Occam's Razor is lizard shit, and other horrors for the inner reptile...

[rsol]

possible. but i think you mean bull not rsol.

[Bull Medicine]

(07-30-2011, 12:37 PM)crystal Wrote: Bless him. I think the writing is too dificult for rsol to understand.

It seems incredible that he persists trolling a thread he is not interested in nor wanted in. His input is facile and self oriented. Really it's not required.

Perhaps after he gets the message and pisses off, the thread can get moving a bit.

[JazzRoc]

(07-25-2011, 07:26 AM)Bull Medicine Wrote:

Quote:But that is exactly why Occam works better than any other.

Logical fallacy.

How?

[Bull Medicine]

(08-09-2011, 04:39 PM)JazzRoc Wrote:

(07-25-2011, 07:26 AM)Bull Medicine Wrote:

Quote:But that is exactly why Occam works better than any other.

Logical fallacy.

How?

Begging the Question

"The fallacy of petitio principii, or "begging the question", is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof", or more generally denotes when an assumption is used, "in some form of the very proposition to be proved, as a premise from which to deduce it""
Welton (1905), 279.

[JazzRoc]

(11-17-2011, 06:25 PM)Bull Medicine Wrote:

(08-09-2011, 04:39 PM)JazzRoc Wrote:

(07-25-2011, 07:26 AM)Bull Medicine Wrote:

Quote:But that is exactly why Occam works better than any other.

Logical fallacy.

How?

Begging the Question. "The fallacy of petitio principii, or "begging the question", is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof", or more generally denotes when an assumption is used, "in some form of the very proposition to be proved, as a premise from which to deduce it"" Welton (1905), 279.

Yes, you're definitely trolling your own thread.

Occam's razor is an activity undertaken in the midst of marshalling arguments to constitute proof, and NOT an argument in itself.

Pull your head out of your ass.