Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
07-01-2009, 09:09 PM,
#31
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:But I do agree with you Hans...evidence for one doesnt automatically mean the other is true. And vice-versa.

THANK YOU.

People on here are much more intelligent than on PP forum, no surprise there. Also, free speech does actually exist here, on PP forum it doesn't. Those teenage fascist moderators there deleted my posts (in which I actually attacked "no-planers" theories) threatened me with ban and then tried to advise me on how to live my live and what I should do. Morons. Another member who called kevlar "less than human" or worse wasn't even warned, and a troll girl who called me names for 10 pages of forum was left alone, also. MORONS.
Reply
07-01-2009, 09:46 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-01-2009, 09:48 PM by SiLVa.)
#32
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Youre welcome. Yeah...Ive never posted there. Thought about once before but Ive heard stuff like that before so i never attempted to go back. I do post occasionally on the comments in some of the featured articles on infowars. But not much. There are plenty of morons over there that seem only capable of binary thinking.

Quote:Thinking Outside the Box: Beyond Binary Thinking
January 19, 2008
Either/or thinking (binary thinking), is a very basic and somewhat reactionary way of thinking. It's based on classifying everything into two boxes. This leads to us viewing the world through a high-contrast, black-and-white filter.

Classification according to either/or binary thinking), reduces our ability to understand and think beyond the limited scope. Binary thinking prevents us from:

- understanding a concept in term of degrees
- understanding a concept in terms of "types"
- understanding processes in contextual terms
- understanding concepts through other lenses
- understanding concepts from other perspectives

http://multispective.wordpress.com/2008/01...inary-thinking/
"Listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research"
~William Cooper

DTTNWO!
Reply
07-02-2009, 02:10 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-02-2009, 02:19 AM by kevlar.)
#33
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
please have a watch of this 25 min video that i came across

http://udn1.com/911/abc.911.audio.mp4

of you can grab the torrent https://tracker.conspiracycentral.net/torre...ils.php?id=7989

please tell me what you think
Reply
07-02-2009, 04:12 AM,
#34
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:
Quote:Thinking Outside the Box: Beyond Binary Thinking
January 19, 2008
Either/or thinking (binary thinking), is a very basic and somewhat reactionary way of thinking. It's based on classifying everything into two boxes. This leads to us viewing the world through a high-contrast, black-and-white filter.

Classification according to either/or binary thinking), reduces our ability to understand and think beyond the limited scope. Binary thinking prevents us from:

- understanding a concept in term of degrees
- understanding a concept in terms of "types"
- understanding processes in contextual terms
- understanding concepts through other lenses
- understanding concepts from other perspectives

http://multispective.wordpress.com/2008/01...inary-thinking/

That's either true or it isn't
Reply
07-02-2009, 11:06 AM,
#35
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:[b]- understanding a concept in term of degrees
- understanding a concept in terms of "types"
- understanding processes in contextual terms
- understanding concepts through other lenses
- understanding concepts from other perspectives

Yeaaaah! That's what I'm talking about! Binary thinking, what a perfect name for that. Thanks!
Reply
07-02-2009, 04:05 PM,
#36
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:Thinking Outside the Box: Beyond Binary Thinking
January 19, 2008
Either/or thinking (binary thinking), is a very basic and somewhat reactionary way of thinking. It's based on classifying everything into two boxes. This leads to us viewing the world through a high-contrast, black-and-white filter.

Classification according to either/or binary thinking), reduces our ability to understand and think beyond the limited scope. Binary thinking prevents us from:

- understanding a concept in term of degrees
- understanding a concept in terms of "types"
- understanding processes in contextual terms
- understanding concepts through other lenses
- understanding concepts from other perspectives

http://multispective.wordpress.com/2008/01...inary-thinking/

That's either true or it isn't

Ha!...at 1st I was like wha? then I got it...lol
"Listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research"
~William Cooper

DTTNWO!
Reply
07-02-2009, 04:14 PM,
#37
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:That's either true or it isn't


Ha!...at 1st I was like wha? then I got it...lol

:wacko: :D
Reply
07-02-2009, 08:31 PM,
#38
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
so no one watched the video ? :/
Reply
07-02-2009, 08:32 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-03-2009, 03:20 AM by ---.)
#39
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:so no one watched the video ? :/

watching it later..

edit)watching now.
Reply
07-06-2009, 07:49 AM,
#40
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
right lets get this straight. i have absolute proof that there were planes flying into buildings that day. so far any videos made on the subject concerning those days are made with people using slow motion to show (slowly) how or what was going on. be it explosives or squibs. we have had very scientific sound analysis aswell as infra-red analysis.

However every video made about "tv fakery" seems to consist of a tiny portion of video played over and over again until you can finally see the emperor has some kit on.The analysis seems to consist of some text in Disney characters reading "SEE?!?!?" with the expectation that you fully understand. Ive also had some people touting a theory of the planes nose poking out from the other side. This is utter horseshit. Also the idea that having a switch happen with the video just at the point of impact as "evidence" even tho you see this on some police chases. not to mention that some of the technologies available (software) would not be able to get so perfect. Give me a year and ill get close. Now lets try it in real time almost 10 years ago!! yeah easy stuff!

