Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
03-07-2008, 05:01 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-07-2008, 05:09 AM by SerialExpLain.)
#1
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
That the air is particularly stagnent in an extremely peculiar way. Not ANY breeze whatsoever. And the air doesn't even seem remotely like the good old air we have been accustomed to because of a very odd stagnent quality. You can easily relate to stagnet water, but stagnet air. What if they aren't spraying? What if that is disinfo and the trails are indicative of an entirely different scenario that has more to do with extreme deficit in air quality and movement. And because of that the normal stream from jets does not dissipate in a normal fashion on the days when that condition is occuring.

Where I live is close to various airports, but passenger jets seem to be all I see actually leaving the trails but on the days when the sky is full of them. The air seems quite dead and devoid of any circulation.
Reply
03-09-2008, 03:02 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-09-2008, 03:04 AM by TeslaandLyne.)
#2
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
I saw a lot in the sky and lower down settling very low on Wednesday.

Went to my cell phone but some how did not get a photo.

ED: Its good to have a camera ready, in 2006 a photographer posted
chemtrails until UFOs started showing up.
Reply
03-11-2008, 02:45 AM,
#3
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Really getting a feel for something about the wind or lack thereof here lately. On Friday, the wind was insane. Just wind. Not a storm or anything.

But today, although there were no contrails/chemtrails as it was overcast, the air had that perfectly still, dead air quality -- 0 breeze just stagnent and smelly heavy air.

So, maybe tommorow there will be another blow-out. I really have no clue about it, but I know it is really noticeable.

Yeah, I should get some pics next time. There are several airports by me, and the thing that is interesting is that you can watch a jet leave a trail on "those" days and see that it is not going to dissipate normally and you do wind up seeing spectacular length in the trails that don't dissipate.
Reply
03-11-2008, 02:52 AM,
#4
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Local news station confirms barium in chemtrails

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI...feature=related
Reply
03-11-2008, 07:11 AM,
#5
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Today planes were seen criss-crossing Orange county in California, opposite directions, east, west, north east...

How come people are not noticing this sort of stuff, they should have picked up already. Why so many planes, sometimes one after another, three to four planes at a time. Weekend is constant...
Unite The Many, defeat the few.

Revolution is for the love of your people, culture, knowledge, wisdom, spirit, and peace. Not Greed!
Soul Rebel Native Son


http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=277...enous&hl=en
Reply
03-11-2008, 09:53 AM,
#6
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
The ones that I see, and I see that on days when they're up there. They are left by ordinary passenger jets. There are several airports nearby and on the days there are trails they are left by ordinary passenger jets and some span quite the entire length of the sky in the residual formations that do not dissipate. Some older ones become dark like the color of dark clouds.

But when you see them here, it is on a day when all the jets you see leave them. Which leaves me to believe that what is occuring here is not a spray-related phenomena but an atmospheric one.
Reply
03-12-2008, 03:49 AM,
#7
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
The natural occurring ones that dissipate quickly are a natural phenomenon, ie, Vapor Trails. The ones that expand are not. Pictures back as far as 1984 don't show chemtrails, or the weird formations in the sky. Most of the patterns are ran late evening throughout the night, on the coast, they are done out at sea. I think a look at Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth more or less, hold partially an answer. He speaks of deflecting 1% of the sun's waves back into space, like a shield. Add to that, it really doesn't matter what causes or if Global Warming is real, it only matters that they think it is.

In the 50s, the government use aerial tests on whole towns, and oddly enough, it is legal for testing purposes. Here are a few links & info I've collected, I have more if you want them:



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=17...mp;q=Morgellons


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBAmskD4DJc&NR

Newscast's Chemtrail Investigation Reveals Dangerous Aerosolized Compounds
http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/0...chemtrails.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WabzHXBJTHg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGIrSepc3z0


The original link contains links to each.  
 
What happens if you give an elephant LSD? Can you keep the severed head of a dog alive apart from its body? Would you drink vomit to prove a theory?
 
Although these experiments are listed on the Museum of Hoaxes web site, every single one of them is absolutely real -- part of a list of scientific experiments that are mind-twistingly, jaw-droppingly strange, and will make you wonder, "How did anyone ever conceive of doing such a thing?"
 
To find out about the experiments above, and many more, click the link below.  
 
And then, after you’re done browsing through such macabre samplings as how anyone can become a willing murderer if approached in the right way, or why anyone in their right mind would create two-headed dogs in an effort to perfect surgical techniques, take a moment to consider this:  
 
You too are a participant in not just one, but several radical, large-scale experiments!  
 
