What REALLY pulverized the Twin Towers?

[rsol]

A word to the wise. Try not to trust someone who uses the word "shill" in the first sentence. They are trying to relay something.

A few questions have arisen from this topic. My doubts on the use of energy weapons and "mini nukes" come from lack of evidence. We have people complain about air quality, contamination from asbestos etc but no mention from any citizens of radioactivity. This was when we were all looking at seismology finding about the extended rumblings from that building.

If a nuke had gone off, every chopper videoing the scene would have dropped out of the sky, every camera would have crashed or turned off for a moment. Its called EMP (electromagnetic pulse). This is a secondary effect of a nuke that would have been detected by anyone within a 10 mile radius regardless to the payload. EMPs are far from undetectable.

This is also the other element missing from the explanation from using "directed energy weapons" these are also very messy when it comes to the electromagnetic spectrum. To detect a set of high energy pulses coming from space would not require any detective work. The evidence would be massive fluctuations in the EM field that would disturb every electronic instrument in the area. Once again, no cameras.

Also someone brought up the idea of bombs being planted whilst building.......this could not be the case as explosives have only a short life span before becoming unstable and you wouldn't be able to know for certain if the wiring had held.

There was building work being done on the towers from the day it opened to the day it fell. New wiring, asbestos removal, extra telephone lines, internet, structural work, refurbishment of floors, all kinds. Ample time for anyone to do it over a course of months with plenty of cover.

Mini nukes? Directed energy weapons? the only way people would believe that story is if the government said it.