Rothschild says he wants a single, One World Currency

[rockclimber]

[Sovereignman]

I'd love to kill that guy.

[h3rm35]

Isn´t that really really old news? Haven´t various members of this family been saying shit like that for decades? I think the most telling thing that he said was that he´d probably be dead in five or less years, and that there probably wasn´t a chance for a global currency before that. And, oh yeah, doesn´t this really belong in ¨Banksters¨?

[rockclimber]

(02-06-2012 08:52 PM)h3rm35 Wrote:  Isn´t that really really old news? Haven´t various members of this family been saying shit like that for decades? I think the most telling thing that he said was that he´d probably be dead in five or less years, and that there probably wasn´t a chance for a global currency before that. And, oh yeah, doesn´t this really belong in ¨Banksters¨?

It's old news to many of us but if there were any doubt, doubt it not.

It really doesn't matter to me where it's moved, but hey if the Rothschild's had their way wouldn't they rule with an Iron Fist?

[thokling]

(02-06-2012 07:25 PM)Sovereignman Wrote:  I'd love to kill that guy.

The truth of the matter is we're all guilty for allowing him and his kind to alter the functioning of society for their own means. I honestly have a certain level of admiration for anyone who does what it takes to ensure their own survival over others. Consumerism is, in my honest opinion, the greatest tool they've come up with to help keep the masses underfoot.

However, we're well past the time of territorial disputes. As a species, we have the ability to think our way through situations rather than react as neanderthals, regardless of how few people wish to demonstrate any amount of synaptic agility.

A global currency would certainly eradicate having to figure out exchange rates for money, and would help to encourage further globalisation. I'm all for it, but I'm not for its management by those with motives that do not hold humanity in as favourable a light as demonstrated by the power hungry psychopaths. Neanderthalism at its finest.

[h3rm35]

(02-08-2012 01:18 AM)thokling Wrote:  

(02-06-2012 07:25 PM)Sovereignman Wrote:  I'd love to kill that guy.

The truth of the matter is we're all guilty for allowing him and his kind to alter the functioning of society for their own means. I honestly have a certain level of admiration for anyone who does what it takes to ensure their own survival over others. Consumerism is, in my honest opinion, the greatest tool they've come up with to help keep the masses underfoot.

However, we're well past the time of territorial disputes. As a species, we have the ability to think our way through situations rather than react as neanderthals, regardless of how few people wish to demonstrate any amount of synaptic agility.

A global currency would certainly eradicate having to figure out exchange rates for money, and would help to encourage further globalisation. I'm all for it, but I'm not for its management by those with motives that do not hold humanity in as favourable a light as demonstrated by the power hungry psychopaths. Neanderthalism at its finest.

Not that you really have any reason to care, but you´re kind of freaking me out with these comments and making me reconsider some of the stuff I post here.

It seems to me as though you´re saying that we have the means with which to take these bastards down, but that we should shun extremism (Neaderthalism as I would roughly define it,) as an outmoded means. We´re supposed to think our way out of the prison...

Yet you go on to label ¨Those with motives that do not hold humanity in as favourable a light as demonstrated by the power hungry psychopaths,¨ as your example of the Neanderthals, and they´re the ones who have thought up the means of incarceration and the ways to keep even the most brilliant of the rest of humanity from being able to come up with a non-violent means to dethrone them. And you do this with a tone of forgiveness and admiration... that´s the part that freaks me out.

With the seeming contradiction though, I´m pretty sure I´m just not understanding you clearly. Care to elucidate?

[Sovereignman]

Quote:Yet you go on to label ¨Those with motives that do not hold humanity in as favourable a light as demonstrated by the power hungry psychopaths,¨ as your example of the Neanderthals, and they´re the ones who have thought up the means of incarceration and the ways to keep even the most brilliant of the rest of humanity from being able to come up with a non-violent means to dethrone them. And you do this with a tone of forgiveness and admiration... that´s the part that freaks me out.

I concur. People seem to forget the heinous acts that people like rothschilds have funded, orchestrated, participated in, etc. Those bastards don't deserve to be out-thought, they deserve to have a uav drop a hot one on them.

A one world currency does not appeal to me in the least, sounds like more fiat money backed by nothing but interest and blind faith. We already have that. Unless it's backed by something tangible like in the old days, no thanks.

Oh, as for considering a swift death to this tyrant Neanderthal-like, tell me that when you are being herded into a FEMA camp Germany style for peacefully protesting.

[thokling]

(02-08-2012 08:35 PM)h3rm35 Wrote:  Not that you really have any reason to care, but you´re kind of freaking me out with these comments and making me reconsider some of the stuff I post here.

It seems to me as though you´re saying that we have the means with which to take these bastards down, but that we should shun extremism (Neaderthalism as I would roughly define it,) as an outmoded means. We´re supposed to think our way out of the prison...

