Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nanoparticles Used in Common Household Items Cause Genetic Damage in Mice
11-18-2009, 04:59 PM,
#1
Nanoparticles Used in Common Household Items Cause Genetic Damage in Mice
Quote:Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, found in everything from cosmetics to sunscreen to paint to vitamins, caused systemic genetic damage in mice, according to a comprehensive study conducted by researchers at UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.
The TiO2 nanoparticles induced single- and double-strand DNA breaks and also caused chromosomal damage as well as inflammation, all of which increase the risk for cancer. The UCLA study is the first to show that the nanoparticles had such an effect, said Robert Schiestl, a professor of pathology, radiation oncology and environmental health sciences, a Jonsson Cancer Center scientist and the study's senior author.

Once in the system, the TiO2 nanoparticles accumulate in different organs because the body has no way to eliminate them. And because they are so small, they can go everywhere in the body, even through cells, and may interfere with sub-cellular mechanisms.

The study appeared the week of November 16 in the journal Cancer Research.

In the past, these TiO2 nanoparticles have been considered non-toxic in that they do not incite a chemical reaction. Instead, it is surface interactions that the nanoparticles have within their environment- in this case inside a mouse -- that is causing the genetic damage, Schiestl said. They wander throughout the body causing oxidative stress, which can lead to cell death.

It is a novel mechanism of toxicity, a physicochemical reaction, these particles cause in comparison to regular chemical toxins, which are the usual subjects of toxicological research, Schiestl said.

"The novel principle is that titanium by itself is chemically inert. However, when the particles become progressively smaller, their surface, in turn, becomes progressively bigger and in the interaction of this surface with the environment oxidative stress is induced," he said. "This is the first comprehensive study of titanium dioxide nanoparticle-induced genotoxicity, possibly caused by a secondary mechanism associated with inflammation and/or oxidative stress. Given the growing use of these nanoparticles, these findings raise concern about potential health hazards associated with exposure."

The manufacture of TiO2 nanoparticles is a huge industry, Schiestl said, with production at about two million tons per year. In addition to paint, cosmetics, sunscreen and vitamins, the nanoparticles can be found in toothpaste, food colorants, nutritional supplements and hundreds of other personal care products.

"It could be that a certain portion of spontaneous cancers are due to this exposure," Schiestl said. "And some people could be more sensitive to nanoparticles exposure than others. "I believe the toxicity of these nanoparticles has not been studied enough."

Schiestl said the nanoparticles cannot go through skin, so he recommends using a lotion sunscreen. Spray-on sunscreens could potentially be inhaled and the nanoparticles can become lodged in the lungs.

The mice were exposed to the TiO2 nanoparticles in their drinking water and began showing genetic damage on the fifth day. The human equivalent is about 1.6 years of exposure to the nanoparticles in a manufacturing environment. However, Schiestl said, it's not clear if regular, everyday exposure in humans increases exponentially as continued contact with the nanoparticles occurs over time.

"These data suggest that we should be concerned about a potential risk of cancer or genetic disorders especially for people occupationally exposed to high concentrations of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, and that it might be prudent to limit their ingestion through non-essential drug additives, food colors, etc.," the study states.

Next, Schiestl and his team will study exposure to the nanoparticles in mice that are deficient in DNA repair, to perhaps help find a way to predict which people might be particularly sensitive to them.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091116165739.htm
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How to cure/reverse brain damage? ormagus 42 38,284 01-25-2014, 03:44 PM
Last Post: Krise
  Respectfully yours, Jagannath Chatterjee, Vaccine damage victim bristopen 0 1,220 01-04-2014, 10:19 AM
Last Post: bristopen
  Genetic Roulette - The Gamble of Our Lives flamesong 0 527 10-16-2012, 02:21 PM
Last Post: flamesong
  Safety warning over Britain’s most common antidepressant TriWooOx 0 639 07-02-2012, 09:20 AM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Undiagnosed Brain Injuries Appear to be Very Common curious2222 3 1,122 01-16-2012, 08:56 PM
Last Post: thokling
Bug EPA Considers Banning Triclosan, A Common Anti-Bacterial in Soap FastTadpole 0 714 06-17-2011, 03:47 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  What Do Sarin Nerve Gas and Your Drinking Water Have In Common? Defendfreedom 0 635 05-06-2011, 08:00 PM
Last Post: Defendfreedom
  Study: fluoridated water causes brain damage in children TriWooOx 2 1,075 05-04-2011, 11:36 PM
Last Post: jao
  Second hand smoking may damage mental well being Sundberg 4 1,405 03-22-2011, 03:10 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Nanoparticles showing up in thousands of consumer products April 1 1,028 03-16-2011, 08:25 AM
Last Post: FastTadpole

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)