Here’s my Top Ten list of current medical and scientific grand-scale experiments that you’re unwittingly participating in:  
 
1.      Water fluoridation
 
2.      Mandated vaccinations
 
3.      Information-carrying radio waves
 
4.      Pharmaceutical drug use for everything from non-existent diseases to ailments that do not have a pharmacological cure
 
5.      Mercury exposures that are claimed to be “safe”
 
6.      Estrogen-mimicking compounds used in everything from children’s toys  to that steak on your plate
 
7.      Aspartame
 
8.      Genetically modified foods, and cloned meats
 
9.      HAARP
 
10.    Chemtrails

Story:
SHREVEPORT, LA
CHEMTRAILS: Is U.S. Gov't. Secretly Testing Americans 'Again'?
 
Posted: Nov 9, 2007 07:46 PM
 
Updated: Nov 9, 2007 07:50 PM
Could a strange substance found by an Ark-La-Tex man be part of secret government testing program? That's the question at the heart of a phenomenon called "Chemtrails." In a KSLA News 12 investigation, Reporter Jeff Ferrell shows us the results of testing we had done about what's in our skies.
"It seemed like some mornings it was just criss-crossing the whole sky. It was just like a giant checkerboard," described Bill Nichols. He snapped several photos of the strange clouds from his home in Stamps, in southwest Arkansas. Nichols said these unusual clouds begin as normal contrails from a jet engine. But unlike normal contrails, these do 'not' fade away.
Soon after a recent episode he saw particles in the air. "We'd see it drop to the ground in a haze," added Nichols. He then noticed the material collecting on the ground.
"This is water and stuff that I collected in bowls. I had it sitting out in my backyard in my dad's pick-up truck," said Nichols as he handed us a mason jar in the KSLA News 12 parking lot back in September after driving down from Arkansas.
KSLA News 12 had the sample tested at a lab. The results: A high level of barium, 6.8 parts per million, (ppm). That's more than three times the toxic level set by the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA.
Armed with these lab results about the high levels of barium found in our sample, we decided to contact the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality. They told us that, 'yes,' these levels are very unusual. But at the same time they added the caveat that proving the source is a whole 'nother matter.
We discovered during our investigation that Barium is a hallmark of other chemtrail testing. This phenomenon even attracted the attention of a Los Angeles network affiliate, which aired a report entitled, "Toxic Sky?"
There's already no shortage of unclassified weather modification programs by the government. But those who fear chemtrails could be secret biological and chemical testing on the public point to the 1977 U.S. Senate hearings which confirmed 239 populated areas had been contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969. Later, the 1994 Rockefeller Report concluded hundreds of thousands of military personnel were also subjected to secret biological experiments over the last 60-years.
But could secret testing be underway yet again? "I'd rather it be something inert and you know something that's not causing any damage but I'd like to know what it is," concluded Nichols.
KSLA News 12 discovered chemtrails are even mentioned by name in the initial draft of HR 2977 back in 2001, under the Space Preservation Act. But the military denies any such program exists.
It turns out, until just nine years ago the government had the right, under U.S. law, to conduct secret testing on the American public, under specific conditions. Only a public outcry repealed part of that law, with some "exceptions."
Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, explained that short term exposure to barium can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains, with long-term exposure causing blood pressure problems.
Ryan addressed concerns by chemtrail researchers that barium could be meant to wear down a person's immune system. "Anything that causes ill effects on the body long-term, chronically, is going to affect your ability, it's just constantly working on the body. So from that aspect yeah it's a potential."
Ryan told us he's conducted research of his own about secret government testing on the public. But he's still a bit skeptical about chemtrails at the moment, especially considering that his Poison Control Center has seen no calls about barium exposure.
 
