Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A Reason for Environmentalists to Support Legalization
05-03-2010, 06:26 PM, (This post was last modified: 05-03-2010, 06:30 PM by Melchor.)
A Reason for Environmentalists to Support Legalization
Yet another casualty of the drug war. Obviously nobody here needs another reason for legalization, but here's one anyway.

Quote:Marijuana farms trash public lands, threaten public and ecology
Mar 12 2010 Andrew Norman

Marijuana farms spreading like weeds in parks and forests nationwide exact environmental costs that include poisoned land and water, poached wildlife and devastating wildfires.

Long present in western states, Mexican drug trafficking organizations are expanding east, cultivating near large consumer bases like Detroit and Chicago, police say.

It’s an often violent, lucrative form of manifest destiny in reverse. And Great Lakes states, too, are feeling the burden.

Authorities seized more than 7.5 million marijuana plants grown outdoors on more than 20,000 sites in 2008, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. More than 2.6 million plants were found on public lands in 2007, a 37 percent increase from the fewer than 1 million seized in 2004.

Marijuana farms were found in 61 national forests across 16 states in 2009, up from 49 forests in 10 states in 2008. Growers have expanded into national forests in Michigan, Wisconsin, Alabama, Colorado and Virginia. But most of the outdoor production still happens in western states ― 80 percent of all outdoor eradication came in California, Oregon and Washington in 2007, according to the DEA.

What illegal farmers add and subtract from these public lands is an equation that endangers entire forest ecosystems, the public, law enforcement officials and the growers themselves. Forest Service officials are not forthcoming about answering questions about the issue.

Marijuana production on U.S. public lands has been a problem since officials discovered the first farm in California’s Sequoia National Park in 1998. But increased border security after 9/11 has made it more difficult to smuggle marijuana. Growing the crop on secluded public lands lets farmers avoid discovery during border-crossings with the added financial benefit of proximity to their primary consumer base.

Marijuana seizures from sites outdoors and on public lands have increased significantly since 2004, according to DEA figures. The photo shows a few of the chemicals California authorities found on a single grow site. Image: California Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement

“It’s easy to do,” says Michelle Gregory, who has participated in more than 50 pot farm eradication efforts since 2003 with California’s Campaign Against Marijuana Planting, also known as CAMP. “You can cross the border and you’re here, and pick a spot where you want to grow it.”

In California alone, authorities seized almost 4.4 million plants in 2008 ― 70 percent from public lands. That’s up from 621,000 plants and 58 percent in 2004, according to CAMP. Involving 110 different agencies, CAMP is the country’s largest law enforcement task force.

Producing illegal pot outdoors in the United States is a growing agribusiness ― officials say the plants seized in California in 2009 would sell wholesale for $17.8 billion. But taxpayers pay much of the cost of the farms that get cleaned up, sometimes as much as $1 million for a single site. The long-term detriment to the environment is harder to calculate.
Clear, plant, poison and poach

Michigan’s marijuana eradication program found 38,000 outdoor plants in 2008 ― more than in any of the previous six years that Lt. David Peltomaa has run the state’s program. But he says his team, operating primarily in helicopters, doesn’t find even half of the state’s grow sites.

The country’s national forest system includes 193 million acres ― including 36 million acres of wilderness ― patrolled by only 535 law enforcement officers, according to the U.S. Forest Service. Forests are ideal for clandestine farms. Many areas may never see a body walking through them, Peltomaa says.

“You’re talking about thousands of acres of forests, and the plots can be in less than a half-acre,” he says. “Unless you’re flying right over it, you’re not going to see it.”

This aerial view of a 4,000-plant grow site on state land in Michigan. The marijuana is a deeper shade of green. Image: Michigan State Police

Drug cartels often hire undocumented workers from Mexico to work as farmers, Gregory says. They hike or use small vehicles to reach spots that are increasingly remote, have nearby water sources, and heavy tree cover to hide them from helicopters.

Farmers live for months at a time at the site, bringing in food, tents, tarps, bedding and propane to fuel fires. They foul streams with human waste and leave behind thousands of pounds of garbage.

“Imagine 10 adults or so camping out in the forest for a summer, and living there and working there and not removing any of their trash,” says Colorado-based spokesman Mike Turner.

