Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ConCen tration Camps In Your Town?
01-12-2007, 01:36 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-08-2011, 11:37 AM by yeti.)
#1
ConCen tration Camps In Your Town?
http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-bloggers/1607403/posts
The truth is out. The “truthiness” is no longer in doubt. There is a minimum of one confirmed concentration camp built on American soil in rural Wyoming.

Okay, many have heard the rumors, dismissed them as kook theories, believed by nobody, perpetuated by the ABB (Anybody but Bush) crowd or as a topic of interest for the Art Bell and Jeff Rense radio audience.

An undisclosed DHS (Department of Homeland Security) order was placed with DigitalGlobe to photograph the near completed work camp facility only listed by location as “central Wyoming” on the mistakenly published photographs.

DHS accidentally placed these photos on a publicly accessible portion of their website on March 28th and they were pulled within one hour. Fortunately Google had cached the images. They too though have been removed in the past 48 hours. The images are not gone forever though.

I am employed by a civil rights organization and due to the sensitive nature of these images I wish to remain anonymous. However these images must get out. Someone must be the whistleblower, someone must warn the American public what the Bush Administration has in store for dissidents, political opponents, civil libertarians and “fifth columnists” as defined by the Justice Department.
[Image: h8kng.jpg]

[Image: l6zhm.jpg]

[Image: khmcd.jpg]

[Image: gb2nx.jpg]

[Image: zyk94.jpg]

[Image: jazdo.jpg]
There has been plenty written about this topic and plenty of historical evidence to back up this is a clear and present danger.

2006 Press Releases (Official KBR Press Release)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 24, 2006

KBR AWARDED U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CONTINGENCY SUPPORT PROJECT FOR EMERGENCY SUPPORT SERVICES

ARLINGTON, Virginia – KBR announced today that its Government and Infrastructure division has been awarded an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to support the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities in the event of an emergency. KBR is the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton (NYSE:HAL).

With a maximum total value of $385 million over a five-year term, consisting of a one-year based period and four one-year options, the competitively awarded contract will be executed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District. KBR held the previous ICE contract from 2000 through 2005.

“We are especially gratified to be awarded this contract because it builds on our extremely strong track record in the arena of emergency operations support,” said Bruce Stanski, executive vice president, KBR Government and Infrastructure. “We look forward to continuing the good work we have been doing to support our customer whenever and wherever we are needed.”

The contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to augment existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs. The contingency support contract provides for planning and, if required, initiation of specific engineering, construction and logistics support tasks to establish, operate and maintain one or more expansion facilities. Halliburton Press Release

Concentration Camps Being Built on US Soil? Published by the Daily Kos Daily Kos Diary Entry

Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft's announced desire for camps for U.S. citizens he deems to be "enemy combatants" has moved him from merely being a political embarrassment to being a constitutional menace.

Ashcroft's plan, disclosed last week but little publicized, would allow him to order the indefinite incarceration of U.S. citizens and summarily strip them of their constitutional rights and access to the courts by declaring them enemy combatants. Truthout.org

A History of Executive Orders

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10990 allows the government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels and minerals.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10998 allows the government to seize all means of transportation, including personal cars, trucks or vehicles of any kind and total control over all highways, seaports, and waterways.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 10999 allows the government to take over all food resources and farms.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11001 allows the government to take over all health, education and welfare functions.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11002 designates the Postmaster General to operate a national registration of all persons.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11003 allows the government to take over all airports and ?aircraft, including commercial aircraft.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11004 allows the Housing and Finance Authority to relocate communities, build new housing with public funds, designate areas to be abandoned, and establish new locations for populations.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11005 allows the government to take over railroads, inland waterways and public storage facilities.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11051 specifies the responsibility of the Office of Emergency Planning and gives authorization to put all Executive Orders into effect in times of increased international tensions and economic or financial crisis.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11310 grants authority to the Department of Justice to enforce the plans set out in Executive Orders, to institute industrial support, to establish judicial and legislative liaison, to control all aliens, to operate penal and correctional institutions, and to advise and assist the President.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11049 assigns emergency preparedness function to federal departments and agencies, consolidating 21 operative Executive Orders issued over a fifteen year period.

EXECUTIVE ORDER 11921 allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over the mechanisms of production and distribution, of energy sources, wages, salaries, credit and the flow of money in U.S. financial institution in any undefined national emergency. It also provides that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. The Federal Emergency Management Agency has broad powers in every aspect of the nation. General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a "new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis." FEMA's powers were consolidated by President Carter to incorporate the...

National Security Act of 1947 allows for the strategic relocation of industries, services, government and other essential economic activities, and to rationalize the requirements for manpower, resources and production facilities.

