Arkadiusz Jadczyk on "directed energy" weapons and 911

[Dave52]

I read this Jadczyk article a while ago and bought her 9/11 book on the back of it. I haven't started reading it yet, but it looks very interesting indeed.

Thanks for posting the article, and yes, I think some form of DEW was used on WTC1 and 2. WTC7 looks very conventional by comparison.

[earthling]

It is good to see this research and line of reasoning being discussed here. It seems so obvious that conventional demolition cannot account for many aspects of the destruction of wtc. I found this webpage recently and you may infer what you want from it: http://www.active-duty.com/BackPackNukes.htm

[TeslaandLyne]

Here is one of the UFO videos taken 9/11/01:

UFO at WTC - BRAND NEW RELEASE !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdVFbTYX-tY

YouTube UFO WTC search

I do not think the others are similar.
Or express what a year of looking at YouTube posted videos looks like a UFO.
Just a flash of light.
Any beam would be invisible electric as Tesla would say would explode the advancing
armies armaments, so stored explosives in the towers would be the target.

[stanteau]

THANK YOU! I am so glad someone besides me brought up the WTC UFO's (and there are TONS)

[TeslaandLyne]

Guided weapons are the thing.

If planes were involved, many think satellite guidance was involved.

Now a UFO was detected on video and is the platform for just the
beam technology Tesla knew would explode ordinance.

So again, we must have explosives and thermate.

Total destruction by a beam can't be explained by the explosive fountain
the towers form took.

I see a beam crumbling a building and not a sequence of explosions.

The beam agitates the molecules as a microwave does water in food to
cook it. Tesla devised a way to agitate the gaseous ether, but thats
how the UFO works.

ED: nukes got to be too powerful, a sequence did a fine job