Story by Jeff Ferrell


United States Patent and Trademark Office
1338343 - April 27, 1920 - Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 - March 1, 1927 - Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 - June 7, 1927 - Electric Heater - Referenced in 3990987  
1665267 - April 10, 1928 - Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 - December 27, 1932 - Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 - October 3, 1933 - Electrical System And Method  
1957075 - May 1, 1934 - Airplane Spray Equipment
2097581 - November 2, 1937 - Electric Stream Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2409201 - October 15, 1946 - Smoke Producing Mixture
2476171 - July 18, 1945 - Smoke Screen Generator
2480967 - September 6, 1949 - Aerial Discharge Device
2550324 - April 24, 1951 - Process For Controlling Weather
2510867 - October 9, 1951 - Method of Crystal Formation and Precipitation
2582678 - June 15, 1952 - Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
2591988 - April 8, 1952 - Production of TiO2 Pigments - Referenced in 3899144
2614083 - October 14, 1952 - Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
2633455 - March 31, 1953 - Smoke Generator
2688069 - August 31, 1954 - Steam Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2721495 - October 25, 1955 - Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
2730402 - January 10, 1956 - Controllable Dispersal Device
2801322 - July 30, 1957 - Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel - Referenced in 3990987
2881335 - April 7, 1959 - Generation of Electrical Fields
2908442 - October 13, 1959 - Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
2986360 - May 30, 1962 - Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device
2963975 - December 13, 1960 - Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet
3126155 - March 24, 1964 - Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator - Referenced in 3990987
3127107 - March 31, 1964 - Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals
3131131 - April 28, 1964 - Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions
3174150 - March 16, 1965 - Self-Focusing Antenna System
3234357 - February 8, 1966 - Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device  
3274035 - September 20, 1966 - Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
3300721 - January 24, 1967 - Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
3313487 - April 11, 1967 - Cloud Seeding Apparatus
3338476 - August 29, 1967 - Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers - Referenced in 3990987  
3410489 - November 12, 1968 - Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
3429507 - February 25, 1969 - Rainmaker
3432208 - November 7, 1967 - Fluidized Particle Dispenser
3441214 - April 29, 1969 - Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
3445844 - May 20, 1969 - Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
3456880 - July 22, 1969 - Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
3518670 June 30, 1970 - Artificial Ion Cloud
3534906 - October 20, 1970 - Control of Atmospheric Particles
3545677 - December 8, 1970 - Method of Cloud Seeding
3564253 - February 16, 1971 - System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
3587966 - June 28, 1971 - Freezing Nucleation
3601312 - August 24, 1971 - Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipatation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
3608810 - September 28, 1971 - Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions  
3608820 - September 20, 1971 - Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein  
3613992 - October 19, 1971 - Weather Modification Method
3630950 - December 28, 1971 - Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
USRE29142 - This patent is a reissue of patent US3630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process  
3659785 - December 8, 1971 - Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
3666176 - March 3, 1972 - Solar Temperature Inversion Device  
3677840 - July 18, 1972 - Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
3722183 - March 27, 1973 - Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
3769107 - October 30, 1973 - Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
3784099 - January 8, 1974 - Air Pollution Control Method
3785557 - January 15, 1974 - Cloud Seeding System
3795626 - March 5, 1974 - Weather Modification Process  
3808595 - April 30, 1974 - Chaff Dispensing System
3813875 - June 4, 1974 - Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmopsphere
3835059 - September 10, 1974 - Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
3835293 - September 10, 1974 - Electrical Heating Aparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors - Referenced in 3990987  
3877642 - April 15, 1975 - Freezing Nucleant
3882393 - May 6, 1975 - Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
3896993 - July 29, 1975 - Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
3899129 - August 12, 1975 - Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification  
3899144 - August 12, 1975 - Powder contrail generation  
3940059 - February 24, 1976 - Method For Fog Dispersion
3940060 - February 24, 1976 - Vortex Ring Generator
3990987 - November 9, 1976 - Smoke generator  
3992628 - November 16, 1976 - Countermeasure system for laser radiation
3994437 - November 30, 1976 - Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals  
4042196 - August 16, 1977 - Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes  
RE29,142 - February 22, 1977 - Reissue of: 03630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process  
4035726 - July 12, 1977 - Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
4096005 - June 20, 1978 - Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 - December 12, 1978 - Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials  
4141274 - February 27, 1979 - Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
4167008 - September 4, 1979 - Fluid bed chaff dispenser
4347284 - August 31, 1982 - White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays  
4362271 - December 7, 1982 - Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure  
4402480 - September 6, 1983 - Atmosphere modification satellite  
4412654 - November 1, 1983 - Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
4415265 - November 15, 1983 - Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy  
4470544 - September 11, 1984 - Method of and Means for weather modification  
4475927 - October 9, 1984 - Bipolar Fog Abatement System
4600147 - July 15, 1986 - Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus  
4633714 - January 6, 1987 - Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
4643355 - February 17, 1987 - Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions  
4653690 - March 31, 1987 - Method of producing cumulus clouds  
4684063 - August 4, 1987 - Particulates generation and removal  
4686605 - August 11, 1987 - Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4704942 - November 10, 1987 - Charged Aerosol
4712155 - December 8, 1987 - Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4744919 - May 17, 1988 - Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer  
4766725 - August 30, 1988 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor  
4829838 - May 16, 1989 - Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
4836086 - June 6, 1989 - Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
4873928 - October 17, 1989 - Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
4948257 - August 14, 1990 - Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
48050 - August 14, 1990 - Liquid atomizing a94pparatus for aerial spraying  
4999637 - March 12, 1991 - Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 - March 26, 1991 - Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming  
5005355 - April 9, 1991 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor  
5038664 - August 13, 1991 - Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface  
5041760 - August 20, 1991 - Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration  
5041834 - August 20, 1991 - Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted  
5056357 - October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium  
5059909 - October 22, 1991 - Determination of particle size and electrical charge
5104069 - April 14, 1992 - Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
5110502 - May 5, 1992 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor  
5156802 - October 20, 1992 - Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics  
5174498 - December 29, 1992 - Cloud Seeding
5148173 - September 15, 1992 - Millimeter wave screening cloud and method  
5245290 - September 14, 1993 - Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
5286979 - February 15, 1994 - Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin  
5296910 - March 22, 1994 - Method and apparatus for particle analysis
5327222 - July 5, 1994 - Displacement information detecting apparatus  
5357865 - October 25, 1994 - Method of cloud seeding
5360162 - November 1, 1994 - Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
5383024 - January 17, 1995 - Optical wet steam monitor
5425413 - June 20, 1995 - Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
5434667 - July 18, 1995 - Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
5441200 - August 15, 1995 - Tropical cyclone disruption
5486900 - January 23, 1996 - Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device
5556029 - September 17, 1996 - Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
5628455 - May 13, 1997 - Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
5631414 - May 20, 1997 - Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
5639441 - June 17, 1997 - Methods for fine particle formation  
5762298 - June 9, 1998 - Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth's weather  
5912396 - June 15, 1999 - System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
5922976 - July 13, 1999 - Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
5949001 - September 7, 1999 - Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
5984239 - November 16, 1999 - Weather modification by artificial satellite
6025402 - February 15, 2000 - Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin  
6030506 - February 29, 2000 - Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
6034073 - March 7, 2000 - Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity  
6045089 - April 4, 2000 - Solar-powered airplane
6056203 - May 2, 2000 - Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds  
6110590 - August 29, 2000 - Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same  
6263744 - July 24, 2001 - Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
6281972 - August 28, 2001 - Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
6315213 - November 13, 2001 - Method of modifying weather
6382526 - May 7, 2002 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers  
6408704 - June 25, 2002 - Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus  
6412416 - July 2, 2002 - Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method  
6520425 - February 18, 2003 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers  
6539812 - April 1, 2003 - System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound  
6553849 - April 29, 2003 - Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
6569393 - May 27, 2003 - Method and device for cleaning the atmosphere