1950 Defense Production Act gives the President sweeping powers over all aspects of the economy.

Act of August 29, 1916 authorizes the Secretary of the Army, in time of war, to take possession of any transportation system for transporting troops, material, or any other purpose related to the emergency.

International Emergency Economic Powers Actenables the President to seize the property of a foreign country or national. These powers were transferred to FEMA in a sweeping consolidation in 1979.
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-12-2007, 02:54 AM,
#2
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
Beech grove Indiana camp
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=38...eech+grove+camp
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=15...eech+grove+camp
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-12-2007, 03:16 AM,
#3
Concentration Camps In Your Town?


Concentration Camps For American Citizens

http://video.google.com/url?vidurl=http%3A...153lsqTkRl8vFjw

Texe Marrs Gulag USA Concentration Camps In America
http://video.google.com/url?vidurl=http%3A...O3vpSTCDfC-qHhA

Clinton asked about American concentration camps
http://video.google.com/url?vidurl=http%3A...ty5AAoaOaTM1I9g

FEMA Concentration Camp for Families in Taylor, Texas

http://video.google.com/url?vidurl=http%3A...BJCdK_u0l2wH6nw

Hurricane Katrina: Afro-American Victims in American Concentration Camp

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4...entration+camps
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-12-2007, 03:23 AM,
#4
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
Some info sites:



U.S. CONCENTRATION CAMPS - FEMA AND THE REX 84 PROGRAM


AMERICAN CONCENTRATION CAMPS
Reply
01-15-2007, 02:41 AM,
#5
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
http://www.alternet.org/rights/32647/
Bush's Mysterious 'New Programs'
By Nat Parry, Consortium News
Posted on February 23, 2006, Printed on January 14, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/story/32647/

Not that George W. Bush needs much encouragement, but Sen. Lindsey Graham suggested to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales a new target for the administration's domestic operations -- Fifth Columnists, supposedly disloyal Americans who sympathize and collaborate with the enemy.

"The administration has not only the right, but the duty, in my opinion, to pursue Fifth Column movements," Graham, R-S.C., told Gonzales during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Feb. 6.

"I stand by this president's ability, inherent to being commander in chief, to find out about Fifth Column movements, and I don't think you need a warrant to do that," Graham added, volunteering to work with the administration to draft guidelines for how best to neutralize this alleged threat.

"Senator," a smiling Gonzales responded, "the president already said we'd be happy to listen to your ideas."

In less paranoid times, Graham's comments might be viewed by many Americans as a Republican trying to have it both ways -- ingratiating himself to an administration of his own party while seeking some credit from Washington centrists for suggesting Congress should have at least a tiny say in how Bush runs the War on Terror.

But recent developments suggest that the Bush administration may already be contemplating what to do with Americans who are deemed insufficiently loyal or who disseminate information that may be considered helpful to the enemy. Top U.S. officials have cited the need to challenge news that undercuts Bush's actions as a key front in defeating the terrorists, who are aided by "news informers," in the words of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Detention centers

Plus, there was that curious development in January when the Army Corps of Engineers awarded Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root a $385 million contract to construct detention centers somewhere in the United States, to deal with "an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs," KBR said.

Later, the New York Times reported that "KBR would build the centers for the Homeland Security Department for an unexpected influx of immigrants, to house people in the event of a natural disaster or for new programs that require additional detention space."

Like most news stories on the KBR contract, the Times focused on concerns about Halliburton's reputation for bilking U.S. taxpayers by overcharging for sub-par services. "It's hard to believe that the administration has decided to entrust Halliburton with even more taxpayer dollars," remarked Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.

Less attention centered on the phrase "rapid development of new programs" and what kind of programs would require a major expansion of detention centers, each capable of holding 5,000 people. Jamie Zuieback, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, declined to elaborate on what these "new programs" might be.

Only a few independent journalists, such as Peter Dale Scott and Maureen Farrell, have pursued what the Bush administration might actually be thinking.

Scott speculated that the "detention centers could be used to detain American citizens if the Bush administration were to declare martial law." He recalled that during the Reagan administration, National Security Council aide Oliver North organized Rex-84 "readiness exercise," which contemplated the Federal Emergency Management Agency rounding up and detaining 400,000 "refugees," in the event of "uncontrolled population movements" over the Mexican border into the United States.

Farrell pointed out that because "another terror attack is all but certain, it seems far more likely that the centers would be used for post-911-type detentions of immigrants rather than a sudden deluge" of immigrants flooding across the border.

