2008 Coolest For At Least Five Years

[Shinobi]

Man-made climate change advocates scramble to explain away failure of global warming to appear as ordered.

Man-made global warming advocates are scrambling to explain away the fact that 2008 has so far been the coolest year in five years, as climate change alarmists face embarrassment amidst a barrage of evidence that the planet has embarked on a clear and natural cooling trend.

“The first half of 2008 was the coolest for at least five years, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said on Wednesday,” reports Reuters, adding that it may actually be the coolest since 2000, but the rest of the article is a strained and bias effort to pin the blame solely on the periodic weather event La Nina.

In reality, there has been no global warming since 1998 as temperatures leveled off and are now beginning to plummet as a result of dwindling sunspot activity.

A dramatic cooling trend is being observed across the planet even as people like Al Gore continue to claim that the threat of global warming mandates the poor and middle class be hit with CO2 taxes in order to prevent climate change.

Both anecdotal evidence and hard data indicates that the planet is in the beginning stages of a significant downturn in global temperatures.

Following the end of the Sun’s most active period in over 11,000 years, the last 10 years have displayed a clear cooling trend as temperatures post-1998 leveled out and are now plummeting.

China recently experienced its coldest winter in 100 years while northeast America was hit by record snow levels and Britain suffered its coldest April in decades as late-blooming daffodils were pounded with hail and snow on an almost daily basis. The British summer has also left many yearning for global warming, with temperatures in June and July rarely struggling to get over 16 degrees and on one occasion even dropping as low as 9 degrees in the middle of the afternoon.

“Summer heat continues in short supply, continuing a trend that has dominated much of the 21st Century’s opening decade,” reports the Chicago Tribune. “There have been only 162 days 90 degrees or warmer at Midway Airport over the period from 2000 to 2008. That’s by far the fewest 90-degree temperatures in the opening nine years of any decade on record here since 1930.”

According to an Associated Press report, The Farmers Almanac is now also predicting “below-average temperatures for most of the U.S.” The publication boasts of an 85 per cent accuracy rate for its forecasts which are given two years in advance.

“The almanac’s 2009 edition, which goes on sale Tuesday, says at least two-thirds of the country can expect colder than average temperatures, with only the Far West and Southeast in line for near-normal readings,” states the article.

The reason? Sunspot activity has dwindled. There have only been a handful of days in the past two months where any sunspot activity has been observed and over 400 spotless days have been recorded in the current solar cycle.

As we reported last week, the Armagh observatory, which has been measuring sun cycles for over 200 years. predicts that global temperatures will drop by two degrees over the next 20 years as solar activity grinds to a halt and the planet drastically cools down, potentially heralding the onset of a new ice age.

“Based on the past Armagh measurements, this suggests that over the next two decades, global temperatures may fall by about 2 degrees C — that is, to a level lower than any we have seen in the last 100 years….”Temperatures have already fallen by about 0.5 degrees C over the past 12 months and, if this is only the start of it, it would be a serious concern,” concludes David Watt.

In addition, Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera of the Institute of Geophysics at the University of Mexico states that “In about ten years the Earth will enter a “little ice age” which will last from 60 to 80 years and may be caused by the decrease in solar activity,” according to a report in the major Mexican newspaper Milenio Diario.

Original Article Published Here By Paul Watson - http://www.prisonplanet.com/2008-coolest-f...five-years.html
may want to check out the original as it contains several links within the article its self.

[rsol]

doh. the people who dont understand weather strike again.

hmm yes global temperature are just all the same everywhere and its violent shift have nothing to do with the overall. Nothing like being general about something so complicated as the weather. I wonder if that same reporter will pipe up in 2 years when the temps have broken the early 2000s records. Bullshit. I love the assumption that sun-spots are not taken into consideration by the rest. laughable. This is the same things they were saying last year. Alex if you read any of this. You have had your well poisoned. mark these words.

[shoobdebabde]

The sun has been least active this year in terms of sunspot activity. Scientists are getting worried. Could it be a feedback mechanism from all the Infrared trapping aerosols that have been sprayed in the last 20yrs? Could the Creator be saving our butts?