In California, old growth stands of Manzanita trees ― some of which reach more than 100 feet high ― make great spots for plantations, says Shane Krogen, executive director of the nonprofit High Sierra Trail Crew, a volunteer group that helps California authorities clean busted pot farms.

Growers chop down all but a few trees, leaving enough canopy to shield the site from the air, while allowing sunlight to reach the plants. They thin the shorter vegetation and ring the site with brush and chopped logs to keep deer from their plants and bears from their camps.

This wood ― along with farmers’ camp and cooking fires and propane ― provides a potent fuel for wildfires. Authorities say a stove used by suspected drug traffickers sparked a wildfire in Los Padres National Forest in California’s Santa Barbara County in August that burned more than 88,000 acres and forced the evacuation of more than 230 homes.

Farmers scrape off ground cover that protects the forest floor from erosion. They dig holes about every 10 inches and plant tens of thousands of marijuana seedlings often transported to the site in plastic containers.

Growers run miles of drip lines ― rubber or PVC piping ― from a water source like a stream to irrigate the plants. Sometimes they divert streams to the plants, breaking down banks and causing erosion. Others use tarps to create water pits for irrigation that can also drown animals.

Water is key, and farmers will go to great lengths to get it.

Gregory traced a drip line from an 80,000-plant site in Riverside County in 2008 that led to a well on the ranch owned by the late comedian Red Skelton’s wife.

“They just came on the back side of the property and dug in there, stuck it in and buried it,” she says. “They get pretty brazen, because they need the water.”

Farmers set traps and use poison ― some long banned in the U.S. ― to keep insects, rodents, raccoons, rabbits and skunks from eating the plants and from chewing on the irrigation lines. The poison can move up the food chain to animals eaten by humans, officials say. The farmers also shoot animals like foxes, mountain lions and bears that come near.

In July, Krogen’s crew found the remains of five skunks and some rattlesnakes that growers had killed, skinned and eaten. Officials have found endangered species like the California spotted owl and ringtail cat they say were shot by farmers.

They’ll kill “rabbits, game birds, deer ― whatever they happen to come upon,” Peltomaa says.

Chemical dope and booby traps

Marijuana is a weed that can grow just about anywhere. But there’s little natural about how farmers grow these highly potent strains of the plant.

They douse the plants with herbicides and pesticides and use gallons of commercial fertilizer ― one official estimated 1.5 pounds of fertilizers and pesticides are used for every 11.5 plants. That could be a health hazard for the dealers’ customers.

“It’s not like these guys are going to go wash them off before they give them to people,” Gregory says.

The planting loosens the forest ground. Heavy rains can wash the soil, chemicals and poisons into streams. Fertilizers increase algae and weed growth, which slows the water.

“Water [then] heats faster and kills fish, frogs, salamanders ― anything accustomed to a water temperature that doesn’t vary,” Krogen says. Forest managers sometimes trace fish kills upstream and find plantations.

Another pot garden on public land in Michigan. Image: Michigan State Police

But it’s not just trained law enforcement officials who discover these illegal operations. It’s often hunters, fisherman, hikers, mushroom hunters and families who either stumble upon or find and follow irrigation lines to grow sites. And that can be dangerous.

Authorities often find booby traps near the sites, including trip lines and boards buried in the ground with spikes sticking up. Gregory says drug traffickers increasingly arm the farmers to protect their profit.

“They’ve been told to stand and fight,” she says. CAMP seized 142 weapons from outdoor grow sites in 2008.

In June, two officers were shot and one suspected grower was killed in a gun battle near a pot farm in California’s Lassen County. Gregory says a law enforcement dog had to have a stick removed from his rib area after being stabbed by a farmer.

Authorities tell people who think they may be near a plantation to back out immediately and call 911.

“You, your family and friends ought to be able to go into a national forest without worrying about walking into someone’s outdoor grow,” Peltomaa says.

Restoring nature

Authorities say they are overwhelmed by the number of pot farms on public lands, and don’t have enough funding to clean them properly. Agents either burn or bury plants on site or remove them by helicopter. Land management agencies and volunteers are often left to reclaim the territory.

Agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management, the Department of Fish and Game and the national forest and park services often recruit volunteers to haul out as much of the garbage, chemicals and irrigation lines as possible. But many of the sites are difficult to reach by vehicle.