In 2000, there were 4.5 million persons with AD in the US population. By 2050, this number will increase by almost 3-fold, to 13.2 million. Owing to the rapid growth of the oldest age groups of the US population, the number who are 85 years and older will more than quadruple to 8.0 million. The number who are 75 to 84 years old will double to 4.8 million, while the number who are 65 to 74 years old will remain fairly constant at 0.3 to 0.5 million.
 
 
http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/60/8/1119
 
 
aluminum is main thing responsible for this disease. see also chemtrails

BARIUM TESTS ARE POSITIVE
Clifford E Carnicom
Santa Fe, New Mexico
May 24 2004
 
A series of qualitative chemical tests and deductions now confirm without doubt the presence of significant amounts of barium within atmospheric samples. Citizens may now begin the process of collecting the sample materials for formal submission to public environmental agencies and private labs for identification. The testing process can be done at modest expense and the results from laboratory analysis can now be qualitatively and independently verified without great difficulty. Any testing service employed will need to be able to demonstrate no vested interest in the outcome of the results, accuracy of method, and the willingness to have the testing process independently monitored.
 
The material under analysis has been collected by a plate ionizing filter; it may also be collected with conventional fiber filtration over a longer period of time. HEPA filter collection and subsequent electrolysis of the filter material placed in distilled water has also proven successful. Extended time periods may be required to collect a sufficient volume of material for electrolytic processing and external testing preferences. Readers are referred to previous articles1,2 for two methods of collection. The use of electrolysis is significant in producing a final compound for testing purposes. The solid materials (powder/ crystals) collected by the plate ionizing filter, assuming they satisify the test procedures described on this page, will be sufficient for laboratory analysis. Qualitative chemical tests and flame tests positively establish the significant presence of barium compounds within the atmospheric sample.
 
Citizens with sufficient environmental concern are encouraged to begin this process of sample collection and identification, along with the documentation of the responses of both public and private environmental services.

Additional Notes:
 
The process of collection and analysis is summarized as follows:
 
1. Solid materials are collected with the use of a plate ionizing filter or fiber based filters as described previously.1,2
 
2. The material can be subjected to low power microscopic viewing to verify similiarity of material form before proceeding. The powder/crystal material under collection has a tan, beige or gray cast to it. The presence of fibrous materials within the sample is not the focus of this report, and further analysis of those materials may occur at a later time.
 