All i know is that when/if all aersol operations cease, the place will be friggin cold. Like a heroine addict who stops cold turkey, will be left miserable with severely attenuated opiate receptors...

[JazzRoc]

Quote:Could it be a feedback mechanism?

Only if the Sun has a telescope trained on us.

[shoobdebabde]

Quote:

Quote:Could it be a feedback mechanism?

Only if the Sun has a telescope trained on us.

Of if there are factors in this universe at work that you could not possibly understand (God forbid, right Mr Aspergers?)

[JazzRoc]

Quote:you could not possibly understand

Haha.

[shoobdebabde]

http://conspiracycentral.info/index.php?showtopic=23512

[psilocybin]

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:Could it be a feedback mechanism?

Only if the Sun has a telescope trained on us.

Of if there are factors in this universe at work that you could not possibly understand (God forbid, right Mr Aspergers?)

Leave Jazz alone dude, your infrared feedback idea is rubbish... Just look at the size ratio, and you could figure out that there would be a linear relationship between size and the amount of energy need to exact any type of effect on the sun...

[shoobdebabde]

Quote:Leave Jazz alone dude, your infrared feedback idea is rubbish... Just look at the size ratio, and you could figure out that there would be a linear relationship between size and the amount of energy need to exact any type of effect on the sun...

Quote:The sun has been least active this year in terms of sunspot activity.

Do you know the answer why? Didn't think so.

Quote:Could it be a feedback mechanism from all the Infrared trapping aerosols that have been sprayed in the last 20yrs? Could the Creator be saving our butts?

What Idea? I posed a question. Not to mention "infrared feedback" was never an idea of mine and something I never said. TO presume that a feedback system exists based on 'infrared feedback' is completly of your own fabrication. I've described the possibility of a feedback mechanism in response to the atmospheric IR trapping that has been caused by aerosol proliferation here on Earth; a program that has been CLEARLY heating parts of the planet up. If you can't figure out what I'm even trying to say, should you bother responding? (again, that's a question, not an idea)

My real estimate with regard to the sun's (lack of sunspot) activity is actually different. I believe it is caused by other factors beyond our solar system, like the sun in which our galaxy revolves and the current position of our galaxy.

Besides, JazRocs is by all counts, clearly a disinfo agent, or at the very least an intellectual antagonist. Do you notice him trying to emotionally manipulate with the use of irrelevant insults and name calling without any effort at all in trying to understand a proporsed idea? Do you see how uncomfortable he becomes as soon as he's called out on his shitty job? Do you see him sidstepping major points and parroting unrelated technicalities that address issues too basic to be relevant to the points beyond it, thus 'hanging up' a train of thought? It doesn't help that being an intellectual antagonist is a key factor in disinformation.......basically nothing about his responses suggest otherwise.

[JazzRoc]

Quote:I believe it is caused by other factors beyond our solar system, like the sun in which our galaxy revolves and the current position of our galaxy

Quote:Besides, JazzRoc is by all counts, clearly a disinfo agent, or at the very least an intellectual antagonist

"An intellectual antagonist" is self-serving in your case: you have no intellect. You may only say antagonist, for that I certainly am.

Quote:Do you notice him trying to emotionally manipulate with the use of irrelevant insults

I consider "clearly a disinfo agent" to be a personal insult. My response with insult was supposed to apprise you of that fact.

My insults were entirely relevant: you ARE an ass-hole.

Quote:without any effort at all in trying to understand a proposed idea

An irony coming from you.

Quote:Do you see how uncomfortable he becomes as soon as he's called out on his shitty job?

I'll give you reasons for my discomfort right now. I worked hard as a schoolboy at fourteen different schools, got to the top of my year at several of them, passed my exams, majoring in Maths and Science, and trained as an engineer. I then worked hard for forty years while the engineering backbone of Britain disintegrated, and brooking no temptations nor obtaining any favours, worked through sixty-five jobs (the last twenty years on temporary contract) before I retired with - nothing. No debts, but nothing in the bank either. I can survive, because I have supported and built up a loving family by my efforts, and they ALL love me and look after me.