“Unfortunately, there’s so many of them out there and the cleanup process takes so long and is so expensive that they can’t get to every single spot,” Gregory says.

But it’s critical that officials remove the materials, not just to restore the land, but because farmers often return to the same sites and plant again. They may wait a year, or sometimes not even a day.

“Our reclamation teams are having growers coming back on them when they’re trying to clean up,” Gregory says.

Farmers hike much of the materials to the site. “That’s pretty labor-intensive,” she says. “If that stuff gets left in there it’s just easier to come back to the same spot, reattach the drip lines and use the same stuff that’s there instead of having to go someplace new.

“You just fix it up and use it again.”

Growers often live on site, and leave behind camping supplies, human waste and garbage. Image: California Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement

About five years ago, law enforcement ― lacking manpower to restore sites left by marijuana growers ― asked Krogen’s trail-cleaning crew to help. The group’s more than 300 members now spend about 60 days each year clearing the sites, removing irrigation line, chemicals and trash, including sleeping bags, tents, tuna cans, snorkels, car batteries and cell phones. They fill in planting holes and cover exposed hillsides with small branches to help prevent erosion.

Peltomaa says he hopes Michigan forests don’t continue to suffer from an increasingly damaging trend.

“These are public lands,” he says. “They’re not meant to be the sole province of someone who decides to grow marijuana. It’s not theirs to decide to clear cut trees and plant and scare people off.”

If you find a marijuana farm on public land, leave the scene immediately and call the authorities. Callers to Michigan’s tip line can remain anonymous: 800-235-HEMP.

What’s the solution to marijuana production on public land?
05-04-2010, 02:14 AM,
RE: A Reason for Environmentalists to Support Legalization
Strangely, I've often heard this as an example against legalization. I'm not sure how they figure that this will increase when it's legalized, but they often talk about how if pot's legal, we'll see all kinds of these springing up everywhere... I guess they figure potheads are addicted to the lawbreaking, rather than the mind-alteration.

[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
05-04-2010, 08:19 AM,
RE: A Reason for Environmentalists to Support Legalization
(05-04-2010, 02:14 AM)h3rm35 Wrote: Strangely, I've often heard this as an example against legalization. I'm not sure how they figure that this will increase when it's legalized, but they often talk about how if pot's legal, we'll see all kinds of these springing up everywhere... I guess they figure potheads are addicted to the lawbreaking, rather than the mind-alteration.


Yeah. I guess people can twist anything in a way to justify programming. I know I'd prefer driving hours, clearing a remote location, trekking in equipment, and camping out when the only alternative is to plant the stuff around my deck.
05-07-2010, 08:35 PM,
RE: A Reason for Environmentalists to Support Legalization
more reasons why ganga is eco-friendly from
Quote:The Greenest HighWhich illegal drug is best for the environment?
By Brendan BorrellPosted Tuesday, May 4, 2010, at 7:15 AM ET

Let's say I were the type of person who would go to a party where an assortment of recreational drugs were being used. Would it matter, so far as the environment goes, which one I took?
Let's be frank: Most highs for you are kind of a downer for the planet. The conditions under which illegal drugs are produced make it impossible for the government to enforce any sort of clean manufacturing regulations, and the long-standing "War on Drugs" inflicts its own environmental damage. (Think of the RoundUp herbicide sprayed on 120,000 hectares of rural Colombia each year.) There are some ways to measure the eco-credentials of various narcotics, though. To understand how various drugs affect the environment, we need to take a close look at where each one comes from and compare the ways they're harvested or synthesized.

Ecstasy and crystal meth turn out to be especially nasty products. The former is made from sassafras oil, which is derived mostly from endangered rainforest trees in Brazil or Southeast Asia. In 2008, the U.K.-based Flora and Fauna International helped law enforcement confiscate 33 tons of oil distilled by criminal gangs from more than 8,000 chopped-down trees at the Phnom Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary in Cambodia. (That's enough to make 245 million Ecstasy tablets.) Meanwhile, crystal meth in the U.S. market comes from the chemicals ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, which are either extracted from an Asian grass or brewed in a frothy vat of molasses. China and India account for half the world's supply, according to the U.S. State Department's 2010 Narcotics Control Strategy Report, and most of the stuff that lands on our shores was likely shipped from halfway around the globe. Big-time meth chefs in the United States and Mexico purchase the raw material from domestic pill makers or middlemen, while smaller players may purchase cold medicines from pharmacy shelves. The facilities that actually cook up the street drug are also running a dirty business: In California's Central Valley, law enforcement estimates between 4 million and 7 million pounds of lab waste were poured into canals and on properties between 2000 and 2004. The people who have to clean it up wear Haz-Mat suits.

