Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
11-24-2007, 06:07 PM,
#1
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
<span style="color:red">9/11 Directed Energy Weapon / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline

By CB_Brooklyn


Lenin, the first Communist dictator after the takeover of Russia in 1917, is widely credited with the following quotation, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."


There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events. Although differences and/or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:


1. OGCT. This is known as the "Official Government Conspiracy Theory". This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 boxcutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA's entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the "Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory". This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the "wacko conspiracy theory" that the "truth movement" believes.

3. REAL. This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, the corporate media broadcasted cartoons of an airplane impacting the South Tower, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). The government and media steer clear of these.



<span style="color:red"> Refer to the Lenin-credited quote above.

Is it possible the "truth movement" has been run by the 9/11 perpetrators since day one?

Is it possible that certain individuals have been planted to steer the "truth movement" away from the perpetrators? Is it possible these plants have affiliations with directed energy weapons (DEW)?

Is it even possible that some of these plants are "in on it" while others got suckered in? You be the judge.



***Former Transportation Secretary, Norman Mineta, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Mineta was Vice President of Lockheed Martin, a sponsor of DEPS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Mineta
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Mineta ensured minimal interference with the DEW by grounding as many commercial airliners as possible during the timeframe of the towers' destruction.

Mineta steered the "truth movement" toward hijackings and plane crashes by spreading the "Cheney stand down order" hoax.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hear..._2003-05-23.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3722436852417384871



***Former BYU physics professor, Steven Jones, has done research at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/atomic...ic/jones_cv.htm

Jones steered the "truth movement" toward thermite/conventional explosives/molten metal theories. Jones' molten metal evidence has been shown to be fabricated.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60

Jones ridicules the directed energy weapon and TV-Fakery theories with statements such as "These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers."
http://judicial-inc.biz/Steven_Jones_quits_911.htm



***Physicist Greg Jenkins' has connections to the NSA and DEW:

"This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA."
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf

Jenkins' papers were listed in an annual report which also listed at least one manufacturer of directed energy weapons (Rockwell).
http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publication...nnualreport.pdf
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/system...at-overview.htm

Jenkins steered the "truth movement" away from directed energy weapons by conducting an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. (However, a read of the transcript reveals Dr Wood won the debate hands down.)
http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/...transcript.html



***Official at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Van Romero, has ties to the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).

Romero participated in events at DEPS before and after 9/11.
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/DEMSconf03.html
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/EduWksp00.html

Romero steered the "truth movement" toward standard controlled demolition by stating "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points"
http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/retractions/romero.html

Romero is a controlled demolitions expert. Scroll down a little and note the photo. Does Romero actually think this was caused by a "relatively small amount of explosives"?



***Former Director of the Star Wars program, Robert Bowman, is about as close to directed energy weapons as one can get.

Bowman steered the "truth movement" toward hijackings, and NORAD standing down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE

Although he is in Jim Fetzer's Scholars group, I have not heard him speaking about Dr Wood's DEW evidence. I do remember, however, an interview where Bowman states that he "doesn't fall for conspiracy theories" with regard to controlled demolition.

Bowman has a PhD in Nuclear Engineering. How can he possibly call this a conspiracy theory?

[Image: Massive-Energy-Releases.jpg]



<span style="color:red">Also of note is the following:

The government contracted with several sponsors of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the NIST (NCSTAR 1) Report:

Boeing - Gold Level Current/Founding Sponsor
Applied Research Associates (ARA) - Silver Level Founding Sponsor
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) - Silver Level Current Sponsor
http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

Dr Judy Wood has discovered that ARA and SAIC are manufacturers of Directed Energy Weapons and have expertise in Psychological Operations (PSYOPS).
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

Dr Wood also discovered two images on ARA's website that are similar to the World Trade Center. She details this in her Appeal to NIST's denial of her Request for Correction.
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_03.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/apics/Appeal_04.jpg
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html



The New York Times is a mainstream media source. Do they tell the truth of 9/11 or do they hide it? Why on earth would they help the "truth movement" by publishing evidence of explosives?

The New York Times steered the "truth movement" towards explosives demolitions by publishing the WTC Task Force Interviews.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html...es_full_01.html

However, they redacted evidence for Directed Energy Weapons.
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2006/02/911-r...inside-wtc.html



<span style="color:red">Who's Popular On Corporate Media? Who's Not?

*William Rodriguez - publicly speaks up against DEW / TV-Fakery
http://www.911researchers.com/node/555#comment-4089

*David Ray Griffin - pro Global Government (aka New World Order)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-TZypcH9eg

*Steven Jones - pro explosives-demolition, pro thermite, pro molten metal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayYXNo0i_Cs

*Kevin Barrett - supports Steven Jones
http://drjudywood.com/articles/a/KB/Barrett_Kevin.html

*Robert Bowman - expert on NORAD's jet-scrambling procedures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5gio_iR2WE


*Judy Wood - never invited to discuss the DEW evidence, despite her filing of an actual court case
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

*Morgan Reynolds - never invited back after discussing TV-Fakery on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8

Reynolds also filed a court case
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&...e1=federal_case

*Jerry Leaphart - mainstream attorney never invited to discuss his clients' (Wood/Reynolds) 9/11 legal actions


In an interview with Kevin Barrett, trial attorney Jerry Leaphart has said:

"What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated."