And on this forum, you, a crap-brained upstart (like you - but you ain't the first by any means) call "cointelpro" immediately you lose your first argument. And, brother, you lost it. But you can always fall back and shout "cointelpro", can't you, because there's NO WAY I can deny it successfully, except by this.... ....the chances are, you've used this before, and it's worked for you in the past, so why not now?

Well, I've read quite a lot of posts about dealing with Cointelpro myself, so how about THIS idea?

It's YOU that is the agent. Your trick is merely to strike first.

Quote:Do you see him sidestepping major points and parroting unrelated technicalities that address issues too basic to be relevant to the points beyond it

There is NOTHING more basic than understanding that NORMAL ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS CAUSE BOTH PERSISTENT AND NON-PERSISTENT CONTRAILS.

If you don't understand THAT, then ANY brainless Tom, Dick, or Harry (in this case, DICK) can tell one all sorts of mind-bending bullshit, and there's a chance one might believe them.

Quote:thus 'hanging up' a train of thought?

If that "train of thought" happens to be "chemtrails" then it NEEDS hanging up.

Quote:basically nothing about his responses suggest otherwise

Well they wouldn't to YOU, would they? Your the guy that actually made no "effort at all in trying to understand a proposed idea", and then took what seemed to you to be the easy way out.

Quote:Hint: you're looking for the stationary blue dots of 'precipitation' that switch on and off, and which are arranged in a grid.

The "stationary" blue dots of precipitation... Let us ask ourselves a few questions about "stationary dots" and moving air masses, shall we?

If there was a HILL beneath the moving mass of air, then rain might fall on the hill? Yes! Does the hill move? No! So you will get a "stationary" dot, yes?

NO. Apparently there are geostationary satellites 24,000 miles up, beaming a RAY causing precipitation (shoobdebabde).

What sort of RAY is it? A heating ray? Er, no, a heating ray would prevent precipitation (physics).

Oh, I see, you mean a COOLING ray! (Is that a magic cooling ray? Er, yes, it would have to be.)

So, over to you, fishturd:

1) what sun does our galaxy revolve in?

2) what is "the current position of our galaxy"?

3) what is a "magic cooling ray"?

[shoobdebabde]

I see a lot of words, but they ain't saying SHIT......

[shoobdebabde]

Quote:"An intellectual antagonist" is self-serving in your case: you have no intellect. You may only say antagonist, for that I certainly am.

My insults were entirely relevant: you ARE an ass-hole.

An irony coming from you.

What do you think this is an editorial forum for your useless OPINIONS?

Quote:I'll give you reasons for my discomfort right now. I worked hard as a schoolboy at fourteen different schools, got to the top of my year at several of them, passed my exams, majoring in Maths and Science, and trained as an engineer. I then worked hard for forty years while the engineering backbone of Britain disintegrated, and brooking no temptations nor obtaining any favours, worked through sixty-five jobs (the last twenty years on temporary contract) before I retired with - nothing. No debts, but nothing in the bank either. I can survive, because I have supported and built up a loving family by my efforts, and they ALL love me and look after me.

Seems that in your self-righteous indignation, and senility, you are clearly reduced to rote learning. Try this, read my post a few more hundred times, and you might just get it.

Quote:And on this forum, you, a crap-brained upstart (like you - but you ain't the first by any means) call "cointelpro" immediately you lose your first argument. And, brother, you lost it. But you can always fall back and shout "cointelpro", can't you, because there's NO WAY I can deny it successfully, except by this.... ....the chances are, you've used this before, and it's worked for you in the past, so why not now?

Really. I can't recall resorting to so many subjective blasts, insults, names and cheap jibes as you have because you have no case. That's basic psychology right there. Don't talk about the water cycle and high school shit when we're taking grown man business. (senility causing a juvenile mindset? or is the fact that you're a burned out ex-rocker to blame for your complete inability to learn and understand?)

Quote:Well, I've read quite a lot of posts about dealing with Cointelpro myself, so how about THIS idea?

It's YOU that is the agent. Your trick is merely to strike first.