Yet you go on to label ¨Those with motives that do not hold humanity in as favourable a light as demonstrated by the power hungry psychopaths,¨ as your example of the Neanderthals, and they´re the ones who have thought up the means of incarceration and the ways to keep even the most brilliant of the rest of humanity from being able to come up with a non-violent means to dethrone them. And you do this with a tone of forgiveness and admiration... that´s the part that freaks me out.

With the seeming contradiction though, I´m pretty sure I´m just not understanding you clearly. Care to elucidate?

You have the right to post anything that abides by the rules of ConCen whether or not I like it. So why you're reconsidering posting things is beyond me.

My use of the word "neanderthal" was subjective and referred to Ye Olde Ways of using violence to control the masses, which is what the RCC's been doing in various guises for centuries now. Extremism is often necessary when these groups decide to employ soldiers, private or otherwise, against the public, and I fully support attacks on those who wish to threaten the freedoms of the people if the people deem it necessary.

I don't support the oppression of people, but the fact that these guys have done it and have enslaved numerous countries in the name of advancing their agendae is a stark display of humanity's legacy at its finest: wolves versus sheep. The wolves have used cunning and guile to hoop the rest of us (at least those of us who haven't woken up yet) into slavery.

If any of us were in their positions, with their backgrounds and experiences, we'd do precisely the same thing.

I'm neither excusing nor condoning their actions. I'm expressing appreciation for the patience and sneakiness that was employed for so long to actually get the job done.

As far as forgiveness goes, the only other options I see are apathy and hatred. Where the former allows for one to objectively and rationally adjust the system so TPTB can't abuse the people, the latter options result in irrational states that do nothing to help solve the problems at hand.

So, yes, I forgive them for their actions. Societally, however, they'd be best brought to bear for their actions and face prosecution as a result of the atrocities they've encouraged.

There's more than one perspective at work on my part here, which may be the source of confusion.

Sovereignman: Sure, their kind have funded lots of those acts. And now, by allowing them to not only enact, but maintain, their policies, we're then responsible for supporting those policies until we change them. I haven't forgotten them, and, if anyone had bothered to pay attention to my other posts, the realisation that I'm more intelligent and attentive than your average human would have been obvious. ;>

[Sovereignman]

Who's allowing the bankers to maintain their policies? The enlisted. The stupid American sheep that constantly felate the enlisted. Oh thank you for your service. Service to who? Who do the enlisted take orders from? It's a simple question. I'm not calling you stupid because you have the mental capacity, the level of consciousness to realize this.

Congressmen are also aiding the bullies, and supporting these wars and the implementation of a new world order and one world currency.

If the enlisted had any brains at all, they wouldn't be killing innocent afghanis, Iraqis, and now Iranians, they would be going rogue or renegade and taking out traitor politicians like John McCain and carl levin, congressmen who create unconstitutional laws like the NDAA, the "patriot act", etc. The enlisted would be taking down tyrants like Janet napolitano, soros, Kissinger, rumsfield, bushes, clintons, Rockefellers, rothschilds, holder (fast and furious) etc etc. All the people who are systematically destroying the usa are domestic enemies. Unless you consider the federal reserve foreign since it came from Europe. The enlisted are helping all of those people by taking orders from them.

The enlisted who are killing women and children 5000 miles away in other nations are not preserving my rights, my liberty, or my freedom. Not while congressmen are here creating laws like the NDAA, SOPA, ACTA, patriot act, etc etc. In fact, the enlisted are aiding in the removal of my liberty, rights, and freedom.

This is why I hate the enlisted.

Here is an easy analogy. You are in the grade school A few bullies form a gang who terrorize the smaller kids at school. They steal the weaker kids lunch money, beat them up, force them to do their homework for them. The idea to bully and control the weaker as a group originated as an idea with one, not all of them. One person presented the idea of joining forces to the others.

Bullies eventually get a beat down from someone who has the courage to stand up for him/herself against the oppressor. But bullies can only become stronger if they recruit more people to their gang. The more bullies that fight for the original bullies, the stronger the gang becomes and the more difficult they are to defeat. The federal reserve cartel are the original bullies. They have recruited, by using their bullshit currency, more bullies, such as the federal government, congressmen, mainstream media, marines, navy, air force, irs, CIA, NSA, FBI, etc etc etc.

All these bullies are complacent in working with the original bullies (bankers) to help them realize their goals. As long as more private sector citizens join these sectors of government, thus government growing, the USA will be destroyed. The USA won't be destroyed from foreign enemies, but from domestic enemies. It is happening right now, it has been happening slowly for decades, and most of us on this forum are smart enough to see it, but we aren't strong enough, there aren't enough of us to stop the bully.