Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Secret of Harmonia
11-15-2007, 12:40 AM,
#2
Secret of Harmonia
I've posted on Laura's "sign of the times" forum in response to a http://conspiracycentral.info poster or maybe it was http://unexplained-mysteries.com (where I was banned for bringing up these tantra issues).

Anyway Laura does a good job on understanding the Stargate Conspiracy (and taking on the AboveTopSecret website).

But again this whole mind-psychic channelling thing is, as Stan Gooch details, based on generalized philosophy with really no applicable details for practical healing energy.

Laura's article on Gurdjieff is very revealing. This is the critical revelation:

"And yet...! Is not the System of Octaves symbolized by the musical scale (tones and semitones) as well as by the notes that compose it (Dominus, Sidereus orbis, etc...). Is not the origin of these notes a Christian hymn to John the Baptist? Mouravieff reminds us of this in detail (Gnosis, chapter 10). He therefore responds, in preventive measure, to the issues raised by Patterson by showing that Christianity, including its European version, contained the System of Octaves at a certain period."

God this reminds of a passage I read last night:

"Is not this the same thing which is described in the Acts as the descent of the Holy Ghost upon the Apostles, when they began to understand divers languages?" asked someone. [of Gurdjieff]

I [Ouspensky] noticed that such questions always irritated G.

"I don't know, I wasn't there," he said. p. 96, "In Search of the Miraculous"

Now for Boris to claim, as Laura records, that Gurdjieff has bad communication skills and therefore was dependent on Ouspensky is a complete joke.

This joke is verified when Gurdjieff asks Ouspensky to provide his commentary of the cosmos:

"See what you can say from your point of view, taking everything just as I said it." (p. 208)

Ouspensky rattles on for FIVE WORTHLESS PAGES (which I tore out of the book because they're so stupid).

Then on page 213 Gurdjieff responds with this very SLY comment:

"I will only add one thing more:

"Time is breath -- try to understand this."

He said nothing further. (p. 213)

Now that Ouspensky reports this without even seeing the SLY joke involved is proof that Gurdjieff in no way was dependent on Ouspensky and also that Ouspensky was simply a scribe, not a teacher.

Not only that but Boris does not understand Gurdjieff, because as I've stated, Gurdjieff was translating nonwestern alchemy into Western philosophy and this confused people.

First of all the Christian scale that Boris' refers to does not rely on asymmetric harmonics -- there's no understanding of how to apply this to the body, as Gurdjieff details in his alchemical teaching which exactly parallels the same as the Taoist Yoga book.

The crucial emphasis of Gurdjieff is that in the West the lower emotions remain undeveloped and it takes a conscious sublimation of these emotions. The sex center is the neutralizing force of the moving center, the lower electrochemical energy center of the body.

So what enables a person to sit in full-lotus is the ability to shoot the yang light-energy back into the yin electrochemical-energy. This creates an increase in vitality or electromagnetic energy. Taoist Yoga teaches that not until yang light-energy can be seen OUTSIDE the head is the female formless awareness established. Otherwise there continues to be just a repression of the lower emotions that creates a projection of oppression outside the body. As the female formless awareness deepens -- what Gurjdieff calls the "possibility of consciousness" then the electrochemical astral body -- shooting yang energy outside the mind -- turns into the electromagnetic astral body (the sun energy of immortality). Finally, as the Golden Light of the yin electrochemical energy merges in the Heart (source of Eternal Nature as Taoist Yoga calls it or the female formless awareness) another physical body is created -- the level 7 of Gurdjieff as the "starry" astral body, immortal in this solar system, beyond the sun.

Master Nan, Huai-chin also discusses these different "levels of emptiness" in his books which are truly amazing.

Now Gurdjieff reveals his secret translation of Western philosophy into nonwestern complimentary opposites with the following SLY comment:

"But, in this connection, it must be remembered that 'intelligence' is determined not by the density of matter but by the density of vibrations. The density of vibrations, however increases not, by doubling as in the octaves of 'hydrogens' [and the Christian doubling scale Boris refers to] but in an entirely different progression which many times out numbers the first. If you know the exact coefficient of this increase you will be in a position to solve this problem." (p. 320)

Of course "coefficient" is a logarithmic term so the Western readers will never be able to solve this "entirely different progression" -- which, again, is the resonance of complimentary opposites.

Finally Gurdjieff emphasized again that alchemy is impersonal and based on the law of three as complimentary opposites:

"You must understand that each center is divided into three parts in conformity with the primary division of centers into 'thinking,' 'emotional,' and 'moving.' On the same principle each of these parts in its turn is divided into three. In addition, from the very outset each center is divided into two parts: positive and negative. And in all parts there are groups of 'rolls' connected together, some in one direction and others in another direction. This explains the differences between people, what is called 'individuality.' Of course there is in this no individuality at all, but simply a difference of 'rolls' and associations." p. 388, the last quote of Gurdjieff in the book, "In Search of the Miraculous."

On John Cook introducing the term "taboo" from the South Pacific, I'd would add another John Cooke, the subject of a book I just read the past couple days:

The Tyrannicide Brief by Geoffrey Robertson (2006, Vintage London).

Robertson rewrites the history of the barrister John Cooke who established "the right to remain silent," along with other modern rights.

Robertson notes that "the fabled sexual promiscuity of the Ranters inspired a moral panic in Parliament" while the Levellers were considered "the enemy within."

In honor of this taboo today I'll read Andrew Eames: "Crossing the Shadow Line: Travels in South-East Asia." (1986)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Secret of Harmonia - drew hempel - 11-13-2007, 10:04 PM
Secret of Harmonia - drew hempel - 11-15-2007, 12:40 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Exclamation Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax Easy Skanking 6 695 01-21-2013, 11:44 PM
Last Post: jarevfra
  Bolivia Ambassador to UN Pablo Sol√≥n Responds to Secret U.S. Manipulation mexika 0 514 12-07-2010, 10:03 PM
Last Post: mexika
  Food: The Ultimate Secret Exposed - PT 1/2 hilly7 4 835 08-07-2010, 10:18 PM
Last Post: Nokturnal
  Russian Scholar Warns Of 'Secret' U.S. Climate Change Weapon mexika 0 529 08-04-2010, 11:57 PM
Last Post: mexika
  Revealed: the nasty secret in your kitchen cupboard drummer 1 547 04-03-2010, 05:18 AM
Last Post: hilly7
  EcoDent's Secret drew hempel 1 512 11-13-2007, 12:15 AM
Last Post: drew hempel
  Yan Xin's Free Energy Secret drew hempel 10 2,926 10-10-2007, 12:25 AM
Last Post: drew hempel
  Secret Plans Drawn Up To Turn Us All Veggie drummer 60 6,797 06-26-2007, 12:42 AM
Last Post: hilly7
  Humans In Secret Radioactive Tests PSX 0 377 04-24-2007, 10:34 PM
Last Post: PSX
  "will Then Meet In Secret" Skinski7 0 319 02-06-2007, 06:48 PM
Last Post: Skinski7

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)