No that doesnt work like most of your ideas. Maybe if I did a limited hangout, but I'm clearly going right for the throat of your masters and their black ops. I'm laying it all down as I see fit, regardless of if the readers are ready to accept it or not. Thats how I roll, no information is restrained.

Quote:There is NOTHING more basic than understanding that NORMAL ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS CAUSE BOTH PERSISTENT AND NON-PERSISTENT CONTRAILS.

Uh huh, even asterisks of chemtrails over cities, and clearly dirstorted chemtrails that have already been licked with tropopausic wind shear yet they still persist. Want to know why? Because heavy metal aerosol matrices DISPERSE and DISSIPATE, not EVAPORATE, because they are NOT WATER. Get it, retard?:)

I don't believe bullshit stories like the 9/11 official story and your LOOOOONG SHOT explanations because they defy logic, continuity and are counter intuitive.

Quote:If that "train of thought" happens to be "chemtrails" then it NEEDS hanging up.

Well, gee Einstein, methinks your senile ass is on the wrong forum then. Wanna take a hike?

[shoobdebabde]

JazRoc Wrote:Well they wouldn't to YOU, would they? Your the guy that actually made no "effort at all in trying to understand a proposed idea", and then took what seemed to you to be the easy way out.

You're tantamount to a child trying to tell his parents that babies come from delivery storks or that Santa Clause is coming. Do you honestly think the parents are going to sit there are argue with that kid?

Quote:The "stationary" blue dots of precipitation... Let us ask ourselves a few questions about "stationary dots" and moving air masses, shall we?

You're a daft fucker aintcha....
a ) the satellite recognizes these dots as rainfall, but it DOES NOT MEAN there is rainfall. Not only that but each and every dot is a very specific type of shower, never deviating into the heavier regions and NOT gradual.
b ) are you going to really try and sit there and tell everyone that this is NORMAL to have perfectly round, popup showers that happen to be justified to a grid and well arranged? REALLY?? LOLOL And then we have the extra bullshit-sauce excuse of....

Quote:If there was a HILL beneath the moving mass of air, then rain might fall on the hill?

These must be magical inflatable, pop up hills that are much bigger than most cities.... and all just happen to be perfectly arranged..................
What are you, retarded?

Quote:Yes!

Oh, okay then.

Quote:Does the hill move? No! So you will get a "stationary" dot, yes?

Right, so these hills only exist on certain occasions like when hurricane remnants pass through. Gawd, what a freaking MORON!

Quote:Apparently there are geostationary satellites 24,000 miles up, beaming a RAY causing precipitation.

DING DING DING Welcome to the 21st century! It ain't 1829 anymore, jerky.

Quote:What sort of RAY is it? A heating ray? Er, no, a heating ray would prevent precipitation (physics).

I mean, god forbid you research current technologies yourself, oh no, you're too old to learn anything new (unless it's by rote:P)

But honestly, it's most likely microwave, but it could easily be another type of energy. You must not be very good at your job, because you could have saved yourself a lot of hassle and embarrassment by just calling it photoshop.

[Melchor]

Quote:

you could have saved yourself a lot of hassle and embarrassment by just calling it photoshop.

Funny you should mention photo doctoring. Why is the timestamp out of sequence?
It kind of damages the credibility of your argument to use photos that are prima facia misleading/inaccurate.

[shoobdebabde]

Quote:

Quote:

you could have saved yourself a lot of hassle and embarrassment by just calling it photoshop.

Funny you should mention photo doctoring. Why is the timestamp out of sequence?
It kind of damages the credibility of your argument to use photos that are prima facia misleading/inaccurate.

ah good call! I didnt even notice that. I used some program called UNFREEZ to animate these gifs, and in my rush, dragged and dropped them as a 'select all' into the image box, musta gotten out of sequence. You've seen the other's I presume...

you realise when I noticed the anomoly, I stayed up saving each new satellite image one by one, in fact one of them I had to sleep between about 3am and 6am... if anyone is interested, I have all the frames used to make this gif and more, originals. I can zip them up and sent it to anyone at request.

Not to mention if you want to accuse of image doctoring, please note the system's completely accurate correspondence to the time stamp shown in the frame...