Vietnam-era whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said, "Almost certainly this is preparation for a roundup after the next 9/11 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters. They've already done this on a smaller scale, with the 'special registration' detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo."

Labor camps

There also was another little-noticed item posted at the U.S. Army website, about the Pentagon's Civilian Inmate Labor Program. This program "provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations."

The Army document, first drafted in 1997, underwent a "rapid action revision" on Jan. 14, 2005. The revision provides a "template for developing agreements" between the Army and corrections facilities for the use of civilian inmate labor on Army installations.

On its face, the Army's labor program refers to inmates housed in federal, state and local jails. The Army also cites various federal laws that govern the use of civilian labor and provide for the establishment of prison camps in the United States, including a federal statute that authorizes the attorney general to "establish, equip, and maintain camps upon sites selected by him" and "make available … the services of United States prisoners" to various government departments, including the Department of Defense.

Though the timing of the document's posting -- within the past few weeks -- may just be a coincidence, the reference to a "rapid action revision" and the KBR contract's contemplation of "rapid development of new programs" has raised eyebrows about why this sudden need for urgency.

These developments also are drawing more attention now because of earlier Bush administration policies to involve the Pentagon in "counter-terrorism" operations inside the United States.

Pentagon surveillance

Despite the Posse Comitatus Act's prohibitions against U.S. military personnel engaging in domestic law enforcement, the Pentagon has expanded its operations beyond previous boundaries, such as its role in domestic surveillance activities.

The Washington Post has reported that since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the Defense Department has been creating new agencies that gather and analyze intelligence within the United States.

The White House also is moving to expand the power of the Pentagon's Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA), created three years ago to consolidate counterintelligence operations. The White House proposal would transform CIFA into an office that has authority to investigate crimes such as treason, terrorist sabotage or economic espionage.

The Pentagon also has pushed legislation in Congress that would create an intelligence exception to the Privacy Act, allowing the FBI and others to share information about U.S. citizens with the Pentagon, CIA and other intelligence agencies. But some in the Pentagon don't seem to think that new laws are even necessary.

In a 2001 Defense Department memo that surfaced in January 2005, the U.S. Army's top intelligence officer wrote, "Contrary to popular belief, there is no absolute ban on [military] intelligence components collecting U.S. person information."

Drawing a distinction between "collecting" information and "receiving" information on U.S. citizens, the memo argued that "MI [military intelligence] may receive information from anyone, anytime."

This receipt of information presumably would include data from the National Security Agency, which has been engaging in surveillance of U.S. citizens without court-approved warrants in apparent violation of the Foreign Intelligence Security Act. Bush approved the program of warrantless wiretaps shortly after 9/11.

There also may be an even more extensive surveillance program. Former NSA employee Russell D. Tice told a congressional committee on Feb. 14 that such a top-secret surveillance program existed, but he said he couldn't discuss the details without breaking classification laws.

Tice added that the "special access" surveillance program may be violating the constitutional rights of millions of Americans. With this expanded surveillance, the government's list of terrorist suspects is rapidly swelling.

The Washington Post reported on Feb. 15 that the National Counterterrorism Center's central repository now holds the names of 325,000 terrorist suspects, a fourfold increase since the fall of 2003. Asked whether the names in the repository were collected through the NSA's domestic surveillance program, an NCTC official told the Post, "Our database includes names of known and suspected international terrorists provided by all intelligence community organizations, including NSA."

Homeland defense

As the administration scoops up more and more names, members of Congress also have questioned the elasticity of Bush's definitions for words like terrorist "affiliates," used to justify wiretapping Americans allegedly in contact with such people or entities.

During the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing on the wiretap program, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., complained that the House and Senate Intelligence committees "have not been briefed on the scope and nature of the program."

Feinstein added that, therefore, the committees "have not been able to explore what is a link or an affiliate to al-Qaida or what minimization procedures (for purging the names of innocent people) are in place."

The combination of the Bush administration's expansive reading of its own power and its insistence on extraordinary secrecy has raised the alarm of civil libertarians when contemplating how far the Pentagon might go in involving itself in domestic matters.

A Defense Department document, entitled the "Strategy for Homeland Defense and Civil Support," has set out a military strategy against terrorism that envisions an "active, layered defense" both inside and outside U.S. territory. In the document, the Pentagon pledges to "transform U.S. military forces to execute homeland defense missions in the … U.S. homeland."

The Pentagon strategy paper calls for increased military reconnaissance and surveillance to "defeat potential challengers before they threaten the United States." The plan "maximizes threat awareness and seizes the initiative from those who would harm us."

But there are concerns over how the Pentagon judges "threats" and who falls under the category "those who would harm us." A Pentagon official said the Counterintelligence Field Activity's TALON program has amassed files on antiwar protesters.

