Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Butt test shows U.S. cigarettes high in chemicals
06-02-2010, 10:02 PM,
#1
Butt test shows U.S. cigarettes high in chemicals
(Reuters) - Americans inhale more cancer-causing agents with their cigarettes, probably because of the tobacco blend, while smokers in Canada, Britain and Australia get less, U.S. researchers reported on Tuesday.

Their unique study also demonstrated that the amounts of these carcinogens in a smoker's cigarette butts directly correlated with tell-tale compounds in the smoker's urine.

The study, published in the June issue of Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, can help researchers trying to trace the harmful effects of smoking.

"We know that cigarettes from around the world vary in their ingredients and the way they are produced," said Dr. Jim Pirkle of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who heads a lab using a mass spectrometer to measure levels of chemicals in people's bodies.

"All of these cigarettes contain harmful levels of carcinogens, but these findings show that amounts of tobacco-specific nitrosamines differ from country to country, and U.S. brands are the highest in the study," Pirkle said in a statement.

CDC's David Ashley and colleagues did in-depth tests using 126 smokers in the United States, Canada, Britain and Australia.

"Seventeen eligible cigarette brands (between 3 and 5 brands from each country) were selected on the basis of national sales and nicotine yield to identify popular brands with a range of ventilation," the researchers wrote. Ventilation is how much air is mixed in with the smoke from the cigarette as it is inhaled.

The volunteers had their saliva and urine tested and also turned over their used cigarette butts to the researchers.

FIVE MILLION DIE A YEAR

These were all tested for nicotine and for the chemicals 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK for short) and the breakdown product of NNK in the body, called NNAL.

These cancer-causing agents are known as tobacco-specific nitrosamines or TSNAs.

"We have shown a direct association between the 24-hour mouth-level exposure of NNK resulting from cigarette smoking and the concentration of its primary metabolite, NNAL, in the urine of smokers," the researchers wrote.

"Internal dose concentrations of urinary NNAL are significantly lower in smokers in countries that have lower TSNA levels in cigarettes such as Canada and Australia in contrast to countries that have high levels of these carcinogens in cigarettes, such as the United States."

The popular U.S. cigarette brands studied contained "American blend" tobacco, known to contain higher TSNA levels than the "bright" tobacco used in the most popular Australian, Canadian, and British brands.

Australian and Canadian smokers got more nicotine than U.S. and British smokers, but not of TSNAs.

The World Health Organizations says 5 million people die every year from tobacco-related heart attacks, strokes and cancers. Another 430,000 adults die annually from breathing second-hand smoke.

Some of the brands tested included:

* Marlboro, sold by Philip Morris International and Altria Group Inc's Philip Morris USA unit.

* Winfield, manufactured under license by British American Tobacco Australia.

* Silk Cut and Benson & Hedges, produced by Japan Tobacco Inc.

* Players, made by Canada's largest manufacturer, Imperial Tobacco, a division of Imasco Ltd.

* Camels, made by Reynolds American.

* Newports, made by Lorillard Inc.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6506EU20100601
“Everything Popular Is Wrong” - Oscar Wilde
Reply
06-03-2010, 01:11 AM,
#2
RE: Butt test shows U.S. cigarettes high in chemicals
Smoking is being blamed as a scapegoat for a disproportionate amount of deaths (especially cancer), even 2nd and now 3rd hand smoke.

Fact is a lot of other carcinogens exist in things like fast food, process foods, computers, building material, plastics and 100s of other household items. Not to mention industrial land waste, x-rays, industrial air pollution and the water supply that is all loaded up with drugs and hormones - oh and pharma drugs too, anyone do a long term study on Viagra, Paxil or any other drug in relation to cancer. EM health studies all cut off after 6 years yet many people are getting brain tumors

Better to put it all on smoking because the people have a choice whether to smoke or not tobacco gets a free pass and these other companies cannot be held liable because they can blame 1st, 2nd and 3rd hand smoke. Good for pharma, good for big tobacco, good for the cell phone / wireless industry, health insurance, life insurance, the energy industry (coal generates way more radiation than nuclear power, lest a meltdown). There is too much motivation to blame this cancer all on ciggies to keep those self serving, penny pinchers from messing and inhibiting these studies and pushing this idea. That's not based on any research just a history of lies and my gut - I'm not even going to waste my time on something we all know is true anyways.

I don't think any Native Americans ever died of lung cancer did they - I mean they invented smoking? Maybe natural organically grown tobacco is actually good for you but with those new home grown food bills coming down the pipe in the US and Canada we may never know without having to go outlaw farmer.

Yes cigarettes are bad the way they are processed, grown and manufactured but they are only a piece of the cancer puzzle.
There are no others, there is only us.
http://FastTadpole.com/
Reply
06-03-2010, 01:36 AM,
#3
RE: Butt test shows U.S. cigarettes high in chemicals
hehehe... he said butts...
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Tongue Study Shows Monsanto GMO Causes Giant Cancer Tumors CharliePrime 2 399 12-04-2013, 03:16 PM
Last Post: CharliePrime
  Naked Juices are NOT so Natural - Full of GMOs and Chemicals mexika 3 851 08-20-2013, 06:56 PM
Last Post: Steav789
  Plastic chemicals 'may feminise boys' brains' drummer 21 6,791 02-05-2013, 08:48 AM
Last Post: April
  Systemic Pesticides: Chemicals You Can’t Wash Off bristopen 0 486 07-30-2012, 06:21 PM
Last Post: bristopen
  People With High Levels of Worry and Anxiety Have Higher IQs April 1 936 04-19-2012, 12:35 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  5 Reasons High Fructose Corn Syrup Will Kill You p4r4 2 531 10-14-2011, 09:30 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  High levels of caesium in Fukushima beef R.R 0 403 07-09-2011, 03:27 PM
Last Post: R.R
  Anti-fluoride campaigners take to High Court TriWooOx 1 564 01-20-2011, 04:19 PM
Last Post: Dunamis
  High Mineral Salt - It's Good for You FastTadpole 6 3,717 11-11-2010, 08:27 AM
Last Post: hilly7
  New high-dose flu shot aims to protect seniors drummer 1 754 10-25-2010, 05:53 PM
Last Post: Deathaniel

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)