3. The solid powder/crystal material that is the subject of this report will be found to dissolve easily within distilled water. Extremely small samples have been used for all tests as the material requires time and effort to collect in sufficient quantity. For testing purposes, samples of a fraction of a gram have been dissolved within a few milliliters of distilled water.
 
4. Solutions of higher concentrations, e.g., 1 part solid to 3 parts water will be found to be strongly alkaline. This indicates the presence of a base and hydroxide ions. A pH value of 9 was recorded in the test that is the subject of this report.
 
5. A weak solution (fraction of a gram to 40ml water) will be found to permit significant electrolysis reactions. A variety of electrodes have been used to verify the chemical results, including aluminum, iron, copper, silver and graphite electrodes. The work at this point establishes the presence of a soluble metallic hydroxide form in solution.
 
6. Chromatography experiments and comparative analysis allows us to conclude that the atomic mass of the metallic cation under examination is greater than that of copper, or greater than 63.5 atomic mass units.3 Cations under reasonable consideration4 therefore include:
 
Ag+, Au+2, Ba+2, Bi+3, Cd+2, Ce+4, Cs+, Ga+3, Hg+2, Pb+2, Rb+, Sb+3, Sn+2, Sr+2
 
7. The results of electrolysis with graphite electrodes permits us to conclude that a reactive metal is a component5 of the metallic hydroxide under examination.
 
8. The electrochemical series and the half-reaction electrode potentials are therefore consulted6,7 to establish a list of reasonable candidates for the cation of the metallic salt which disassociates in solution to permit electrolysis. The list of candidate cations, with the condition of hydroxide formation included, is now reduced to:
 
Ba+2, Sr+2, Rb+ and Cs+ with oxidation potentials of 2.91, 2.90, 2.98 and 3.03 volts respectively.
 
It is noticed that this group is now closely confined within the periodic table, and that chemical properties of these elements are in many ways shared. It is also instructive to note the remarkable similiarity in the work functions of these elements, which is an expression of the ionization capabililty of the element.
 
9. Each of these cations must form a soluble hydroxide. Solubility tables8 indicate that these conditions are satisified by each of the hydroxide forms: Ba(OH)2, Sr(OH)2, RbOH and CsOH.
 
10. Practical levels of worldwide production of the elements are helpful to consider9. Barium and strontium both are produced at high tonnage levels worldwide, rubidium and cesium are inconsequential in production. Barium production is stated at 6 million tons per year, strontium at 137,000 tons, cesium at 20 tons and rubidium in such low levels as to not be available. Common hydroxide forms are also to be considered in this analysis. This reduces the candidate cation list to strontium and barium, whereupon additional conditions of qualitative testing are to be imposed.
 
11. The material in solution must produce a cation and a hydroxide ion in solution. Precipitate tests are conducted with carbonate, oxalate and sulfate compounds for the existence of barium or strontium ions, using a combination of the unknown with sodium carbonate, sodium oxalate and copper sulfate10. The material in question forms a precipitate under all three conditions. The consideration of barium hydroxide and strontium hydroxide continues to be valid under under these results.
 
12. The precipitate formed with the use of copper sulfate is hypothesized to be barium sulfate. The precipitate formed under electrolysis is also hypothesized to be a barium sulphate compound. Solubility tests are necessary to test this hypothesis. The precipitate and the compound formed from electrolysis pass the solubility tests when subjected to water, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and ethanol. The identification of barium sulphate remains valid. The sulfate precipitate fails the solubility test for strontium sulfate, as strontium sulfate is soluble in hydrochloric acid. The sulphate compound that has been formed by both displacement and electrolysis is highly insoluble, and is insoluble in hydrochloric acid.
 
13. The solubility test for barium carbonate should also be verified. The carbonate precipitate is soluble in hydrochloric acid and passes this test. The identification of barium compounds in the analysis remains valid. No solubility tests for barium oxalate are specified11.
 
14. The next test which is to be conducted is the flame test. Barium burns yellow-green under the flame test12,13. A sample of the electrolysis compound, identified as barium sulphate, is subjected to a flame test using a nichrome wire. The compound is observed to burn with a yellow-green color. The identification of barium compounds within the analysis is valid under all conditions and circumstances examined.
 
