Something I've Noticed About Osama Tapes

[tjw84]

Why is it, that every time we see a new Osama Bin Laden tape on the news, it's ALWAYS an audio tape. He's sent plenty of videos before from what I've seen. Also, everything he says sounds scripted. For example, every time we get a tape, he's talking about something, and then completely switches subjects, always at the end, and usually repeatedly states that he is the only person solely responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Also, seeing as most of the American public doesn't know what Osama sounds like, it seems like they could be easily, and as i am suggesting, faked. Is there any validity to these tapes at all?I haven't really seen this discussed anywhere on the web and it's been bugging me. Discuss i guess

[fjaneson]

I agree.

All the tapes come from our intelligence services, they are then handed over to Network news which is also
run by our intelligence services.

Wondering if a fake message from a fake guy broadcast on a fake news network is fake?

Probably, it is.:)


The whole thing is made up by the same butt munchers who give us World Wide Wrestling and

the presidential elections.

Social controllers from the Tavistock institute and Georgetown University.

Just remember: If a force with the manpower and technology of the US Military wants to find someone, they find them. If you or I do not pay our taxes, for example, they would find us, and it would not take
10 Divisions and 7 years and two land wars.

Osama Bin Laden of Crawford Texas, leader of AL CIA DUH.

[LeveL]

Something I noticed about an Osama video tape - he is African in it. <_<

Quote:For example, every time we get a tape, he's talking about something, and then completely switches subjects, always at the end, and usually repeatedly states that he is the only person solely responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Common tactic often used by tabloids. Maybe not in the same way I mean, I have seen that where they praise the subject (could be a person or political argument or anything really) then right at the end they slam the subject. Or the reverse - they slam the subject, then right at the end they praise the subject.

Its because of all the content of the piece, the most likely thing you're going to remember is the last sentence.

[hammer]

fjaneson,
spot on.

[NtCkEr]

Just a reminder on what they admited back in 1999 :

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/natio...arkin020199.htm

[nataraja]

yes and that technology also voids any calls received by the media and the ones from the "planes". they become completely useless as evidence

this technology which i remember hearing about in one of the ealier loose change versions. has larger ramifications, even in the court of law, telephone or voice recording should not be used as evidence.