Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Legalise drugs, says former defence secretary
12-16-2010, 02:17 PM, (This post was last modified: 12-16-2010, 02:29 PM by TriWooOx.)
Legalise drugs, says former defence secretary
Quote:A former Labour minister was rebuked by Ed Miliband's office today after calling for a "grown-up debate" to consider legalising drugs on the grounds that prohibition has failed to protect the public.

Bob Ainsworth, the MP for Coventry North East, who previously served as a drugs minister in the Home Office and as defence secretary, has claimed that the war on drugs has been "nothing short of a disaster" and that it was time to study other options, including decriminalising possession of drugs and legally regulating their production and supply.

His comments were met with dismay by the party leadership, while fellow backbencher John Mann claimed that Ainsworth "doesn't know what he's talking about".

A spokeswoman for Miliband made clear that Ainsworth's comments did not have the blessing of the leadership or the wider party. She said: "These are not the views of Ed Miliband, the Labour party or the wider British public."

A party source described the legalisation proposal as "extremely irresponsible", adding: "I don't know what he was thinking."

Mann, who carried out an inquiry into hard drug use in his Bassetlaw constituency while Ainsworth was drugs minister, said: "He didn't know what he was talking about when I met him with my constituents during my heroin inquiry and he doesn't know what he's talking about now."

Ainsworth, who claimed that his departure from the frontbenches now allowed him to express his "long-held view" on drugs policy, is due to lay out his case later today at a debate in Westminster Hall.

He said his ministerial stint in the Home Office made him see that prohibition failed to reduce the harm that drugs cause in the UK, while his time as defence secretary with specific responsibilities in Afghanistan, "showed to me that the war on drugs creates the very conditions that perpetuate the illegal trade, while undermining international development and security".

He called on those on all sides of the debate to support "an independent, evidence-based review, exploring all policy options, including further resourcing the war on drugs, decriminalising the possession of drugs, and legally regulating their production and supply".

His call for a review was backed by former Conservative party deputy leader Peter Lilley, who said that it was time "for all politicians to stop using the issue as a political football".

"I have long advocated breaking the link between soft and hard drugs – by legalising cannabis while continuing to prohibit hard drugs," said Lilley. "But I support Bob Ainsworth's sensible call for a proper, evidence-based review, comparing the pros and cons of the current prohibitionist approach with all the alternatives, including wider decriminalisation and legal regulation."

Ainsworth cited the legalisation of alcohol in the United States after 13 years of prohibition to argue that after 50 years of global drug prohibition it was time for a "genuine and grown-up debate" about alternatives to prohibition, which he said had "failed to protect us".

"Leaving the drugs market in the hands of criminals causes huge and unnecessary harms to individuals, communities and entire countries, with the poor the hardest hit," he said.

"We spend billions of pounds without preventing the wide availability of drugs. It is time to replace our failed war on drugs with a strict system of legal regulation, to make the world a safer, healthier place, especially for our children. We must take the trade away from organised criminals and hand it to the control of doctors and pharmacists."

The backbencher criticised the government's new drugs strategy, which aims to shift the focus from reducing the harm caused by drugs to recovery as the most effective route out of dependency. "It is described by the home secretary as fundamentally different to what has gone before; it is not," he said.

"To the extent that it is different, it is potentially harmful because it retreats from the principle of harm reduction, which has been one of the main reasons for the reduction in acquisitive crime in recent years."

Ainsworth suggested one way to review the policy would be to conduct an impact assessment of the Misuse of Drugs Act in line with a home affairs select committee recommendation made in 2002 for the government (then Labour) to explore alternatives to prohibition, including legal regulation.

The report by the committee, of which David Cameron was a member at the time, did not support legalisation and regulation in its conclusion at the time, but added that drugs policy should "not be set in stone".

However, one of its recommendations did urge the government to initiate a discussion within the Commission on Narcotic Drugs of alternative ways – including the possibility of legalisation and regulation – to tackle the global drugs dilemma.

James Brokenshire, the crime prevention minister, said: "Drugs are harmful and ruin lives – legalisation is not the answer. Decriminalisation is a simplistic solution that fails to recognise the complexity of the problem and ignores the serious harm drug taking poses to the individual.

"Legalisation fails to address the reasons people misuse drugs in the first place or the misery, cost and lost opportunities that dependence causes individuals, their families and the wider community."
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast
03-24-2011, 11:21 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-24-2011, 11:22 PM by Beostein.)
RE: Legalise drugs, says former defence secretary
I've held the view for a few years now that all drugs should be legal. I know it may seem a little weird at the idea of people shooting up heroin or smoking crack legally, but hear me out. Being created by knowledgeable chemists, the threat of taking drugs cut with other substances is gone. It's always been a common reason that people have died from drug use. Legalize drugs and back them with factual non-biased pro and con information on all drugs (whether they be "soft" or "hard" drugs) as well as information on safe doses and effects at varying levels.

Locally produced and taxed drugs could be helping fund our nation's economy;yet instead, most of that money is going to violent cartels and gangs. This industry would create jobs, profit billions, and save the U.S. tax payers billions of dollars that goes towards this incompetent "War On Drugs".

Now I know there is an instant concern about the health and well being of citizens with the availability and legality of such dangerous substances. There is also a worry that more kids and teens would be able to do these drugs through their accessibility. I disagree though. I feel that the majority of people (especially impressionable youngsters) are lacking the true knowledge of these substance, and therefore are more likely to do them as they are unaware of potential harm. If they were better informed perhaps they would decide against it. For those that know and STILL choose to take them, at least they're getting it in a pure form and aren't ingesting other dangerous chemicals that are cut into the drugs. Not to mention violence over drug wars would dramatically decrease, as the black market for drugs would diminish.

So is it really better for drugs to be legal or illegal? What are some of your opinions?
" If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary-wise; what it is it wouldn't be, and what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?"

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Thumbs Up How to Make Money Selling Drugs - Instructional Video CharliePrime 1 405 10-04-2013, 07:54 PM
Last Post: thokling
  CIA-DoD Death Squads & Mexican corruption intertwined, War for Drugs Continues h3rm35 7 2,201 09-06-2012, 12:35 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  How the Militarized War on Drugs in Latin America Benefits Transnational Corporations mexika 0 547 08-07-2012, 10:56 PM
Last Post: mexika
  U.S. Tells South America to Shut Up About Legalizing Drugs mexika 0 530 03-01-2012, 02:12 AM
Last Post: mexika
  The War On Drugs Is A $2.5 Trillion Racket: How Big Banks, Private Military Com mexika 0 733 07-12-2011, 08:40 AM
Last Post: mexika
  CIA funnels drugs into poor US neighborhoods mexika 1 1,136 01-30-2011, 12:59 AM
Last Post: springhawk
  Government proposes to scrap need for scientific advice on drugs policy mothandrust 0 572 12-06-2010, 01:22 PM
Last Post: mothandrust
  Partners in Crime: The U.S. Secret State and Mexico's "War on Drugs" mexika 1 700 09-20-2010, 03:15 PM
Last Post: persecuted in alberni
  Our 'war on drugs' has been an abysmal failure. Just look at Mexico mexika 1 610 09-13-2010, 11:36 PM
Last Post: persecuted in alberni
  End The War on Drugs petition Easy Skanking 2 689 06-04-2010, 09:25 AM
Last Post: h3rm35

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)