15. The final test is a viewing of the spectrum of the flame test with a calibrated spectroscope and an optical spectroscope. Dominant green and yellow emission spectral lines are measured at approximately 515 (wider line, boundary line) and 587 nanometers (narrow and distinct), they are confirmed with the optical spectroscope, and they correspond to the green and yellow wavelengths specified for the flame test. A secondary wide line in the green portion of the spectrum borders at approximately 560nm. For comparison purposes, the spectrum of barium chloride and barium hydroxide test salts in solution appears and measures identically within the green portion of the spectrum. The identification of barium compounds within the analysis remains valid under all conditions and examined and tests conducted.
 
 
 
The most reasonable hypothesis at this point is that the original compound is a barium oxide form. This compound readily combines with water to form barium hydroxide. The ionizing plate filter and the fiber filter both appear to be successful at accumulating the solid form of this metallic salt. Solubility, pH, precipitation, chromatography, electrode, electrolysis, flame, spectroscopy and spectroscopy comparison tests all support the conclusion within this report that significant levels of barium compounds have been verified to exist and are now to be examined in the atmospheric sampling process. This report corroborates, at an elevated level, the previous research that is available on this site.
 
This page is subject to revision.
 
 
References:
 
1. Clifford E Carnicom, Electrolysis and Barium, (http://www.carnicom.com/precip1.htm), May 27, 2002
2. Carnicom, Sub-Micron Particulates Isolated, (http://www.carnicom.com/micro3.htm), Apr 26, 2004
3. Frank Eshelman, Ph.D., MicroChem Manual (Frank Eschelman, http://www.microchemkits.com, 2003), 1-4, 76.
4. Gordon J. Coleman, The Addison-Wesley Science Handbook (Addison-Wesley, 1997), 130.
5. Andrew Hunt, A-Z Chemistry, (McGraw-Hill, 2003), 125.
6. David R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, (CRC Press, 2001), 8-21 to 8-31.
7. Fred C. Hess, Chemistry Made Simple, (Doubleday, 1984), 89, 91.
8. Lide, 4-37 to 4-96.
9. John Emsley, The Elements, (Clarendon Press, 1998), 30-31, 46-47, 176-177, 196-197.
10. University of Nebraska-Lincoln, The Identification of Ions, (http://dwb.unl.edu/Chemistry/LABS/LABS10.html)
11. Lide, 4-44.
12. Hunt, 152-153.
13. Infoplease Encyclopedia, Flame Test, (http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0818856.html)
Reply
03-12-2008, 04:22 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-12-2008, 04:44 AM by mexika.)
#8
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Quote:The natural occurring ones that dissipate quickly are a natural phenomenon, ie, Vapor Trails. The ones that expand are not. Pictures back as far as 1984 don't show chemtrails, or the weird formations in the sky. Most of the patterns are ran late evening throughout the night, on the coast, they are done out at sea. I think a look at Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth more or less, hold partially an answer. He speaks of deflecting 1% of the sun's waves back into space, like a shield. Add to that, it really doesn't matter what causes or if Global Warming is real, it only matters that they think it is.

I


Didn't George bush suggest something of the sort to reduce global warming. If you google with George bush, you might find the articles. George bush, if I recollect, jokingly made that suggestion.

Could they be doing it now and who knows what else...

This is scary...could it be affecting our bodies already, something we dont know, the government put in us like cattle?
Unite The Many, defeat the few.

Revolution is for the love of your people, culture, knowledge, wisdom, spirit, and peace. Not Greed!
Soul Rebel Native Son


http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=277...enous&hl=en
Reply
03-12-2008, 05:14 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-12-2008, 05:20 AM by TeslaandLyne.)
#9
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Quote:Yeah, I should get some pics next time. There are several airports by me, and the thing that is interesting is that you can watch a jet leave a trail on "those" days and see that it is not going to dissipate normally and you do wind up seeing spectacular length in the trails that don't dissipate.

Oh yeah, thats good if you are by an airport.

If UFOs are involved they need signals from the airport.
Yet present theory says they need laser communications.

I only see a single high flying plane or UFO, I can't tell.
Then all the expanding puffy clouds until lying out flat as a haze.

I mean sticking together and expanding from such a hight like 10,000 feet.
It might be ions so the do not attract one another and expand but do not dissipate
because the ions and air do not mix as other trails of vapor.

ED: I just thought if this. If positive ions are coming down on us, those are
the bad ones. I mean what other ions are there, you need electrons for
negative charges. Remember those ion machines for the house.
Positive ions cause depression and dull feelings.
Reply
03-12-2008, 05:32 AM,
#10
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Quote:
Quote:The natural occurring ones that dissipate quickly are a natural phenomenon, ie, Vapor Trails. The ones that expand are not. Pictures back as far as 1984 don't show chemtrails, or the weird formations in the sky. Most of the patterns are ran late evening throughout the night, on the coast, they are done out at sea. I think a look at Al Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth more or less, hold partially an answer. He speaks of deflecting 1% of the sun's waves back into space, like a shield. Add to that, it really doesn't matter what causes or if Global Warming is real, it only matters that they think it is.

