Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
From NAFTA to CETA: Canada-EU Deep Economic Integration
01-15-2011, 11:31 PM,
From NAFTA to CETA: Canada-EU Deep Economic Integration
From NAFTA to CETA: Canada-EU Deep Economic Integration

By Dana Gabriel

Global Research, January 13, 2011

Canada and the European Union (EU) have already held five rounds of negotiations towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) which will go beyond NAFTA. With the sixth round of talks scheduled to take place in Brussels, Belgium from January 17-21, Canadian and EU officials remain optimistic that a deal could be finalized by the end of 2011. Thus far, negotiations have included key areas such as goods, rules of origin, services, investment, government procurement, as well as others. As talks enter their final crucial stages, there are growing concerns over the threat CETA poses to Canadian sovereignty. Coupled with the financial turmoil sweeping Europe, deep economic integration with the EU could prove disastrous.

In a recent article Maude Barlow, national chair of the Council of Canadians, points out the dangers Canada faces with the current CETA trade model. She warns that, “CETA will open up the rules, standards and public spending priorities of provinces and municipalities to direct competition and challenge from European corporations.” Barlow goes on to say, “Europe is seeking a comprehensive and aggressive global approach to acquiring the raw materials needed by its corporations. At its heart, this deal is a bid for unprecedented and uncontrolled European access to Canadian resources.” She also added, “CETA will likely have a NAFTA-type investor-state enforcement mechanism, which means that European corporations will have the same right that U.S. companies now enjoy to sue the Canadian government if it introduces new rules to protect the environment.” If CETA includes something similar to NAFTA's Chapter 11 which gives corporations the power to challenge laws and regulations that restrict their profits, U.S. and Mexican companies could benefit from any rulings that favour the EU. Ultimately, like NAFTA and other trade deals, CETA will further serve corporate interests.

A report released in December of last year, entitled Public Water for Sale: How Canada will privatize our public water systems, “exposes how CETA would open up public municipal water systems across Canada to privatization.” The paper prepared by the the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Union of Public Employees cautions that, “public water in Canada will be lost unless the provinces and territories take immediate steps to remove water from the scope of the proposed Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement.” The Union of B.C. Municipalities supports a resolution by those cities and towns who wish to receive a clear, permanent exemption from CETA. Others have voiced opposition to any deal that could deny government the ability to favour local businesses and create jobs. There has been increased pressure on Ottawa to either fully or partly shield the municipal sector from government procurement of goods and services. Giving the EU full access to sub-national purchasing and contracting in Canada would open up areas such as school boards, universities, hospitals, as well as other provincial agencies.

The October 2010 report, Out of Equilibrium: The Impact of EU-Canada Free Trade on the Real Economy written by economist Jim Stanford warns that Canada’s bilateral trade deficit with the EU could grow under CETA. Released by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, the paper, “models three scenarios to provide a range of estimates regarding the likely impacts of EU-Canada free trade. In every case, Canada’s bilateral trade balance worsens significantly. The simulations suggest an incremental loss of between 28,000 and 150,000 Canadian jobs.” Many of these could be good jobs in sectors such as machinery, chemicals, electronic, food-processing, apparel-making and the auto industry. The study on the economic impacts of CETA also, “estimates direct losses in Canadian GDP between 0.56% and almost 3%, experienced over several years of adjustment to the new trade pact. Indirect losses of spin-off production, employment, and investment could add significantly to those economic losses.” Stanford concluded, “Free trade with Europe will take a bad situation for Canada, marked by large deficits and lost jobs, and make it much worse.”

It is becoming apparent that Canadian sacrifices in regards to a free trade agreement with the EU outweighs any potential benefits. While Canada does need to lessen its dependency on the U.S. economy, CETA is based on the failed NAFTA trade model and will only serve to accelerate the corporate takeover of the country. The sixth round of negotiations are expected to focus on sensitive areas such as tariffs on dairy imports, intellectual property rights investment and regulatory standardization, as well as public procurement. CETA is part of a larger agenda and could be used as a blueprint for a future US-EU trade agreement and a stepping-stone to a NAFTA-EU free trade zone.

At the EU-U.S. Summit held in Lisbon several months back, leaders reaffirmed their close partnership, as well as their desire to bring greater prosperity and security to both sides of the Atlantic. They recognised the central role of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) and entrusted, “the TEC to develop a transatlantic agenda to stimulate growth and create jobs in key emerging sectors and technologies.” The TEC was called upon to, “identify ways to improve transatlantic consultation before regulators and agencies develop regulation in economically promising new technologies and sectors, to share best practices, and to develop joint principles with the aim of promoting maximum compatibility of regulations and the freest possible transatlantic flow of ideas, products, and services.” The TEC was established in 2007 in an effort to work towards increasing investment, eliminating trade barriers and streamlining harmonization on regulations. It is the framework for advancing transatlantic economic integration between the U.S. and the EU.

