Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
08-05-2007, 09:18 PM,
#1
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner

Received. 08 July 2007 Last updated. 26 July 2007
Abstract. The atmospheric greenhouse effect, an idea that authors trace back to the traditional works of Fourier 1824, Tyndall 1861, and Arrhenius 1896, and which is still supported in global climatology, essentially describes a fictitious mechanism, in which a planetary atmosphere acts as a heat pump driven by an environment that is radiatively interacting with but radiatively equilibrated to the atmospheric system. According to the second law of thermodynamics such a planetary machine can never exist. Nevertheless, in almost all texts of global climatology and in a widespread secondary literature it is taken for granted that such mechanism is real and stands on a firm scientific foundation. In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying physical principles are clarified. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (B)there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, © the frequently mentioned difference of 33 degrees Celsius is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

http://eprintweb.org/S/article/physics/0707.1161

Here's the whole paper in PDF:

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0707/0707.1161v2.pdf

Any PHD's want to write a dissenting piece to this?
The belief in 'coincidence' is the prevalent superstition of the Age of Science.

&I don't understand why you're taking such a belligerant tone when you're obviously the ignorant one here. &
-triplesix
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Physics Community Afire With Rumors of Higgs Boson Discovery h3rm35 1 652 06-20-2012, 10:01 PM
Last Post: thokling
Video A New Era in Physics: Anti-Gravity / Cold Fusion Explained In Detail (video series) senqua 0 1,541 12-03-2010, 08:28 AM
Last Post: senqua
  The Effects of Genetically Modified Foods on Animal Health icosaface 0 704 01-03-2010, 08:56 PM
Last Post: icosaface
  Nassim Haramein - 2009 - Space Time & Physics - Coast TO Coast AM - 1/11 --- 4 1,422 08-24-2009, 11:19 PM
Last Post: ---
  GMO Scandal: The Long Term Effects of Genetically Modified Food on Humans TriWooOx 0 911 08-02-2009, 09:27 AM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  The problem with physics waxzy 2 771 01-08-2008, 09:31 AM
Last Post: Blueku
  Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming: blove8. 0 396 10-21-2007, 12:57 AM
Last Post: blove8.
  Global Warming: it's not caused by greenhouse gases says academic drunkenmunky 9 1,723 07-27-2007, 09:50 PM
Last Post: V13
  Einstein, Cartan And Evans – Start Of A New Age In Physics? Solve et Coagula 0 521 06-17-2007, 02:22 PM
Last Post: Solve et Coagula
  Us Urges New Greenhouse Gas Goals TriWooOx 0 429 05-31-2007, 04:45 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)