Plain 'No Plane' Pain

[---]

No Stanley Praimnath is not my star witness. Perhaps you're trying to belittle my argument somewhat?

Of course there have been people like him who will lie outright in order to get their 5 minutes and maybe cash in a bit by selling trash disguised as books.

The human being didn't suddenly lose it's baser traits as a result of 911 :rolleyes:

They 'added a pod' to the 'fake footage' to get me 'hooked' did they?

excuse me but LMFAO - seriously, you believe that?


As I said already - I don't dispute SOME of the imagery was tampered with - I contend that happened to get YOU hooked. LOL


I don't remember stating that I was completely convinced that the planes were standard commercial airliners...eg since when do civilian craft have PODS?

and in terms of your 'crash physics' - perhaps you might consider that the FLASH before entry might go someway toward explaining object penetration..

As for debris 'falling away' from the building - you have to consider the speed of the impact and the ensuing massive explosion

here look at this site please:

http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/767orwhatzit.html

Also if you care to look at the picture of the impact damage to the North tower you will see that much of the steel is bent INWARDS, which would be concurrent with the effect of being hit by an object moving in towards the building from the outside.

You say this debate is done and dusted and there's no point in talking about it yet you cite a page from your own site which has the header - "Why it's Important"

Do you see the contrary nature of your statements?

I started this thread because you made the statement that only a fool would believe now that there were planes.

I do, however, agree with you - well, when you say it IS important anyway..

It is important because even though it's soon to be coming up to 8 years ago, give or take, the whole process of waking people up is STILL COMPROMISED by people waking around saying there were no planes on 911.

It pisses me off.

Your page you linked - if anything - makes me MORE than ever convinced that there were, of course, planes.

Your arguments are flimsy tbh

I suggest you look at the site I linked to in terms of 'TV fakery'

I do believe that SOME of the imagery has been manipulated or willfully misconstrued - as said - to get YOU hooked on the no planes theory.

In terms of no planes - focus it on the Pentagon attack instead where at least it's the truth.