Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator
12-22-2009, 01:55 PM,
Bank charges challenge is dropped by regulator
Quote:The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has decided to drop its investigation into the fairness of bank overdraft charges.

It follows last month's Supreme Court ruling that the OFT could not use part of the unfair contract regulations to decide if bank charges were unfair.

However, the OFT said it still had "significant concerns" about the way banks operate current accounts.

More than a million refund claims that have been on hold since July 2007 are likely to be rejected.

The regulator said "fundamental change" was still needed in the interests of customers.

"The OFT has concluded that any investigation it were to continue into the fairness of current unarranged overdraft charging terms under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations (UTCCRs) would have a very limited scope and low prospects of success," the OFT said.

"Given this, it has decided against taking forward such an investigation."

BBC's personal finance reporter Ian Pollock said two and a half years of work by the OFT had ended in defeat.

This is a victory for the ability of the banks to set their own charges, no matter how unfair some customers may consider them to be, our correspondent said.

'Voluntary agreement'

Banks levy charges amounting to £2.6bn each year on their overdrawn customers and this makes up a third of their income from running current accounts.

The OFT said the charges were "difficult to understand, not transparent, and not subject to effective consumer control".

"We are committed to securing significant changes to unarranged overdraft charges going forward, whether through voluntary agreement with the banks or by other means," said the OFT's chief executive, John Fingleton.

He threatened to ask the government to change the law if the banks did not co-operate, a stance supported by the Treasury.

"We're working towards a voluntary agreement with the banks, but we don't rule out further action if this doesn't deliver the kind of changes we expect to see," said a Treasury spokesman

"Through the Financial Services Bill we are legislating to give consumers greater powers and protection for the future, including the ability to take a group action through the courts wherever there is mis-selling or abuse on the parts of banks," he added.

The OFT hopes the banks will come to an agreement by the end of March 2010.

Supreme Court ruling

The banks and the OFT first agreed to stage a legal test case in July 2007, to decide if the OFT had the powers to rule on the fairness of bank charges.

A consumer campaign on the issue had led to hundreds of thousands of complaints which threatened to swamp the UK legal system.

But after the High Court and Appeal Court sided with the OFT, the Supreme Court turned the tables.

The five judges did not rule on the issue of fairness itself.

They decided that the parts of the 1999 Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations (UTCCR) that the OFT was trying to invoke did not, in fact, give it the powers it thought it had.

The judges said that overdraft charges were part of the price that customers agreed to pay for the package of services their banks provided, and as such were excluded from the scope of the regulations.

New line of attack?

The banks are currently working their way through more than a million complaints that have been stacked up since the test case started in July 2007.

The overwhelming majority are likely to be rejected.

Thousands of other claims for the repayment of past bank charges, which have been stayed in the courts, may now be reopened at the request of either the banks or their customers, but the chances of any succeeding seem slim.

The OFT also revealed it had decided against launching a different legal attack on bank charges.

It had considered using the Consumer Credit Act, but had concluded it would have little chance of success if it attempted to argue in court that under that law the banks had established an "unfair relationship" with their customers.

"This partly reflects an assessment of the wider repercussions of [the] reasoning underlying the judgement," the OFT said.

"This reasoning will inevitably be influential in guiding the deliberations of any UK court before which the OFT might bring enforcement action based on the concept of fairness."

However the OFT said an individual might have greater chance of success with such an argument "since a case would need to focus on the individual circumstances of each creditor-debtor relationship - including matters relating to the individual debtor".
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Rainbow End of Bank Foreclosures 4 Clear Title Holders ZeroCenter 9 1,713 05-25-2014, 10:41 PM
Last Post: ZeroCenter
  'Dollar valueless, about to crash' - World Bank whistleblower SiLVa 11 1,275 04-07-2014, 10:52 PM
Last Post: CharliePrime
  World Bank Accused Of Destroying Small Farms for Land Grabs mexika 0 219 04-03-2014, 06:26 PM
Last Post: mexika
Bug TruthJihad Interviews World Bank Whistleblowing Lawyer CharliePrime 0 432 11-25-2013, 08:50 PM
Last Post: CharliePrime
  Bank Run in Canada? stiffy 8 1,184 04-11-2013, 11:16 PM
Last Post: stiffy
  CYPRUS : BANK RUNS HAVE STARTED ! shortwave 22 2,490 04-02-2013, 09:17 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
Information Wow That Was Fast! Libyan Rebels Have Already Established A New Central Bank Of Libya Nokturnal 37 8,525 11-24-2012, 06:30 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  The MintChip Challenge brought to you by The Royal Canadian Mint SiLVa 8 1,261 08-20-2012, 09:10 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Lauryn Hill responds to tax evasion charges TriWooOx 11 2,234 06-16-2012, 03:05 AM
Last Post: Anarchist
  Keiser Report: Anti-Bank Currency icosaface 1 530 04-08-2012, 11:37 AM
Last Post: Zammo

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)