In December of last year, the TEC met in Washington where “European Commissioners and leading US government representatives took the first concrete steps to ensure the TEC process creates a forward-looking business environment that reduces regulatory barriers and encourages innovation, shared standards and high-tech business.” An agreement on a common approach to electronic health record systems and a declaration on energy efficiency was also signed. The TEC meeting identified other, “key areas for joint activities in the innovation sector and discussed ways to ensure secure trade and strengthen the customs cooperation between the two partners.” The TEC has been compared to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Along with NAFTA, the SPP agenda which continues to move forward through other initiatives, is essentially laying the foundation for a North American Union. A Canada-EU trade deal would be an incremental step towards a Free Trade Area of the Atlantic and an eventual Transatlantic Union.

Canada has fared better than other countries during the current financial crisis. With parts of Europe still marred in recession and debt trouble, a trade agreement with the EU, especially under the template in which it is being negotiated could prove costly. Failed monetary policies and government managed free trade agreements that favour corporate interests, deserve their share of the blame for the current global economic predicament. Yet, we are still being told that more globalization is the solution to our financial woes. In order to further restructure the world, the ruling elite seek to capitalize on the economic chaos which in many ways they engineered.

Dana Gabriel is an activist and independent researcher. He writes about trade, globalization, sovereignty, security, as well as other issues. Contact: Visit his blog at
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
01-20-2011, 02:13 PM,
RE: From NAFTA to CETA: Canada-EU Deep Economic Integration

This is the most important issue coming from Parliament that could effect, no obliterate, what remains of Canadian sovereignty.

Canada-European Union Economic and Trade Agreement Draft (CETA) [2010.01.12]

An older, but very relevant, discussion on CETA
Canada and the European Union: Advancing the Transatlantic Agenda

Backgrounder / Overview

On May 6, 2009, Prime Minister Stephen Harper launched negotiations with Europe toward a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement that will go beyond NAFTA in ways that threaten public services and local democracy in Canada. On April 19, 2010, the Trade Justice Network leaked the draft consolidated text of the agreement to start a public debate on the effect the agreement would have on a number of public policy areas in Canada.

While Canadian companies are mostly interested in reducing European regulatory barriers to entry for products like meat and genetically modified crops, European companies see Canada's public services, including water treatment, transportation, energy and even health care, as ripe for privatization. Most of these services are delivered provincially or locally, which is why for the first time the provinces (though not their cities) are part of the negotiations.

Because these services are often delivered through public spending at the provincial and municipal level, the EU is also pushing to liberalize local procurement rules, which will weaken democratic controls over how communities spend public money — controls that currently let communities set their own economic priorities but that would be eliminated in favour of corporate priorities under the Canada-EU agreement.

Source: (great resource)

Another Great Resource:

Good Contacts in Labour Unions voicing concern over CETA.

Stuart Trew, Council of Canadians (647) 222-9782;

Angelo DiCaro, Canadian Auto Workers (416) 606-6311.

Lucy Sharratt, Coordinator
Canadian Biotechnology Action Network (CBAN)
Collaborative Campaigning for Food Sovereignty and Environmental Justice
431 Gilmour Street, Second Floor
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K2P 0R5
Phone: 613 241 2267 ext.6
Fax: 613 241 2506

.. and not just CETA integration but IMF Corporate Governance, UN Agenda 21 and a "leaked" Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness (PDF) are all coming to a head... if we change nothing or react without a will and a plan.
There are no others, there is only us.

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Information New Immigration Stream – No Job Offer Needed in Canada FastTadpole 2 410 03-22-2014, 12:23 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  U.S BlackMails Ecuador over Snowden through economic terrorism mexika 3 457 07-01-2013, 06:48 AM
Last Post: mexika
Exclamation Canada and US Border, Security, Military, Trade and Law Integration FastTadpole 6 2,309 03-09-2013, 07:38 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Bill C-38 protest has 13,000 websites going dark across Canada this June icosaface 2 597 05-30-2012, 05:51 PM
Last Post: operatorkos
  Canada's SOPA, Bill C11 icosaface 3 999 03-06-2012, 07:47 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Economic blockade of Iran is an act of war datars 0 429 02-21-2012, 02:01 AM
Last Post: datars
  John Perkins: From Economic Hitman to Shaman Solve et Coagula 0 374 02-01-2012, 04:05 PM
Last Post: Solve et Coagula
  CANADA: Tax Cuts, Privatization and Deregulation: icosaface 0 435 01-20-2012, 05:45 PM
Last Post: icosaface
  The Doomsday Project and Deep Events: JFK, Watergate, Iran-Contra, and 9/11 Solve et Coagula 0 355 01-16-2012, 05:18 PM
Last Post: Solve et Coagula
Information Bill C-428: Canada's Old Age Security Act Amendments FastTadpole 10 4,065 10-05-2011, 01:48 PM
Last Post: icosaface

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)