Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
10-23-2010, 12:04 AM,
#16
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
I hate to tell you this but jazzroc is not right, as usual he demands that he is the one with the control of the context. The electromagnetic spectrum is all space filling, jazzroc, in his usual snide way, claims that empty space exists. You seem to be of the opinion that e = mc to the second power is wrong.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
10-23-2010, 02:23 PM,
#17
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
Well there's two things that puzzle me, first thing is: They don't seem to know which effects can be created, just as in previous scientific tests, perfectly pointed out by icosaface

Quote:Yuh, wait and see. When they set off the first atomic bomb they didn't know whether the chain reaction would stop. They are carrying on without due diligence, they appear to have abandoned control.

And after the first collisions a CERN's TV anchorswoman stated..
Quote:‘We made it’ said CERN’s TV anchorwoman, when the first collisions showed we were not going to die of a black hole yet… A ‘giant leap for mankind’ said CEO Rolf Hauer, from his refuge at Tokyo. Since we ‘were still here’…
http://www.cerntruth.com/?p=103

But the second thing that bothers me, and it bothers me the most is that CERN has manipulated it's documents, and shown no interest of showing the full truth, now why is that? One can only see such an action as an attempt to hide something.

"1st Extinction Event: Leaked CERN Documents State LHC Has 70% Chances to Produce Strangelets [and Destroy the Earth] on 11/9"

It had to be leaked before people could know about it.. Now when you read this, ask yourself WHY? Why would they try to paint the picture prettier than it is? .. Why does Hawking defies Einsteins theory that these black holes WILL NOT evoparate, when almost all scientists agree with einstein rather than with Hawking, AND WHY are they at CERN accepting HAWKINGS theory over Einsteins theory??

Ofcourse it could be true that that hawking could be right, it's a small chance, but still. But that doesn't take away the fact that figures are facts, and gambling with these facts, means gambling with evryones lives.
Reply
10-24-2010, 08:27 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-24-2010, 08:49 PM by JazzRoc.)
#18
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
(10-23-2010, 12:04 AM)icosaface Wrote: I hate to tell you this but jazzroc is not right, as usual he demands that he is the one with the control of the context. The electromagnetic spectrum is all space filling, jazzroc, in his usual snide way, claims that empty space exists. You seem to be of the opinion that e = mc to the second power is wrong.
You insist upon naughty responses.
I am only making a sincerely helpful response in an area which has proven, so far at least, to be impossible to be explicable clearly by ANY human being.
Just because I bite you when you attack me you think I have teeth. You should try NOT attacking me - then I'll be pleasantly "gummy"..
It's interesting you bring up E = M*C^2, because that IS at the root of the argument that strangelets will NEVER ingest the Earth.
Empty space exists AND EM fields fill it.
The argument in EM field terms boils down to LACK of sufficient FIELD INTENSITY.
If you were to bother to work it out.
Haha.

(10-23-2010, 02:23 PM)Skullthirst Wrote: Well there's two things that puzzle me, first thing is: They don't seem to know which effects can be created, just as in previous scientific tests, perfectly pointed out by icosaface
All the "pointing out" has been done by journalists who actually have an insufficient understanding themselves. It is necessary to make allowances for this, or else you'll end up in all sorts of strange places.

Quote:Yuh, wait and see. When they set off the first atomic bomb they didn't know whether the chain reaction would stop. They are carrying on without due diligence, they appear to have abandoned control.
No. quite wrong.

Quote:And after the first collisions a CERN's TV anchorwoman stated ‘We made it, we were not going to die of a black hole yet". ‘A giant leap for mankind’ said CEO Rolf Hauer, from his refuge at Tokyo. Since we ‘were still here’. But the second thing that bothers me, and it bothers me the most is that CERN has manipulated its documents, and shown no interest of showing the full truth, now why is that? One can only see such an action as an attempt to hide something.
Just not true. A simple distance calculation, as I have said before, is all it takes to make nonsense of your idea.

Quote:It had to be leaked before people could know about it.. Now when you read this, ask yourself WHY? Why would they try to paint the picture prettier than it is? Why does Hawking defy Einsteins theory that these black holes WILL NOT evaporate, when almost all scientists agree with Einstein rather than with Hawking, and why are they at CERN accepting HAWKING's theory over Einstein's theory?
Einstein was unprepared for the consequences of his work. He, and everyone else in the business knew this, but unfortunately this hasn't reached down to you. Your "herringness" is TOTALLY RED.

Quote:Of course it could be true that that hawking could be right, it's a small chance, but still. But that doesn't take away the fact that figures are facts, and gambling with these facts, means gambling with everyone's lives.
NO.
THERE IS NO CHANCE.
YOU'RE MAKING A MOUNTAIN OUT OF NOTHING AT ALL.

Reply
10-24-2010, 08:46 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-24-2010, 08:51 PM by icosaface.)
#19
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
Define your terms, what do you mean when you say empty space? I take it to mean "a multi dimensional space, whose boundaries are defined by events surrounding it, with no events on the inside".
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
10-25-2010, 08:31 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-25-2010, 08:32 PM by rsol.)
#20
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
hey iso,

I think its got to be said on a sense of scale. we are not talking about large groupings of matter here. whatever produced is to be read off super sensitive equipment for good reason. The reaction (if any) has no other level but slight. even IF it had the worst reaction it could damage some equipment. The shear scale of the reaction is minuscule. e=mc2 as you say. these are constants. the energy introduced is tiny. the guiding hand may be powerful but the reaction is basically the tidiest explosion everSmile. The fact that matter exists in this present time indicate various channels for any energy to dissipate, although this would all be negligible as the sensors will be picking up most if not all of it. It wont matter what record you play, the needle is not going to shake the earth apart.

unwrapping particles isnt something unheard of in nature. for a man who understands waves and space you know this is all translation. a few tricked out particles vs 1 massive interference pattern of a planet? im betting on earth.
Reply
11-11-2010, 09:57 PM, (This post was last modified: 11-11-2010, 09:59 PM by JazzRoc.)
#21
RE: Leaked: LHC has 70% chances to produce ‘ice-9′ strangelets on 9 NOVEMBER! -> THE END
And now it's Thursday. There must be life after death, after all. Don't tell me - we were just "lucky" and ended up in the 30%. LOL
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Leaked CEO conversation suggests electricity revolution coming drummer 1 1,223 08-04-2009, 01:53 AM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  NASA Mars photo leaked - wood found on mars! Weyland 9 2,730 12-10-2008, 11:15 PM
Last Post: humbug
  Mars photo leaked - wood found on mars! waxzy 0 1,160 08-05-2008, 01:11 PM
Last Post: waxzy
  Strangelets SerialExpLain 0 612 03-02-2007, 05:56 AM
Last Post: SerialExpLain
  Using Organics To Produce Hydrogen Energy waxzy 0 743 12-02-2006, 01:20 AM
Last Post: waxzy

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)