If anyone out there thinks that no planes hit wtc on that day. you have managed to get your noggin in a terrible state and suggest you start blaming zionists. Also you must understand i am a shill working for aforementioned zionists and cannot be trusted. If you want to start getting exotic with your theories please carry on just dont expect much response. im sick to death of this bullshit concept.

All of what i say wont dissuade any no planer as they believe what they believe. ill stick with what evidence there is out there that can at least seem plausible. I mean if we are having a competition on who can get the most outlandish theories then fine. all good fun. but to make this out as legitimate is laughable. sorry no planers. ive looked. i looked hard. but your case is weak. your conspiracy kung fu is not strong. and you make legitimate research get tarred and feathered by the haters. thanks for your contribution but no thanks. i await your flame....
Reply
07-08-2009, 03:44 PM,
#41
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:right lets get this straight. i have absolute proof that there were planes flying into buildings that day.

And that would be?

Obviously your eyes CAN decieve you and this talk of "thousands of eye witnesses" has been dealt with over and over to show that there were just as many if not MORE witnesses who didn't see planes (either directly or "didn't see a plane necessarily" talk) along with oodles upon oodles of either phony eye witnesses (people proven to be actors, people wearing obviously fake moustaches and tossing in Osama Bin Laden references mere hours later) or people with heavy connections to established media (who DID lie to us and used tactics of enforcing a terrorist/Hamas/Osama Bin Laden connection, we can all agree on that, right?) or the government/military itself. You have to admit that at least SOME (IMO Most) of the eye-witnesses were plants and again, the genuine people on the street who "saw" the plane, aren't they susceptible to the "saw the explosion briefly but saw the plane on TV 50 times so there HAS to be a plane" brain-washing?

Now, to those who don't believe in this nonsense what do you make of all the evidence for it? Planted evidence? What of the nose-out? Was that a plant all the way back then? I mean, that IS the outline of the nose going THROUGH the tower, right? What of the moving backgrounds? The changes in flight path? The various videos where the plane is simply NOT there? (The NBC4 footage in particular)

I'm just curious, is your argument that ALL of this are plants to make us look like fools? And if they are, how come this is the most under-talked, under-researched, and under-exposed part of the conspiracy theory (since it's always a theory). Alex Jones has basically banned the discussion from his shows outright, so how is this helping their agenda if it's talked about so little?

One last question that I always have to ask since to me it's a real deal breaker, anyone who's ever had a plane go over head knows you can hear a plane coming for a good minute to two minutes before it actually passes, how come when the second plane hits NO ONE, NOT ONE PERSON is pointing up in the sky and screaming "OH MY GOD! ANOTHER PLANE!"? IMO it's impossible for not a single person to see this and exclaim about it, and I've watched close to if not all the footage available of the second hit and I've never seen or heard this reaction from any of these supposed "eye witnesses to the second crash"
Reply
07-08-2009, 08:50 PM,
#42
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:right lets get this straight. i have absolute proof that there were planes flying into buildings that day.

OK, show us the ABSOLUTE PROOF. I mean, I also believe there were planes, don't get me wrong. But I want to see the absolute proof nevertheless.
Reply
07-08-2009, 08:57 PM,
#43
TV fakery does not mean "no planes".
Quote:
Quote:right lets get this straight. i have absolute proof that there were planes flying into buildings that day.

OK, show us the ABSOLUTE PROOF. I mean, I also believe there were planes, don't get me wrong. But I want to see the absolute proof nevertheless.

lol yes, ABSOLUTE PROOF!! please :popcorn:
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Suspicious package found in British airport as terror alert grounds planes in U.S. drummer 3 951 10-30-2010, 05:23 PM
Last Post: rsol
  Military to Deploy on U.S. Soil to "Assist" with Pandemic Outbreak mexika 1 739 07-31-2009, 05:01 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  Honduras: "They knew and they helped a little" mexika 0 602 07-30-2009, 03:20 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Are the Iranian Protests Another US Orchestrated "Color Revolution?" mexika 0 482 06-27-2009, 06:17 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Like Iraq, the "Facts" Regarding 9/11 Were "Fixed Around the Policy" icosaface 0 558 05-19-2009, 02:03 AM
Last Post: icosaface
  Swine flu "discovered thanks to improved testing facilities and expanded disease surveillance" yeti 21 2,803 04-28-2009, 04:19 AM
Last Post: ---
  Harold Pinter (1930-2008) on "Art, Truth and Politics" mexika 0 508 12-31-2008, 07:31 AM
Last Post: mexika
  Is the fact that millions now know details about 9/11 like TV fakery or mini-nukes a sign of the End of the US? Answer: Kyoon 3 859 12-18-2008, 03:31 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  No Planes, 911 T.V. Fakery trueaim 18 1,420 05-22-2008, 05:45 AM
Last Post: trueaim
  The Planes of 9-11 voltaxebec 21 2,714 03-21-2008, 06:19 PM
Last Post: TeslaandLyne

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)