I


Didn't George bush suggest something of the sort to reduce global warming. If you google with George bush, you might find the articles. George bush, if I recollect, jokingly made that suggestion.

Could they be doing it now and who knows what else...

This is scary...could it be affecting our bodies already, something we dont know, the government put in us like cattle?

Yep, they are still doing it, he just just part of a problem way back. It is done all over the world. From what I gathered over the years, the UN, Al Gore's buddies. Notice that it dates back to 1920?

Also, relates to Black Mold, I'm 47 and never heard of it until later years, so either since 1984 they have changed it, or some stays suspended, I'm guessing the answer lies in both.
Here is another article :

Watch the skies

I know this going to sound crazy I thought it did the first time I heard it, but I started watching it. I read were back in War World War two times that the government ofted tested virsus, bacterias, and chemicals. By releasing them into the air over small towns and cities, while flying over here in america. This is isn't here say this is fact, documented fact. We still do to this day.


Already one govener and one mayor in two seperate states in the mid west have succesfully taken ti court the federal goverment for mysterious vapor trail left by jets. The normal vapor trail dispates very quickly and this is a tru vapor trail, however there are of vapor trails that do not dispate, rather spread. I know you have seen this if kind of looks like stringy clouds streaked in the sky that grow larger as the minutes pass.


When taken to court the goverment argued that they were seeding clouds has been done longer than we've flew. As weird as this sounds, and check me on any scientific website there are invisible rivers that go through the sky these change postion with the jet stream which are made up of water molecules. There are chemicals that bond with water vapors causing them to become heavy, turn to liquid and thus fall as rain. In effect we can almost control our rainfall, but it is dependent on where the river is located, and where the molecules of water are concentrated this story didn't fly with the courts and the govener and the mayor at seperate times, seperate states, seperate events succesfully proved to the court that there was more then seeding going on. Hints the jets can no longer legally fly over these two states leaving vapor trails.

The next time watch the skies natural vapor trails will disappear quickly, but should they not they are Cmeotrails and within two weeks people begin getting sick. Usually if they are seeding within two days we will have massive rain. I've observed this with a skeptical lie and now I believe it, and so does the people, through evidence that I've talked to.

We often wonder when we get sick why we get sick. I don't think this is the reason we get sick or have bad dieseas but it certaintly is a factor. When you add this chemical exposure to a already weakened body, even if it appears strong this can play a role for predisposing you to greater illness's. How you might ask? Here is the way it will work we spread a little diesase, nothing real bad next the diease is transferred person to person, seeking out only those with the worst weakened immune systems and toxic build up. These people aren't going die, they are just sick. So they got to the doctor, doctor prescribes the medicine, usually a anti-botic or steroild. Now if, sterolids are used, our immune system is supressed, with a supressed immune system and a contaminated food supply. This will open our body's up to worse diesases, cancer, diabetes, arthiritis, mental disorders, auto immune dieases, and a host of other dieases that were once rare if indeed exsisted at all. If antbiotics are used and used frequntley, like everything else in the world it will mutate and become resistant.
Senate Bill 517, proposed by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), would create a platform for future legislation that would allow for a nationwide weather-modification advisory and research board to make large-scale chemical alterations in our atmosphere. Authoritative sources say this is already occurring.

High levels of barium, aluminum and quartz have already been found in areas that have been reporting heavy chemtrail activity. Those substances, though natural minerals, have never been detected in those areas previously. For example, in portions of Canada, one of the first countries to raise awareness of aerosol spraying, barium and aluminum levels were found to be seven times above normal, according to media accounts published in a Vancouver newspaper in 1999.

How can this not effect us, it will. But the sevierity of how it effects us is still in our court. By proper nutrition, diet, exercise we may perhaps fight it off using natural antibodies our system comes with. The bacteria in our in testinal flora will naturally assist us, yet if we take antibiotics it will kill this natural bacteria we need to survive. Speak your mind and voice your concern about this money grabbing senseless, activity carried out by those who we elect to protect and serve us, but don't take my word for it, I may just be crazy like thousands of others. Judge for yourself.