In December 2005, NBC News revealed the existence of a secret 400-page Pentagon document listing 1,500 "suspicious incidents" over a 10-month period, including dozens of small antiwar demonstrations that were classified as a "threat."

The Defense Department also might be moving toward legitimizing the use of propaganda domestically, as part of its overall war strategy.

A secret Pentagon "Information Operations Roadmap," approved by Rumsfeld in October 2003, calls for "full spectrum" information operations and notes that "information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and PSYOP, increasingly is consumed by our domestic audience and vice versa."

"PSYOPS messages will often be replayed by the news media for much larger audiences, including the American public," the document states. The Pentagon argues, however, that "the distinction between foreign and domestic audiences becomes more a question of USG [U.S. government] intent rather than information dissemination practices."

It calls for "boundaries" between information operations abroad and the news media at home, but does not outline any corresponding limits on PSYOP campaigns.

Similar to the distinction the Pentagon draws between "collecting" and "receiving" intelligence on U.S. citizens, the Information Operations Roadmap argues that as long as the American public is not intentionally "targeted," any PSYOP propaganda consumed by the American public is acceptable.

The Pentagon plan also includes a strategy for taking over the internet and controlling the flow of information, viewing the web as a potential military adversary. The "roadmap" speaks of "fighting the net," and implies that the internet is the equivalent of "an enemy weapons system."

In a speech on Feb. 17 to the Council on Foreign Relations, Rumsfeld elaborated on the administration's perception that the battle over information would be a crucial front in the War on Terror, or as Rumsfeld calls it, the Long War.

"Let there be no doubt, the longer it takes to put a strategic communication framework into place, the more we can be certain that the vacuum will be filled by the enemy and by news informers that most assuredly will not paint an accurate picture of what is actually taking place," Rumsfeld said.

The Department of Homeland Security also has demonstrated a tendency to deploy military operatives to deal with domestic crises.

In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, the department dispatched "heavily armed paramilitary mercenaries from the Blackwater private security firm, infamous for its work in Iraq, (and had them) openly patrolling the streets of New Orleans," reported journalists Jeremy Scahill and Daniela Crespo on Sept. 10, 2005.

Noting the reputation of the Blackwater mercenaries as "some of the most feared professional killers in the world," Scahill and Crespo said Blackwater's presence in New Orleans "raises alarming questions about why the government would allow men trained to kill with impunity in places like Iraq and Afghanistan to operate here."

U.S. battlefield

In the view of some civil libertarians, a form of martial law already exists in the United States and has been in place since shortly after the 9/11 attacks when Bush issued Military Order No. 1 which empowered him to detain any noncitizen as an international terrorist or enemy combatant.

"The president decided that he was no longer running the country as a civilian president," wrote civil rights attorney Michael Ratner in the book "Guantanamo: What the World Should Know." "He issued a military order giving himself the power to run the country as a general."

For any American citizen suspected of collaborating with terrorists, Bush also revealed what's in store. In May 2002, the FBI arrested U.S. citizen Jose Padilla in Chicago on suspicion that he might be an al-Qaida operative planning an attack.

Rather than bring criminal charges, Bush designated Padilla an "enemy combatant" and had him imprisoned indefinitely without benefit of due process. After three years, the administration finally brought charges against Padilla, in order to avoid a Supreme Court showdown the White House might have lost.

But since the court was not able to rule on the Padilla case, the administration's arguments have not been formally repudiated. Indeed, despite filing charges against Padilla, the White House still asserts the right to detain U.S. citizens without charges as enemy combatants.

This claimed authority is based on the assertion that the United States is at war and the American homeland is part of the battlefield.

"In the war against terrorists of global reach, as the nation learned all too well on Sept. 11, 2001, the territory of the United States is part of the battlefield," Bush's lawyers argued in briefs to the federal courts.

Given Bush's now open assertions that he is using his "plenary" -- or unlimited -- powers as commander in chief for the duration of the indefinite War on Terror, Americans can no longer trust that their constitutional rights protect them from government actions.

As former Vice President Al Gore asked after recounting a litany of sweeping powers that Bush has asserted to fight the War on Terror, "Can it be true that any president really has such powers under our Constitution? If the answer is 'yes,' then under the theory by which these acts are committed, are there any acts that can on their face be prohibited?"

In such extraordinary circumstances, the American people might legitimately ask exactly what the Bush administration means by the "rapid development of new programs," which might require the construction of a new network of detention camps.

© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/32647/
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-15-2007, 03:24 AM,
#6
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
I drove that road from Casper, WY to Rawlins, WY last year at night. I never saw anything, you'd think there would be heaps of lights on at an installation like that.. Though, maybe nobody is there or they keep it on the down low. :eyebrow:
&its just like.. doood ya get the best barrels ever dood..
its just like.. ya pull in and ya just get spit right out of em...
ya just drop in n just smack the lip.. whabap.. drop down..
zibbaaaahhhahahah..
n then after that.. ya drop in.. ride the barrel..
and get pitted.. sooo pitted like that&
- surfer dood

Northern Alberta Surface Water Study
check it out: www.nasws.ca
Reply
01-15-2007, 05:36 AM,
#7
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
Looking for allegations of camps in OR, NJ, PA and CO so I can personally verify.

Will be in each this coming year with free time to maneuver. I will take pics and do any other local investigating I can.
Reply
01-15-2007, 05:49 AM,
#8
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
Check for a list HERE. The list may be a few years old.
Reply
01-15-2007, 05:54 AM,
#9
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
I know someone who does interrogations, but I need two outside sources to confirm these places.
Reply
01-15-2007, 09:48 AM,
#10
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
Quote:Check for a list HERE. The list may be a few years old.
yeah those are the rex 84 camps they already had set up prior to 911
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-17-2007, 05:35 PM,
#11
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
This image was just sent to us showing many school buses being painted from the normal yellow color, to a white color and the words "UN" in black are also being painted on the sides of them. This was taken at a Chevy/Oldsmobile car dealership in Lafayette, Georgia.

When asked why these buses were being painted white, they responded that they were contracted to paint these buses so that United Nation's troops could be transported in America.
[Image: unbus.jpg]

more pics here
and even more here
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-17-2007, 05:44 PM,
#12
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
This was taken close to Nellis Air Force Base (next to Union Pacific Railroad Tracks & I-15).
[Image: epw.jpg]
Watch tower
[Image: pow1.jpg]
[Image: pow2.jpg]
[Image: pow3.jpg]
Portable jails on a truck
[Image: jail1.jpg]
[Image: jail2.jpg]
[Image: camp1.jpg]

[Image: camp2.jpg]
[Image: camp2.jpg]
http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/powpict/home.htm
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-17-2007, 05:47 PM,
#13
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
These images show two masked Russian Vehicles being transported on a Texas highway. The lettering on the door is in Russian.
[Image: russianvehicle.jpg]
[Image: russianvehicle2.jpg]

http://www.newswatchmagazine.org/pics/russianvehicles.htm
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-17-2007, 06:09 PM,
#14
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
[Image: untrucks.jpg]
[Image: untrucks2.gif]
Qiucktime
Realplayer

[Image: untanks.jpg]
[Image: untanks3.gif]
Quicktime
Realplayer

[Image: unveh.jpg]
[Image: unveh2.gif]
Quicktime
Realplayer
[Image: terrorists_230606.gif]
Reply
01-20-2007, 06:16 AM,
#15
Concentration Camps In Your Town?
This country already has seven million behind bars (or on parole or probation), the majority being nonviolent drug offenders. Just because they're not all in one facility doesn't mean we don't already have a form of extremely UN-secret camps unjustly holding Americans. I guess it's all downhill from here, tho . . .
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Steel Mill Polluted Town As Romney Firm Profited mexika 8 1,025 08-17-2012, 08:03 PM
Last Post: h3rm35
  Concen blocking proxy access to forum peragrate 4 695 03-21-2012, 10:46 AM
Last Post: peragrate
  The town that's banned salt: Shakers taken off chip-shop counters and put out of sigh R.R 0 534 04-01-2011, 06:36 AM
Last Post: R.R
  Big Brother town halls squander £315m on CCTV in three years, despite massive job cut TriWooOx 0 532 12-28-2010, 01:54 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Vast number of town hall bureaucrats get power to enter your home without a warrant TriWooOx 0 459 12-28-2009, 11:53 AM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  Australia town bans bottled water A rural town in Australia has voted overwhelmingly to ban the sale of bottled water o --- 2 605 07-10-2009, 10:19 AM
Last Post: ---
  Legislation to Establish Internment Camps on US Military Bases --- 0 347 03-26-2009, 04:54 AM
Last Post: ---
  The Camps Are Real waxzy 2 579 05-29-2007, 09:51 PM
Last Post: schering
  Is It Just Yeti, Or Is Concen Being Dos'ed? yeti 6 1,153 04-03-2007, 12:37 PM
Last Post: Phil999
  Disinfo Agents Here On Concen? WeThePeople 19 1,878 03-12-2007, 01:16 PM
Last Post: techsture

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)