Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
03-01-2007, 08:42 PM,
#1
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
http://www.total411.info/2007/03/ua-175-de...nces-prove.html

A little more fuel on the fire.
Reply
03-01-2007, 09:53 PM,
#2
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
They really should have used the footage that was used in "9/11 In Plane Site". They had 4 simultaneous different angels of the flight hitting the building. They might have been able to do a little more contrast and compare.
“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after
equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. ” -Nikola Tesla

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace." -Jimi Hendrix
Reply
03-01-2007, 10:09 PM, (This post was last modified: 03-01-2007, 10:09 PM by yeti.)
#3
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure that standard video doesn't have the frame rates to allow this kind of analysis...
[Image: randquote.png]
Reply
03-06-2007, 03:00 AM,
#4
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
Quote:I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure that standard video doesn't have the frame rates to allow this kind of analysis...

Ya, I agree.

Dont get me wrong, I dont doubt that we have the technology to edit the planes into video undetected. But, it just seems so damn improbable. There doesnt seem like much of a way they could have policed up all the random people with cameras down there. I just couldnt see ever mentioning this in any sort of argument. The evidence just doesnt seem there.

What do you think Ctrl? Do you buy any of this?
Reply
03-06-2007, 01:39 PM,
#5
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
I would say stuff like this actually serves as water, not fuel to the fire. Planes hit the towers & even in the slight, and I mean slight, chance that they didn't you're never gonna prove it to the public & it's a great way to blow the whole thing. Let's talk about Israel & the Mossad more and no plane theories less, just my 2 cents.
[Image: paulbanneroc1.gif]
Reply
03-07-2007, 04:25 AM,
#6
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
Quote:I would say stuff like this actually serves as water, not fuel to the fire. Planes hit the towers & even in the slight, and I mean slight, chance that they didn't you're never gonna prove it to the public & it's a great way to blow the whole thing. Let's talk about Israel & the Mossad more and no plane theories less, just my 2 cents.

Agreed
The first step to revolution is consciousness,
So I wont stop screaming at you until this all make sense.
Reply
03-07-2007, 07:01 AM,
#7
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
Quote:I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure that standard video doesn't have the frame rates to allow this kind of analysis...

It sort of does.

The tape moves at so many feet per sec, but every camera is different. You'd have a lot of variance from wow and flutter, plus drag depending on the quality of the tape used, and how worn the capstans are, the exact amount of amps/volts supplied to the motor etc. In general, it's about 30 feet per second, but sampling rate and the number of pixels used can factor into it.

Comparing two different tapes?

I don't see how. Normally a clap-board is used to synchronize film and video with a sound. For high end video equipment, you can hook up a time mark that records the time index across the bottom of the video, but that's typically for 1" video tape, not 1/2" video, and don't see it happening for the 8mm video format. I'm not totally up on the technology, but still I don't see where a couple of guys wandering down the street taking random video shots would have those attachments.

I suppose in theory you could use the sound of the impact and work backwards, but that poses problems because you'd have to know exactly how far each video recorder was from the point of impact to determine the amount of travel time between impact and the recorder. Kinda like the Flash-Bang method.

In looking at both the photos and the video from various sources, I don't see airbrakes and I see the trim even with no flaps up or down. Without that, I don't see how anyone could possibly claim the aircraft decelerated. Even if they attempted to reverse thrust at the last second, there's a time delay and even if there wasn't, the aircraft's forward momentum wouldn't allow for the plane to decelerate appreciably.

I don't see it.

As far as I'm concerned, an aircraft hit each tower. If you want to argue about the type of aircraft, we can do that, because some of the photos and video make it appear as if the aircrcaft that hit WTC2 was an unmarked Air Force KC-767 tanker.
Reply
03-13-2007, 12:25 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-13-2007, 12:36 AM by TeslaandLyne.)
#8
'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery
Some people think this did in the Pentagon, the small plane theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Agm-28_1.jpg



Keep on with the links to the page, the flights never existed, is that why they are looking for a crash
plane missile or remotely controlled airplane more than likely by the FEMA helicopters?

I wonder if a plane would bounce off the WTT in real life.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  TV fakery does not mean "no planes". Hans Olo 42 5,268 07-08-2009, 08:57 PM
Last Post: ---
  Is the fact that millions now know details about 9/11 like TV fakery or mini-nukes a sign of the End of the US? Answer: Kyoon 3 791 12-18-2008, 03:31 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  No Planes, 911 T.V. Fakery trueaim 18 1,226 05-22-2008, 05:45 AM
Last Post: trueaim
  9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline CB_Brooklyn 8 940 11-30-2007, 01:55 PM
Last Post: byrd
  Is The 9/11 Tv-fakery Theory Really That Crazy? CB_Brooklyn 6 674 04-24-2007, 02:15 PM
Last Post: byrd

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)