Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Canada – $6b to cut global temps by 0.0007°C. Just $84Trillion per degree!
10-18-2011, 06:55 PM,
Canada – $6b to cut global temps by 0.0007°C. Just $84Trillion per degree!
by Jo Nova

I thought the Canadians had gotten over this type of insanity. Environment Canada apparently wants to cut the coal industry in half (at least that’s as much as they’ll admit too). Presumably they’d feel like they’d completed their life’s-work if they could only wipe it out completely.

Christopher Monckton has analyzed the Canadian regulatory action on “Coal Emissions” and finds that, as usual, legislators are choosing the most expensive option possible with other people’s money. Environment Canada wants to spend $6 billion to reduce the atmospheric concentration of a trace molecule by 0.01ppmv, and assuming there is any advantage in doing so, it would still cost one-eighteenth as much to just do nothing, suck it and see, and pay for all the theoretical damage that could ensue.

Like so many other Western Nations, there is not even the pretense that the legislation makes sense judged by any numerical outcome, yet Canadian citizens may have to pay thousands in tithe to witchdoctors in a futile attempt to change the weather. It’s as if the highest echelons of Western leadership are stone-age innumerate.

As per usual with these type of posts, I expect no real challenge on Monckton’s figures. Environment Canada are not going to pop up and announce a specific accurate target — not in dollars, ppmv, °C or Watts per metre. The fans of these symbolic feel-good policies will respond with overwhelming silence. I mean, the numbers are so damningly small that even if they found an order of magnitude in a correction (“oh look, now that’s 0.007 °C!”) the policy still doesn’t make any sense.

I used to be reluctant to publish these type of figures, they just seem so incredibly small and too-hard-to-believe. But now we know, it really is that stupid.

If there is any consolation for Canadians, it’s that schadenfreude sense that at least things are more stupid in Australia.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi

Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
10-21-2011, 04:27 PM,
RE: Canada – $6b to cut global temps by 0.0007°C. Just $84Trillion per degree!
Wait JazzCock will post here soon approving of the bullshit science. Lol.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Survival or Extinction: The OM Principles versus the Global Depopulation Policy mexika 0 374 11-20-2013, 10:06 PM
Last Post: mexika
  US farmers may stop planting GMs after poor global yields Easy Skanking 6 762 02-16-2013, 06:33 PM
Last Post: thokling
  Do you see a pattern on food files at Health Canada under Leona Aglukkaq? icosaface 0 528 07-30-2012, 04:15 PM
Last Post: icosaface
  Bird flu is 'only three steps' from mutating into deadly new form - global pandemic TriWooOx 2 517 07-14-2012, 08:29 AM
Last Post: nwo2012
  Leaked Rio+20 Earth Summit Final Agreed Text – Utterly Inadequate Response to Global mexika 1 480 06-22-2012, 03:35 PM
Last Post: nwo2012
  The Global Bee Death. i8manu 6 1,758 05-20-2012, 09:38 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Simplified Global Warming logic DoomSayer 17 2,545 01-11-2012, 11:15 PM
Last Post: thokling
  Fukushima radiation in Canada was worse than Canadian officials ever let on yeti 0 580 10-21-2011, 05:44 PM
Last Post: yeti
Information Where's the Beef? Global Livestock Population and Agricultural Production Statistics FastTadpole 1 2,892 08-23-2011, 05:48 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Baby death spike in W. Canada blamed on parents not radiation yeti 1 746 07-08-2011, 01:21 AM
Last Post: icosaface

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)