MP3 Clip: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3
Full Show: http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFCs.mp3

============================================
============================================
============================================


<span style="color:red">The following is a timeline relating to promotion of the Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory by government plants and the media, and suppression of the REAL version by government plants and media. Also included is suppression of free energy research.


Continued here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...1&Itemid=60
Reply
11-24-2007, 07:19 PM,
#2
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
What's the ratio of actual eyewitnesses who say there were planes to those who say there were no planes?
debate is the vehicle of truth
Reply
11-24-2007, 09:04 PM,
#3
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
Even if planes, drones were used, we would be naive to think the opposition to all major groups are not controlled, manipulated and curtailed. Lets get a million man march on the gates of congress and demand the "truth" questions answerd, not simply continue to pacify the masses with half efforts and go nowhere initiatives, while media, shills etc have ample time do there magic. Time seems to work in there favor.

i think the Lennon quote very revealing indeed, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."

The 3rd option seems to always be the independent, thinking option, wanting to gather all evidence and get to the truth, wherever it may lead.
Reply
11-24-2007, 09:37 PM,
#4
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
A quote isnt proof
The first step to revolution is consciousness,
So I wont stop screaming at you until this all make sense.
Reply
11-25-2007, 06:54 AM,
#5
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
Anyways im open to this

I'll see what comes from these dew/npt groups
The first step to revolution is consciousness,
So I wont stop screaming at you until this all make sense.
Reply
11-26-2007, 04:17 PM,
#6
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
911 truth movement, needs a new name.

how about 911 misinformation movement.

i strongly lean towards NPT, have studied the fox, cnn, abc news footage of the day myself, and come to same conclusion as september clues does.

this is the first time im hearing about "golden eye" technology being used to destory the towers. im still going with the theory that 4 missiles were used and that the buildings were demolished by some means. its seems by watching the videos of the "collaspe" that there was definetly explosives planted in the buildings due to the small minor explosions coming out the buildings.

its also must be noted that the goverment has technology that we wont see for decades, so we realy have no idea what they could of used to blow up the towers.

thanks for the info!
Reply
11-30-2007, 03:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 11-30-2007, 03:15 AM by CB_Brooklyn.)
#7
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
Quote:i think the Lennon quote very revealing indeed, "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves."


John Lennon was a member of the Beatles and a peace activist. ("Give Peace a Chance".)

The quote "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves" is credited to Vladimir Lenin, a totally different person.
Reply
11-30-2007, 03:17 AM,
#8
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
Quote:What's the ratio of actual eyewitnesses who say there were planes to those who say there were no planes?


This analysis of the WTC Task Force Interviews (FDNY/EMS First Responders) might help:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/inde...4&Itemid=60
Reply
11-30-2007, 01:55 PM,
#9
9/11 DEW / TV-Fakery Suppression Timeline
JUDY? YA THERE JUDY? WHERES JUDY WOODS. IS SHE HERE? JUDY? ARE YOU THERE? JUDY!!!! TALK TO US JUDY. TELL US WHAT HAPPENED!!!!
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  911 Timeline And War Games wokensheep 11 3,098 07-14-2009, 01:09 PM
Last Post: ---
  TV fakery does not mean &quot;no planes&quot;. Hans Olo 42 5,268 07-08-2009, 08:57 PM
Last Post: ---
  Is the fact that millions now know details about 9/11 like TV fakery or mini-nukes a sign of the End of the US? Answer: Kyoon 3 791 12-18-2008, 03:31 AM
Last Post: Easy Skanking
  The 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression, and the Global Elite's Agenda CB_Brooklyn 3 1,097 07-23-2008, 03:38 PM
Last Post: silkworm
  The 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression, and the Global Elite's Agenda CB_Brooklyn 0 455 06-02-2008, 04:44 AM
Last Post: CB_Brooklyn
  No Planes, 911 T.V. Fakery trueaim 18 1,226 05-22-2008, 05:45 AM
Last Post: trueaim
  2/14/2008: Newly Released FBI Timeline Reveals New Information about 9/11 Hijackers that Was Ignored by 9/11 Commission blove8. 4 1,092 02-21-2008, 08:07 PM
Last Post: SiLVa
  Is The 9/11 Tv-fakery Theory Really That Crazy? CB_Brooklyn 6 674 04-24-2007, 02:15 PM
Last Post: byrd
  'ua 175' Deceleration Differences Prove 9/11 Tv Fakery Guest 7 1,125 03-13-2007, 12:25 AM
Last Post: TeslaandLyne
  Complete 911 Timeline byrd 2 548 11-15-2006, 05:46 PM
Last Post: Tblacksheep

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)