Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How Accurate is A Prediction?
03-01-2010, 02:10 PM,
#1
How Accurate is A Prediction?
According to the Spaceman (Gary Bell), he swears by/stands by the Vedic Astrological prediction that the 44th president of the US will not survive his term in office.

Having been exposed to astrology in my earlier years by various friends, family members, etc., I know from first hand experience that those predictions can be all too true. No matter how hard you fight it it happens.

There are those who are of the school of thought that will tell you that in being told something specific and concentrating on avoiding it you bring it about.

There are those who are of the school of thought that will say that fate deals it cards and you can see that in astrology (if you are adept at reading the stars).

There are those who are of the school of thought that there is nothing but coincidence when you talk about that stuff.

And on and on it goes. Pick your school and go with that is what I say.

However, Space says this is what Vedic (Far Eastern) astrology tells us. Have I seen it? No, I really haven't tried to search it out. But I have heard him talk about it for two years, which forces me to pose a question.

Barry has been in office a little over a year now and we can get a fair idea of what type of governing he is going to do. Going by what has happened during the campaign and including the first year of his office what does he look like as a leader?

During the campaign, he regularly lost control of topics and subjects and he had a very hard time getting control back. He was constantly labeled as 'NOT BEING A CLOSER'. He could never take control of a subject or topic and put it to rest. Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Birth Certificate, Nationality, Muslim, etc.

When he got into office everything he has put his hands on and tried to get accomplished has or is in the process of failing.

Every candidate he endorses has lost his office in a campaign.

Everything he said he was going to do he hasn't and he has not been allowed to forget about it.

In other words he has failed from the very beginning.

But he speaks well and UPON OCCASSION can give a good speech depending on how well he has memorized it. He is afterall known as the 'Teleprompter President'.

If what Space is saying is true then it would stand to reason that either one of two things have to be happening:

1. The Elites want all this failure for some obscure reason
2. The Elites have a plan in place and need for these things to be pushed through.

If #1 is correct then Barry is on schedule and the prediction is wrong. Nothing to see here.

If #2 is correct then Barry has failed at his given task and he will NEED to be replaced with someone the people can be comfortable with and go along with whatever is being offered up as being good for them.

Let's say #2 is actually what the Elites are trying to accomplish and Barry has failed. Who would be the replacement? Can we see him yet? Is he right under our noses? Who would it be?

Under most administrations the VP & P are never in the same place at the same time or travel together for obvious reasons. Not so with this administration. You often times will see the VP & P together. Is there a possibility that both will meet with an accident? I don't believe that the elites want Biden as President. If they did he would be. But I don't see him stepping into the office. I don't see him surviving the office either.

Nancy Pelosi is third in line for the office in case of some tragic mishap. I see her as being not long for her own office considering that she has lost all control of the house.

There are persistent rumors in DC that Rahm Emmanuel is set to take over her seat in the near future. If that is the case and it happens before any accident takes place, would he be the next president? Could he be? Is it possible to govern just by giving everyone the finger?

Does anyone else have any theories about this subject?
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag and begin slitting throats. H. L. Mencken




Reply
03-02-2010, 02:12 AM,
#2
RE: How Accurate is A Prediction?
As far as the 44th president not surviving their term in office - why would Indians have created a prophecy relating to that at all? I'm much more in line with this point:

"1. The Elites want all this failure for some obscure reason"

but I have to add - is it really all that obscure? Failure lays the groundwork for more government intervention, more bailouts, and more depressed and angry peons that will need to be put in check... does this seem obscure to you? Mr. Shrub-chimp hybrid laid the legal groudwork for the imposition of martial law, and Obama will create the circumstances that will lead to its institution. Sounds pretty blatant. If he gets killed in office, it'll happen even sooner.

as far as the rest of the post, I don't really understand your logic...

Nancy Pelosi has lost control of the house?
She sure does manage to get plenty of things through the way the democratic base would like them to end up - it would be far more accurate to say the same thing of Reid and the senate.

"I see her as being not long for her own office considering that she has lost all control of the house."

Who could possibly beat her in her district? She's long ago sold out to all the right corporations, and no one has dared to come into the spotlight to challenge her in the democratic party. Any republican has a snowball's chance in hell in SF, CA. It is possible, but improbable, that the house will shift majorities in 2010, so she won't necessarily be speaker, but she'll still be there. Pelosi has a far easier job than Reid, as she has a much larger majority, so I can pretty much guarantee that she'll be there through at least 2012.

And Obama not being a closer - losing control of issues on the campaign trail?

The election numbers beg to differ.

"Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, Tony Rezko, Birth Certificate, Nationality, Muslim, etc."
I understand you don't like the guy, but that doesn't make what you're saying even the slightest bit accurate - only hardcore right-wing lunatics will come out and voice any of these issues. The MSM has tamped them all down, and has made a recurrent practice of showing those who attend tea party events with those sentiments plastered across poorly - spelled signs as uninformed, hypocritical morons.

Not that they necessarily are, mind you, but everyone who isn't on Fox or AM radio has pretty much shrugged off these talking points.

I'm not personally a fan of either Pelosi or Obama, they're both shills, but so is just about everyone else on the national political stage. They're all actors and liars, but you're trying to say that two that are really good at acting and lying are not doing those tasks very well... Obama's still got approval numbers over 50% (amazingly,) and Pelosi has great numbers in her district. They're both doing very well at keeping their job prospects intact. Unless they get shot.
[Image: conspiracy_theory.jpg]
Reply
03-02-2010, 11:25 PM,
#3
RE: How Accurate is A Prediction?
(03-02-2010, 02:12 AM)h3rm35 Wrote: "1. The Elites want all this failure for some obscure reason"

but I have to add - is it really all that obscure? Failure lays the groundwork for more government intervention, more bailouts, and more depressed and angry peons that will need to be put in check... does this seem obscure to you? Mr. Shrub-chimp hybrid laid the legal groudwork for the imposition of martial law, and Obama will create the circumstances that will lead to its institution. Sounds pretty blatant. If he gets killed in office, it'll happen even sooner.

My worldview was drastically different in 2000 so this is a post hoc analysis. However, looking back Bush was set up to fail his whole presidency. First there was a blatantly stolen election. Then he was constantly portrayed as borderline retarded. Gaff after gaff after gaff. The only thing he did right was grandstand for people after 9/11. Everyone knew Iraq was bullshit ahead of time etc... So looked at it from that perspective, a "failing president" makes selling the agenda easier. "It wasn't some orchestrated plan dictated from other places, I just screwed up." People eat that incompetence shit up especially when corruption is the alternative.

As to thrice-great's comment I quoted I couldn't agree more. It's pretty blatant. During the campaign I speculated that an assassination might be a possibility the way all the McCain supporters were getting riled up. If the goal was to rip the country apart I think assassinating the first black president would ignite a race war instantly. But the more time passes, it looks to me like the approach is to use Obama as a red-bait scapegoat to create vast hordes of tea-baggers like hardline and drive them right into the arms of the fascists who will save them from the commies. Obviously this is highly speculative but America has always been propagandized toward hyper-nationalism and fascism than toward international socialism. Hence, I am expecting the change agents to come from the Glenn Becks and Alex Jones' not those nasty leftists.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  West wings election prediction DJOldskool 3 1,114 11-07-2008, 09:41 AM
Last Post: DJOldskool

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)