Are Some Alternative Media Also Controlled?

[ov3rkomer]

Are some alternative media also controlled?

Are they purposely avoiding to expose certain groups? What do you think?

<!--fontc--><!--/fontc-->

Quote: Most people in the “patriot movement” are aware of the fact that America’s mainstream media is massively controlled and regulated. But could a segment of the so-called “alternative media” ALSO be controlled? Might a segment of the “alternative media” be putting out disinformation and misinformation? Might a segment of the “alternative media” be throwing out “red herrings” to cover for the real power brokers operating (and hiding) “behind the scenes”? Might a segment of the “alternative media” be deliberately concentrating most of their efforts in areas such as the “high-tech” aspects of the New World Order, weather modification, Jewish Cabbalism, etc., in order to divert us from a much more important aspect of the New World Order, i.e., State and Church combining for genocide? Might a segment of the “alternative media” be “deflecting” call-ins to their broadcasts that try to address important aspects of history that point to the “real controllers”? Might a segment of the “alternative media” be carefully manipulating the direction of discussions on their broadcasts to exclude certain critical topics? I believe the answer to all those questions is: “It is quite likely!”

Obviously, there are some major differences of opinion within the “patriot movement”. A fairly large segment within this movement believes that “the Jews” (i.e., the Jewish neo-conservatives, Israel, the Zionists, Jewish Masons, Jewish bankers, etc.) are running the world and the USA. Probably a much smaller segment within the movement believes that the Vatican and Jesuit Order (with help from its Knights of Malta, members of Opus Dei, and top levels of Freemasonry under the control of the “Black Pope”) are the top players. Obviously, there is a “mix” of various groups near the top levels of the “New World Order”; however, one group historically dominates any movement – i.e., directs and controls the other groups. It is equally as obvious that both “the Jews” (as described in this paragraph) and the Vatican-Jesuits can’t both be at the head of the New World Order. Thus, one of these two above-mentioned segments within the patriot movement is, for the most part, WRONG in their assessment of the “major threat” to our liberties.

...

<!--fontc--><!--/fontc--> Why are so many of the broadcast hosts and writers within the so-called “alternative media” afraid to seriously tackle the topic of the Vatican and its Jesuits? Why do so many of them hesitate to even broach the topic of Vatican-sponsored genocide, the Inquisition, the crusades [some of which were against Christians], the infamous Vatican Ratlines used to help war criminals escape after World War II, the Vatican support of Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, etc.? There could be a number of reasons for refusing to fully and openly discuss these topics, but I believe most of them fall into these following main categories:

• (1) Some individuals within the “alternative media” are actual Jesuit “temporal coadjutors” (persons performing service or duties for the Jesuit Order, but who are not Jesuit priests). ((They are in these media positions for the sole purpose of stymieing [i.e., impeding] any open discussion of the role of the Vatican, Jesuits, Opus Dei, Knights of Malta, etc., on the geopolitical, financial, and religious “chessboard”.))
• (2) Certain segments of the “alternative media” could simply be afraid of offending Roman Catholic listeners (or, readers) should they mention the pope, the Vatican, etc., in a “negative” manner. Maybe some of these folks feel that we must have “unity at any price” in the fight against the New World Order, and thus we can’t afford to “offend” American Roman Catholics.
• (3) Certain segments of the “alternative media” may fear the possible loss of financial support from Roman Catholic listeners (or, readers) should they courageously expose the Papacy, Vatican State, Jesuits, Knights of Malta, etc.
• (4) Certain segments of the “alternative media” may actually fear losing some of their radio stations – or being thrown off a major network – should they courageously expose the Papacy, Vatican State, Jesuits, Knights of Malta, etc. ((Two “alternative media” broadcast hosts basically admitted such to me during personal phone conversations that I had with them!))
• (5) Certain segments of the “alternative media” may simply be grossly ignorant about the tremendous power and influence of the Vatican, Jesuits, Knights of Malta, etc. ((This seems the least likely of reasons, since there is so much information available on this topic. Additionally, I have mailed a “ton” of material on these topics to many of the top broadcast hosts in the “alternative media”.))
• (6) Certain segments of the “alternative media” have been fed a whole lot of “misinformation” and “disinformation” by lackeys of the “real powers” behind the scenes. I know of at least one broadcast host who falls in this category.
• (7) Certain individuals within the “alternative media” may have even been threatened with harm should they dare to expose the Vatican, Jesuits, Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, and other Roman Catholic groups.

It may be one or more of any of the above that prevents certain elements within the “alternative media” from tackling the tough topics of the Roman Catholic Church’s propensity for religious genocide, Inquisition, and “holy” wars and crusades – and its Jesuit Order’s well-documented history of assassinating heads of State, and of fomenting wars and revolutions.