Here is a link I'm adding to this. http://willthomas.net/Chemtrails/Articles/...Ozone_Layer.htm


In 2000, there were 4.5 million persons with AD in the US population. By 2050, this number will increase by almost 3-fold, to 13.2 million. Owing to the rapid growth of the oldest age groups of the US population, the number who are 85 years and older will more than quadruple to 8.0 million. The number who are 75 to 84 years old will double to 4.8 million, while the number who are 65 to 74 years old will remain fairly constant at 0.3 to 0.5 million.


http://archneur.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/60/8/1119


aluminum is main thing responsible for this disease. see also chemtrails

--------------------------------------------------------------------

[/url]http://rense.com/Datapages/morgdat.htm


MORGELLONS DISEASE

Listen Free - Six Jeff
Rense Morgellons Programs!
http://rense.com/Datapages/morgdat.htm
Morgellons Photos Pages 1-5

[url="http://rense.com/general74/morg6-1.htm"]http://rense.com/general74/morg6-1.htm://http://rense.com/Datapages/morgdat....l74/morg6-1.htm://http://rense.com/Datapages/morgdat....l74/morg6-1.htm://http://rense.com/Datapages/morgdat....l74/morg6-1.htm


Major Radio/TV Morgellons
Information Posted

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...D=66859005& ;blogID=198266534

Morgellons 'Disease' -
A True Medical Mystery

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/16093733.htm


Medical Mystery - Morgellons
Syndrome (Part 1)

http://www.myfoxcleveland.com/myfox/pages/...549984&vers ion=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.2.1


Medical Mystery - Morgellons
Syndrome (Part 2)
http://www.myfoxcleveland.com/myfox/pages/...549984&vers ion=8&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=3.5.1

Chemtrails, Nanotech and Morgellons

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...19374778&am p;blogID=197142828


Morgellons Mystery Disease Datafiles

http://www.rense.com/Datapages/morgdat.htm

---------------------------------------------------

I have been very curious as to whether or not the chemtrails have increased the death rate. I found it very difficult to get any official figures to compare from different years so I decided to do an informal check using the classified death listing archives from my local newspaper.

I was shocked at what I found. These figures are truly alarming. I compared the number of death notices for the same two months (Jan and Feb) going back for approx ten years (to compare pre chemtrails years with chemtrails years). This is what I found:

Year
Death Notice Totals for Jan-Feb:

1995
191

1996
134

1997
105

1998
98

1999
144

2000
196

2001
1680

2002
1734

2003
1728

2004
2000



As you can see the totals for 2003 are almost 10 times higher than the totals for 1995. This seems way out of line and very alarming even taking into consideration an aging population. Perhaps there is another reason for these figures but I suspect it is a result of the chemtrails and what we are seeing may be the result of a deliberate depopulation campaign. These figures are from the San Francisco Chronicle death notice archives. For accuracy the actual newspaper archives should be doublechecked aginst the online archives because death notices that were originally listed in the newspaper are not necessarily included in the online archives. This is only done with the families permission.

Perhaps you could ask people in other communities to run this check to see what figures they come up with.

I appreciate your efforts on behalf of the greater community.

Best Regards,"

Anonymous by Request

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Have no clue where the last one came from, an email I got long ago.
Reply
03-12-2008, 05:42 AM,
#11
Qx: On days of contrails/chemtrails(?)...?
Hate to double post, but just got this email. This is an excellent short video explaining chemtrails & comtrails


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56uoBsU26o8
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Danger From Above, Chemtrails Defendfreedom 159 38,828 06-23-2013, 04:32 PM
Last Post: FastTadpole
  Chemtrails The Changing The Face Of The Planet. Finished article Defendfreedom 28 7,068 08-20-2011, 11:05 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  HOW TO STOP CHEMTRAILS lorae41 17 5,107 05-18-2011, 09:12 AM
Last Post: JazzRoc
Rainbow Chemtrails in "my" country? humbug 9 2,593 05-17-2011, 11:33 AM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Chemtrails and Monsanto’s New Aluminum Resistance Gene – Coincidence? plasticfan 6 2,781 07-15-2010, 03:50 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Barium in Chemtrails and Project Blue Beam Reboot 11 6,513 07-15-2010, 03:42 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  chemtrails, while you sleep stonecutter 10 2,684 07-13-2010, 05:02 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Chemtrails? TriWooOx 21 4,682 11-04-2009, 02:52 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  History Channel Documentary Validates Chemtrails and Weather Warfare blove8. 10 2,825 09-26-2009, 03:55 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc
  Chemtrails Confirmed author William Thomas is Live on ORN Radio east147 21 3,583 07-29-2009, 01:23 PM
Last Post: JazzRoc

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)