Cocaine isn't much better. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency estimates that 2.4 million hectares of rainforest have been cleared by coca growers in the South American Andes over the last 20 years. If the DEA's numbers can be trusted, that represents nearly one-quarter of the deforestation taking place in the region. The Peruvian government says that 15 million liters of toxic chemicals—primarily kerosene or diesel—are dumped in Amazonian watersheds every year during the production of coca paste. Finally, the drug has to make its way to North America by plane, boat or narco-sub, and this may involve a gas-guzzling route via South Africa and Europe.

A better choice for those into the hard stuff may be heroin. Though most of the supply comes from poppy-growing regions all the way in Afghanistan and Southeast Asia, some have argued that opium is a better crop for the environment than local alternatives. Switching over to rice or rubber would require farmers to cultivate quite a bit more land just to get the same income—an argument that might apply to South American coca growers as well. But the main reason heroin beats out cocaine has to do with land use: According to the 2009 U.N. World Drug Report, one square meter of opium poppies nets 23 doses of heroin, while a square meter of coca plants yields just six lines of cocaine.

Which brings us to cannabis, the greenest fix of all. The same U.N. report finds that a square meter of marijuana cultivation can support 250 dose units of the drug. About the same amount of land—200,000 hectares—is under cultivation for cannabis, cocaine, and heroin around the world, but the cannabis is getting a heck of a lot more people high. For users in the United States, it also has the relative advantage of being produced in large quantities on American soil. About half of our marijuana supply comes from domestic sources—with minimal "drug miles" and a slimmer carbon footprint.

There are some major environmental downsides to marijuana, however. At least half of the world's yearly crop of 50,000 metric tons is cultivated in subtropical Mexico, including protected areas in the mountains of the Sierra Madre Occidental, where the Lantern himself has spotted more than a few gardens within park boundaries. In California, growers in Sequoia National Park have cleared native vegetation, diverted streams, and applied fertilizers and poisons on public land. In August 2009, cannabis farmers managed to set off a 75,000-acre conflagration with a cook fire.

While most of today's drug culture is simply another wasteful frontier of American consumerism, some enthusiastic drug users have proven to be fervid environmentalists. For instance, the peyote-eating Huichol people* of Mexico even established a protected area for their psychedelic pilgrimages at Wirikuta.

Is there an environmental quandary that's been keeping you up at night? Send it to, and check this space every Tuesday.

*Correction, May 4, 2010: The original described the Huichol people as "smoking" peyote. The drug is taken orally and not inhaled.
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Information The Globalist agenda behind Marijuana Legalization FastTadpole 12 904 02-24-2014, 02:35 AM
Last Post: thokling
Thumbs Up Support President Molina's Call for Legalization Easy Skanking 2 572 03-07-2012, 11:50 PM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  Arizona: Medical Marijuana Legalization Measure Certified For November Ballot Easy Skanking 4 770 06-04-2010, 11:29 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  DEA seize 200 legalization petition signatures in WA state h3rm35 2 721 05-25-2010, 06:30 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  CBS Polls Finds Majority Of Western Voters, Californians, Back Legalization Easy Skanking 0 477 04-23-2010, 04:08 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  tell firedoglake that you want them to support pot initiatives h3rm35 0 428 04-07-2010, 07:08 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Marijuana Legalization Officially Qualifies for California Ballot h3rm35 3 632 03-26-2010, 09:16 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Rhode Island Lawmakers Introduce State's First Ever Marijuana Legalization Bill Easy Skanking 1 571 03-06-2010, 01:38 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Canada: Pro-legalization cop censored by department h3rm35 0 446 03-04-2010, 01:19 AM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Marijuana Legalization Questions Excluded From YouTube Presidential Forum Easy Skanking 1 573 02-05-2010, 10:21 AM
Last Post: h3rm35

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)