Dear Reader of this newsletter, history indeed does tend to frequently repeat itself. Knowing this, how in blazes can those in the “alternative media” who claim to be “exposing” the New World Order, IGNORE (and REFUSE to discuss) one of the most powerful players on the geopolitical, financial, and religious “chessboard”? (One can make a good argument that “the Vatican and its Jesuits” is THE TOP player on that “chessboard”.) Which of the above-listed reasons for not discussing this top player would apply to the broadcast hosts and other “alternative media” folks that you know?

And since history does indeed repeat itself, shouldn’t these below-listed topics be openly and fully discussed by those in the “alternative media” who claim to be exposing the New World Order – especially by the top “alternative media” broadcast hosts?
<!--fontc--><!--/fontc-->

http://www.tacklingthetoughtopics.net/Eber..._alt_media.html

Is Alex Jones avoiding to tackle the Vatican connection?

[Conspiracy Dave]

I think most of us already realize this and have taken this into account when we read stuff.

Good article though

[Skinski7]

Overcomer, you'll find it worthwhile if you locate and read 'Scarlet and the Beast' Volumes 1, 2 and 3 by John Daniel.

It is a thoroughly researched tome that goes into great detail of the power plays of the Vatican, English Masonry and French Freemasonry and the conflict between these three powerful forces. The reader will come away with a better understanding of how some of the different powers working towards world government are operating. The book does not really delve into Zionism unfortunately, but you'll learn a lot about the origin of organisations like the mafia and many terrorist groups.

It is true that many outlets of the alternative media are serving subversive agendas by disseminating false and biased information. This is why it is essential we maintain our own intense research efforts.

[Infowarrior]

Here we again. If you don't believe the Jesuits are running the world your a disinfo agent if you don't believe the Zionists are running the world then your called a crypto jew. When is this going to end?

[Calculon]

Jesuits dont have any power any more and they are not recruiting enough people to ensure the order last the next few decades. You are deluded if you think they control world affairs.

[harflimon]

I've read a little bit about the knights of malta, and I have one of those books you mentioned skinski that I will probably read soon, but from what i've seen I only think that the Jesuits have influence and don't overall control the world. They have a master, and I don't think it's any Black Pope. I don't buy into that theory just like I don't buy into the 5 Jew bankers theory:D

[DHammer]

Quote:Is Alex Jones avoiding to tackle the Vatican connection?

LOL
oh come one man ... he knows the vatican is infected with criminals, but focusing on that aspect alone would be just dumb. he exposes all equally.

Hitler used the Learned Elders of Zion's documents to blame the jews for EVERYTHING. saying Jews control ALL is the most idiotic statement one can make.

[Ognir]

That seems like another hit piece

Listen we know about the 1.6B$ for fake news and imagine the real figure

Paid agents, I'll give you some names, DBS for sure and Eric Fishbait as he is now known, Phelps is another one I don't trust and between these 3 morons, the amount of disinfo is unreal

[Shinobi]

Conspiracy Dave hit it .. basically what he said on this.

[ov3rkomer]

I think the quoted article asks some valid questions. I do not know, if the author is right about Jesuit control of the NWO, but its an interesting area of research. Here is my take on this:

The author gives 7 possible reasons why certain topics are not fully discussed by a media outlet. Where he sees Jesuit influence on alternative media, others would see muslim, zionist, illuminati, leftist or whatever influence. And the reasons could be re-written from a different viewpoint, substituting one of those groups as the manipilators.

Besides the 7 reasons that the author gives for refusing to fully and openly discuss certain topics, be it Vatican, Zionism, Masonry or whatever, there could be a few other less nefarious reasons as well:

(8) The alternative media outlet wishes to discuss only what can be proven from published newspaper reports and other sources in the established media. I think most 9/11 researchers take this approach and I think Alex Jones commented in a similar way.

(9) The alternative media outlet does not want to be associated with any 'grand conspiracy' theory, because it would limit their reach. Emphasizing any particular theory might compromise their ability to reach the general public.

(10) The alternative media outlet has decided that a specific goup is responsible for all the worlds ills and will only publish information that supports their conclusion. Any other information is disregarded. DBS, Marrs (Anti-Zionist), Phelps (Anti-Jesuit) and many others are probably in this category.

(11) The alternative media outlet is influenced by their predominant world-view (as we all are). For example: Protestants will tend to see a Vatican conspiracy. New Agers may want to deny a Theosophical conpiracy. Some Christian sites may have a problem recognizing anything wrong with Zionism, even though they may be more perceptive in other aspects of the NWO.

Obviously most of us take the various sources with a grain of salt. Many times the information they do provide on certain groups is useful and valid, even while some of the conclusions are biased or invalid. Usually it is what they DO NOT tell us which is important. And hopefully some other outlet will publish the information, which one outlet will not publish.B)

Quote:Overcomer, you'll find it worthwhile if you locate and read 'Scarlet and the Beast' Volumes 1, 2 and 3 by John Daniel

I found it. Interesting material and a long read (722 pages :o ). It'll take a while before I get to finish that...