Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
09-11-2009, 05:22 AM,
#1
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
It's on now for me and pissing me off... anyone else watching it?
&We grow to recognize form. We grow to label that form. In doing so, do we become more intelligent? Do we become more awakened?& - Siji Tzu 四季子
Reply
09-11-2009, 07:43 AM,
#2
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
Tv? What channel? Maybe it'll play again sometime here.
[Image: Palestinian_Dawn_by_Palestinian_Pride.jpg]
Reply
09-11-2009, 11:24 AM,
#3
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
It was on Discovery Channel but is a National Geographic production.

Total strawman, red herring, gong show hit piece. The narrator even refers to 9/11 'conspiracy theorists' as 'truthers' throughout.
&We grow to recognize form. We grow to label that form. In doing so, do we become more intelligent? Do we become more awakened?& - Siji Tzu 四季子
Reply
09-11-2009, 01:10 PM,
#4
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
Yes it is a "ministry of truth" special. Rupert Murdoch (Fox) owns 67% of National Geographic channel and has total editorial control. A bullshit deal from start to finish.
An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it.
Mohandas Gandhi


Each of us is put here in this time and this place to personally decide the future of humankind.
Did you think you were put here for something less?
Chief Arvol Looking Horse
Reply
09-11-2009, 02:39 PM,
#5
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
I saw it. Its total garbage. And I believe its back firing.
A friend of mine had his father watch it(an old Army Ranger Vet who doesnt fully believe it was an inside job) and even he said that the tests they did were ridiculous and that the so called science proved nothing. It actually made him want to reseach it more on his own even further because he said "it felt like he was being bullshitted."

Of course there will be some idiots that will believe it because they saw it on TV, too bad for them.

Somethings I noticed...
Wasnt it funny how the middle core column of that Controlled Demolition was still left standing. Of course they didnt show where they put the charges, but I gather they never put any charges on those columns. Just goes to show, the same thing would have happened with the WTC buildings if some kind of charges werent on the middle core columns.

Also...They didnt want to show how there was actually a huge piece of the model "plane" still intact after hitting their model Pentagon. Just another anomaly of many they'd much rather ignore.

"Listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research"
~William Cooper

DTTNWO!
Reply
09-11-2009, 11:20 PM,
#6
9/11 Science and Conspiracy
I was also a bit stunned by the modelling of the plane impact with the building as well. They bragged considerably that the outer hole created by the model was almost identical to the hole created in real life, which is a statistical near impossibility but we'll let that go. What really blew me away though was how they continued to model the impact inside the building. They show the plane disintegrating, as it would have, but somehow these tiny fragments of burning plane were still capable of sheering inner, enormous, central steel support columns.

The whole thing was ridiculous. I liked how the narrator said, "Now we will observe how truthers react to scientific evidence that disproves their belief about how it happened," or something of that nature, as if they had unequivocally proven the situation, and it was one big psychological experiment on crazy people.

The most frustrating thing is I think most people are convinced it was an inside job because it actually happened. Not any details, controlled demolition, missing planes, whatever. It is just the fact that regular military protocols failed to be followed and the government was holding drills exactly like what was happening that day. Something which they both tried to claim was a regular military practice, while simultaneously coming on the news and claiming "no one could have predicted planes would be used as weapons."

The issue isn't so much controlled demolition, that is just a tiny fragment of the issue. Then there's WTC7. Well whatever, you all know where I'm going with this.
&We grow to recognize form. We grow to label that form. In doing so, do we become more intelligent? Do we become more awakened?& - Siji Tzu 四季子
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Government Twists Science of 9/11 icosaface 14 2,199 10-02-2011, 08:39 PM
Last Post: Loke
  I just saw Anthony Bourdain in Kurdistan deny any conspiracy in 911. Weyland 6 3,098 08-31-2011, 06:32 AM
Last Post: yeti
  Conspiracy » KMPH Fox 26, WTC & controlled demolition Erik 7 1,560 08-20-2009, 01:41 AM
Last Post: abduLmaria
  Conspiracy » Russia Today, WTC - controlled demolition? Erik 0 607 08-14-2009, 09:43 PM
Last Post: Erik
  Conspiracy fever: As rumours swell that the government staged 7/7, victims' relatives call for a proper inquiry TriWooOx 3 1,137 07-06-2009, 07:25 AM
Last Post: rsol
  Unmasking the mysterious 7/7 conspiracy theorist TriWooOx 0 754 07-01-2009, 01:46 PM
Last Post: TriWooOx
  9/11 illuminati conspiracy: the basic links Kyoon 0 642 07-15-2008, 08:39 PM
Last Post: Kyoon
  Jesse Ventura Debates the 9-11 Conspiracy Theory hammer 9 1,344 06-03-2008, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Hans Olo
  9/11 Conspiracy Theories 'Ridiculous,' Al Qaeda Says hammer 2 716 04-04-2008, 11:05 PM
Last Post: shZ
  Some questions about the 9-11 conspiracy Manticore 89 7,561 11-27-2007, 04:59 AM
Last Post: proteinspill

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)