business operations while also undermining its competition--such as the Vicente Carrillo Fuentes organization out of Juárez, Mexico, the murder capital of the world."

"The alleged deal," Conroy averred, "assured protection for the Sinaloa Cartel's business operations while also undermining its competition--such as the Vicente Carrillo Fuentes organization out of Juárez, Mexico, the murder capital of the world."

"At the same time," Narco News reported, "the information provided by the Sinaloa Cartel to US agencies against its rivals assures a steady flow of drug busts and media victory headlines for US agencies and for the Mexican government."

Conroy pointed out, "That propaganda is necessary for hoodwinking their citizens into believing that progress is being made in the drug war and thereby assuring the continued funding of bloated drug-war budgets and support for failed policies that have cost the lives of some 50,000 Mexican citizens since late 2006 and ended any hope of a productive life for hundreds of thousands of US citizens--most wasting away in US prisons and not a small number the victims of street homicides linked to drug deals gone bad."

Call it business as usual in "God's country," that "shining city upon a hill."

Past as Prologue

If history is a guide to current practices, the CIA has long-relied on financing black Agency operations through dodgy banks and the bankers who run them.

Amongst the swindlers who have profited from cosy relations with the Agency, readers no doubt are reminded of Paul Helliwell's Castle Bank Bank & Trust; Michael Hand, Frank Nugan and Bernie Houghton's Nugan-Hand Bank; Agha Hasan Abedi's Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI); or more recently, as Antifascist Calling disclosed two years ago, convicted fraudster R. Allen Stanford's multibillion dollar Ponzi scheme disguised as a "full-service bank," Stanford International.

That all four banks collapsed in ignominy and scandal as investors were bilked out of billions of dollars in deposits amid charges that these financial black holes were little more than conduits for organized crime and intelligence operations, only underscores the inescapable fact that for secret state outfits like the CIA, crime pays.

Two years after the Wachovia scandal broke amid deafening media silence in the U.S., Daniel Mejía told The Observer: "Overall, there's great reluctance to go after the big money. They don't target those parts of the chain where there's a large value added. In Europe and America the money is dispersed--once it reaches the consuming country it goes into the system, in every city and state. They'd rather go after the petty economy, the small people and coca crops in Colombia, even though the economy is tiny."

"It's an extension of the way they operate at home," Mejía said. "Go after the lower classes, the weak link in the chain--the little guy, to show results. Again, transferring the cost of the drug war on to the poorest, but not the financial system and the big business that moves all this along."

Given the corrupt trajectory of the "War on Drugs," this should not surprise anyone. As Peter Dale Scott wrote in Deep Events and the CIA's Global Drug Connection: "The global drug connection is not just a lateral connection between CIA field operatives and their drug-trafficking contacts. It is more significantly a global financial complex of hot money uniting prominent business, financial and government as well as underworld figures."

According to Scott, this global criminal-elite nexus "maintains its own political influence by the systematic supply of illicit finances, favors and even sex to politicians around the world, including leaders of both parties in the United States. The result is a system that might be called indirect empire, one that, in its search for foreign markets and resources, is satisfied to subvert existing governance without imposing a progressive alternative."

Scott's analysis has certainly been borne out by honest law enforcement officials.

Martin Woods, a former senior detective with London's Metropolitan police anti-drugs squad joined Wachovia in 2005 as the bank's chief anti-money laundering investigator and paid a steep price for his diligence.

Hounded out of his position when he refused to stop filing suspicious activity reports to headquarters in Charlotte over dubious deposit practices by Wachovia branches in London and Miami, Woods told The Observer: "New York and London have become the world's two biggest laundries of criminal and drug money, and offshore tax havens. Not the Cayman Islands, not the Isle of Man or Jersey. The big laundering is right through the City of London and Wall Street."

"Meanwhile," Woods said, "the drug industry has two products: money and suffering. On one hand, you have massive profits and enrichment. On the other, you have massive suffering, misery and death. You cannot separate one from the other."

With hundreds of billions of dollars washing through the system each and every year, there aren't many incentives to collar the big boys. And you can take that to the bank...
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
09-28-2012, 10:50 PM,
RE: the nexus of narcotics and banking (and, of course, intelligence agencies.)

Black Dossier: HSBC & Terrorist Finance (Updated w/part 2!)
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  CBC publishes articles questioning private central banking stiffy 3 15,750 05-02-2013, 05:35 AM
Last Post: stiffy
Information The Future of Money: Smartcards, Encryption, Digital Currency and Thin Branch Banking FastTadpole 12 8,644 12-22-2012, 08:58 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Free banking should end, says FSA head Lord Turner TriWooOx 4 1,879 07-25-2012, 07:26 PM
Last Post: rsol
  Charting the Cozy Connections between JP Morgan and the Senate Banking Committee h3rm35 0 738 06-15-2012, 12:52 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Gordon Brown admits 'big mistake' over banking crisis TriWooOx 0 880 04-11-2011, 06:13 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Time Banking in Santa Fe Solve et Coagula 0 808 01-18-2011, 08:18 PM
Last Post: Solve et Coagula
  A Secretive Banking Elite Rules Trading in Derivatives h3rm35 1 1,036 12-18-2010, 03:23 AM
Last Post: ZeroCenter
  George Osborne set to shelve plans on banking pay transparency TriWooOx 0 750 11-22-2010, 09:14 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
Last Post: dicktater
  Are We About To Witness The Greatest Banking Consolidation In U.S. History? h3rm35 1 1,013 05-28-2010, 02:01 AM
Last Post: Scorpio

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)