ConCen
/
Main
/
Legal Issues 
/
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
/
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
|
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
|
|
01-04-2007, 02:43 AM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
Ever wonder why we have Supreme Court "Justices" instead of "Judges?" Our supreme court only has jurisdiction in federal territory, not the various states.
(ex)lawyer Ed Rivera explains. Only about 30 minutes total Part 1 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4...ivera&hl=en Part 2 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1...ivera&hl=en Part 3 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=15...ivera&hl=en Part 4 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8...ivera&hl=en ![[Image: 13703654.jpg]](http://i.real.com/assets/rn/img/4/5/6/3/13703654.jpg) ![[Image: rock1.jpg]](http://www.whale.to/a/image/rock1.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
03-02-2007, 09:16 AM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
US federal courthouses are federal territory and are also federal enclaves/reservations.
|
|||
|
|
|
03-02-2007, 10:40 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"justices" Are Not "judges" - We Have No Article 3 Courts
At least you guys have a reasonable separation of powers. Up here in Canada, we're all subjects of "The Crown". How very convenient for The Controllers...
![[Image: randquote.png]](http://truthdb.org/randquote.png)
|
|||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)