Plain 'No Plane' Pain

[Halliburton Crusher]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjQmxS-DpyM...feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vI3ZpLuz3ts

magicians get away with whatever their audiences do not understand. i realize this is a heavy topic, and people who are new to 911 truth, after 7 years, should not be offered tv fakery, no plane, or directed energy weaponry as a starter course of study, but open mindedness is crucial or else the magician can use the same tricks, again.

i don`t understand some items, such as the flash before the plane hits the building, but i had a feeling something was not right when i noticed in the film, 911 in plane site, that one scene showed what looked more like a black silhouette of a plane more so than an actual plane, flying from left to right in the scene.

i am also perplexed about people/witnesses on the streets. some say they did not see a plane, while some say they did. food for thought - only seven years later the beijing olympics had holographic fireworks which surprised people. they were in color, also.

even fairbanks footage of the north tower/#1 being hit shows zero reaction from the "plane" or the tower until the plane image is 3/4 of the way into the building. if you play it frame by frame you will understand this.

we do not need to delude ourselves into thinking that any differences of opinion about certain items of 911 will be bad for the truth movement. people worry too much about what new people to 911 truth will think of plane versus no plane too much. the solution is simple. introduce people who are new to some of the simple aspects of the physical aspects first. my favorite film to give to 911 virgins is 911 in plane site. after that, 911 mysteries is good for a more in depth look at the physics of that day.

when i have handed out dvds in my cities airport, a few people who have refused to take a free dvd from me have confronted me about "no planes". i realized that they simply wanted to vent at me without any willingness to have a civil conversation. i responded by saying, "of course there were no planes. the airforce did not respond with there planes! they could have easily reached the hijacked planes." i then mention that it is ridiculous that the pentagon could not defend itself. the final convincer is when i mention building seven, and of course the simple math of the buildings falling so quickly. buildings one and two, 220 stories, fell in 18 seconds. thats 12 stories per second. that is a demolition. 911 truth deniers then shuffle their feet and disappear.