Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'Eat fewer sausages to save the planet from global warming', Britons warned
11-26-2009, 09:11 AM,
#1
'Eat fewer sausages to save the planet from global warming', Britons warned
Quote:Cutting a sausage a day from the average British diet is necessary to save the planet, scientists claim.

Their controversial report, which partly blames meat-eaters for climate change, was backed by Environment Secretary Hilary Benn's department last night.

The scientists called for a 30 per cent reduction in the number of farm animals bred for meat to prevent rising temperatures and rising sea levels.

The average meat intake in men is 970g a week and in women 550g a week. A 30 per cent reduction in men is equivalent to seven 40g sausages, two 130g chicken breasts, four 70g lamb chops or 12 bacon rashers of 25g.

Such a reduction would also bring significant health benefits, the scientists said, by reducing premature deaths from heart disease in Britain by 17 per cent - equivalent to 18,000 lives a year.

They claimed food production from animals was a major source of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and that by 2030, rising demand for meat was expected to drive up livestock production globally by 85 per cent from 2000 levels, leading to substantial emission increases.

The authors, led by Dr Alan Dangour, from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and Dr Sharon Friel, from the Australian National University in Canberra, wrote in the medical journal The Lancet that improvements in agricultural efficiency were 'necessary but not sufficient to meet targets to reduce emissions'.

Although the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said it would not comment on the 30 per cent figure, it released a statement to say: 'There are lots of ways people can cut their carbon footprint and impact on the environment - and reducing the amount of meat in our diets is one option.'

But the backing of vegetarian Mr Benn's department, which is specifically responsible for promoting farming, drew strong criticism from farmers and scientists who said cutting meat consumption was not the way to combat climate change.

Peter Kendall, president of the National Farmers' Union, said: 'Farmers will be angry that yet again we have an ill-informed and simplistic report which appears to completely misunderstand agriculture's emissions and its role in climate change.

'This report advocates a 30 per cent reduction in livestock numbers in countries that have the most efficient production systems and hence the lowest emissions.

'What we need to do is look at doing things more efficiently rather than simply cutting livestock numbers.

'The car industry is praised for producing more efficient and environmentally friendly vehicles rather than being told to cut production.

'Other governments that value their livestock production are looking at exciting and innovative ways to reduce agriculture's environmental impacts while understanding the need to produce more food for an expanding global population.'

Professor Ian Crute, chief scientist at the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, which advises the meat industry, said: 'A large fall in meat eating or turning vegetarian is not the solution to climate change - it would make only a marginal difference to greenhouse gas emissions.

'The challenge is to produce meat more sustainably - which is already happening in countries such as the UK, which is leading global thinking in this area.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230781/Decade-soaring-temperatures-ahead-Health-Secretary-warns-real-present-danger-posed-climate-change.html
The revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall. - Che Guevara

Resistance Films Youtube Channel

TriWooOx Podcast
Reply
11-26-2009, 10:45 AM,
#2
RE: 'Eat fewer sausages to save the planet from global warming', Britons warned
Quote:.......
Cutting a sausage a day from the average British diet is necessary to save the planet, scientists claim.
.......


Rofl Rofl Rofl Rofl Undecided
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Naming Names: The 90 Companies Destroying Our Planet mexika 0 534 12-03-2013, 04:06 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Survival or Extinction: The OM Principles versus the Global Depopulation Policy mexika 0 761 11-20-2013, 10:06 PM
Last Post: mexika
  US farmers may stop planting GMs after poor global yields Easy Skanking 6 1,322 02-16-2013, 06:33 PM
Last Post: thokling
  Bird flu is 'only three steps' from mutating into deadly new form - global pandemic TriWooOx 2 831 07-14-2012, 08:29 AM
Last Post: nwo2012
  Leaked Rio+20 Earth Summit Final Agreed Text – Utterly Inadequate Response to Global mexika 1 709 06-22-2012, 03:35 PM
Last Post: nwo2012
  The Global Bee Death. i8manu 6 2,280 05-20-2012, 09:38 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Royal Society Believes Depopulation Will Save the Environment mexika 0 584 05-03-2012, 08:50 PM
Last Post: mexika
Thumbs Down Children Are Going Hungry: School Meals are ‘Made Smaller to Save Money’ FastTadpole 3 1,189 04-04-2012, 08:57 PM
Last Post: Sovereignman
  Change Your Diet & Help Save Animals From a Life of Suffering Solve et Coagula 12 2,484 01-12-2012, 04:28 AM
Last Post: nwo2012
  Simplified Global Warming logic DoomSayer 17 4,340 01-11-2012, 11:15 PM
Last Post: thokling

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)