|
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy
|
|
08-02-2007, 11:12 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy
[Note: For a more in-depth look at 65 health risks of GM foods, excerpted from Jeffrey Smith's comprehensive new book Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, click here.]
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy A recent Russian study found that an astounding 55.6% of the offspring of female rats fed genetically engineered soy flour died within three weeks. The female rats had received 5-7 grams of the Roundup Ready variety of soybeans, beginning two weeks before conception and continuing through nursing. By comparison, only 9% of the offspring of rats fed non-GM soy died. Furthermore, offspring from the GM-fed group were significantly stunted36% weighed less than 20 grams after 2 weeks, compared to only 6.7% from the non-GM soy control group. The study was conducted by Dr. Irina Ermakova, a leading scientist at the Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS). It was originally presented on October 10, 2005 to the symposium on genetic modification in Russia, organized by the National Association for Genetic Security (NAGS). Click here for Jeffrey Smith's newsletter article on the study. Click here for the Institute of Responsible Technology's press release on the study. Click here for the American Academy of Environmental Medicine's resolution. Click here for media coverage of study. Photos of two rats from the Russian study, showing stunted growth - the larger rat, 19 days old, is from the control group; the smaller rat, 20 days old, is from the "GM soy" group. http://www.responsibletechnology.org/utili...e/?objectID=293 |
|||
|
08-06-2007, 04:53 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy
Should we expect GM foods to be a depopulation plan, executed on humans, without us knowing and being able to see it ?
Will it kick in in the next generation ? What is the significance of the posted findings ? If you think you know what the hell is going on, you're probably full of shit. - RAW &Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth.& &Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too.& - Marcus Aurelius |
|||
|
08-06-2007, 06:34 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy
It's certainly a means of controlling the food production and reaping in vast sums of profits.
luceo no uro |
|||
|
08-07-2007, 04:01 AM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
55.6% Mortality in Rats Whose Mothers Were Fed GM Soy
Quote:Should we expect GM foods to be a depopulation plan, executed on humans, without us knowing and being able to see it ? Yes, but a profitable one. Already unless your eating your own foods, and even then your probably eating GM & GE foods. If it were a simple depopulation thing that would be bad enough. Yes, but a profitable one. Already unless your eating your own foods, and even then your probably eating GM & GE foods. If it were a simple depopulation thing that would be bad enough but the hole is deeper, much deeper. We're not talking about a simple quick death but rather a slow profitable one. Kids today will live less lifespan than their parents, that much is proven and not disputed. The Franken foods are bad in 2 ways, actually changing the body on a cellular level and even dna as well and the other way is to increase the bad aspects but non absorption or absorption of the wrong elements. Such as with table salt, milk, cheese, and many others. It can and does cause diseases from many areas, free radicals, over production, under production, non absorption of needed minerals and vitamins, and more. It's a double edged sword. Most people will have to build to their demise while few will be instant. Those that are instant or pretty quick not much will be made on (monetarily), while the vast majority will provide much profit. We look at Africa and people either have sympathy or feel superior saying they bring it upon themselves. Those with sympathy will give donations which in turn feed the evil that has taken their nutrition out of the equation. Most are dieing not of lack of food but rather lack of nutrition, something with the coming of Codex to the US soon we will see as well, even from their own admission. Now if you drop a bomb or have a war people get unruly and protest yet disease they just set back, watch and think secretly thank God it's not me. Speaking of which, churches can say it is a curse from God, much like AIDS, herpes and more. These vial people most will say deserve it. Yes, I am a Christian but I also see the mind control from those claiming to be from God. We can have plaques but over centuries they do depopulate but not nearly enough ... so far. With compromised immune systems, altered responses and already weaken minds they will become more effective. The diseases brought upon by nutrition (will like a cup filling then spilling) do our bodies the same way. As we get older our bodies can not filter out the unnatural or those responses that are natural will erode away, thus we die younger, working the prime days then as we get a bit older we become sick. Pharma will make a killing selling useless drugs, doctors and hospitals serving up these useless and often lethal cocktails. So that we can feel we've all done our part we have charities so we can "help", look into the real American Cancer Society and others. Medical bills from all this "help" will trigger financial burdens then eventually many will lose what they worked for from debt. Big Pharma also owns many vitamin companies so even that avenue is blocked selling cheap crap that just don't work. Cancer at the early 1900s was very rare (documented). Today, 107 years later it changed last year to we will all have some for of cancer in our lifetimes. An even better quote was the ACS saying they want to make cancer chronic. (Notice not cured.) Diabetes is on the rise, so are many other diseases considered incurable, Lupus, Arthritis, and the list is endless. The "Chicken Flu" oddly enough chickens are fairly immune to it in nature becomes the "Avian Flu", which then becomes the "HN51". None of these are transferred human to human or animal to human. Perhaps the web is responsible for averting the efforts for this new plaque on a disease that has been in existence since the beginning of time. Education, even if it doesn't exactly fit what you've been taught, knowledge is power, they know this. Basically they know that if a deliberate killing of millions occurred much like war people would rise up but if God or nature does it (or appears as such), all they have to do is pacify us, tell us they're working hard and we believe that it is so. We become complacent until we are too weak to fight, if indeed we ever do fight back. |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)





